All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	"Qiang Yu" <yuq825@gmail.com>,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	lima@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 07/18] drm/lima: use scheduler dependency tracking
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 19:53:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210712175352.802687-8-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210712175352.802687-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Nothing special going on here.

Aside reviewing the code, it seems like drm_sched_job_arm() should be
moved into lima_sched_context_queue_task and put under some mutex
together with drm_sched_push_job(). See the kerneldoc for
drm_sched_push_job().

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Qiang Yu <yuq825@gmail.com>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: lima@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c   |  4 ++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c | 21 ---------------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h |  3 ---
 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c
index c528f40981bb..e54a88d5037a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static int lima_gem_sync_bo(struct lima_sched_task *task, struct lima_bo *bo,
 	if (explicit)
 		return 0;
 
-	return drm_gem_fence_array_add_implicit(&task->deps, &bo->base.base, write);
+	return drm_sched_job_await_implicit(&task->base, &bo->base.base, write);
 }
 
 static int lima_gem_add_deps(struct drm_file *file, struct lima_submit *submit)
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ static int lima_gem_add_deps(struct drm_file *file, struct lima_submit *submit)
 		if (err)
 			return err;
 
-		err = drm_gem_fence_array_add(&submit->task->deps, fence);
+		err = drm_sched_job_await_fence(&submit->task->base, fence);
 		if (err) {
 			dma_fence_put(fence);
 			return err;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c
index e968b5a8f0b0..99d5f6f1a882 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c
@@ -134,24 +134,15 @@ int lima_sched_task_init(struct lima_sched_task *task,
 	task->num_bos = num_bos;
 	task->vm = lima_vm_get(vm);
 
-	xa_init_flags(&task->deps, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
 void lima_sched_task_fini(struct lima_sched_task *task)
 {
-	struct dma_fence *fence;
-	unsigned long index;
 	int i;
 
 	drm_sched_job_cleanup(&task->base);
 
-	xa_for_each(&task->deps, index, fence) {
-		dma_fence_put(fence);
-	}
-	xa_destroy(&task->deps);
-
 	if (task->bos) {
 		for (i = 0; i < task->num_bos; i++)
 			drm_gem_object_put(&task->bos[i]->base.base);
@@ -186,17 +177,6 @@ struct dma_fence *lima_sched_context_queue_task(struct lima_sched_task *task)
 	return fence;
 }
 
-static struct dma_fence *lima_sched_dependency(struct drm_sched_job *job,
-					       struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
-{
-	struct lima_sched_task *task = to_lima_task(job);
-
-	if (!xa_empty(&task->deps))
-		return xa_erase(&task->deps, task->last_dep++);
-
-	return NULL;
-}
-
 static int lima_pm_busy(struct lima_device *ldev)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -472,7 +452,6 @@ static void lima_sched_free_job(struct drm_sched_job *job)
 }
 
 static const struct drm_sched_backend_ops lima_sched_ops = {
-	.dependency = lima_sched_dependency,
 	.run_job = lima_sched_run_job,
 	.timedout_job = lima_sched_timedout_job,
 	.free_job = lima_sched_free_job,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h
index ac70006b0e26..6a11764d87b3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h
@@ -23,9 +23,6 @@ struct lima_sched_task {
 	struct lima_vm *vm;
 	void *frame;
 
-	struct xarray deps;
-	unsigned long last_dep;
-
 	struct lima_bo **bos;
 	int num_bos;
 
-- 
2.32.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: lima@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, "Qiang Yu" <yuq825@gmail.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 07/18] drm/lima: use scheduler dependency tracking
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 19:53:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210712175352.802687-8-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210712175352.802687-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Nothing special going on here.

Aside reviewing the code, it seems like drm_sched_job_arm() should be
moved into lima_sched_context_queue_task and put under some mutex
together with drm_sched_push_job(). See the kerneldoc for
drm_sched_push_job().

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Qiang Yu <yuq825@gmail.com>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: lima@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c   |  4 ++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c | 21 ---------------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h |  3 ---
 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c
index c528f40981bb..e54a88d5037a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static int lima_gem_sync_bo(struct lima_sched_task *task, struct lima_bo *bo,
 	if (explicit)
 		return 0;
 
-	return drm_gem_fence_array_add_implicit(&task->deps, &bo->base.base, write);
+	return drm_sched_job_await_implicit(&task->base, &bo->base.base, write);
 }
 
 static int lima_gem_add_deps(struct drm_file *file, struct lima_submit *submit)
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ static int lima_gem_add_deps(struct drm_file *file, struct lima_submit *submit)
 		if (err)
 			return err;
 
-		err = drm_gem_fence_array_add(&submit->task->deps, fence);
+		err = drm_sched_job_await_fence(&submit->task->base, fence);
 		if (err) {
 			dma_fence_put(fence);
 			return err;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c
index e968b5a8f0b0..99d5f6f1a882 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c
@@ -134,24 +134,15 @@ int lima_sched_task_init(struct lima_sched_task *task,
 	task->num_bos = num_bos;
 	task->vm = lima_vm_get(vm);
 
-	xa_init_flags(&task->deps, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
 void lima_sched_task_fini(struct lima_sched_task *task)
 {
-	struct dma_fence *fence;
-	unsigned long index;
 	int i;
 
 	drm_sched_job_cleanup(&task->base);
 
-	xa_for_each(&task->deps, index, fence) {
-		dma_fence_put(fence);
-	}
-	xa_destroy(&task->deps);
-
 	if (task->bos) {
 		for (i = 0; i < task->num_bos; i++)
 			drm_gem_object_put(&task->bos[i]->base.base);
@@ -186,17 +177,6 @@ struct dma_fence *lima_sched_context_queue_task(struct lima_sched_task *task)
 	return fence;
 }
 
-static struct dma_fence *lima_sched_dependency(struct drm_sched_job *job,
-					       struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
-{
-	struct lima_sched_task *task = to_lima_task(job);
-
-	if (!xa_empty(&task->deps))
-		return xa_erase(&task->deps, task->last_dep++);
-
-	return NULL;
-}
-
 static int lima_pm_busy(struct lima_device *ldev)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -472,7 +452,6 @@ static void lima_sched_free_job(struct drm_sched_job *job)
 }
 
 static const struct drm_sched_backend_ops lima_sched_ops = {
-	.dependency = lima_sched_dependency,
 	.run_job = lima_sched_run_job,
 	.timedout_job = lima_sched_timedout_job,
 	.free_job = lima_sched_free_job,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h
index ac70006b0e26..6a11764d87b3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h
@@ -23,9 +23,6 @@ struct lima_sched_task {
 	struct lima_vm *vm;
 	void *frame;
 
-	struct xarray deps;
-	unsigned long last_dep;
-
 	struct lima_bo **bos;
 	int num_bos;
 
-- 
2.32.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: lima@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, "Qiang Yu" <yuq825@gmail.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 07/18] drm/lima: use scheduler dependency tracking
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 19:53:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210712175352.802687-8-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210712175352.802687-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Nothing special going on here.

Aside reviewing the code, it seems like drm_sched_job_arm() should be
moved into lima_sched_context_queue_task and put under some mutex
together with drm_sched_push_job(). See the kerneldoc for
drm_sched_push_job().

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Qiang Yu <yuq825@gmail.com>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: lima@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c   |  4 ++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c | 21 ---------------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h |  3 ---
 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c
index c528f40981bb..e54a88d5037a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static int lima_gem_sync_bo(struct lima_sched_task *task, struct lima_bo *bo,
 	if (explicit)
 		return 0;
 
-	return drm_gem_fence_array_add_implicit(&task->deps, &bo->base.base, write);
+	return drm_sched_job_await_implicit(&task->base, &bo->base.base, write);
 }
 
 static int lima_gem_add_deps(struct drm_file *file, struct lima_submit *submit)
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ static int lima_gem_add_deps(struct drm_file *file, struct lima_submit *submit)
 		if (err)
 			return err;
 
-		err = drm_gem_fence_array_add(&submit->task->deps, fence);
+		err = drm_sched_job_await_fence(&submit->task->base, fence);
 		if (err) {
 			dma_fence_put(fence);
 			return err;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c
index e968b5a8f0b0..99d5f6f1a882 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c
@@ -134,24 +134,15 @@ int lima_sched_task_init(struct lima_sched_task *task,
 	task->num_bos = num_bos;
 	task->vm = lima_vm_get(vm);
 
-	xa_init_flags(&task->deps, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
 void lima_sched_task_fini(struct lima_sched_task *task)
 {
-	struct dma_fence *fence;
-	unsigned long index;
 	int i;
 
 	drm_sched_job_cleanup(&task->base);
 
-	xa_for_each(&task->deps, index, fence) {
-		dma_fence_put(fence);
-	}
-	xa_destroy(&task->deps);
-
 	if (task->bos) {
 		for (i = 0; i < task->num_bos; i++)
 			drm_gem_object_put(&task->bos[i]->base.base);
@@ -186,17 +177,6 @@ struct dma_fence *lima_sched_context_queue_task(struct lima_sched_task *task)
 	return fence;
 }
 
-static struct dma_fence *lima_sched_dependency(struct drm_sched_job *job,
-					       struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
-{
-	struct lima_sched_task *task = to_lima_task(job);
-
-	if (!xa_empty(&task->deps))
-		return xa_erase(&task->deps, task->last_dep++);
-
-	return NULL;
-}
-
 static int lima_pm_busy(struct lima_device *ldev)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -472,7 +452,6 @@ static void lima_sched_free_job(struct drm_sched_job *job)
 }
 
 static const struct drm_sched_backend_ops lima_sched_ops = {
-	.dependency = lima_sched_dependency,
 	.run_job = lima_sched_run_job,
 	.timedout_job = lima_sched_timedout_job,
 	.free_job = lima_sched_free_job,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h
index ac70006b0e26..6a11764d87b3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h
@@ -23,9 +23,6 @@ struct lima_sched_task {
 	struct lima_vm *vm;
 	void *frame;
 
-	struct xarray deps;
-	unsigned long last_dep;
-
 	struct lima_bo **bos;
 	int num_bos;
 
-- 
2.32.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-12 20:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 112+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-12 17:53 [PATCH v4 00/18] drm/sched dependency tracking and dma-resv fixes Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53 ` [PATCH v4 01/18] drm/sched: Split drm_sched_job_init Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 20:22   ` Emma Anholt
2021-07-12 20:22     ` [Intel-gfx] " Emma Anholt
2021-07-12 20:22     ` Emma Anholt
2021-07-13  6:40   ` Christian König
2021-07-13  6:40     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-07-13  6:40     ` Christian König
2021-07-13  6:53     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-13  6:53       ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-13  6:53       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53 ` [PATCH v4 02/18] drm/sched: Barriers are needed for entity->last_scheduled Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-13  6:35   ` Christian König
2021-07-13  6:35     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-07-13  6:50     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-13  6:50       ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-13  7:25       ` Christian König
2021-07-13  7:25         ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-07-13  9:10         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-13  9:10           ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-13 11:20           ` Christian König
2021-07-13 11:20             ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-07-13 16:11           ` Andrey Grodzovsky
2021-07-13 16:11             ` [Intel-gfx] " Andrey Grodzovsky
2021-07-13 16:45             ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-13 16:45               ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-14 22:12               ` Andrey Grodzovsky
2021-07-14 22:12                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Andrey Grodzovsky
2021-07-15 10:16                 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-15 10:16                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53 ` [PATCH v4 03/18] drm/sched: Add dependency tracking Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-27 11:09   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-27 11:09     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-27 11:09     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-28 11:28     ` [Linaro-mm-sig] " Christian König
2021-07-28 11:28       ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-07-28 11:28       ` Christian König
2021-07-28 12:09       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-28 12:09         ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-28 12:09         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-28 12:46         ` Christian König
2021-07-28 12:46           ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-07-28 12:46           ` Christian König
2021-07-28 15:20         ` Melissa Wen
2021-07-28 15:20           ` [Intel-gfx] " Melissa Wen
2021-07-28 15:20           ` Melissa Wen
2021-07-12 17:53 ` [PATCH v4 04/18] drm/sched: drop entity parameter from drm_sched_push_job Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53 ` [PATCH v4 05/18] drm/sched: improve docs around drm_sched_entity Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53 ` [PATCH v4 06/18] drm/panfrost: use scheduler dependency tracking Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2021-07-12 17:53   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 07/18] drm/lima: " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53 ` [PATCH v4 08/18] drm/v3d: Move drm_sched_job_init to v3d_job_init Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-14  9:34   ` Melissa Wen
2021-07-14  9:34     ` [Intel-gfx] " Melissa Wen
2021-07-12 17:53 ` [PATCH v4 09/18] drm/v3d: Use scheduler dependency handling Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-14  9:37   ` Melissa Wen
2021-07-14  9:37     ` [Intel-gfx] " Melissa Wen
2021-07-12 17:53 ` [PATCH v4 10/18] drm/etnaviv: " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53 ` [PATCH v4 11/18] drm/gem: Delete gem array fencing helpers Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53 ` [PATCH v4 12/18] drm/sched: Don't store self-dependencies Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53 ` [PATCH v4 13/18] drm/sched: Check locking in drm_sched_job_await_implicit Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53 ` [PATCH v4 14/18] drm/msm: Don't break exclusive fence ordering Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-13 16:55   ` Rob Clark
2021-07-13 16:55     ` [Intel-gfx] " Rob Clark
2021-07-13 16:55     ` Rob Clark
2021-07-13 16:58     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-13 16:58       ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-13 16:58       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-13 17:46       ` Rob Clark
2021-07-13 17:46         ` [Intel-gfx] " Rob Clark
2021-07-13 17:46         ` Rob Clark
2021-07-13 17:45         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-13 17:45           ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-13 17:45           ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53 ` [PATCH v4 15/18] drm/etnaviv: " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53 ` [PATCH v4 16/18] drm/i915: delete exclude argument from i915_sw_fence_await_reservation Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53 ` [PATCH v4 17/18] drm/i915: Don't break exclusive fence ordering Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53 ` [PATCH v4 18/18] dma-resv: Give the docs a do-over Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 17:53   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 20:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/sched dependency tracking and dma-resv fixes (rev3) Patchwork
2021-07-12 21:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-12 23:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-07-27 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 00/18] drm/sched dependency tracking and dma-resv fixes Boris Brezillon
2021-07-27 11:51   ` [Intel-gfx] " Boris Brezillon
2021-07-27 14:47 ` Melissa Wen
2021-07-27 14:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " Melissa Wen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210712175352.802687-8-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lima@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=yuq825@gmail.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v4 07/18] drm/lima: use scheduler dependency tracking' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.