[PATCH] ASoC: SOF: Intel: Update ADL descriptor to use ACPI power states

[PATCH] ASoC: SOF: Intel: Update ADL descriptor to use ACPI power states

[Pierre-Louis Bossart]

From: Sathya Prakash M R <sathya.prakash.m.r@intel.com>

The ADL descriptor was missing an ACPI power setting, causing the DSP
to enter D3 even with a D0i1-compatible wake-on-voice/hotwording
capture stream.

Fixes: 4ad03f894b3c ('ASoC: SOF: Intel: Update ADL P to use its own descriptor')
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sathya Prakash M R <sathya.prakash.m.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
---
 sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-tgl.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-tgl.c b/sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-tgl.c
index a00262184efa..d04ce84fe7cc 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-tgl.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-tgl.c
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ static const struct sof_dev_desc adls_desc = {
 static const struct sof_dev_desc adl_desc = {
 	.machines               = snd_soc_acpi_intel_adl_machines,
 	.alt_machines           = snd_soc_acpi_intel_adl_sdw_machines,
+	.use_acpi_target_states = true,
 	.resindex_lpe_base      = 0,
 	.resindex_pcicfg_base   = -1,
 	.resindex_imr_base      = -1,
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: Intel: Update ADL descriptor to use ACPI power states

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 15:16:20 -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> The ADL descriptor was missing an ACPI power setting, causing the DSP
> to enter D3 even with a D0i1-compatible wake-on-voice/hotwording
> capture stream.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: SOF: Intel: Update ADL descriptor to use ACPI power states
      commit: aa21548e34c19c12e924c736f3fd9e6a4d0f5419

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark