From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, casey@schaufler-ca.com,
linux-audit@redhat.com, keescook@chromium.org,
john.johansen@canonical.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
paul@paul-moore.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v28 21/25] audit: support non-syscall auxiliary records
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 01:02:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202107230058.3lMBsPSR-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210722004758.12371-22-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 10113 bytes --]
Hi Casey,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on pcmoore-audit/next]
[also build test ERROR on nf/master linus/master v5.14-rc2]
[cannot apply to nf-next/master next-20210722]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Casey-Schaufler/LSM-Infrastructure-management-of-the-sock-security/20210722-094735
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/audit.git next
config: openrisc-randconfig-r025-20210722 (attached as .config)
compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 10.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/63ea5078624b9ff368f945d654ace5f79160fb6a
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Casey-Schaufler/LSM-Infrastructure-management-of-the-sock-security/20210722-094735
git checkout 63ea5078624b9ff368f945d654ace5f79160fb6a
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-10.3.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=openrisc SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from init/init_task.c:12:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
--
In file included from arch/openrisc/kernel/ptrace.c:23:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
arch/openrisc/kernel/ptrace.c:157:17: warning: no previous prototype for 'do_syscall_trace_enter' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
157 | asmlinkage long do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/openrisc/kernel/ptrace.c:176:17: warning: no previous prototype for 'do_syscall_trace_leave' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
176 | asmlinkage void do_syscall_trace_leave(struct pt_regs *regs)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from kernel/fork.c:63:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
kernel/fork.c:162:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'arch_release_task_struct' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
162 | void __weak arch_release_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/fork.c:752:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'arch_task_cache_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
752 | void __init __weak arch_task_cache_init(void) { }
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/fork.c:847:12: warning: no previous prototype for 'arch_dup_task_struct' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
847 | int __weak arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from kernel/exit.c:49:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
kernel/exit.c:1810:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'abort' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
1810 | __weak void abort(void)
| ^~~~~
--
In file included from kernel/audit.c:51:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
kernel/audit.c:1781:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'audit_serial' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
1781 | unsigned int audit_serial(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/audit.c: In function 'audit_log_vformat':
kernel/audit.c:1929:2: warning: function 'audit_log_vformat' might be a candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
1929 | len = vsnprintf(skb_tail_pointer(skb), avail, fmt, args);
| ^~~
kernel/audit.c:1938:3: warning: function 'audit_log_vformat' might be a candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
1938 | len = vsnprintf(skb_tail_pointer(skb), avail, fmt, args2);
| ^~~
--
In file included from fs/pipe.c:23:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
fs/pipe.c:741:15: warning: no previous prototype for 'account_pipe_buffers' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
741 | unsigned long account_pipe_buffers(struct user_struct *user,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/pipe.c:747:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'too_many_pipe_buffers_soft' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
747 | bool too_many_pipe_buffers_soft(unsigned long user_bufs)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/pipe.c:754:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'too_many_pipe_buffers_hard' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
754 | bool too_many_pipe_buffers_hard(unsigned long user_bufs)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/pipe.c:761:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'pipe_is_unprivileged_user' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
761 | bool pipe_is_unprivileged_user(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/pipe.c:1231:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'pipe_resize_ring' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
1231 | int pipe_resize_ring(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, unsigned int nr_slots)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from include/linux/fsnotify.h:16,
from kernel/trace/trace.c:49:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
kernel/trace/trace.c: In function 'trace_check_vprintf':
kernel/trace/trace.c:3815:3: warning: function 'trace_check_vprintf' might be a candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
3815 | trace_seq_vprintf(&iter->seq, iter->fmt, ap);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/trace/trace.c:3870:3: warning: function 'trace_check_vprintf' might be a candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
3870 | trace_seq_vprintf(&iter->seq, p, ap);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
At top level:
kernel/trace/trace.c:1692:37: warning: 'tracing_max_lat_fops' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
1692 | static const struct file_operations tracing_max_lat_fops;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from net/socket.c:81:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
net/socket.c: In function '__sys_getsockopt':
net/socket.c:2178:6: warning: variable 'max_optlen' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
2178 | int max_optlen;
| ^~~~~~~~~~
vim +557 include/linux/audit.h
553
554 extern int audit_n_rules;
555 extern int audit_signals;
556 #else /* CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL */
> 557 +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
558 {
559 return NULL;
560 }
561 static inline void audit_free_context(struct audit_context *context)
562 { }
563 static inline int audit_alloc(struct task_struct *task)
564 {
565 return 0;
566 }
567 static inline void audit_free(struct task_struct *task)
568 { }
569 static inline void audit_syscall_entry(int major, unsigned long a0,
570 unsigned long a1, unsigned long a2,
571 unsigned long a3)
572 { }
573 static inline void audit_syscall_exit(void *pt_regs)
574 { }
575 static inline bool audit_dummy_context(void)
576 {
577 return true;
578 }
579 static inline void audit_set_context(struct task_struct *task, struct audit_context *ctx)
580 { }
581 static inline struct audit_context *audit_context(void)
582 {
583 return NULL;
584 }
585 static inline struct filename *audit_reusename(const __user char *name)
586 {
587 return NULL;
588 }
589 static inline void audit_getname(struct filename *name)
590 { }
591 static inline void audit_inode(struct filename *name,
592 const struct dentry *dentry,
593 unsigned int aflags)
594 { }
595 static inline void audit_file(struct file *file)
596 {
597 }
598 static inline void audit_inode_parent_hidden(struct filename *name,
599 const struct dentry *dentry)
600 { }
601 static inline void audit_inode_child(struct inode *parent,
602 const struct dentry *dentry,
603 const unsigned char type)
604 { }
605 static inline void audit_core_dumps(long signr)
606 { }
607 static inline void audit_seccomp(unsigned long syscall, long signr, int code)
608 { }
609 static inline void audit_seccomp_actions_logged(const char *names,
610 const char *old_names, int res)
611 { }
612 static inline void audit_ipc_obj(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp)
613 { }
614 static inline void audit_ipc_set_perm(unsigned long qbytes, uid_t uid,
615 gid_t gid, umode_t mode)
616 { }
617 static inline void audit_bprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
618 { }
619 static inline int audit_socketcall(int nargs, unsigned long *args)
620 {
621 return 0;
622 }
623
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 34024 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: john.johansen@canonical.com, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v28 21/25] audit: support non-syscall auxiliary records
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 01:02:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202107230058.3lMBsPSR-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210722004758.12371-22-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 10113 bytes --]
Hi Casey,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on pcmoore-audit/next]
[also build test ERROR on nf/master linus/master v5.14-rc2]
[cannot apply to nf-next/master next-20210722]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Casey-Schaufler/LSM-Infrastructure-management-of-the-sock-security/20210722-094735
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/audit.git next
config: openrisc-randconfig-r025-20210722 (attached as .config)
compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 10.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/63ea5078624b9ff368f945d654ace5f79160fb6a
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Casey-Schaufler/LSM-Infrastructure-management-of-the-sock-security/20210722-094735
git checkout 63ea5078624b9ff368f945d654ace5f79160fb6a
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-10.3.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=openrisc SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from init/init_task.c:12:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
--
In file included from arch/openrisc/kernel/ptrace.c:23:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
arch/openrisc/kernel/ptrace.c:157:17: warning: no previous prototype for 'do_syscall_trace_enter' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
157 | asmlinkage long do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/openrisc/kernel/ptrace.c:176:17: warning: no previous prototype for 'do_syscall_trace_leave' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
176 | asmlinkage void do_syscall_trace_leave(struct pt_regs *regs)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from kernel/fork.c:63:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
kernel/fork.c:162:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'arch_release_task_struct' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
162 | void __weak arch_release_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/fork.c:752:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'arch_task_cache_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
752 | void __init __weak arch_task_cache_init(void) { }
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/fork.c:847:12: warning: no previous prototype for 'arch_dup_task_struct' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
847 | int __weak arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from kernel/exit.c:49:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
kernel/exit.c:1810:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'abort' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
1810 | __weak void abort(void)
| ^~~~~
--
In file included from kernel/audit.c:51:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
kernel/audit.c:1781:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'audit_serial' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
1781 | unsigned int audit_serial(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/audit.c: In function 'audit_log_vformat':
kernel/audit.c:1929:2: warning: function 'audit_log_vformat' might be a candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
1929 | len = vsnprintf(skb_tail_pointer(skb), avail, fmt, args);
| ^~~
kernel/audit.c:1938:3: warning: function 'audit_log_vformat' might be a candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
1938 | len = vsnprintf(skb_tail_pointer(skb), avail, fmt, args2);
| ^~~
--
In file included from fs/pipe.c:23:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
fs/pipe.c:741:15: warning: no previous prototype for 'account_pipe_buffers' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
741 | unsigned long account_pipe_buffers(struct user_struct *user,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/pipe.c:747:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'too_many_pipe_buffers_soft' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
747 | bool too_many_pipe_buffers_soft(unsigned long user_bufs)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/pipe.c:754:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'too_many_pipe_buffers_hard' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
754 | bool too_many_pipe_buffers_hard(unsigned long user_bufs)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/pipe.c:761:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'pipe_is_unprivileged_user' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
761 | bool pipe_is_unprivileged_user(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/pipe.c:1231:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'pipe_resize_ring' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
1231 | int pipe_resize_ring(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, unsigned int nr_slots)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from include/linux/fsnotify.h:16,
from kernel/trace/trace.c:49:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
kernel/trace/trace.c: In function 'trace_check_vprintf':
kernel/trace/trace.c:3815:3: warning: function 'trace_check_vprintf' might be a candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
3815 | trace_seq_vprintf(&iter->seq, iter->fmt, ap);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/trace/trace.c:3870:3: warning: function 'trace_check_vprintf' might be a candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
3870 | trace_seq_vprintf(&iter->seq, p, ap);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
At top level:
kernel/trace/trace.c:1692:37: warning: 'tracing_max_lat_fops' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
1692 | static const struct file_operations tracing_max_lat_fops;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from net/socket.c:81:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
net/socket.c: In function '__sys_getsockopt':
net/socket.c:2178:6: warning: variable 'max_optlen' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
2178 | int max_optlen;
| ^~~~~~~~~~
vim +557 include/linux/audit.h
553
554 extern int audit_n_rules;
555 extern int audit_signals;
556 #else /* CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL */
> 557 +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
558 {
559 return NULL;
560 }
561 static inline void audit_free_context(struct audit_context *context)
562 { }
563 static inline int audit_alloc(struct task_struct *task)
564 {
565 return 0;
566 }
567 static inline void audit_free(struct task_struct *task)
568 { }
569 static inline void audit_syscall_entry(int major, unsigned long a0,
570 unsigned long a1, unsigned long a2,
571 unsigned long a3)
572 { }
573 static inline void audit_syscall_exit(void *pt_regs)
574 { }
575 static inline bool audit_dummy_context(void)
576 {
577 return true;
578 }
579 static inline void audit_set_context(struct task_struct *task, struct audit_context *ctx)
580 { }
581 static inline struct audit_context *audit_context(void)
582 {
583 return NULL;
584 }
585 static inline struct filename *audit_reusename(const __user char *name)
586 {
587 return NULL;
588 }
589 static inline void audit_getname(struct filename *name)
590 { }
591 static inline void audit_inode(struct filename *name,
592 const struct dentry *dentry,
593 unsigned int aflags)
594 { }
595 static inline void audit_file(struct file *file)
596 {
597 }
598 static inline void audit_inode_parent_hidden(struct filename *name,
599 const struct dentry *dentry)
600 { }
601 static inline void audit_inode_child(struct inode *parent,
602 const struct dentry *dentry,
603 const unsigned char type)
604 { }
605 static inline void audit_core_dumps(long signr)
606 { }
607 static inline void audit_seccomp(unsigned long syscall, long signr, int code)
608 { }
609 static inline void audit_seccomp_actions_logged(const char *names,
610 const char *old_names, int res)
611 { }
612 static inline void audit_ipc_obj(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp)
613 { }
614 static inline void audit_ipc_set_perm(unsigned long qbytes, uid_t uid,
615 gid_t gid, umode_t mode)
616 { }
617 static inline void audit_bprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
618 { }
619 static inline int audit_socketcall(int nargs, unsigned long *args)
620 {
621 return 0;
622 }
623
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 34024 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 106 bytes --]
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v28 21/25] audit: support non-syscall auxiliary records
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 01:02:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202107230058.3lMBsPSR-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210722004758.12371-22-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 10323 bytes --]
Hi Casey,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on pcmoore-audit/next]
[also build test ERROR on nf/master linus/master v5.14-rc2]
[cannot apply to nf-next/master next-20210722]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Casey-Schaufler/LSM-Infrastructure-management-of-the-sock-security/20210722-094735
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/audit.git next
config: openrisc-randconfig-r025-20210722 (attached as .config)
compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 10.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/63ea5078624b9ff368f945d654ace5f79160fb6a
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Casey-Schaufler/LSM-Infrastructure-management-of-the-sock-security/20210722-094735
git checkout 63ea5078624b9ff368f945d654ace5f79160fb6a
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-10.3.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=openrisc SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from init/init_task.c:12:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
--
In file included from arch/openrisc/kernel/ptrace.c:23:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
arch/openrisc/kernel/ptrace.c:157:17: warning: no previous prototype for 'do_syscall_trace_enter' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
157 | asmlinkage long do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/openrisc/kernel/ptrace.c:176:17: warning: no previous prototype for 'do_syscall_trace_leave' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
176 | asmlinkage void do_syscall_trace_leave(struct pt_regs *regs)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from kernel/fork.c:63:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
kernel/fork.c:162:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'arch_release_task_struct' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
162 | void __weak arch_release_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/fork.c:752:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'arch_task_cache_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
752 | void __init __weak arch_task_cache_init(void) { }
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/fork.c:847:12: warning: no previous prototype for 'arch_dup_task_struct' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
847 | int __weak arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from kernel/exit.c:49:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
kernel/exit.c:1810:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'abort' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
1810 | __weak void abort(void)
| ^~~~~
--
In file included from kernel/audit.c:51:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
kernel/audit.c:1781:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'audit_serial' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
1781 | unsigned int audit_serial(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/audit.c: In function 'audit_log_vformat':
kernel/audit.c:1929:2: warning: function 'audit_log_vformat' might be a candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
1929 | len = vsnprintf(skb_tail_pointer(skb), avail, fmt, args);
| ^~~
kernel/audit.c:1938:3: warning: function 'audit_log_vformat' might be a candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
1938 | len = vsnprintf(skb_tail_pointer(skb), avail, fmt, args2);
| ^~~
--
In file included from fs/pipe.c:23:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
fs/pipe.c:741:15: warning: no previous prototype for 'account_pipe_buffers' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
741 | unsigned long account_pipe_buffers(struct user_struct *user,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/pipe.c:747:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'too_many_pipe_buffers_soft' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
747 | bool too_many_pipe_buffers_soft(unsigned long user_bufs)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/pipe.c:754:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'too_many_pipe_buffers_hard' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
754 | bool too_many_pipe_buffers_hard(unsigned long user_bufs)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/pipe.c:761:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'pipe_is_unprivileged_user' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
761 | bool pipe_is_unprivileged_user(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/pipe.c:1231:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'pipe_resize_ring' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
1231 | int pipe_resize_ring(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, unsigned int nr_slots)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from include/linux/fsnotify.h:16,
from kernel/trace/trace.c:49:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
kernel/trace/trace.c: In function 'trace_check_vprintf':
kernel/trace/trace.c:3815:3: warning: function 'trace_check_vprintf' might be a candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
3815 | trace_seq_vprintf(&iter->seq, iter->fmt, ap);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/trace/trace.c:3870:3: warning: function 'trace_check_vprintf' might be a candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
3870 | trace_seq_vprintf(&iter->seq, p, ap);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
At top level:
kernel/trace/trace.c:1692:37: warning: 'tracing_max_lat_fops' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
1692 | static const struct file_operations tracing_max_lat_fops;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from net/socket.c:81:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
net/socket.c: In function '__sys_getsockopt':
net/socket.c:2178:6: warning: variable 'max_optlen' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
2178 | int max_optlen;
| ^~~~~~~~~~
vim +557 include/linux/audit.h
553
554 extern int audit_n_rules;
555 extern int audit_signals;
556 #else /* CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL */
> 557 +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
558 {
559 return NULL;
560 }
561 static inline void audit_free_context(struct audit_context *context)
562 { }
563 static inline int audit_alloc(struct task_struct *task)
564 {
565 return 0;
566 }
567 static inline void audit_free(struct task_struct *task)
568 { }
569 static inline void audit_syscall_entry(int major, unsigned long a0,
570 unsigned long a1, unsigned long a2,
571 unsigned long a3)
572 { }
573 static inline void audit_syscall_exit(void *pt_regs)
574 { }
575 static inline bool audit_dummy_context(void)
576 {
577 return true;
578 }
579 static inline void audit_set_context(struct task_struct *task, struct audit_context *ctx)
580 { }
581 static inline struct audit_context *audit_context(void)
582 {
583 return NULL;
584 }
585 static inline struct filename *audit_reusename(const __user char *name)
586 {
587 return NULL;
588 }
589 static inline void audit_getname(struct filename *name)
590 { }
591 static inline void audit_inode(struct filename *name,
592 const struct dentry *dentry,
593 unsigned int aflags)
594 { }
595 static inline void audit_file(struct file *file)
596 {
597 }
598 static inline void audit_inode_parent_hidden(struct filename *name,
599 const struct dentry *dentry)
600 { }
601 static inline void audit_inode_child(struct inode *parent,
602 const struct dentry *dentry,
603 const unsigned char type)
604 { }
605 static inline void audit_core_dumps(long signr)
606 { }
607 static inline void audit_seccomp(unsigned long syscall, long signr, int code)
608 { }
609 static inline void audit_seccomp_actions_logged(const char *names,
610 const char *old_names, int res)
611 { }
612 static inline void audit_ipc_obj(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp)
613 { }
614 static inline void audit_ipc_set_perm(unsigned long qbytes, uid_t uid,
615 gid_t gid, umode_t mode)
616 { }
617 static inline void audit_bprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
618 { }
619 static inline int audit_socketcall(int nargs, unsigned long *args)
620 {
621 return 0;
622 }
623
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 34024 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-22 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20210722004758.12371-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 00/25] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 01/25] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 02/25] LSM: Add the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 03/25] LSM: provide lsm name and id slot mappings Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 04/25] IMA: avoid label collisions with stacked LSMs Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 05/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 06/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 07/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 08/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 09/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 10/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 11/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 12/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-23 23:56 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-23 23:56 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-23 23:56 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 13/25] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 14/25] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 15/25] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 16/25] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 17/25] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 18/25] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 19/25] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 20/25] LSM: Verify LSM display sanity in binder Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 21/25] audit: support non-syscall auxiliary records Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 17:02 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2021-07-22 17:02 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-22 17:02 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 22/25] Audit: Add record for multiple process LSM attributes Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 4:08 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-22 4:08 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-12 20:59 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-12 20:59 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-12 22:38 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-12 22:38 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-13 15:31 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-13 15:31 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-13 18:48 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-13 18:48 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-13 20:43 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-13 20:43 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-13 21:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-13 21:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-16 18:57 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-16 18:57 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-18 21:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-18 21:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-19 0:47 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-19 0:47 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-19 0:56 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-19 0:56 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-19 22:41 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-19 22:41 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-20 19:06 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-20 19:06 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-20 19:17 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-20 19:17 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-20 23:48 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-20 23:48 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-24 14:45 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-24 14:45 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-24 15:20 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-24 15:20 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-24 16:14 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-24 16:14 ` Paul Moore
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 23/25] Audit: Add record for multiple object " Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 24/25] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 25/25] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` Casey Schaufler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202107230058.3lMBsPSR-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.