All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
	Mark Greer <mgreer@animalcreek.com>,
	Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@samsung.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	linux-nfc@lists.01.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/12] nfc: port100: constify several pointers
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:40:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210729104022.47761-4-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210729104022.47761-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>

Several functions do not modify pointed data so arguments and local
variables can be const for correctness and safety.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/nfc/port100.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nfc/port100.c b/drivers/nfc/port100.c
index ccb5c5fab905..517376c43b86 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/port100.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/port100.c
@@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ static inline u8 port100_checksum(u16 value)
 }
 
 /* The rule: sum(data elements) + checksum = 0 */
-static u8 port100_data_checksum(u8 *data, int datalen)
+static u8 port100_data_checksum(const u8 *data, int datalen)
 {
 	u8 sum = 0;
 	int i;
@@ -568,10 +568,10 @@ static void port100_tx_update_payload_len(void *_frame, int len)
 	le16_add_cpu(&frame->datalen, len);
 }
 
-static bool port100_rx_frame_is_valid(void *_frame)
+static bool port100_rx_frame_is_valid(const void *_frame)
 {
 	u8 checksum;
-	struct port100_frame *frame = _frame;
+	const struct port100_frame *frame = _frame;
 
 	if (frame->start_frame != cpu_to_be16(PORT100_FRAME_SOF) ||
 	    frame->extended_frame != cpu_to_be16(PORT100_FRAME_EXT))
@@ -589,23 +589,24 @@ static bool port100_rx_frame_is_valid(void *_frame)
 	return true;
 }
 
-static bool port100_rx_frame_is_ack(struct port100_ack_frame *frame)
+static bool port100_rx_frame_is_ack(const struct port100_ack_frame *frame)
 {
 	return (frame->start_frame == cpu_to_be16(PORT100_FRAME_SOF) &&
 		frame->ack_frame == cpu_to_be16(PORT100_FRAME_ACK));
 }
 
-static inline int port100_rx_frame_size(void *frame)
+static inline int port100_rx_frame_size(const void *frame)
 {
-	struct port100_frame *f = frame;
+	const struct port100_frame *f = frame;
 
 	return sizeof(struct port100_frame) + le16_to_cpu(f->datalen) +
 	       PORT100_FRAME_TAIL_LEN;
 }
 
-static bool port100_rx_frame_is_cmd_response(struct port100 *dev, void *frame)
+static bool port100_rx_frame_is_cmd_response(const struct port100 *dev,
+					     const void *frame)
 {
-	struct port100_frame *f = frame;
+	const struct port100_frame *f = frame;
 
 	return (PORT100_FRAME_CMD(f) == PORT100_CMD_RESPONSE(dev->cmd->code));
 }
@@ -655,7 +656,8 @@ static void port100_recv_response(struct urb *urb)
 	schedule_work(&dev->cmd_complete_work);
 }
 
-static int port100_submit_urb_for_response(struct port100 *dev, gfp_t flags)
+static int port100_submit_urb_for_response(const struct port100 *dev,
+					   gfp_t flags)
 {
 	dev->in_urb->complete = port100_recv_response;
 
@@ -666,7 +668,7 @@ static void port100_recv_ack(struct urb *urb)
 {
 	struct port100 *dev = urb->context;
 	struct port100_cmd *cmd = dev->cmd;
-	struct port100_ack_frame *in_frame;
+	const struct port100_ack_frame *in_frame;
 	int rc;
 
 	cmd->status = urb->status;
@@ -708,7 +710,7 @@ static void port100_recv_ack(struct urb *urb)
 	schedule_work(&dev->cmd_complete_work);
 }
 
-static int port100_submit_urb_for_ack(struct port100 *dev, gfp_t flags)
+static int port100_submit_urb_for_ack(const struct port100 *dev, gfp_t flags)
 {
 	dev->in_urb->complete = port100_recv_ack;
 
@@ -753,8 +755,9 @@ static int port100_send_ack(struct port100 *dev)
 	return rc;
 }
 
-static int port100_send_frame_async(struct port100 *dev, struct sk_buff *out,
-				    struct sk_buff *in, int in_len)
+static int port100_send_frame_async(struct port100 *dev,
+				    const struct sk_buff *out,
+				    const struct sk_buff *in, int in_len)
 {
 	int rc;
 
@@ -960,7 +963,7 @@ static void port100_abort_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev)
 	usb_kill_urb(dev->in_urb);
 }
 
-static struct sk_buff *port100_alloc_skb(struct port100 *dev, unsigned int size)
+static struct sk_buff *port100_alloc_skb(const struct port100 *dev, unsigned int size)
 {
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 
@@ -1152,7 +1155,7 @@ static int port100_in_configure_hw(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, int type,
 static void port100_in_comm_rf_complete(struct port100 *dev, void *arg,
 				       struct sk_buff *resp)
 {
-	struct port100_cb_arg *cb_arg = arg;
+	const struct port100_cb_arg *cb_arg = arg;
 	nfc_digital_cmd_complete_t cb = cb_arg->complete_cb;
 	u32 status;
 	int rc;
@@ -1330,7 +1333,7 @@ static void port100_tg_comm_rf_complete(struct port100 *dev, void *arg,
 					struct sk_buff *resp)
 {
 	u32 status;
-	struct port100_cb_arg *cb_arg = arg;
+	const struct port100_cb_arg *cb_arg = arg;
 	nfc_digital_cmd_complete_t cb = cb_arg->complete_cb;
 	struct port100_tg_comm_rf_res *hdr;
 
@@ -1453,7 +1456,7 @@ static int port100_listen_mdaa(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev,
 static int port100_listen(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, u16 timeout,
 			  nfc_digital_cmd_complete_t cb, void *arg)
 {
-	struct port100 *dev = nfc_digital_get_drvdata(ddev);
+	const struct port100 *dev = nfc_digital_get_drvdata(ddev);
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 
 	skb = port100_alloc_skb(dev, 0);
-- 
2.27.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
	Mark Greer <mgreer@animalcreek.com>,
	Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@samsung.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	linux-nfc@lists.01.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [linux-nfc] [PATCH 03/12] nfc: port100: constify several pointers
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:40:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210729104022.47761-4-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210729104022.47761-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>

Several functions do not modify pointed data so arguments and local
variables can be const for correctness and safety.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/nfc/port100.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nfc/port100.c b/drivers/nfc/port100.c
index ccb5c5fab905..517376c43b86 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/port100.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/port100.c
@@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ static inline u8 port100_checksum(u16 value)
 }
 
 /* The rule: sum(data elements) + checksum = 0 */
-static u8 port100_data_checksum(u8 *data, int datalen)
+static u8 port100_data_checksum(const u8 *data, int datalen)
 {
 	u8 sum = 0;
 	int i;
@@ -568,10 +568,10 @@ static void port100_tx_update_payload_len(void *_frame, int len)
 	le16_add_cpu(&frame->datalen, len);
 }
 
-static bool port100_rx_frame_is_valid(void *_frame)
+static bool port100_rx_frame_is_valid(const void *_frame)
 {
 	u8 checksum;
-	struct port100_frame *frame = _frame;
+	const struct port100_frame *frame = _frame;
 
 	if (frame->start_frame != cpu_to_be16(PORT100_FRAME_SOF) ||
 	    frame->extended_frame != cpu_to_be16(PORT100_FRAME_EXT))
@@ -589,23 +589,24 @@ static bool port100_rx_frame_is_valid(void *_frame)
 	return true;
 }
 
-static bool port100_rx_frame_is_ack(struct port100_ack_frame *frame)
+static bool port100_rx_frame_is_ack(const struct port100_ack_frame *frame)
 {
 	return (frame->start_frame == cpu_to_be16(PORT100_FRAME_SOF) &&
 		frame->ack_frame == cpu_to_be16(PORT100_FRAME_ACK));
 }
 
-static inline int port100_rx_frame_size(void *frame)
+static inline int port100_rx_frame_size(const void *frame)
 {
-	struct port100_frame *f = frame;
+	const struct port100_frame *f = frame;
 
 	return sizeof(struct port100_frame) + le16_to_cpu(f->datalen) +
 	       PORT100_FRAME_TAIL_LEN;
 }
 
-static bool port100_rx_frame_is_cmd_response(struct port100 *dev, void *frame)
+static bool port100_rx_frame_is_cmd_response(const struct port100 *dev,
+					     const void *frame)
 {
-	struct port100_frame *f = frame;
+	const struct port100_frame *f = frame;
 
 	return (PORT100_FRAME_CMD(f) == PORT100_CMD_RESPONSE(dev->cmd->code));
 }
@@ -655,7 +656,8 @@ static void port100_recv_response(struct urb *urb)
 	schedule_work(&dev->cmd_complete_work);
 }
 
-static int port100_submit_urb_for_response(struct port100 *dev, gfp_t flags)
+static int port100_submit_urb_for_response(const struct port100 *dev,
+					   gfp_t flags)
 {
 	dev->in_urb->complete = port100_recv_response;
 
@@ -666,7 +668,7 @@ static void port100_recv_ack(struct urb *urb)
 {
 	struct port100 *dev = urb->context;
 	struct port100_cmd *cmd = dev->cmd;
-	struct port100_ack_frame *in_frame;
+	const struct port100_ack_frame *in_frame;
 	int rc;
 
 	cmd->status = urb->status;
@@ -708,7 +710,7 @@ static void port100_recv_ack(struct urb *urb)
 	schedule_work(&dev->cmd_complete_work);
 }
 
-static int port100_submit_urb_for_ack(struct port100 *dev, gfp_t flags)
+static int port100_submit_urb_for_ack(const struct port100 *dev, gfp_t flags)
 {
 	dev->in_urb->complete = port100_recv_ack;
 
@@ -753,8 +755,9 @@ static int port100_send_ack(struct port100 *dev)
 	return rc;
 }
 
-static int port100_send_frame_async(struct port100 *dev, struct sk_buff *out,
-				    struct sk_buff *in, int in_len)
+static int port100_send_frame_async(struct port100 *dev,
+				    const struct sk_buff *out,
+				    const struct sk_buff *in, int in_len)
 {
 	int rc;
 
@@ -960,7 +963,7 @@ static void port100_abort_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev)
 	usb_kill_urb(dev->in_urb);
 }
 
-static struct sk_buff *port100_alloc_skb(struct port100 *dev, unsigned int size)
+static struct sk_buff *port100_alloc_skb(const struct port100 *dev, unsigned int size)
 {
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 
@@ -1152,7 +1155,7 @@ static int port100_in_configure_hw(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, int type,
 static void port100_in_comm_rf_complete(struct port100 *dev, void *arg,
 				       struct sk_buff *resp)
 {
-	struct port100_cb_arg *cb_arg = arg;
+	const struct port100_cb_arg *cb_arg = arg;
 	nfc_digital_cmd_complete_t cb = cb_arg->complete_cb;
 	u32 status;
 	int rc;
@@ -1330,7 +1333,7 @@ static void port100_tg_comm_rf_complete(struct port100 *dev, void *arg,
 					struct sk_buff *resp)
 {
 	u32 status;
-	struct port100_cb_arg *cb_arg = arg;
+	const struct port100_cb_arg *cb_arg = arg;
 	nfc_digital_cmd_complete_t cb = cb_arg->complete_cb;
 	struct port100_tg_comm_rf_res *hdr;
 
@@ -1453,7 +1456,7 @@ static int port100_listen_mdaa(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev,
 static int port100_listen(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, u16 timeout,
 			  nfc_digital_cmd_complete_t cb, void *arg)
 {
-	struct port100 *dev = nfc_digital_get_drvdata(ddev);
+	const struct port100 *dev = nfc_digital_get_drvdata(ddev);
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 
 	skb = port100_alloc_skb(dev, 0);
-- 
2.27.0
_______________________________________________
Linux-nfc mailing list -- linux-nfc@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nfc-leave@lists.01.org
%(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
To: linux-nfc@lists.01.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/12] nfc: port100: constify several pointers
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:40:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210729104022.47761-4-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210729104022.47761-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5036 bytes --]

Several functions do not modify pointed data so arguments and local
variables can be const for correctness and safety.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/nfc/port100.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nfc/port100.c b/drivers/nfc/port100.c
index ccb5c5fab905..517376c43b86 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/port100.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/port100.c
@@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ static inline u8 port100_checksum(u16 value)
 }
 
 /* The rule: sum(data elements) + checksum = 0 */
-static u8 port100_data_checksum(u8 *data, int datalen)
+static u8 port100_data_checksum(const u8 *data, int datalen)
 {
 	u8 sum = 0;
 	int i;
@@ -568,10 +568,10 @@ static void port100_tx_update_payload_len(void *_frame, int len)
 	le16_add_cpu(&frame->datalen, len);
 }
 
-static bool port100_rx_frame_is_valid(void *_frame)
+static bool port100_rx_frame_is_valid(const void *_frame)
 {
 	u8 checksum;
-	struct port100_frame *frame = _frame;
+	const struct port100_frame *frame = _frame;
 
 	if (frame->start_frame != cpu_to_be16(PORT100_FRAME_SOF) ||
 	    frame->extended_frame != cpu_to_be16(PORT100_FRAME_EXT))
@@ -589,23 +589,24 @@ static bool port100_rx_frame_is_valid(void *_frame)
 	return true;
 }
 
-static bool port100_rx_frame_is_ack(struct port100_ack_frame *frame)
+static bool port100_rx_frame_is_ack(const struct port100_ack_frame *frame)
 {
 	return (frame->start_frame == cpu_to_be16(PORT100_FRAME_SOF) &&
 		frame->ack_frame == cpu_to_be16(PORT100_FRAME_ACK));
 }
 
-static inline int port100_rx_frame_size(void *frame)
+static inline int port100_rx_frame_size(const void *frame)
 {
-	struct port100_frame *f = frame;
+	const struct port100_frame *f = frame;
 
 	return sizeof(struct port100_frame) + le16_to_cpu(f->datalen) +
 	       PORT100_FRAME_TAIL_LEN;
 }
 
-static bool port100_rx_frame_is_cmd_response(struct port100 *dev, void *frame)
+static bool port100_rx_frame_is_cmd_response(const struct port100 *dev,
+					     const void *frame)
 {
-	struct port100_frame *f = frame;
+	const struct port100_frame *f = frame;
 
 	return (PORT100_FRAME_CMD(f) == PORT100_CMD_RESPONSE(dev->cmd->code));
 }
@@ -655,7 +656,8 @@ static void port100_recv_response(struct urb *urb)
 	schedule_work(&dev->cmd_complete_work);
 }
 
-static int port100_submit_urb_for_response(struct port100 *dev, gfp_t flags)
+static int port100_submit_urb_for_response(const struct port100 *dev,
+					   gfp_t flags)
 {
 	dev->in_urb->complete = port100_recv_response;
 
@@ -666,7 +668,7 @@ static void port100_recv_ack(struct urb *urb)
 {
 	struct port100 *dev = urb->context;
 	struct port100_cmd *cmd = dev->cmd;
-	struct port100_ack_frame *in_frame;
+	const struct port100_ack_frame *in_frame;
 	int rc;
 
 	cmd->status = urb->status;
@@ -708,7 +710,7 @@ static void port100_recv_ack(struct urb *urb)
 	schedule_work(&dev->cmd_complete_work);
 }
 
-static int port100_submit_urb_for_ack(struct port100 *dev, gfp_t flags)
+static int port100_submit_urb_for_ack(const struct port100 *dev, gfp_t flags)
 {
 	dev->in_urb->complete = port100_recv_ack;
 
@@ -753,8 +755,9 @@ static int port100_send_ack(struct port100 *dev)
 	return rc;
 }
 
-static int port100_send_frame_async(struct port100 *dev, struct sk_buff *out,
-				    struct sk_buff *in, int in_len)
+static int port100_send_frame_async(struct port100 *dev,
+				    const struct sk_buff *out,
+				    const struct sk_buff *in, int in_len)
 {
 	int rc;
 
@@ -960,7 +963,7 @@ static void port100_abort_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev)
 	usb_kill_urb(dev->in_urb);
 }
 
-static struct sk_buff *port100_alloc_skb(struct port100 *dev, unsigned int size)
+static struct sk_buff *port100_alloc_skb(const struct port100 *dev, unsigned int size)
 {
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 
@@ -1152,7 +1155,7 @@ static int port100_in_configure_hw(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, int type,
 static void port100_in_comm_rf_complete(struct port100 *dev, void *arg,
 				       struct sk_buff *resp)
 {
-	struct port100_cb_arg *cb_arg = arg;
+	const struct port100_cb_arg *cb_arg = arg;
 	nfc_digital_cmd_complete_t cb = cb_arg->complete_cb;
 	u32 status;
 	int rc;
@@ -1330,7 +1333,7 @@ static void port100_tg_comm_rf_complete(struct port100 *dev, void *arg,
 					struct sk_buff *resp)
 {
 	u32 status;
-	struct port100_cb_arg *cb_arg = arg;
+	const struct port100_cb_arg *cb_arg = arg;
 	nfc_digital_cmd_complete_t cb = cb_arg->complete_cb;
 	struct port100_tg_comm_rf_res *hdr;
 
@@ -1453,7 +1456,7 @@ static int port100_listen_mdaa(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev,
 static int port100_listen(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, u16 timeout,
 			  nfc_digital_cmd_complete_t cb, void *arg)
 {
-	struct port100 *dev = nfc_digital_get_drvdata(ddev);
+	const struct port100 *dev = nfc_digital_get_drvdata(ddev);
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 
 	skb = port100_alloc_skb(dev, 0);
-- 
2.27.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-29 10:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-29 10:40 [PATCH 00/12] nfc: constify, continued (part 2) Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40 ` [linux-nfc] " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 01/12] nfc: constify passed nfc_dev Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40   ` [linux-nfc] " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 02/12] nfc: mei_phy: constify buffer passed to mei_nfc_send() Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40   ` [linux-nfc] " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2021-07-29 10:40   ` [PATCH 03/12] nfc: port100: constify several pointers Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40   ` [linux-nfc] " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 04/12] nfc: trf7970a: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40   ` [linux-nfc] " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 15:58   ` Mark Greer
2021-07-29 15:58     ` Mark Greer
2021-07-29 15:58     ` [linux-nfc] " Mark Greer
2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 05/12] nfc: virtual_ncidev: constify pointer to nfc_dev Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40   ` [linux-nfc] " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 06/12] nfc: nfcsim: constify drvdata (struct nfcsim) Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40   ` [linux-nfc] " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 07/12] nfc: fdp: drop unneeded cast for printing firmware size in dev_dbg() Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40   ` [linux-nfc] " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 08/12] nfc: fdp: use unsigned int as loop iterator Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40   ` [linux-nfc] " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 09/12] nfc: fdp: constify several pointers Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40   ` [linux-nfc] " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 10/12] nfc: microread: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40   ` [linux-nfc] " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 11/12] nfc: mrvl: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40   ` [linux-nfc] " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:48   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:48     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:48     ` [linux-nfc] " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:42 ` [PATCH 12/12] nfc: mrvl: constify static nfcmrvl_if_ops Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:42   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:42   ` [linux-nfc] " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 11:30 ` [PATCH 00/12] nfc: constify, continued (part 2) patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2021-07-29 11:35   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 11:35     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 11:35     ` [linux-nfc] " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 11:58     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 11:58       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 11:58       ` [linux-nfc] " Krzysztof Kozlowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210729104022.47761-4-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
    --to=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
    --cc=bongsu.jeon@samsung.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfc@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgreer@animalcreek.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.