All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>,
	Sundaresan Sujaritha <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Gate Host RPS when SLPC is enabled
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 19:00:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210730020107.31415-3-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210730020107.31415-1-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>

Also ensure uc_init is called before we initialize RPS so that we
can check for SLPC support. We do not need to enable up/down
interrupts when SLPC is enabled. However, we still need the ARAT
interrupt, which will be enabled separately later.

v2: Explicitly return from intel_rps_enable with slpc check (Matthew B)

Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sundaresan Sujaritha <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c  |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
index a64aa43f7cd9..04dd69bcf6cb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
@@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ void intel_gt_init_early(struct intel_gt *gt, struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 	intel_gt_init_timelines(gt);
 	intel_gt_pm_init_early(gt);
 
-	intel_rps_init_early(&gt->rps);
 	intel_uc_init_early(&gt->uc);
+	intel_rps_init_early(&gt->rps);
 }
 
 int intel_gt_probe_lmem(struct intel_gt *gt)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
index 0c8e7f2b06f0..a92da4b3bd42 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
@@ -37,6 +37,13 @@ static struct intel_uncore *rps_to_uncore(struct intel_rps *rps)
 	return rps_to_gt(rps)->uncore;
 }
 
+static bool rps_uses_slpc(struct intel_rps *rps)
+{
+	struct intel_gt *gt = rps_to_gt(rps);
+
+	return intel_uc_uses_guc_slpc(&gt->uc);
+}
+
 static u32 rps_pm_sanitize_mask(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 mask)
 {
 	return mask & ~rps->pm_intrmsk_mbz;
@@ -167,6 +174,8 @@ static void rps_enable_interrupts(struct intel_rps *rps)
 {
 	struct intel_gt *gt = rps_to_gt(rps);
 
+	GEM_BUG_ON(rps_uses_slpc(rps));
+
 	GT_TRACE(gt, "interrupts:on rps->pm_events: %x, rps_pm_mask:%x\n",
 		 rps->pm_events, rps_pm_mask(rps, rps->last_freq));
 
@@ -771,6 +780,8 @@ static int gen6_rps_set(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 val)
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = rps_to_i915(rps);
 	u32 swreq;
 
+	GEM_BUG_ON(rps_uses_slpc(rps));
+
 	if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 9)
 		swreq = GEN9_FREQUENCY(val);
 	else if (IS_HASWELL(i915) || IS_BROADWELL(i915))
@@ -861,6 +872,9 @@ void intel_rps_park(struct intel_rps *rps)
 {
 	int adj;
 
+	if (!intel_rps_is_enabled(rps))
+		return;
+
 	GEM_BUG_ON(atomic_read(&rps->num_waiters));
 
 	if (!intel_rps_clear_active(rps))
@@ -1356,6 +1370,9 @@ void intel_rps_enable(struct intel_rps *rps)
 	if (!HAS_RPS(i915))
 		return;
 
+	if (rps_uses_slpc(rps))
+		return;
+
 	intel_gt_check_clock_frequency(rps_to_gt(rps));
 
 	intel_uncore_forcewake_get(uncore, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
@@ -1829,6 +1846,9 @@ void intel_rps_init(struct intel_rps *rps)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = rps_to_i915(rps);
 
+	if (rps_uses_slpc(rps))
+		return;
+
 	if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(i915))
 		chv_rps_init(rps);
 	else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(i915))
@@ -1885,6 +1905,9 @@ void intel_rps_init(struct intel_rps *rps)
 
 void intel_rps_sanitize(struct intel_rps *rps)
 {
+	if (rps_uses_slpc(rps))
+		return;
+
 	if (GRAPHICS_VER(rps_to_i915(rps)) >= 6)
 		rps_disable_interrupts(rps);
 }
-- 
2.25.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Gate Host RPS when SLPC is enabled
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 19:00:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210730020107.31415-3-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210730020107.31415-1-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>

Also ensure uc_init is called before we initialize RPS so that we
can check for SLPC support. We do not need to enable up/down
interrupts when SLPC is enabled. However, we still need the ARAT
interrupt, which will be enabled separately later.

v2: Explicitly return from intel_rps_enable with slpc check (Matthew B)

Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sundaresan Sujaritha <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c  |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
index a64aa43f7cd9..04dd69bcf6cb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
@@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ void intel_gt_init_early(struct intel_gt *gt, struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 	intel_gt_init_timelines(gt);
 	intel_gt_pm_init_early(gt);
 
-	intel_rps_init_early(&gt->rps);
 	intel_uc_init_early(&gt->uc);
+	intel_rps_init_early(&gt->rps);
 }
 
 int intel_gt_probe_lmem(struct intel_gt *gt)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
index 0c8e7f2b06f0..a92da4b3bd42 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
@@ -37,6 +37,13 @@ static struct intel_uncore *rps_to_uncore(struct intel_rps *rps)
 	return rps_to_gt(rps)->uncore;
 }
 
+static bool rps_uses_slpc(struct intel_rps *rps)
+{
+	struct intel_gt *gt = rps_to_gt(rps);
+
+	return intel_uc_uses_guc_slpc(&gt->uc);
+}
+
 static u32 rps_pm_sanitize_mask(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 mask)
 {
 	return mask & ~rps->pm_intrmsk_mbz;
@@ -167,6 +174,8 @@ static void rps_enable_interrupts(struct intel_rps *rps)
 {
 	struct intel_gt *gt = rps_to_gt(rps);
 
+	GEM_BUG_ON(rps_uses_slpc(rps));
+
 	GT_TRACE(gt, "interrupts:on rps->pm_events: %x, rps_pm_mask:%x\n",
 		 rps->pm_events, rps_pm_mask(rps, rps->last_freq));
 
@@ -771,6 +780,8 @@ static int gen6_rps_set(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 val)
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = rps_to_i915(rps);
 	u32 swreq;
 
+	GEM_BUG_ON(rps_uses_slpc(rps));
+
 	if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 9)
 		swreq = GEN9_FREQUENCY(val);
 	else if (IS_HASWELL(i915) || IS_BROADWELL(i915))
@@ -861,6 +872,9 @@ void intel_rps_park(struct intel_rps *rps)
 {
 	int adj;
 
+	if (!intel_rps_is_enabled(rps))
+		return;
+
 	GEM_BUG_ON(atomic_read(&rps->num_waiters));
 
 	if (!intel_rps_clear_active(rps))
@@ -1356,6 +1370,9 @@ void intel_rps_enable(struct intel_rps *rps)
 	if (!HAS_RPS(i915))
 		return;
 
+	if (rps_uses_slpc(rps))
+		return;
+
 	intel_gt_check_clock_frequency(rps_to_gt(rps));
 
 	intel_uncore_forcewake_get(uncore, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
@@ -1829,6 +1846,9 @@ void intel_rps_init(struct intel_rps *rps)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = rps_to_i915(rps);
 
+	if (rps_uses_slpc(rps))
+		return;
+
 	if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(i915))
 		chv_rps_init(rps);
 	else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(i915))
@@ -1885,6 +1905,9 @@ void intel_rps_init(struct intel_rps *rps)
 
 void intel_rps_sanitize(struct intel_rps *rps)
 {
+	if (rps_uses_slpc(rps))
+		return;
+
 	if (GRAPHICS_VER(rps_to_i915(rps)) >= 6)
 		rps_disable_interrupts(rps);
 }
-- 
2.25.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-30  2:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-30  2:00 [PATCH v5 00/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Enable GuC based power management features Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:00 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:00 ` [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Initial definitions for SLPC Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:00   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:00 ` Vinay Belgaumkar [this message]
2021-07-30  2:00   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Gate Host RPS when SLPC is enabled Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:00 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Adding SLPC communication interfaces Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:00   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:00 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Allocate, initialize and release SLPC Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:00   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:00 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Enable SLPC and add related H2G events Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:00   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:00 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Remove BUG_ON in guc_submission_disable Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:00   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:01 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add methods to set min/max frequency Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:01   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:01 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add get max/min freq hooks Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:01   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:01 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add debugfs for SLPC info Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:01   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:01 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Enable ARAT timer interrupt Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:01   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:01 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Cache platform frequency limits Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:01   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:01 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Sysfs hooks for SLPC Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:01   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:01 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add SLPC selftest Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:01   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30 19:55   ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-30  2:01 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915/guc/rc: Setup and enable GuCRC feature Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:01   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/guc/slpc: Enable GuC based power management features (rev3) Patchwork
2021-07-30  2:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-07-30  3:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-30 11:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-07-30 20:21 [PATCH v6 00/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Enable GuC based power management features Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30 20:21 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Gate Host RPS when SLPC is enabled Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-28 21:11 [PATCH v4 00/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Enable GuC based power management features Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-28 21:11 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Gate Host RPS when SLPC is enabled Vinay Belgaumkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210730020107.31415-3-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
    --to=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.