All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
To: marcel@holtmann.org, johan.hedberg@gmail.com,
	luiz.dentz@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
	sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com
Cc: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	skhan@linuxfoundation.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 5/6] Bluetooth: switch to lock_sock in RFCOMM
Date: Wed,  4 Aug 2021 19:03:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210804110308.910744-6-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210804110308.910744-1-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>

Other than rfcomm_sk_state_change and rfcomm_connect_ind, functions in
RFCOMM use lock_sock to lock the socket.

Since bh_lock_sock and spin_lock_bh do not provide synchronization
with lock_sock, these calls should be changed to lock_sock.

This is now safe to do because packet processing is now done in a
workqueue instead of a tasklet, so bh_lock_sock/spin_lock_bh are no
longer necessary to synchronise between user contexts and SOFTIRQ
processing.

Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
---
 net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
index ae6f80730561..2c95bb58f901 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static void rfcomm_sk_state_change(struct rfcomm_dlc *d, int err)
 
 	BT_DBG("dlc %p state %ld err %d", d, d->state, err);
 
-	spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
+	lock_sock(sk);
 
 	if (err)
 		sk->sk_err = err;
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static void rfcomm_sk_state_change(struct rfcomm_dlc *d, int err)
 		sk->sk_state_change(sk);
 	}
 
-	spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
+	release_sock(sk);
 
 	if (parent && sock_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED)) {
 		/* We have to drop DLC lock here, otherwise
@@ -974,7 +974,7 @@ int rfcomm_connect_ind(struct rfcomm_session *s, u8 channel, struct rfcomm_dlc *
 	if (!parent)
 		return 0;
 
-	bh_lock_sock(parent);
+	lock_sock(parent);
 
 	/* Check for backlog size */
 	if (sk_acceptq_is_full(parent)) {
@@ -1001,7 +1001,7 @@ int rfcomm_connect_ind(struct rfcomm_session *s, u8 channel, struct rfcomm_dlc *
 	result = 1;
 
 done:
-	bh_unlock_sock(parent);
+	release_sock(parent);
 
 	if (test_bit(BT_SK_DEFER_SETUP, &bt_sk(parent)->flags))
 		parent->sk_state_change(parent);
-- 
2.25.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
To: marcel@holtmann.org, johan.hedberg@gmail.com,
	luiz.dentz@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
	sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 5/6] Bluetooth: switch to lock_sock in RFCOMM
Date: Wed,  4 Aug 2021 19:03:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210804110308.910744-6-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210804110308.910744-1-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>

Other than rfcomm_sk_state_change and rfcomm_connect_ind, functions in
RFCOMM use lock_sock to lock the socket.

Since bh_lock_sock and spin_lock_bh do not provide synchronization
with lock_sock, these calls should be changed to lock_sock.

This is now safe to do because packet processing is now done in a
workqueue instead of a tasklet, so bh_lock_sock/spin_lock_bh are no
longer necessary to synchronise between user contexts and SOFTIRQ
processing.

Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
---
 net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
index ae6f80730561..2c95bb58f901 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static void rfcomm_sk_state_change(struct rfcomm_dlc *d, int err)
 
 	BT_DBG("dlc %p state %ld err %d", d, d->state, err);
 
-	spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
+	lock_sock(sk);
 
 	if (err)
 		sk->sk_err = err;
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static void rfcomm_sk_state_change(struct rfcomm_dlc *d, int err)
 		sk->sk_state_change(sk);
 	}
 
-	spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
+	release_sock(sk);
 
 	if (parent && sock_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED)) {
 		/* We have to drop DLC lock here, otherwise
@@ -974,7 +974,7 @@ int rfcomm_connect_ind(struct rfcomm_session *s, u8 channel, struct rfcomm_dlc *
 	if (!parent)
 		return 0;
 
-	bh_lock_sock(parent);
+	lock_sock(parent);
 
 	/* Check for backlog size */
 	if (sk_acceptq_is_full(parent)) {
@@ -1001,7 +1001,7 @@ int rfcomm_connect_ind(struct rfcomm_session *s, u8 channel, struct rfcomm_dlc *
 	result = 1;
 
 done:
-	bh_unlock_sock(parent);
+	release_sock(parent);
 
 	if (test_bit(BT_SK_DEFER_SETUP, &bt_sk(parent)->flags))
 		parent->sk_state_change(parent);
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-04 11:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-04 11:03 [PATCH v5 0/6] Bluetooth: fix locking and socket killing in SCO and RFCOMM Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-08-04 11:03 ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-08-04 11:03 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] Bluetooth: schedule SCO timeouts with delayed_work Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-08-04 11:03   ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-08-04 11:03 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] Bluetooth: avoid circular locks in sco_sock_connect Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-08-04 11:03   ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-08-04 11:03 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] Bluetooth: switch to lock_sock in SCO Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-08-04 11:03   ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-08-04 11:03 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] Bluetooth: serialize calls to sco_sock_{set,clear}_timer Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-08-04 11:03   ` [PATCH v5 4/6] Bluetooth: serialize calls to sco_sock_{set, clear}_timer Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-08-04 11:03 ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi [this message]
2021-08-04 11:03   ` [PATCH v5 5/6] Bluetooth: switch to lock_sock in RFCOMM Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-08-04 11:03 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] Bluetooth: fix repeated calls to sco_sock_kill Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-08-04 11:03   ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210804110308.910744-6-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com \
    --to=desmondcheongzx@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.