From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> To: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org> Cc: "Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>, "Qiang Yu" <yuq825@gmail.com>, "Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>, "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>, lima@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org Subject: [PATCH v5 08/20] drm/lima: use scheduler dependency tracking Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 12:46:53 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210805104705.862416-9-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210805104705.862416-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Nothing special going on here. Aside reviewing the code, it seems like drm_sched_job_arm() should be moved into lima_sched_context_queue_task and put under some mutex together with drm_sched_push_job(). See the kerneldoc for drm_sched_push_job(). v2: Rebase over renamed functions to add dependencies. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Cc: Qiang Yu <yuq825@gmail.com> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: lima@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c | 6 ++++-- drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c | 21 --------------------- drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h | 3 --- 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c index c528f40981bb..640acc060467 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c @@ -267,7 +267,9 @@ static int lima_gem_sync_bo(struct lima_sched_task *task, struct lima_bo *bo, if (explicit) return 0; - return drm_gem_fence_array_add_implicit(&task->deps, &bo->base.base, write); + return drm_sched_job_add_implicit_dependencies(&task->base, + &bo->base.base, + write); } static int lima_gem_add_deps(struct drm_file *file, struct lima_submit *submit) @@ -285,7 +287,7 @@ static int lima_gem_add_deps(struct drm_file *file, struct lima_submit *submit) if (err) return err; - err = drm_gem_fence_array_add(&submit->task->deps, fence); + err = drm_sched_job_add_dependency(&submit->task->base, fence); if (err) { dma_fence_put(fence); return err; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c index e968b5a8f0b0..99d5f6f1a882 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c @@ -134,24 +134,15 @@ int lima_sched_task_init(struct lima_sched_task *task, task->num_bos = num_bos; task->vm = lima_vm_get(vm); - xa_init_flags(&task->deps, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC); - return 0; } void lima_sched_task_fini(struct lima_sched_task *task) { - struct dma_fence *fence; - unsigned long index; int i; drm_sched_job_cleanup(&task->base); - xa_for_each(&task->deps, index, fence) { - dma_fence_put(fence); - } - xa_destroy(&task->deps); - if (task->bos) { for (i = 0; i < task->num_bos; i++) drm_gem_object_put(&task->bos[i]->base.base); @@ -186,17 +177,6 @@ struct dma_fence *lima_sched_context_queue_task(struct lima_sched_task *task) return fence; } -static struct dma_fence *lima_sched_dependency(struct drm_sched_job *job, - struct drm_sched_entity *entity) -{ - struct lima_sched_task *task = to_lima_task(job); - - if (!xa_empty(&task->deps)) - return xa_erase(&task->deps, task->last_dep++); - - return NULL; -} - static int lima_pm_busy(struct lima_device *ldev) { int ret; @@ -472,7 +452,6 @@ static void lima_sched_free_job(struct drm_sched_job *job) } static const struct drm_sched_backend_ops lima_sched_ops = { - .dependency = lima_sched_dependency, .run_job = lima_sched_run_job, .timedout_job = lima_sched_timedout_job, .free_job = lima_sched_free_job, diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h index ac70006b0e26..6a11764d87b3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h @@ -23,9 +23,6 @@ struct lima_sched_task { struct lima_vm *vm; void *frame; - struct xarray deps; - unsigned long last_dep; - struct lima_bo **bos; int num_bos; -- 2.32.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> To: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org> Cc: "Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>, "Qiang Yu" <yuq825@gmail.com>, "Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>, "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>, lima@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 08/20] drm/lima: use scheduler dependency tracking Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 12:46:53 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210805104705.862416-9-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210805104705.862416-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Nothing special going on here. Aside reviewing the code, it seems like drm_sched_job_arm() should be moved into lima_sched_context_queue_task and put under some mutex together with drm_sched_push_job(). See the kerneldoc for drm_sched_push_job(). v2: Rebase over renamed functions to add dependencies. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Cc: Qiang Yu <yuq825@gmail.com> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: lima@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c | 6 ++++-- drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c | 21 --------------------- drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h | 3 --- 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c index c528f40981bb..640acc060467 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c @@ -267,7 +267,9 @@ static int lima_gem_sync_bo(struct lima_sched_task *task, struct lima_bo *bo, if (explicit) return 0; - return drm_gem_fence_array_add_implicit(&task->deps, &bo->base.base, write); + return drm_sched_job_add_implicit_dependencies(&task->base, + &bo->base.base, + write); } static int lima_gem_add_deps(struct drm_file *file, struct lima_submit *submit) @@ -285,7 +287,7 @@ static int lima_gem_add_deps(struct drm_file *file, struct lima_submit *submit) if (err) return err; - err = drm_gem_fence_array_add(&submit->task->deps, fence); + err = drm_sched_job_add_dependency(&submit->task->base, fence); if (err) { dma_fence_put(fence); return err; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c index e968b5a8f0b0..99d5f6f1a882 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c @@ -134,24 +134,15 @@ int lima_sched_task_init(struct lima_sched_task *task, task->num_bos = num_bos; task->vm = lima_vm_get(vm); - xa_init_flags(&task->deps, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC); - return 0; } void lima_sched_task_fini(struct lima_sched_task *task) { - struct dma_fence *fence; - unsigned long index; int i; drm_sched_job_cleanup(&task->base); - xa_for_each(&task->deps, index, fence) { - dma_fence_put(fence); - } - xa_destroy(&task->deps); - if (task->bos) { for (i = 0; i < task->num_bos; i++) drm_gem_object_put(&task->bos[i]->base.base); @@ -186,17 +177,6 @@ struct dma_fence *lima_sched_context_queue_task(struct lima_sched_task *task) return fence; } -static struct dma_fence *lima_sched_dependency(struct drm_sched_job *job, - struct drm_sched_entity *entity) -{ - struct lima_sched_task *task = to_lima_task(job); - - if (!xa_empty(&task->deps)) - return xa_erase(&task->deps, task->last_dep++); - - return NULL; -} - static int lima_pm_busy(struct lima_device *ldev) { int ret; @@ -472,7 +452,6 @@ static void lima_sched_free_job(struct drm_sched_job *job) } static const struct drm_sched_backend_ops lima_sched_ops = { - .dependency = lima_sched_dependency, .run_job = lima_sched_run_job, .timedout_job = lima_sched_timedout_job, .free_job = lima_sched_free_job, diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h index ac70006b0e26..6a11764d87b3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h @@ -23,9 +23,6 @@ struct lima_sched_task { struct lima_vm *vm; void *frame; - struct xarray deps; - unsigned long last_dep; - struct lima_bo **bos; int num_bos; -- 2.32.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-05 10:47 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 122+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-08-05 10:46 [PATCH v5 00/20] drm/sched dependency handling and implicit sync fixes Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 01/20] drm/sched: Split drm_sched_job_init Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 13:43 ` Christian König 2021-08-05 13:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König 2021-08-05 14:07 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 14:07 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 14:47 ` Christian König 2021-08-05 14:47 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König 2021-08-05 15:07 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 15:07 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-17 8:49 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-17 8:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 02/20] drm/msm: Fix drm/sched point of no return rules Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 23:02 ` Rob Clark 2021-08-05 23:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Rob Clark 2021-08-06 16:41 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-08-06 16:41 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-06 17:19 ` Rob Clark 2021-08-06 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] " Rob Clark 2021-08-06 18:41 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-08-06 18:41 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-06 19:01 ` Rob Clark 2021-08-06 19:01 ` [Intel-gfx] " Rob Clark 2021-08-06 19:10 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-08-06 19:10 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-06 19:59 ` Rob Clark 2021-08-06 19:59 ` [Intel-gfx] " Rob Clark 2021-08-17 8:53 ` [PATCH] drm/msm: Improve " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-17 8:53 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-26 9:33 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-08-26 9:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-26 15:38 ` Rob Clark 2021-08-26 15:38 ` Rob Clark 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 03/20] drm/sched: Barriers are needed for entity->last_scheduled Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 13:45 ` Christian König 2021-08-05 13:45 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 04/20] drm/sched: Add dependency tracking Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 13:47 ` Christian König 2021-08-05 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 05/20] drm/sched: drop entity parameter from drm_sched_push_job Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 13:48 ` Christian König 2021-08-05 13:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 06/20] drm/sched: improve docs around drm_sched_entity Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 07/20] drm/panfrost: use scheduler dependency tracking Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 15:10 ` Alyssa Rosenzweig 2021-08-05 15:10 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alyssa Rosenzweig 2021-08-05 10:46 ` Daniel Vetter [this message] 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 08/20] drm/lima: " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-12 19:28 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-08-12 19:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-14 2:45 ` Qiang Yu 2021-08-14 2:45 ` [Intel-gfx] " Qiang Yu 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 09/20] drm/v3d: Move drm_sched_job_init to v3d_job_init Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 10/20] drm/v3d: Use scheduler dependency handling Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 11/20] drm/etnaviv: " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-12 19:28 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-08-12 19:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 12/20] drm/msm: " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-12 19:29 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-08-12 19:29 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-26 16:12 ` Rob Clark 2021-08-26 16:12 ` [Intel-gfx] " Rob Clark 2021-08-30 9:01 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-08-30 9:01 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 13/20] drm/gem: Delete gem array fencing helpers Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-12 19:29 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-08-12 19:29 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 14/20] drm/sched: Don't store self-dependencies Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:46 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 13:18 ` Christian König 2021-08-05 13:18 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König 2021-08-05 13:25 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 13:25 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 13:57 ` Christian König 2021-08-05 13:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König 2021-08-05 15:06 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 15:06 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:47 ` [PATCH v5 15/20] drm/sched: Check locking in drm_sched_job_await_implicit Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:47 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 13:19 ` Christian König 2021-08-05 13:19 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König 2021-08-05 13:27 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 13:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:47 ` [PATCH v5 16/20] drm/msm: Don't break exclusive fence ordering Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:47 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-26 16:16 ` Rob Clark 2021-08-26 16:16 ` [Intel-gfx] " Rob Clark 2021-08-26 16:16 ` Rob Clark 2021-08-30 9:02 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-08-30 9:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:47 ` [PATCH v5 17/20] drm/etnaviv: " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:47 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:47 ` [PATCH v5 18/20] drm/i915: delete exclude argument from i915_sw_fence_await_reservation Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:47 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:47 ` [PATCH v5 19/20] drm/i915: Don't break exclusive fence ordering Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:47 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:47 ` [PATCH v5 20/20] dma-resv: Give the docs a do-over Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 10:47 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-30 19:38 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-08-30 19:38 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-08-05 13:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/sched dependency handling and implicit sync fixes Patchwork 2021-08-05 14:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork 2021-08-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/sched dependency handling and implicit sync fixes (rev2) Patchwork 2021-08-17 16:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/sched dependency handling and implicit sync fixes (rev4) Patchwork 2021-08-17 16:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork 2021-08-17 18:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork 2021-08-26 13:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/sched dependency handling and implicit sync fixes (rev5) Patchwork 2021-08-26 13:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork 2021-08-26 21:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210805104705.862416-9-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \ --to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \ --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \ --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=lima@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \ --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \ --cc=yuq825@gmail.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.