All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Simon Xue <xxm@rock-chips.com>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: adc: rockchip_saradc: add voltage notifier so get referenced voltage once at probe
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 17:48:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210808174826.7b82b7bf@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210806105524.231838-1-xxm@rock-chips.com>

On Fri,  6 Aug 2021 18:55:24 +0800
Simon Xue <xxm@rock-chips.com> wrote:

> From: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
> 
> Add voltage notifier, no need to query regulator voltage for
> every saradc read, just get regulator voltage once at probe.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Xue <xxm@rock-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>

Looks like Andy's v1 reviews crossed with your v2.
Given you are going to be doing a v3 because of signed-off-by ordering as per Andy's
comments please tidy up the other thing he mentioned (repeated below).

Otherwise looks good to me.

Thanks,

Jonathan


> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/rockchip_saradc.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/rockchip_saradc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/rockchip_saradc.c
> index f3eb8d2e50dc..295da1ad6edb 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/rockchip_saradc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/rockchip_saradc.c
> @@ -49,10 +49,12 @@ struct rockchip_saradc {
>  	struct clk		*clk;
>  	struct completion	completion;
>  	struct regulator	*vref;
> +	int			uv_vref;
>  	struct reset_control	*reset;
>  	const struct rockchip_saradc_data *data;
>  	u16			last_val;
>  	const struct iio_chan_spec *last_chan;
> +	struct notifier_block nb;
>  };
>  
>  static void rockchip_saradc_power_down(struct rockchip_saradc *info)
> @@ -105,13 +107,7 @@ static int rockchip_saradc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  		mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
>  		return IIO_VAL_INT;
>  	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> -		ret = regulator_get_voltage(info->vref);
> -		if (ret < 0) {
> -			dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "failed to get voltage\n");
> -			return ret;
> -		}
> -
> -		*val = ret / 1000;
> +		*val = info->uv_vref / 1000;
>  		*val2 = chan->scan_type.realbits;
>  		return IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2;
>  	default:
> @@ -298,6 +294,26 @@ static irqreturn_t rockchip_saradc_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> +static int rockchip_saradc_volt_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
> +						   unsigned long event,
> +						   void *data)
> +{
> +	struct rockchip_saradc *info =
> +			container_of(nb, struct rockchip_saradc, nb);
> +
> +	if (event & REGULATOR_EVENT_VOLTAGE_CHANGE)
> +		info->uv_vref = (unsigned long)data;
> +
> +	return NOTIFY_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static void rockchip_saradc_regulator_action(void *data)
> +{
> +	struct rockchip_saradc *info = data;
> +
> +	regulator_unregister_notifier(info->vref, &info->nb);
> +}
> +
>  static int rockchip_saradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct rockchip_saradc *info = NULL;
> @@ -410,6 +426,13 @@ static int rockchip_saradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> +	info->uv_vref = regulator_get_voltage(info->vref);
> +	if (info->uv_vref < 0) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get voltage\n");
> +		ret = info->uv_vref;
> +		return ret;
> +	}

Andy suggested a cleaner form of this (which I also prefer) is

	ret = regulator_get_voltage(info->vref);
	if (ret < 0)
		return ret;

	info->uv_vref = ret;

> +
>  	ret = clk_prepare_enable(info->pclk);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable pclk\n");
> @@ -450,6 +473,16 @@ static int rockchip_saradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> +	info->nb.notifier_call = rockchip_saradc_volt_notify;
> +	ret = regulator_register_notifier(info->vref, &info->nb);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev,
> +				       rockchip_saradc_regulator_action, info);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	return devm_iio_device_register(&pdev->dev, indio_dev);
>  }
>  


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Simon Xue <xxm@rock-chips.com>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: adc: rockchip_saradc: add voltage notifier so get referenced voltage once at probe
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 17:48:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210808174826.7b82b7bf@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210806105524.231838-1-xxm@rock-chips.com>

On Fri,  6 Aug 2021 18:55:24 +0800
Simon Xue <xxm@rock-chips.com> wrote:

> From: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
> 
> Add voltage notifier, no need to query regulator voltage for
> every saradc read, just get regulator voltage once at probe.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Xue <xxm@rock-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>

Looks like Andy's v1 reviews crossed with your v2.
Given you are going to be doing a v3 because of signed-off-by ordering as per Andy's
comments please tidy up the other thing he mentioned (repeated below).

Otherwise looks good to me.

Thanks,

Jonathan


> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/rockchip_saradc.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/rockchip_saradc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/rockchip_saradc.c
> index f3eb8d2e50dc..295da1ad6edb 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/rockchip_saradc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/rockchip_saradc.c
> @@ -49,10 +49,12 @@ struct rockchip_saradc {
>  	struct clk		*clk;
>  	struct completion	completion;
>  	struct regulator	*vref;
> +	int			uv_vref;
>  	struct reset_control	*reset;
>  	const struct rockchip_saradc_data *data;
>  	u16			last_val;
>  	const struct iio_chan_spec *last_chan;
> +	struct notifier_block nb;
>  };
>  
>  static void rockchip_saradc_power_down(struct rockchip_saradc *info)
> @@ -105,13 +107,7 @@ static int rockchip_saradc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  		mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
>  		return IIO_VAL_INT;
>  	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> -		ret = regulator_get_voltage(info->vref);
> -		if (ret < 0) {
> -			dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "failed to get voltage\n");
> -			return ret;
> -		}
> -
> -		*val = ret / 1000;
> +		*val = info->uv_vref / 1000;
>  		*val2 = chan->scan_type.realbits;
>  		return IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2;
>  	default:
> @@ -298,6 +294,26 @@ static irqreturn_t rockchip_saradc_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> +static int rockchip_saradc_volt_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
> +						   unsigned long event,
> +						   void *data)
> +{
> +	struct rockchip_saradc *info =
> +			container_of(nb, struct rockchip_saradc, nb);
> +
> +	if (event & REGULATOR_EVENT_VOLTAGE_CHANGE)
> +		info->uv_vref = (unsigned long)data;
> +
> +	return NOTIFY_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static void rockchip_saradc_regulator_action(void *data)
> +{
> +	struct rockchip_saradc *info = data;
> +
> +	regulator_unregister_notifier(info->vref, &info->nb);
> +}
> +
>  static int rockchip_saradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct rockchip_saradc *info = NULL;
> @@ -410,6 +426,13 @@ static int rockchip_saradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> +	info->uv_vref = regulator_get_voltage(info->vref);
> +	if (info->uv_vref < 0) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get voltage\n");
> +		ret = info->uv_vref;
> +		return ret;
> +	}

Andy suggested a cleaner form of this (which I also prefer) is

	ret = regulator_get_voltage(info->vref);
	if (ret < 0)
		return ret;

	info->uv_vref = ret;

> +
>  	ret = clk_prepare_enable(info->pclk);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable pclk\n");
> @@ -450,6 +473,16 @@ static int rockchip_saradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> +	info->nb.notifier_call = rockchip_saradc_volt_notify;
> +	ret = regulator_register_notifier(info->vref, &info->nb);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev,
> +				       rockchip_saradc_regulator_action, info);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	return devm_iio_device_register(&pdev->dev, indio_dev);
>  }
>  


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-08 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-06 10:55 [PATCH v2] iio: adc: rockchip_saradc: add voltage notifier so get referenced voltage once at probe Simon Xue
2021-08-06 10:55 ` Simon Xue
2021-08-06 11:06 ` Heiko Stübner
2021-08-06 11:06   ` Heiko Stübner
2021-08-07 10:36 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-07 10:36   ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-08 16:48 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2021-08-08 16:48   ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210808174826.7b82b7bf@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=david.wu@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=jbx6244@gmail.com \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=xxm@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.