All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ebiederm@xmission.com,
	willy@infradead.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
	ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, luto@kernel.org, bfields@fieldses.org,
	w@1wt.eu, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] fs: warn about impending deprecation of mandatory locks
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 12:08:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210820120848.5692d25a@oasis.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0f4f3e65-1d2d-e512-2a6f-d7d63effc479@redhat.com>

On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 17:52:19 +0200
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:

> > +static bool warned_mand;
> >   static inline bool may_mandlock(void)
> >   {
> > +	if (!warned_mand) {
> > +		warned_mand = true;
> > +		pr_warn("======================================================\n");
> > +		pr_warn("WARNING: the mand mount option is being deprecated and\n");
> > +		pr_warn("         will be removed in v5.15!\n");
> > +		pr_warn("======================================================\n");
> > +	}  
> 
> Is there a reason not to use pr_warn_once() ?

You would need a single call though, otherwise each pr_warn_once()
would have its own state that it warned once.

	const char warning[] =
		"======================================================\n"
		"WARNING: the mand mount option is being deprecated and\n"
		"         will be removed in v5.15!\n"
		"======================================================\n";

	pr_warn_once(warning);

-- Steve

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, bfields@fieldses.org,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, w@1wt.eu, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, luto@kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
	ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] fs: warn about impending deprecation of mandatory locks
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 12:08:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210820120848.5692d25a@oasis.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0f4f3e65-1d2d-e512-2a6f-d7d63effc479@redhat.com>

On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 17:52:19 +0200
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:

> > +static bool warned_mand;
> >   static inline bool may_mandlock(void)
> >   {
> > +	if (!warned_mand) {
> > +		warned_mand = true;
> > +		pr_warn("======================================================\n");
> > +		pr_warn("WARNING: the mand mount option is being deprecated and\n");
> > +		pr_warn("         will be removed in v5.15!\n");
> > +		pr_warn("======================================================\n");
> > +	}  
> 
> Is there a reason not to use pr_warn_once() ?

You would need a single call though, otherwise each pr_warn_once()
would have its own state that it warned once.

	const char warning[] =
		"======================================================\n"
		"WARNING: the mand mount option is being deprecated and\n"
		"         will be removed in v5.15!\n"
		"======================================================\n";

	pr_warn_once(warning);

-- Steve

_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-devel mailing list
Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] fs: warn about impending deprecation of mandatory locks
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 12:08:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210820120848.5692d25a@oasis.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0f4f3e65-1d2d-e512-2a6f-d7d63effc479@redhat.com>

On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 17:52:19 +0200
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:

> > +static bool warned_mand;
> >   static inline bool may_mandlock(void)
> >   {
> > +	if (!warned_mand) {
> > +		warned_mand = true;
> > +		pr_warn("======================================================\n");
> > +		pr_warn("WARNING: the mand mount option is being deprecated and\n");
> > +		pr_warn("         will be removed in v5.15!\n");
> > +		pr_warn("======================================================\n");
> > +	}  
> 
> Is there a reason not to use pr_warn_once() ?

You would need a single call though, otherwise each pr_warn_once()
would have its own state that it warned once.

	const char warning[] =
		"======================================================\n"
		"WARNING: the mand mount option is being deprecated and\n"
		"         will be removed in v5.15!\n"
		"======================================================\n";

	pr_warn_once(warning);

-- Steve



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-20 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-20 13:57 [PATCH v2 0/2] fs: remove support for mandatory locking Jeff Layton
2021-08-20 13:57 ` [Cluster-devel] " Jeff Layton
2021-08-20 13:57 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Jeff Layton
2021-08-20 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] fs: warn about impending deprecation of mandatory locks Jeff Layton
2021-08-20 13:57   ` [Cluster-devel] " Jeff Layton
2021-08-20 13:57   ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Jeff Layton
2021-08-20 15:49   ` David Laight
2021-08-20 15:49     ` [Cluster-devel] " David Laight
2021-08-20 15:49     ` David Laight
2021-08-20 15:49     ` [Ocfs2-devel] " David Laight
2021-08-20 15:50     ` Jeff Layton
2021-08-20 15:50       ` [Cluster-devel] " Jeff Layton
2021-08-20 15:50       ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Jeff Layton
2021-08-20 15:50       ` Jeff Layton
2021-08-20 15:52   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-20 15:52     ` [Cluster-devel] " David Hildenbrand
2021-08-20 15:52     ` [Ocfs2-devel] " David Hildenbrand
2021-08-20 16:06     ` Jeff Layton
2021-08-20 16:06       ` [Cluster-devel] " Jeff Layton
2021-08-20 16:06       ` Jeff Layton
2021-08-20 16:06       ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Jeff Layton
2021-08-20 16:08     ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2021-08-20 16:08       ` [Cluster-devel] " Steven Rostedt
2021-08-20 16:08       ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Steven Rostedt
2021-08-20 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] fs: remove mandatory file locking support Jeff Layton
2021-08-20 13:57   ` [Cluster-devel] " Jeff Layton
2021-08-20 13:57   ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Jeff Layton
2021-08-20 14:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] fs: remove support for mandatory locking J. Bruce Fields
2021-08-20 14:09   ` [Cluster-devel] " J. Bruce Fields
2021-08-20 14:09   ` [Ocfs2-devel] " J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210820120848.5692d25a@oasis.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.