All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
To: maz@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, will@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 15/39] drivers/perf: Expose the cpumask of CPUs that support SPE
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 17:17:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210825161815.266051-16-alexandru.elisei@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210825161815.266051-1-alexandru.elisei@arm.com>

KVM SPE emulation will require the list of CPUs that have hardware support
for SPE. Add a function that returns the cpumask of supported CPUs
discovered by the driver during probing.

CC: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
---
 drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c   | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------
 include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h |  7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
index d44bcc29d99c..40749665f102 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
@@ -50,7 +50,6 @@ struct arm_spe_pmu_buf {
 struct arm_spe_pmu {
 	struct pmu				pmu;
 	struct platform_device			*pdev;
-	cpumask_t				supported_cpus;
 	struct hlist_node			hotplug_node;
 
 	int					irq; /* PPI */
@@ -72,6 +71,8 @@ struct arm_spe_pmu {
 	struct perf_output_handle __percpu	*handle;
 };
 
+static cpumask_t supported_cpus;
+
 #define to_spe_pmu(p) (container_of(p, struct arm_spe_pmu, pmu))
 
 /* Convert a free-running index from perf into an SPE buffer offset */
@@ -234,9 +235,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group arm_spe_pmu_format_group = {
 static ssize_t cpumask_show(struct device *dev,
 			    struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
 {
-	struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
-
-	return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus);
+	return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &supported_cpus);
 }
 static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(cpumask);
 
@@ -677,7 +676,7 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
 	if (event->cpu >= 0 &&
-	    !cpumask_test_cpu(event->cpu, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus))
+	    !cpumask_test_cpu(event->cpu, &supported_cpus))
 		return -ENOENT;
 
 	if (arm_spe_event_to_pmsevfr(event) & arm_spe_pmsevfr_res0(spe_pmu->pmsver))
@@ -797,11 +796,10 @@ static void arm_spe_pmu_stop(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
 static int arm_spe_pmu_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
-	struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu = to_spe_pmu(event->pmu);
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
 	int cpu = event->cpu == -1 ? smp_processor_id() : event->cpu;
 
-	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus))
+	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &supported_cpus))
 		return -ENOENT;
 
 	hwc->state = PERF_HES_UPTODATE | PERF_HES_STOPPED;
@@ -883,6 +881,13 @@ static void arm_spe_pmu_free_aux(void *aux)
 	kfree(buf);
 }
 
+#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_ARM_SPE_PMU)
+const cpumask_t *arm_spe_pmu_supported_cpus(void)
+{
+	return &supported_cpus;
+}
+#endif
+
 /* Initialisation and teardown functions */
 static int arm_spe_pmu_perf_init(struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu)
 {
@@ -1039,7 +1044,7 @@ static void __arm_spe_pmu_dev_probe(void *info)
 
 	dev_info(dev,
 		 "probed for CPUs %*pbl [max_record_sz %u, align %u, features 0x%llx]\n",
-		 cpumask_pr_args(&spe_pmu->supported_cpus),
+		 cpumask_pr_args(&supported_cpus),
 		 spe_pmu->max_record_sz, spe_pmu->align, spe_pmu->features);
 
 	spe_pmu->features |= SPE_PMU_FEAT_DEV_PROBED;
@@ -1083,7 +1088,7 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_cpu_startup(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
 	struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu;
 
 	spe_pmu = hlist_entry_safe(node, struct arm_spe_pmu, hotplug_node);
-	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus))
+	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &supported_cpus))
 		return 0;
 
 	__arm_spe_pmu_setup_one(spe_pmu);
@@ -1095,7 +1100,7 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_cpu_teardown(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
 	struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu;
 
 	spe_pmu = hlist_entry_safe(node, struct arm_spe_pmu, hotplug_node);
-	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus))
+	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &supported_cpus))
 		return 0;
 
 	__arm_spe_pmu_stop_one(spe_pmu);
@@ -1105,7 +1110,7 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_cpu_teardown(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
 static int arm_spe_pmu_dev_init(struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu)
 {
 	int ret;
-	cpumask_t *mask = &spe_pmu->supported_cpus;
+	cpumask_t *mask = &supported_cpus;
 
 	/* Make sure we probe the hardware on a relevant CPU */
 	ret = smp_call_function_any(mask,  __arm_spe_pmu_dev_probe, spe_pmu, 1);
@@ -1151,7 +1156,7 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_irq_probe(struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	if (irq_get_percpu_devid_partition(irq, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus)) {
+	if (irq_get_percpu_devid_partition(irq, &supported_cpus)) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get PPI partition (%d)\n", irq);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -1216,6 +1221,7 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	arm_spe_pmu_dev_teardown(spe_pmu);
 out_free_handle:
 	free_percpu(spe_pmu->handle);
+	cpumask_clear(&supported_cpus);
 	return ret;
 }
 
diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
index 505480217cf1..3121d95c575b 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
 #ifndef __ARM_PMU_H__
 #define __ARM_PMU_H__
 
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/perf_event.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
@@ -177,4 +178,10 @@ void armpmu_free_irq(int irq, int cpu);
 
 #define ARMV8_SPE_PDEV_NAME "arm,spe-v1"
 
+#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_ARM_SPE_PMU)
+extern const cpumask_t *arm_spe_pmu_supported_cpus(void);
+#else
+static inline const cpumask_t *arm_spe_pmu_supported_cpus(void) { return NULL; };
+#endif
+
 #endif /* __ARM_PMU_H__ */
-- 
2.33.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
To: maz@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, will@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 15/39] drivers/perf: Expose the cpumask of CPUs that support SPE
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 17:17:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210825161815.266051-16-alexandru.elisei@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210825161815.266051-1-alexandru.elisei@arm.com>

KVM SPE emulation will require the list of CPUs that have hardware support
for SPE. Add a function that returns the cpumask of supported CPUs
discovered by the driver during probing.

CC: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
---
 drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c   | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------
 include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h |  7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
index d44bcc29d99c..40749665f102 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
@@ -50,7 +50,6 @@ struct arm_spe_pmu_buf {
 struct arm_spe_pmu {
 	struct pmu				pmu;
 	struct platform_device			*pdev;
-	cpumask_t				supported_cpus;
 	struct hlist_node			hotplug_node;
 
 	int					irq; /* PPI */
@@ -72,6 +71,8 @@ struct arm_spe_pmu {
 	struct perf_output_handle __percpu	*handle;
 };
 
+static cpumask_t supported_cpus;
+
 #define to_spe_pmu(p) (container_of(p, struct arm_spe_pmu, pmu))
 
 /* Convert a free-running index from perf into an SPE buffer offset */
@@ -234,9 +235,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group arm_spe_pmu_format_group = {
 static ssize_t cpumask_show(struct device *dev,
 			    struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
 {
-	struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
-
-	return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus);
+	return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &supported_cpus);
 }
 static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(cpumask);
 
@@ -677,7 +676,7 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
 	if (event->cpu >= 0 &&
-	    !cpumask_test_cpu(event->cpu, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus))
+	    !cpumask_test_cpu(event->cpu, &supported_cpus))
 		return -ENOENT;
 
 	if (arm_spe_event_to_pmsevfr(event) & arm_spe_pmsevfr_res0(spe_pmu->pmsver))
@@ -797,11 +796,10 @@ static void arm_spe_pmu_stop(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
 static int arm_spe_pmu_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
-	struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu = to_spe_pmu(event->pmu);
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
 	int cpu = event->cpu == -1 ? smp_processor_id() : event->cpu;
 
-	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus))
+	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &supported_cpus))
 		return -ENOENT;
 
 	hwc->state = PERF_HES_UPTODATE | PERF_HES_STOPPED;
@@ -883,6 +881,13 @@ static void arm_spe_pmu_free_aux(void *aux)
 	kfree(buf);
 }
 
+#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_ARM_SPE_PMU)
+const cpumask_t *arm_spe_pmu_supported_cpus(void)
+{
+	return &supported_cpus;
+}
+#endif
+
 /* Initialisation and teardown functions */
 static int arm_spe_pmu_perf_init(struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu)
 {
@@ -1039,7 +1044,7 @@ static void __arm_spe_pmu_dev_probe(void *info)
 
 	dev_info(dev,
 		 "probed for CPUs %*pbl [max_record_sz %u, align %u, features 0x%llx]\n",
-		 cpumask_pr_args(&spe_pmu->supported_cpus),
+		 cpumask_pr_args(&supported_cpus),
 		 spe_pmu->max_record_sz, spe_pmu->align, spe_pmu->features);
 
 	spe_pmu->features |= SPE_PMU_FEAT_DEV_PROBED;
@@ -1083,7 +1088,7 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_cpu_startup(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
 	struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu;
 
 	spe_pmu = hlist_entry_safe(node, struct arm_spe_pmu, hotplug_node);
-	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus))
+	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &supported_cpus))
 		return 0;
 
 	__arm_spe_pmu_setup_one(spe_pmu);
@@ -1095,7 +1100,7 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_cpu_teardown(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
 	struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu;
 
 	spe_pmu = hlist_entry_safe(node, struct arm_spe_pmu, hotplug_node);
-	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus))
+	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &supported_cpus))
 		return 0;
 
 	__arm_spe_pmu_stop_one(spe_pmu);
@@ -1105,7 +1110,7 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_cpu_teardown(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
 static int arm_spe_pmu_dev_init(struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu)
 {
 	int ret;
-	cpumask_t *mask = &spe_pmu->supported_cpus;
+	cpumask_t *mask = &supported_cpus;
 
 	/* Make sure we probe the hardware on a relevant CPU */
 	ret = smp_call_function_any(mask,  __arm_spe_pmu_dev_probe, spe_pmu, 1);
@@ -1151,7 +1156,7 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_irq_probe(struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	if (irq_get_percpu_devid_partition(irq, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus)) {
+	if (irq_get_percpu_devid_partition(irq, &supported_cpus)) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get PPI partition (%d)\n", irq);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -1216,6 +1221,7 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	arm_spe_pmu_dev_teardown(spe_pmu);
 out_free_handle:
 	free_percpu(spe_pmu->handle);
+	cpumask_clear(&supported_cpus);
 	return ret;
 }
 
diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
index 505480217cf1..3121d95c575b 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
 #ifndef __ARM_PMU_H__
 #define __ARM_PMU_H__
 
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/perf_event.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
@@ -177,4 +178,10 @@ void armpmu_free_irq(int irq, int cpu);
 
 #define ARMV8_SPE_PDEV_NAME "arm,spe-v1"
 
+#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_ARM_SPE_PMU)
+extern const cpumask_t *arm_spe_pmu_supported_cpus(void);
+#else
+static inline const cpumask_t *arm_spe_pmu_supported_cpus(void) { return NULL; };
+#endif
+
 #endif /* __ARM_PMU_H__ */
-- 
2.33.0

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
To: maz@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, will@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 15/39] drivers/perf: Expose the cpumask of CPUs that support SPE
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 17:17:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210825161815.266051-16-alexandru.elisei@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210825161815.266051-1-alexandru.elisei@arm.com>

KVM SPE emulation will require the list of CPUs that have hardware support
for SPE. Add a function that returns the cpumask of supported CPUs
discovered by the driver during probing.

CC: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
---
 drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c   | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------
 include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h |  7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
index d44bcc29d99c..40749665f102 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
@@ -50,7 +50,6 @@ struct arm_spe_pmu_buf {
 struct arm_spe_pmu {
 	struct pmu				pmu;
 	struct platform_device			*pdev;
-	cpumask_t				supported_cpus;
 	struct hlist_node			hotplug_node;
 
 	int					irq; /* PPI */
@@ -72,6 +71,8 @@ struct arm_spe_pmu {
 	struct perf_output_handle __percpu	*handle;
 };
 
+static cpumask_t supported_cpus;
+
 #define to_spe_pmu(p) (container_of(p, struct arm_spe_pmu, pmu))
 
 /* Convert a free-running index from perf into an SPE buffer offset */
@@ -234,9 +235,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group arm_spe_pmu_format_group = {
 static ssize_t cpumask_show(struct device *dev,
 			    struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
 {
-	struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
-
-	return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus);
+	return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &supported_cpus);
 }
 static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(cpumask);
 
@@ -677,7 +676,7 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
 	if (event->cpu >= 0 &&
-	    !cpumask_test_cpu(event->cpu, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus))
+	    !cpumask_test_cpu(event->cpu, &supported_cpus))
 		return -ENOENT;
 
 	if (arm_spe_event_to_pmsevfr(event) & arm_spe_pmsevfr_res0(spe_pmu->pmsver))
@@ -797,11 +796,10 @@ static void arm_spe_pmu_stop(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
 static int arm_spe_pmu_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
-	struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu = to_spe_pmu(event->pmu);
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
 	int cpu = event->cpu == -1 ? smp_processor_id() : event->cpu;
 
-	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus))
+	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &supported_cpus))
 		return -ENOENT;
 
 	hwc->state = PERF_HES_UPTODATE | PERF_HES_STOPPED;
@@ -883,6 +881,13 @@ static void arm_spe_pmu_free_aux(void *aux)
 	kfree(buf);
 }
 
+#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_ARM_SPE_PMU)
+const cpumask_t *arm_spe_pmu_supported_cpus(void)
+{
+	return &supported_cpus;
+}
+#endif
+
 /* Initialisation and teardown functions */
 static int arm_spe_pmu_perf_init(struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu)
 {
@@ -1039,7 +1044,7 @@ static void __arm_spe_pmu_dev_probe(void *info)
 
 	dev_info(dev,
 		 "probed for CPUs %*pbl [max_record_sz %u, align %u, features 0x%llx]\n",
-		 cpumask_pr_args(&spe_pmu->supported_cpus),
+		 cpumask_pr_args(&supported_cpus),
 		 spe_pmu->max_record_sz, spe_pmu->align, spe_pmu->features);
 
 	spe_pmu->features |= SPE_PMU_FEAT_DEV_PROBED;
@@ -1083,7 +1088,7 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_cpu_startup(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
 	struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu;
 
 	spe_pmu = hlist_entry_safe(node, struct arm_spe_pmu, hotplug_node);
-	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus))
+	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &supported_cpus))
 		return 0;
 
 	__arm_spe_pmu_setup_one(spe_pmu);
@@ -1095,7 +1100,7 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_cpu_teardown(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
 	struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu;
 
 	spe_pmu = hlist_entry_safe(node, struct arm_spe_pmu, hotplug_node);
-	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus))
+	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &supported_cpus))
 		return 0;
 
 	__arm_spe_pmu_stop_one(spe_pmu);
@@ -1105,7 +1110,7 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_cpu_teardown(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
 static int arm_spe_pmu_dev_init(struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu)
 {
 	int ret;
-	cpumask_t *mask = &spe_pmu->supported_cpus;
+	cpumask_t *mask = &supported_cpus;
 
 	/* Make sure we probe the hardware on a relevant CPU */
 	ret = smp_call_function_any(mask,  __arm_spe_pmu_dev_probe, spe_pmu, 1);
@@ -1151,7 +1156,7 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_irq_probe(struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	if (irq_get_percpu_devid_partition(irq, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus)) {
+	if (irq_get_percpu_devid_partition(irq, &supported_cpus)) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get PPI partition (%d)\n", irq);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -1216,6 +1221,7 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	arm_spe_pmu_dev_teardown(spe_pmu);
 out_free_handle:
 	free_percpu(spe_pmu->handle);
+	cpumask_clear(&supported_cpus);
 	return ret;
 }
 
diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
index 505480217cf1..3121d95c575b 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
 #ifndef __ARM_PMU_H__
 #define __ARM_PMU_H__
 
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/perf_event.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
@@ -177,4 +178,10 @@ void armpmu_free_irq(int irq, int cpu);
 
 #define ARMV8_SPE_PDEV_NAME "arm,spe-v1"
 
+#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_ARM_SPE_PMU)
+extern const cpumask_t *arm_spe_pmu_supported_cpus(void);
+#else
+static inline const cpumask_t *arm_spe_pmu_supported_cpus(void) { return NULL; };
+#endif
+
 #endif /* __ARM_PMU_H__ */
-- 
2.33.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-25 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 141+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-25 16:17 [RFC PATCH v4 00/39] KVM: arm64: Add Statistical Profiling Extension (SPE) support Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/39] KVM: arm64: Make lock_all_vcpus() available to the rest of KVM Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-09-22 10:39   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-09-22 10:39     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-09-22 10:39     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-08-25 16:17 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/39] KVM: arm64: Add lock/unlock memslot user API Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-10-18  9:04   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-10-18  9:04     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-10-18  9:04     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-10-18 14:09     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-10-18 14:09       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-10-18 14:09       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/39] KVM: arm64: Implement the memslot lock/unlock functionality Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/39] KVM: arm64: Defer CMOs for locked memslots until a VCPU is run Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-10-17 11:43   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-17 11:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-17 11:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 12:56     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-10-18 12:56       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-10-18 12:56       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/39] KVM: arm64: Perform CMOs on locked memslots when userspace resets VCPUs Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/39] KVM: arm64: Delay tag scrubbing for locked memslots until a VCPU runs Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/39] KVM: arm64: Unlock memslots after stage 2 tables are freed Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/39] KVM: arm64: Deny changes to locked memslots Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/39] KVM: Add kvm_warn{,_ratelimited} macros Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/39] KVM: arm64: Print a warning for unexpected faults on locked memslots Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/39] KVM: arm64: Allow userspace to lock and unlock memslots Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/39] KVM: arm64: Add the KVM_ARM_VCPU_SUPPORTED_CPUS VCPU ioctl Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/39] KVM: arm64: Add CONFIG_KVM_ARM_SPE Kconfig option Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/39] KVM: arm64: Add SPE capability and VCPU feature Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17 ` Alexandru Elisei [this message]
2021-08-25 16:17   ` [RFC PATCH v4 15/39] drivers/perf: Expose the cpumask of CPUs that support SPE Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17 ` [RFC PATCH v4 16/39] KVM: arm64: Make SPE available when at least one CPU supports it Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17 ` [RFC PATCH v4 17/39] KVM: arm64: Set the VCPU SPE feature bit when SPE is available Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17 ` [RFC PATCH v4 18/39] KVM: arm64: Expose SPE version to guests Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17 ` [RFC PATCH v4 19/39] KVM: arm64: Do not emulate SPE on CPUs which don't have SPE Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17 ` [RFC PATCH v4 20/39] KVM: arm64: Add a new VCPU device control group for SPE Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17 ` [RFC PATCH v4 21/39] KVM: arm64: Add SPE VCPU device attribute to set the interrupt number Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17 ` [RFC PATCH v4 22/39] KVM: arm64: Add SPE VCPU device attribute to initialize SPE Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17 ` [RFC PATCH v4 23/39] KVM: arm64: VHE: Clear MDCR_EL2.E2PB in vcpu_put() Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18 ` [RFC PATCH v4 24/39] KVM: arm64: debug: Configure MDCR_EL2 when a VCPU has SPE Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18 ` [RFC PATCH v4 25/39] KVM: arm64: Move the write to MDCR_EL2 out of __activate_traps_common() Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18 ` [RFC PATCH v4 26/39] KVM: arm64: VHE: Change MDCR_EL2 at world switch if VCPU has SPE Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18 ` [RFC PATCH v4 27/39] KVM: arm64: Add SPE system registers to VCPU context Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18 ` [RFC PATCH v4 28/39] KVM: arm64: nVHE: Save PMSCR_EL1 to the host context Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18 ` [RFC PATCH v4 29/39] KVM: arm64: Rename DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_SPE -> DEBUG_SAVE_SPE_BUFFER flags Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18 ` [RFC PATCH v4 30/39] KVM: arm64: nVHE: Context switch SPE state if VCPU has SPE Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18 ` [RFC PATCH v4 31/39] KVM: arm64: VHE: " Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18 ` [RFC PATCH v4 32/39] KVM: arm64: Save/restore PMSNEVFR_EL1 on VCPU put/load Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18 ` [RFC PATCH v4 33/39] KVM: arm64: Allow guest to use physical timestamps if perfmon_capable() Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18 ` [RFC PATCH v4 34/39] KVM: arm64: Emulate SPE buffer management interrupt Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18 ` [RFC PATCH v4 35/39] KVM: arm64: Add an userspace API to stop a VCPU profiling Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18 ` [RFC PATCH v4 36/39] KVM: arm64: Implement " Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18 ` [RFC PATCH v4 37/39] KVM: arm64: Add PMSIDR_EL1 to the SPE register context Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18 ` [RFC PATCH v4 38/39] KVM: arm64: Make CONFIG_KVM_ARM_SPE depend on !CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18 ` [RFC PATCH v4 39/39] KVM: arm64: Allow userspace to enable SPE for guests Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-08-25 16:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-09-22 10:11 ` [RFC PATCH v4 00/39] KVM: arm64: Add Statistical Profiling Extension (SPE) support Suzuki K Poulose
2021-09-22 10:11   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-09-22 10:11   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-09-23 15:12   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-09-23 15:12     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-09-23 15:12     ` Alexandru Elisei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210825161815.266051-16-alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --to=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.