From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: "Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>, "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>, "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/19] drm/i915: Fix runtime pm handling in i915_gem_shrink Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:09:55 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210830121006.2978297-9-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210830121006.2978297-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> We forgot to call intel_runtime_pm_put on error, fix it! Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Fixes: cf41a8f1dc1e ("drm/i915: Finally remove obj->mm.lock.") Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.13+ --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c index e382b7f2353b..5ab136ffdeb2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ i915_gem_shrink(struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww, intel_wakeref_t wakeref = 0; unsigned long count = 0; unsigned long scanned = 0; - int err; + int err = 0; /* CHV + VTD workaround use stop_machine(); need to trylock vm->mutex */ bool trylock_vm = !ww && intel_vm_no_concurrent_access_wa(i915); @@ -242,12 +242,15 @@ i915_gem_shrink(struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww, list_splice_tail(&still_in_list, phase->list); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i915->mm.obj_lock, flags); if (err) - return err; + break; } if (shrink & I915_SHRINK_BOUND) intel_runtime_pm_put(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref); + if (err) + return err; + if (nr_scanned) *nr_scanned += scanned; return count; -- 2.32.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: "Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>, "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>, "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 08/19] drm/i915: Fix runtime pm handling in i915_gem_shrink Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:09:55 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210830121006.2978297-9-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210830121006.2978297-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> We forgot to call intel_runtime_pm_put on error, fix it! Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Fixes: cf41a8f1dc1e ("drm/i915: Finally remove obj->mm.lock.") Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.13+ --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c index e382b7f2353b..5ab136ffdeb2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ i915_gem_shrink(struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww, intel_wakeref_t wakeref = 0; unsigned long count = 0; unsigned long scanned = 0; - int err; + int err = 0; /* CHV + VTD workaround use stop_machine(); need to trylock vm->mutex */ bool trylock_vm = !ww && intel_vm_no_concurrent_access_wa(i915); @@ -242,12 +242,15 @@ i915_gem_shrink(struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww, list_splice_tail(&still_in_list, phase->list); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i915->mm.obj_lock, flags); if (err) - return err; + break; } if (shrink & I915_SHRINK_BOUND) intel_runtime_pm_put(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref); + if (err) + return err; + if (nr_scanned) *nr_scanned += scanned; return count; -- 2.32.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-30 12:10 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-08-30 12:09 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/19] drm/i915: Short-term pinning and async eviction Maarten Lankhorst 2021-08-30 12:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/19] drm/i915: Move __i915_gem_free_object to ttm_bo_destroy Maarten Lankhorst 2021-09-16 9:43 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel) 2021-09-16 13:35 ` Maarten Lankhorst 2021-08-30 12:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/19] drm/i915: Remove unused bits of i915_vma/active api Maarten Lankhorst 2021-09-08 1:37 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura 2021-08-30 12:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/19] drm/i915: Slightly rework EXEC_OBJECT_CAPTURE handling Maarten Lankhorst 2021-09-08 1:49 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura 2021-08-30 12:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/19] drm/i915: Remove gen6_ppgtt_unpin_all Maarten Lankhorst 2021-09-29 8:07 ` Matthew Auld 2021-08-30 12:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/19] drm/i915: Create a dummy object for gen6 ppgtt Maarten Lankhorst 2021-08-30 12:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/19] drm/i915: Create a full object for mock_ring Maarten Lankhorst 2021-08-30 12:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/19] drm/i915: vma is always backed by an object Maarten Lankhorst 2021-08-31 9:18 ` Tvrtko Ursulin 2021-08-31 9:34 ` Maarten Lankhorst 2021-08-31 10:29 ` Tvrtko Ursulin 2021-09-03 9:31 ` Maarten Lankhorst 2021-09-03 10:48 ` Tvrtko Ursulin 2021-09-16 13:41 ` Maarten Lankhorst 2021-09-16 14:30 ` Tvrtko Ursulin 2021-09-16 15:05 ` Tvrtko Ursulin 2021-08-30 12:09 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message] 2021-08-30 12:09 ` [PATCH 08/19] drm/i915: Fix runtime pm handling in i915_gem_shrink Maarten Lankhorst 2021-09-08 1:12 ` [Intel-gfx] " Niranjana Vishwanathapura 2021-09-29 8:37 ` Matthew Auld 2021-09-29 8:40 ` Matthew Auld 2021-09-29 8:53 ` Maarten Lankhorst 2021-08-30 12:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/19] drm/i915: Change shrink ordering to use locking around unbinding Maarten Lankhorst 2021-09-08 1:04 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura 2021-08-30 12:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/19] Move CONTEXT_VALID_BIT check Maarten Lankhorst 2021-09-08 19:45 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura 2021-08-30 12:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/19] drm/i915: Remove resv from i915_vma Maarten Lankhorst 2021-09-08 1:10 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura 2021-08-30 12:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/19] drm/i915: Remove pages_mutex and intel_gtt->vma_ops.set/clear_pages members Maarten Lankhorst 2021-08-30 12:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/19] drm/i915: Take object lock in i915_ggtt_pin if ww is not set Maarten Lankhorst 2021-09-08 3:11 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura 2021-09-16 13:54 ` Maarten Lankhorst 2021-08-30 12:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/19] drm/i915: Add i915_vma_unbind_unlocked, and take obj lock for i915_vma_unbind Maarten Lankhorst 2021-09-03 9:33 ` Maarten Lankhorst 2021-08-30 12:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/19] drm/i915: Remove support for unlocked i915_vma unbind Maarten Lankhorst 2021-09-08 3:35 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura 2021-08-30 12:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/19] drm/i915: Remove short-term pins from execbuf Maarten Lankhorst 2021-08-30 12:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/19] drm/i915: Add functions to set/get moving fence Maarten Lankhorst 2021-09-08 4:08 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura 2021-09-16 13:49 ` Maarten Lankhorst 2021-09-16 9:48 ` Thomas Hellström 2021-08-30 12:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/19] drm/i915: Add support for asynchronous moving fence waiting Maarten Lankhorst 2021-09-16 10:01 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel) 2021-08-30 12:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/19] drm/i915: Add accelerated migration to ttm Maarten Lankhorst 2021-09-16 11:19 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel) 2021-08-30 13:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Short-term pinning and async eviction Patchwork 2021-08-30 13:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork 2021-08-30 13:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork 2021-09-16 9:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/19] " Thomas Hellström (Intel) 2021-09-16 11:24 ` Maarten Lankhorst
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210830121006.2978297-9-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \ --to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \ --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \ --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.