[merged] mm-mempolicy-unify-the-create-func-for-bind-interleave-prefer-many-policies.patch removed from -mm tree

[merged] mm-mempolicy-unify-the-create-func-for-bind-interleave-prefer-many-policies.patch removed from -mm tree

[akpm]

The patch titled
     Subject: mm/mempolicy: unify the create() func for bind/interleave/prefer-many policies
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-mempolicy-unify-the-create-func-for-bind-interleave-prefer-many-policies.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Subject: mm/mempolicy: unify the create() func for bind/interleave/prefer-many policies

As they all do the same thing: sanity check and save nodemask info, create
one mpol_new_nodemask() to reduce redundancy.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1627970362-61305-6-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/mempolicy.c |   24 ++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/mempolicy.c~mm-mempolicy-unify-the-create-func-for-bind-interleave-prefer-many-policies
+++ a/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static void mpol_relative_nodemask(nodem
 	nodes_onto(*ret, tmp, *rel);
 }
 
-static int mpol_new_interleave(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *nodes)
+static int mpol_new_nodemask(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *nodes)
 {
 	if (nodes_empty(*nodes))
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -210,22 +210,6 @@ static int mpol_new_preferred(struct mem
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int mpol_new_preferred_many(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *nodes)
-{
-	if (nodes_empty(*nodes))
-		return -EINVAL;
-	pol->nodes = *nodes;
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static int mpol_new_bind(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *nodes)
-{
-	if (nodes_empty(*nodes))
-		return -EINVAL;
-	pol->nodes = *nodes;
-	return 0;
-}
-
 /*
  * mpol_set_nodemask is called after mpol_new() to set up the nodemask, if
  * any, for the new policy.  mpol_new() has already validated the nodes
@@ -405,7 +389,7 @@ static const struct mempolicy_operations
 		.rebind = mpol_rebind_default,
 	},
 	[MPOL_INTERLEAVE] = {
-		.create = mpol_new_interleave,
+		.create = mpol_new_nodemask,
 		.rebind = mpol_rebind_nodemask,
 	},
 	[MPOL_PREFERRED] = {
@@ -413,14 +397,14 @@ static const struct mempolicy_operations
 		.rebind = mpol_rebind_preferred,
 	},
 	[MPOL_BIND] = {
-		.create = mpol_new_bind,
+		.create = mpol_new_nodemask,
 		.rebind = mpol_rebind_nodemask,
 	},
 	[MPOL_LOCAL] = {
 		.rebind = mpol_rebind_default,
 	},
 	[MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY] = {
-		.create = mpol_new_preferred_many,
+		.create = mpol_new_nodemask,
 		.rebind = mpol_rebind_preferred,
 	},
 };
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from feng.tang@intel.com are