All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
Cc: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	wsd_upstream@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 2/3] cpufreq: Add of_perf_domain_get_sharing_cpumask
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 15:13:09 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210906094309.rcacbme27zpvdd4a@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1630658364-6192-3-git-send-email-hector.yuan@mediatek.com>

On 03-09-21, 16:39, Hector Yuan wrote:
> From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> 
> Add of_perf_domain_get_sharing_cpumask function to group cpu
> to specific performance domain.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/cpufreq.h |   46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

To speed things up, I have applied this with following changes. Please
test my branch and see if something breaks:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm.git/log/?h=cpufreq/arm/linux-next

-- 
viresh

-------------------------8<-------------------------
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 9eb1fa17a8a4..acd3ee5b8b0a 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -1006,37 +1006,49 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_count_valid_entries(const struct cpufreq_policy
        return count;
 }

-static inline int of_perf_domain_get_sharing_cpumask(int pcpu, const char *list_name,
-                                                    const char *cell_name, struct cpumask *cpumask)
+static inline int parse_perf_domain(int cpu, const char *list_name,
+                                   const char *cell_name)
 {
        struct device_node *cpu_np;
        struct of_phandle_args args;
+       int ret;
+
+       cpu_np = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
+       if (!cpu_np)
+               return -ENODEV;
+
+       ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(cpu_np, list_name, cell_name, 0,
+                                        &args);
+       if (ret < 0)
+               return ret;
+
+       of_node_put(cpu_np);
+
+       return args.args[0];
+}
+
+static inline int of_perf_domain_get_sharing_cpumask(int pcpu, const char *list_name,
+                                                    const char *cell_name, struct cpumask *cpumask)
+{
        int target_idx;
        int cpu, ret;

-       cpu_np = of_cpu_device_node_get(pcpu);
-       of_parse_phandle_with_args(cpu_np, list_name,
-                                  cell_name, 0, &args);
-       of_node_put(cpu_np);
-       target_idx = args.args[0];
+       ret = parse_perf_domain(pcpu, list_name, cell_name);
+       if (ret < 0)
+               return ret;
+
+       target_idx = ret;
+       cpumask_set_cpu(pcpu, cpumask);

        for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
                if (cpu == pcpu)
                        continue;

-               cpu_np = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
-               if (!cpu_np)
-                       continue;
-
-               ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(cpu_np, list_name,
-                                                cell_name, 0,
-                                                &args);
-
-               of_node_put(cpu_np);
+               ret = parse_perf_domain(pcpu, list_name, cell_name);
                if (ret < 0)
                        continue;

-               if (target_idx == args.args[0])
+               if (target_idx == ret)
                        cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpumask);
        }


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
Cc: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	wsd_upstream@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 2/3] cpufreq: Add of_perf_domain_get_sharing_cpumask
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 15:13:09 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210906094309.rcacbme27zpvdd4a@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1630658364-6192-3-git-send-email-hector.yuan@mediatek.com>

On 03-09-21, 16:39, Hector Yuan wrote:
> From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> 
> Add of_perf_domain_get_sharing_cpumask function to group cpu
> to specific performance domain.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/cpufreq.h |   46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

To speed things up, I have applied this with following changes. Please
test my branch and see if something breaks:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm.git/log/?h=cpufreq/arm/linux-next

-- 
viresh

-------------------------8<-------------------------
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 9eb1fa17a8a4..acd3ee5b8b0a 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -1006,37 +1006,49 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_count_valid_entries(const struct cpufreq_policy
        return count;
 }

-static inline int of_perf_domain_get_sharing_cpumask(int pcpu, const char *list_name,
-                                                    const char *cell_name, struct cpumask *cpumask)
+static inline int parse_perf_domain(int cpu, const char *list_name,
+                                   const char *cell_name)
 {
        struct device_node *cpu_np;
        struct of_phandle_args args;
+       int ret;
+
+       cpu_np = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
+       if (!cpu_np)
+               return -ENODEV;
+
+       ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(cpu_np, list_name, cell_name, 0,
+                                        &args);
+       if (ret < 0)
+               return ret;
+
+       of_node_put(cpu_np);
+
+       return args.args[0];
+}
+
+static inline int of_perf_domain_get_sharing_cpumask(int pcpu, const char *list_name,
+                                                    const char *cell_name, struct cpumask *cpumask)
+{
        int target_idx;
        int cpu, ret;

-       cpu_np = of_cpu_device_node_get(pcpu);
-       of_parse_phandle_with_args(cpu_np, list_name,
-                                  cell_name, 0, &args);
-       of_node_put(cpu_np);
-       target_idx = args.args[0];
+       ret = parse_perf_domain(pcpu, list_name, cell_name);
+       if (ret < 0)
+               return ret;
+
+       target_idx = ret;
+       cpumask_set_cpu(pcpu, cpumask);

        for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
                if (cpu == pcpu)
                        continue;

-               cpu_np = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
-               if (!cpu_np)
-                       continue;
-
-               ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(cpu_np, list_name,
-                                                cell_name, 0,
-                                                &args);
-
-               of_node_put(cpu_np);
+               ret = parse_perf_domain(pcpu, list_name, cell_name);
                if (ret < 0)
                        continue;

-               if (target_idx == args.args[0])
+               if (target_idx == ret)
                        cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpumask);
        }


_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
Cc: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	wsd_upstream@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 2/3] cpufreq: Add of_perf_domain_get_sharing_cpumask
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 15:13:09 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210906094309.rcacbme27zpvdd4a@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1630658364-6192-3-git-send-email-hector.yuan@mediatek.com>

On 03-09-21, 16:39, Hector Yuan wrote:
> From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> 
> Add of_perf_domain_get_sharing_cpumask function to group cpu
> to specific performance domain.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/cpufreq.h |   46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

To speed things up, I have applied this with following changes. Please
test my branch and see if something breaks:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm.git/log/?h=cpufreq/arm/linux-next

-- 
viresh

-------------------------8<-------------------------
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 9eb1fa17a8a4..acd3ee5b8b0a 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -1006,37 +1006,49 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_count_valid_entries(const struct cpufreq_policy
        return count;
 }

-static inline int of_perf_domain_get_sharing_cpumask(int pcpu, const char *list_name,
-                                                    const char *cell_name, struct cpumask *cpumask)
+static inline int parse_perf_domain(int cpu, const char *list_name,
+                                   const char *cell_name)
 {
        struct device_node *cpu_np;
        struct of_phandle_args args;
+       int ret;
+
+       cpu_np = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
+       if (!cpu_np)
+               return -ENODEV;
+
+       ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(cpu_np, list_name, cell_name, 0,
+                                        &args);
+       if (ret < 0)
+               return ret;
+
+       of_node_put(cpu_np);
+
+       return args.args[0];
+}
+
+static inline int of_perf_domain_get_sharing_cpumask(int pcpu, const char *list_name,
+                                                    const char *cell_name, struct cpumask *cpumask)
+{
        int target_idx;
        int cpu, ret;

-       cpu_np = of_cpu_device_node_get(pcpu);
-       of_parse_phandle_with_args(cpu_np, list_name,
-                                  cell_name, 0, &args);
-       of_node_put(cpu_np);
-       target_idx = args.args[0];
+       ret = parse_perf_domain(pcpu, list_name, cell_name);
+       if (ret < 0)
+               return ret;
+
+       target_idx = ret;
+       cpumask_set_cpu(pcpu, cpumask);

        for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
                if (cpu == pcpu)
                        continue;

-               cpu_np = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
-               if (!cpu_np)
-                       continue;
-
-               ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(cpu_np, list_name,
-                                                cell_name, 0,
-                                                &args);
-
-               of_node_put(cpu_np);
+               ret = parse_perf_domain(pcpu, list_name, cell_name);
                if (ret < 0)
                        continue;

-               if (target_idx == args.args[0])
+               if (target_idx == ret)
                        cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpumask);
        }


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-06  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-03  8:39 [PATCH v15] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for Mediatek cpufreq HW driver Hector Yuan
2021-09-03  8:39 ` Hector Yuan
2021-09-03  8:39 ` Hector Yuan
2021-09-03  8:39 ` [PATCH v15 1/3] dt-bindings: cpufreq: add bindings for MediaTek cpufreq HW Hector Yuan
2021-09-03  8:39   ` Hector Yuan
2021-09-03  8:39   ` Hector Yuan
2021-09-03 16:35   ` Rob Herring
2021-09-03 16:35     ` Rob Herring
2021-09-03 16:35     ` Rob Herring
2021-09-03  8:39 ` [PATCH v15 2/3] cpufreq: Add of_perf_domain_get_sharing_cpumask Hector Yuan
2021-09-03  8:39   ` Hector Yuan
2021-09-03  8:39   ` Hector Yuan
2021-09-04 22:32   ` kernel test robot
2021-09-04 22:32     ` kernel test robot
2021-09-04 22:32     ` kernel test robot
2021-09-04 22:32     ` kernel test robot
2021-09-06  9:43   ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2021-09-06  9:43     ` Viresh Kumar
2021-09-06  9:43     ` Viresh Kumar
2021-09-06 13:11     ` Hector Yuan
2021-09-06 13:11       ` Hector Yuan
2021-09-06 13:11       ` Hector Yuan
2021-09-03  8:39 ` [PATCH v15 3/3] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for CPUFREQ HW Hector Yuan
2021-09-03  8:39   ` Hector Yuan
2021-09-03  8:39   ` Hector Yuan
2021-09-03 15:54   ` kernel test robot
2021-09-03 15:54     ` kernel test robot
2021-09-03 15:54     ` kernel test robot
2021-09-03 15:54     ` kernel test robot
2021-09-03 16:34   ` kernel test robot
2021-09-03 16:34     ` kernel test robot
2021-09-03 16:34     ` kernel test robot
2021-09-03 16:34     ` kernel test robot
2021-09-06  9:44   ` Viresh Kumar
2021-09-06  9:44     ` Viresh Kumar
2021-09-06  9:44     ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210906094309.rcacbme27zpvdd4a@vireshk-i7 \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hector.yuan@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.