[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 1/4] pwm: img: Don't modify HW state in .remove() callback

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 1/4] pwm: img: Don't modify HW state in .remove() callback

[Sasha Levin]

From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

[ Upstream commit c68eb29c8e9067c08175dd0414f6984f236f719d ]

A consumer is expected to disable a PWM before calling pwm_put(). And if
they didn't there is hopefully a good reason (or the consumer needs
fixing). Also if disabling an enabled PWM was the right thing to do,
this should better be done in the framework instead of in each low level
driver.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c | 16 ----------------
 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c
index 3b0a097ce2ab..6111e8848b07 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c
@@ -332,23 +332,7 @@ static int img_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 static int img_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct img_pwm_chip *pwm_chip = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
-	u32 val;
-	unsigned int i;
-	int ret;
-
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev);
-		return ret;
-	}
-
-	for (i = 0; i < pwm_chip->chip.npwm; i++) {
-		val = img_pwm_readl(pwm_chip, PWM_CTRL_CFG);
-		val &= ~BIT(i);
-		img_pwm_writel(pwm_chip, PWM_CTRL_CFG, val);
-	}
 
-	pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev);
 	pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
 	if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(&pdev->dev))
 		img_pwm_runtime_suspend(&pdev->dev);
-- 
2.30.2

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 2/4] pwm: rockchip: Don't modify HW state in .remove() callback

[Sasha Levin]

From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

[ Upstream commit 9d768cd7fd42bb0be16f36aec48548fca5260759 ]

A consumer is expected to disable a PWM before calling pwm_put(). And if
they didn't there is hopefully a good reason (or the consumer needs
fixing). Also if disabling an enabled PWM was the right thing to do,
this should better be done in the framework instead of in each low level
driver.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c | 14 --------------
 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
index 48bcc853d57a..cf34fb00c054 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
@@ -392,20 +392,6 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct rockchip_pwm_chip *pc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 
-	/*
-	 * Disable the PWM clk before unpreparing it if the PWM device is still
-	 * running. This should only happen when the last PWM user left it
-	 * enabled, or when nobody requested a PWM that was previously enabled
-	 * by the bootloader.
-	 *
-	 * FIXME: Maybe the core should disable all PWM devices in
-	 * pwmchip_remove(). In this case we'd only have to call
-	 * clk_unprepare() after pwmchip_remove().
-	 *
-	 */
-	if (pwm_is_enabled(pc->chip.pwms))
-		clk_disable(pc->clk);
-
 	clk_unprepare(pc->pclk);
 	clk_unprepare(pc->clk);
 
-- 
2.30.2

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 2/4] pwm: rockchip: Don't modify HW state in .remove() callback

[Sasha Levin]

From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

[ Upstream commit 9d768cd7fd42bb0be16f36aec48548fca5260759 ]

A consumer is expected to disable a PWM before calling pwm_put(). And if
they didn't there is hopefully a good reason (or the consumer needs
fixing). Also if disabling an enabled PWM was the right thing to do,
this should better be done in the framework instead of in each low level
driver.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c | 14 --------------
 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
index 48bcc853d57a..cf34fb00c054 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
@@ -392,20 +392,6 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct rockchip_pwm_chip *pc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 
-	/*
-	 * Disable the PWM clk before unpreparing it if the PWM device is still
-	 * running. This should only happen when the last PWM user left it
-	 * enabled, or when nobody requested a PWM that was previously enabled
-	 * by the bootloader.
-	 *
-	 * FIXME: Maybe the core should disable all PWM devices in
-	 * pwmchip_remove(). In this case we'd only have to call
-	 * clk_unprepare() after pwmchip_remove().
-	 *
-	 */
-	if (pwm_is_enabled(pc->chip.pwms))
-		clk_disable(pc->clk);
-
 	clk_unprepare(pc->pclk);
 	clk_unprepare(pc->clk);
 
-- 
2.30.2


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 2/4] pwm: rockchip: Don't modify HW state in .remove() callback

[Sasha Levin]

From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

[ Upstream commit 9d768cd7fd42bb0be16f36aec48548fca5260759 ]

A consumer is expected to disable a PWM before calling pwm_put(). And if
they didn't there is hopefully a good reason (or the consumer needs
fixing). Also if disabling an enabled PWM was the right thing to do,
this should better be done in the framework instead of in each low level
driver.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c | 14 --------------
 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
index 48bcc853d57a..cf34fb00c054 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
@@ -392,20 +392,6 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct rockchip_pwm_chip *pc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 
-	/*
-	 * Disable the PWM clk before unpreparing it if the PWM device is still
-	 * running. This should only happen when the last PWM user left it
-	 * enabled, or when nobody requested a PWM that was previously enabled
-	 * by the bootloader.
-	 *
-	 * FIXME: Maybe the core should disable all PWM devices in
-	 * pwmchip_remove(). In this case we'd only have to call
-	 * clk_unprepare() after pwmchip_remove().
-	 *
-	 */
-	if (pwm_is_enabled(pc->chip.pwms))
-		clk_disable(pc->clk);
-
 	clk_unprepare(pc->pclk);
 	clk_unprepare(pc->clk);
 
-- 
2.30.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 3/4] pwm: stm32-lp: Don't modify HW state in .remove() callback

[Sasha Levin]

From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

[ Upstream commit d44084c93427bb0a9261432db1a8ca76a42d805e ]

A consumer is expected to disable a PWM before calling pwm_put(). And if
they didn't there is hopefully a good reason (or the consumer needs
fixing). Also if disabling an enabled PWM was the right thing to do,
this should better be done in the framework instead of in each low level
driver.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c
index 28e1f6413476..e92a14007422 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c
@@ -224,8 +224,6 @@ static int stm32_pwm_lp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct stm32_pwm_lp *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 
-	pwm_disable(&priv->chip.pwms[0]);
-
 	return pwmchip_remove(&priv->chip);
 }
 
-- 
2.30.2

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 3/4] pwm: stm32-lp: Don't modify HW state in .remove() callback

[Sasha Levin]

From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

[ Upstream commit d44084c93427bb0a9261432db1a8ca76a42d805e ]

A consumer is expected to disable a PWM before calling pwm_put(). And if
they didn't there is hopefully a good reason (or the consumer needs
fixing). Also if disabling an enabled PWM was the right thing to do,
this should better be done in the framework instead of in each low level
driver.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c
index 28e1f6413476..e92a14007422 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c
@@ -224,8 +224,6 @@ static int stm32_pwm_lp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct stm32_pwm_lp *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 
-	pwm_disable(&priv->chip.pwms[0]);
-
 	return pwmchip_remove(&priv->chip);
 }
 
-- 
2.30.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 4/4] blk-throttle: fix UAF by deleteing timer in blk_throtl_exit()

[Sasha Levin]

From: Li Jinlin <lijinlin3@huawei.com>

[ Upstream commit 884f0e84f1e3195b801319c8ec3d5774e9bf2710 ]

The pending timer has been set up in blk_throtl_init(). However, the
timer is not deleted in blk_throtl_exit(). This means that the timer
handler may still be running after freeing the timer, which would
result in a use-after-free.

Fix by calling del_timer_sync() to delete the timer in blk_throtl_exit().

Signed-off-by: Li Jinlin <lijinlin3@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210907121242.2885564-1-lijinlin3@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 block/blk-throttle.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/block/blk-throttle.c b/block/blk-throttle.c
index caee658609d7..853b1770df36 100644
--- a/block/blk-throttle.c
+++ b/block/blk-throttle.c
@@ -2437,6 +2437,7 @@ int blk_throtl_init(struct request_queue *q)
 void blk_throtl_exit(struct request_queue *q)
 {
 	BUG_ON(!q->td);
+	del_timer_sync(&q->td->service_queue.pending_timer);
 	throtl_shutdown_wq(q);
 	blkcg_deactivate_policy(q, &blkcg_policy_throtl);
 	free_percpu(q->td->latency_buckets[READ]);
-- 
2.30.2