From: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, linux-imx@nxp.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Lucas Stach <lst@pengutronix.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: dts: imx6sl: fix mmc compatibles
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2021 20:33:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210926203314.7c187191@aktux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a5ec87f2-7e72-9c23-e13a-75498287b451@pengutronix.de>
Hi Ahmad,
On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 08:54:35 +0200
Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> Hello Andreas,
>
> On 24.09.21 11:14, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > Binding specification only allows one compatible here.
>
> This same change was NACKed by Lucas here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/72e1194e10ccb4f87aed96265114f0963e805092.camel@pengutronix.de/
>
> I also think the schema should be fixed instead.
>
well, that argumentation makes sense. Feel free to drop this patch. I
will not repost the series if it is just about dropping patches.
Regards,
Andreas
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, linux-imx@nxp.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Lucas Stach <lst@pengutronix.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: dts: imx6sl: fix mmc compatibles
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2021 20:33:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210926203314.7c187191@aktux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a5ec87f2-7e72-9c23-e13a-75498287b451@pengutronix.de>
Hi Ahmad,
On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 08:54:35 +0200
Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> Hello Andreas,
>
> On 24.09.21 11:14, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > Binding specification only allows one compatible here.
>
> This same change was NACKed by Lucas here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/72e1194e10ccb4f87aed96265114f0963e805092.camel@pengutronix.de/
>
> I also think the schema should be fixed instead.
>
well, that argumentation makes sense. Feel free to drop this patch. I
will not repost the series if it is just about dropping patches.
Regards,
Andreas
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-26 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-24 9:14 [PATCH v2 0/5] ARM: dts: imx6sl / imx6sll: dtbs_check errors Andreas Kemnade
2021-09-24 9:14 ` Andreas Kemnade
2021-09-24 9:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ARM: dts: imx: e60k02: correct led node name Andreas Kemnade
2021-09-24 9:14 ` Andreas Kemnade
2021-09-24 9:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] ARM: dts: imx6sl: fixup of operating points Andreas Kemnade
2021-09-24 9:14 ` Andreas Kemnade
2021-09-24 9:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ARM: dts: imx6sll: " Andreas Kemnade
2021-09-24 9:14 ` Andreas Kemnade
2021-09-24 9:14 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: dts: imx6sl: fix mmc compatibles Andreas Kemnade
2021-09-24 9:14 ` Andreas Kemnade
2021-09-26 6:54 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-09-26 6:54 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-09-26 18:33 ` Andreas Kemnade [this message]
2021-09-26 18:33 ` Andreas Kemnade
2021-09-27 7:34 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-09-27 7:34 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-09-28 6:51 ` Andreas Kemnade
2021-09-28 6:51 ` Andreas Kemnade
2023-01-07 16:39 ` Andreas Kemnade
2023-01-07 16:39 ` Andreas Kemnade
2021-09-24 9:14 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: dts: imx6sll: " Andreas Kemnade
2021-09-24 9:14 ` Andreas Kemnade
2021-10-05 5:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] ARM: dts: imx6sl / imx6sll: dtbs_check errors Shawn Guo
2021-10-05 5:46 ` Shawn Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210926203314.7c187191@aktux \
--to=andreas@kemnade.info \
--cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lst@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.