All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] blk-mq: support nested blk_mq_quiesce_queue()
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 12:15:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210929041559.701102-6-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210929041559.701102-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

Turns out that blk_mq_freeze_queue() isn't stronger[1] than
blk_mq_quiesce_queue() because dispatch may still be in-progress after
queue is frozen, and in several cases, such as switching io scheduler,
updating nr_requests & wbt latency, we still need to quiesce queue as a
supplement of freezing queue.

As we need to extend uses of blk_mq_quiesce_queue(), it is inevitable
for us to need support nested quiesce, especailly we can't let
unquiesce happen when there is quiesce originated from other contexts.

This patch introduces q->mq_quiesce_depth to deal concurrent quiesce,
and we only unquiesce queue when it is the last one from all contexts.

One kernel panic issue has been reported[2] when running stress test on
dm-mpath's updating nr_requests and suspending queue, and the similar
issue should exist on almost all drivers which use quiesce/unquiesce.

[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=150993988115872&w=2
[2] https://listman.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2021-September/msg00189.html

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-mq.c         | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
 include/linux/blkdev.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 21bf4c3f0825..10f8a3d4e3a1 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -209,7 +209,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_unfreeze_queue);
  */
 void blk_mq_quiesce_queue_nowait(struct request_queue *q)
 {
-	blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED, q);
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&q->queue_lock, flags);
+	if (!q->quiesce_depth++)
+		blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED, q);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->queue_lock, flags);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_quiesce_queue_nowait);
 
@@ -250,10 +255,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_quiesce_queue);
  */
 void blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(struct request_queue *q)
 {
-	blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED, q);
+	unsigned long flags;
+	bool run_queue = false;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&q->queue_lock, flags);
+	if (q->quiesce_depth > 0 && !--q->quiesce_depth) {
+		blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED, q);
+		run_queue = true;
+	}
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->queue_lock, flags);
 
 	/* dispatch requests which are inserted during quiescing */
-	blk_mq_run_hw_queues(q, true);
+	if (run_queue)
+		blk_mq_run_hw_queues(q, true);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_unquiesce_queue);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 0e960d74615e..74c60e2d61f9 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -315,6 +315,8 @@ struct request_queue {
 	 */
 	struct mutex		mq_freeze_lock;
 
+	int			quiesce_depth;
+
 	struct blk_mq_tag_set	*tag_set;
 	struct list_head	tag_set_list;
 	struct bio_set		bio_split;
-- 
2.31.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] blk-mq: support nested blk_mq_quiesce_queue()
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 12:15:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210929041559.701102-6-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210929041559.701102-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

Turns out that blk_mq_freeze_queue() isn't stronger[1] than
blk_mq_quiesce_queue() because dispatch may still be in-progress after
queue is frozen, and in several cases, such as switching io scheduler,
updating nr_requests & wbt latency, we still need to quiesce queue as a
supplement of freezing queue.

As we need to extend uses of blk_mq_quiesce_queue(), it is inevitable
for us to need support nested quiesce, especailly we can't let
unquiesce happen when there is quiesce originated from other contexts.

This patch introduces q->mq_quiesce_depth to deal concurrent quiesce,
and we only unquiesce queue when it is the last one from all contexts.

One kernel panic issue has been reported[2] when running stress test on
dm-mpath's updating nr_requests and suspending queue, and the similar
issue should exist on almost all drivers which use quiesce/unquiesce.

[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=150993988115872&w=2
[2] https://listman.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2021-September/msg00189.html

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-mq.c         | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
 include/linux/blkdev.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 21bf4c3f0825..10f8a3d4e3a1 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -209,7 +209,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_unfreeze_queue);
  */
 void blk_mq_quiesce_queue_nowait(struct request_queue *q)
 {
-	blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED, q);
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&q->queue_lock, flags);
+	if (!q->quiesce_depth++)
+		blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED, q);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->queue_lock, flags);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_quiesce_queue_nowait);
 
@@ -250,10 +255,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_quiesce_queue);
  */
 void blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(struct request_queue *q)
 {
-	blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED, q);
+	unsigned long flags;
+	bool run_queue = false;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&q->queue_lock, flags);
+	if (q->quiesce_depth > 0 && !--q->quiesce_depth) {
+		blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED, q);
+		run_queue = true;
+	}
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->queue_lock, flags);
 
 	/* dispatch requests which are inserted during quiescing */
-	blk_mq_run_hw_queues(q, true);
+	if (run_queue)
+		blk_mq_run_hw_queues(q, true);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_unquiesce_queue);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 0e960d74615e..74c60e2d61f9 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -315,6 +315,8 @@ struct request_queue {
 	 */
 	struct mutex		mq_freeze_lock;
 
+	int			quiesce_depth;
+
 	struct blk_mq_tag_set	*tag_set;
 	struct list_head	tag_set_list;
 	struct bio_set		bio_split;
-- 
2.31.1


_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-29  4:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-29  4:15 [PATCH 0/5] blk-mq: support nested queue quiescing Ming Lei
2021-09-29  4:15 ` Ming Lei
2021-09-29  4:15 ` [PATCH 1/5] nvme: add APIs for stopping/starting admin queue Ming Lei
2021-09-29  4:15   ` Ming Lei
2021-09-29  4:15 ` [PATCH 2/5] nvme: apply nvme API to quiesce/unquiesce " Ming Lei
2021-09-29  4:15   ` Ming Lei
2021-09-29  4:15 ` [PATCH 3/5] nvme: prepare for pairing quiescing and unquiescing Ming Lei
2021-09-29  4:15   ` Ming Lei
2021-09-29  4:15 ` [PATCH 4/5] nvme: paring quiesce/unquiesce Ming Lei
2021-09-29  4:15   ` Ming Lei
2021-09-29 11:49   ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-09-29 11:49     ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-09-29 15:28     ` Ming Lei
2021-09-29 15:28       ` Ming Lei
2021-09-29  4:15 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-09-29  4:15   ` [PATCH 5/5] blk-mq: support nested blk_mq_quiesce_queue() Ming Lei
2021-09-29 11:53   ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-09-29 11:53     ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-09-29 15:44     ` Ming Lei
2021-09-29 15:44       ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210929041559.701102-6-ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.