All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] arm64: kprobes: Record frame pointer with kretprobe instance
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 17:04:05 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211014170405.f59d287b30086efe7dd7f4d9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211013100126.GA3187@C02TD0UTHF1T.local>

On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 11:01:39 +0100
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 09:28:39PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > Record the frame pointer instead of stack address with kretprobe
> > instance as the identifier on the instance list.
> > Since arm64 always enable CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER, we can use the
> > actual frame pointer (x29).
> 
> Just to check, why do we need to use the FP rather than SP? It wasn't
> clear to me if that's necessary later in the series, or if I'm missing
> something here.

Actually, this is for finding correct return address from the per-task
kretprobe instruction list (suppose it as a shadow stack) when it will
be searched in stack-backtracing. At that point, the framepointer will
be a reliable key.

> 
> FWIW, I plan to rework arm64's ftrace bits to use FP for
> HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RET_ADDR_PTR, so I'm happy to do likewise here.

Yes, I think you can use FP for that too.

> 
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> 
> Regardless of the above:
> 
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Thank you!

> 
> Mark.
> 
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c |    4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> > index e7ad6da980e8..d9dfa82c1f18 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> > @@ -401,14 +401,14 @@ int __init arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist(void)
> >  
> >  void __kprobes __used *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >  {
> > -	return (void *)kretprobe_trampoline_handler(regs, (void *)kernel_stack_pointer(regs));
> > +	return (void *)kretprobe_trampoline_handler(regs, (void *)regs->regs[29]);
> >  }
> >  
> >  void __kprobes arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
> >  				      struct pt_regs *regs)
> >  {
> >  	ri->ret_addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)regs->regs[30];
> > -	ri->fp = (void *)kernel_stack_pointer(regs);
> > +	ri->fp = (void *)regs->regs[29];
> >  
> >  	/* replace return addr (x30) with trampoline */
> >  	regs->regs[30] = (long)&__kretprobe_trampoline;
> > 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] arm64: kprobes: Record frame pointer with kretprobe instance
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 17:04:05 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211014170405.f59d287b30086efe7dd7f4d9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211013100126.GA3187@C02TD0UTHF1T.local>

On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 11:01:39 +0100
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 09:28:39PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > Record the frame pointer instead of stack address with kretprobe
> > instance as the identifier on the instance list.
> > Since arm64 always enable CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER, we can use the
> > actual frame pointer (x29).
> 
> Just to check, why do we need to use the FP rather than SP? It wasn't
> clear to me if that's necessary later in the series, or if I'm missing
> something here.

Actually, this is for finding correct return address from the per-task
kretprobe instruction list (suppose it as a shadow stack) when it will
be searched in stack-backtracing. At that point, the framepointer will
be a reliable key.

> 
> FWIW, I plan to rework arm64's ftrace bits to use FP for
> HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RET_ADDR_PTR, so I'm happy to do likewise here.

Yes, I think you can use FP for that too.

> 
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> 
> Regardless of the above:
> 
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Thank you!

> 
> Mark.
> 
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c |    4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> > index e7ad6da980e8..d9dfa82c1f18 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> > @@ -401,14 +401,14 @@ int __init arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist(void)
> >  
> >  void __kprobes __used *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >  {
> > -	return (void *)kretprobe_trampoline_handler(regs, (void *)kernel_stack_pointer(regs));
> > +	return (void *)kretprobe_trampoline_handler(regs, (void *)regs->regs[29]);
> >  }
> >  
> >  void __kprobes arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
> >  				      struct pt_regs *regs)
> >  {
> >  	ri->ret_addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)regs->regs[30];
> > -	ri->fp = (void *)kernel_stack_pointer(regs);
> > +	ri->fp = (void *)regs->regs[29];
> >  
> >  	/* replace return addr (x30) with trampoline */
> >  	regs->regs[30] = (long)&__kretprobe_trampoline;
> > 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-14  8:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-08 12:28 [PATCH 0/8] kprobes: Make KUnit and add stacktrace on kretprobe tests Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-08 12:28 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-08 12:28 ` [PATCH 1/8] kprobes: convert tests to kunit Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-08 12:28   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-08 12:28 ` [PATCH 2/8] kprobes: Add a test case for stacktrace from kretprobe handler Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-08 12:28   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-08 12:28 ` [PATCH 3/8] arm64: kprobes: Record frame pointer with kretprobe instance Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-08 12:28   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-13  8:14   ` Will Deacon
2021-10-13  8:14     ` Will Deacon
2021-10-13 10:01   ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-13 10:01     ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-14  8:04     ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2021-10-14  8:04       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-14  9:13       ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-14  9:13         ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-14 10:01         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-14 10:01           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-14 10:27           ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-14 10:27             ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-14 13:50             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-14 13:50               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-08 12:28 ` [PATCH 4/8] arm64: kprobes: Make a frame pointer on __kretprobe_trampoline Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-08 12:28   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-13  8:14   ` Will Deacon
2021-10-13  8:14     ` Will Deacon
2021-10-08 12:28 ` [PATCH 5/8] arm64: Recover kretprobe modified return address in stacktrace Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-08 12:28   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-13  8:14   ` Will Deacon
2021-10-13  8:14     ` Will Deacon
2021-10-14  8:05     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-14  8:05       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-13 10:13   ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-13 10:13     ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-14  9:57     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-14  9:57       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-08 12:29 ` [PATCH 6/8] ARM: clang: Do not relay on lr register for stacktrace Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-08 12:29   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-11 18:45   ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-10-11 18:45     ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-10-12 14:18     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-12 14:18       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-13 19:54       ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-10-13 19:54         ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-10-14 16:53   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-10-14 16:53     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-10-15  0:18     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-15  0:18       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-08 12:29 ` [PATCH 7/8] ARM: kprobes: Make a frame pointer on __kretprobe_trampoline Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-08 12:29   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-11 19:06   ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-10-11 19:06     ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-10-08 12:29 ` [PATCH 8/8] ARM: Recover kretprobe modified return address in stacktrace Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-08 12:29   ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211014170405.f59d287b30086efe7dd7f4d9@kernel.org \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=ananth@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.