All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>
To: <wsa@kernel.org>, <jie.deng@intel.com>, <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	<linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<kernel@axis.com>,
	Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: virtio: disable timeout handling
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:46:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211019074647.19061-2-vincent.whitchurch@axis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211019074647.19061-1-vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>

If a timeout is hit, it can result is incorrect data on the I2C bus
and/or memory corruptions in the guest since the device can still be
operating on the buffers it was given while the guest has freed them.

Here is, for example, the start of a slub_debug splat which was
triggered on the next transfer after one transfer was forced to timeout
by setting a breakpoint in the backend (rust-vmm/vhost-device):

 BUG kmalloc-1k (Not tainted): Poison overwritten
 First byte 0x1 instead of 0x6b
 Allocated in virtio_i2c_xfer+0x65/0x35c age=350 cpu=0 pid=29
 	__kmalloc+0xc2/0x1c9
 	virtio_i2c_xfer+0x65/0x35c
 	__i2c_transfer+0x429/0x57d
 	i2c_transfer+0x115/0x134
 	i2cdev_ioctl_rdwr+0x16a/0x1de
 	i2cdev_ioctl+0x247/0x2ed
 	vfs_ioctl+0x21/0x30
 	sys_ioctl+0xb18/0xb41
 Freed in virtio_i2c_xfer+0x32e/0x35c age=244 cpu=0 pid=29
 	kfree+0x1bd/0x1cc
 	virtio_i2c_xfer+0x32e/0x35c
 	__i2c_transfer+0x429/0x57d
 	i2c_transfer+0x115/0x134
 	i2cdev_ioctl_rdwr+0x16a/0x1de
 	i2cdev_ioctl+0x247/0x2ed
 	vfs_ioctl+0x21/0x30
 	sys_ioctl+0xb18/0xb41

There is no simple fix for this (the driver would have to always create
bounce buffers and hold on to them until the device eventually returns
the buffers), so just disable the timeout support for now.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c | 14 +++++---------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c
index f10a603b13fb..7b2474e6876f 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c
@@ -106,11 +106,10 @@ static int virtio_i2c_prepare_reqs(struct virtqueue *vq,
 
 static int virtio_i2c_complete_reqs(struct virtqueue *vq,
 				    struct virtio_i2c_req *reqs,
-				    struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num,
-				    bool timedout)
+				    struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
 {
 	struct virtio_i2c_req *req;
-	bool failed = timedout;
+	bool failed = false;
 	unsigned int len;
 	int i, j = 0;
 
@@ -132,7 +131,7 @@ static int virtio_i2c_complete_reqs(struct virtqueue *vq,
 			j++;
 	}
 
-	return timedout ? -ETIMEDOUT : j;
+	return j;
 }
 
 static int virtio_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
@@ -141,7 +140,6 @@ static int virtio_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
 	struct virtio_i2c *vi = i2c_get_adapdata(adap);
 	struct virtqueue *vq = vi->vq;
 	struct virtio_i2c_req *reqs;
-	unsigned long time_left;
 	int count;
 
 	reqs = kcalloc(num, sizeof(*reqs), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -164,11 +162,9 @@ static int virtio_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
 	reinit_completion(&vi->completion);
 	virtqueue_kick(vq);
 
-	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&vi->completion, adap->timeout);
-	if (!time_left)
-		dev_err(&adap->dev, "virtio i2c backend timeout.\n");
+	wait_for_completion(&vi->completion);
 
-	count = virtio_i2c_complete_reqs(vq, reqs, msgs, count, !time_left);
+	count = virtio_i2c_complete_reqs(vq, reqs, msgs, count);
 
 err_free:
 	kfree(reqs);
-- 
2.28.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>
To: <wsa@kernel.org>, <jie.deng@intel.com>, <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>,
	kernel@axis.com, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: virtio: disable timeout handling
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:46:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211019074647.19061-2-vincent.whitchurch@axis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211019074647.19061-1-vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>

If a timeout is hit, it can result is incorrect data on the I2C bus
and/or memory corruptions in the guest since the device can still be
operating on the buffers it was given while the guest has freed them.

Here is, for example, the start of a slub_debug splat which was
triggered on the next transfer after one transfer was forced to timeout
by setting a breakpoint in the backend (rust-vmm/vhost-device):

 BUG kmalloc-1k (Not tainted): Poison overwritten
 First byte 0x1 instead of 0x6b
 Allocated in virtio_i2c_xfer+0x65/0x35c age=350 cpu=0 pid=29
 	__kmalloc+0xc2/0x1c9
 	virtio_i2c_xfer+0x65/0x35c
 	__i2c_transfer+0x429/0x57d
 	i2c_transfer+0x115/0x134
 	i2cdev_ioctl_rdwr+0x16a/0x1de
 	i2cdev_ioctl+0x247/0x2ed
 	vfs_ioctl+0x21/0x30
 	sys_ioctl+0xb18/0xb41
 Freed in virtio_i2c_xfer+0x32e/0x35c age=244 cpu=0 pid=29
 	kfree+0x1bd/0x1cc
 	virtio_i2c_xfer+0x32e/0x35c
 	__i2c_transfer+0x429/0x57d
 	i2c_transfer+0x115/0x134
 	i2cdev_ioctl_rdwr+0x16a/0x1de
 	i2cdev_ioctl+0x247/0x2ed
 	vfs_ioctl+0x21/0x30
 	sys_ioctl+0xb18/0xb41

There is no simple fix for this (the driver would have to always create
bounce buffers and hold on to them until the device eventually returns
the buffers), so just disable the timeout support for now.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c | 14 +++++---------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c
index f10a603b13fb..7b2474e6876f 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c
@@ -106,11 +106,10 @@ static int virtio_i2c_prepare_reqs(struct virtqueue *vq,
 
 static int virtio_i2c_complete_reqs(struct virtqueue *vq,
 				    struct virtio_i2c_req *reqs,
-				    struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num,
-				    bool timedout)
+				    struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
 {
 	struct virtio_i2c_req *req;
-	bool failed = timedout;
+	bool failed = false;
 	unsigned int len;
 	int i, j = 0;
 
@@ -132,7 +131,7 @@ static int virtio_i2c_complete_reqs(struct virtqueue *vq,
 			j++;
 	}
 
-	return timedout ? -ETIMEDOUT : j;
+	return j;
 }
 
 static int virtio_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
@@ -141,7 +140,6 @@ static int virtio_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
 	struct virtio_i2c *vi = i2c_get_adapdata(adap);
 	struct virtqueue *vq = vi->vq;
 	struct virtio_i2c_req *reqs;
-	unsigned long time_left;
 	int count;
 
 	reqs = kcalloc(num, sizeof(*reqs), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -164,11 +162,9 @@ static int virtio_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
 	reinit_completion(&vi->completion);
 	virtqueue_kick(vq);
 
-	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&vi->completion, adap->timeout);
-	if (!time_left)
-		dev_err(&adap->dev, "virtio i2c backend timeout.\n");
+	wait_for_completion(&vi->completion);
 
-	count = virtio_i2c_complete_reqs(vq, reqs, msgs, count, !time_left);
+	count = virtio_i2c_complete_reqs(vq, reqs, msgs, count);
 
 err_free:
 	kfree(reqs);
-- 
2.28.0

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-19  7:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-19  7:46 [PATCH 0/2] virtio-i2c: Fix buffer handling Vincent Whitchurch
2021-10-19  7:46 ` Vincent Whitchurch
2021-10-19  7:46 ` Vincent Whitchurch [this message]
2021-10-19  7:46   ` [PATCH 1/2] i2c: virtio: disable timeout handling Vincent Whitchurch
2021-10-19  8:09   ` Viresh Kumar
2021-10-19  8:09     ` Viresh Kumar
2021-10-19  9:36     ` Greg KH
2021-10-19  9:36       ` Greg KH
2021-10-19  9:42       ` Viresh Kumar
2021-10-19  9:42         ` Viresh Kumar
2021-10-19 11:15         ` Wolfram Sang
2021-10-19 14:14           ` Viresh Kumar
2021-10-19 14:14             ` Viresh Kumar
2021-10-19 11:16         ` Greg KH
2021-10-19 11:16           ` Greg KH
2021-10-19 14:37           ` Viresh Kumar
2021-10-19 14:37             ` Viresh Kumar
2021-10-19 18:14             ` Wolfram Sang
2021-10-20  4:20               ` Jie Deng
2021-10-20  4:20                 ` Jie Deng
2021-10-20  5:36                 ` Greg KH
2021-10-20  5:36                   ` Greg KH
2021-10-20  6:35                   ` Jie Deng
2021-10-20  6:35                     ` Jie Deng
2021-10-20  6:41                     ` Viresh Kumar
2021-10-20  6:41                       ` Viresh Kumar
2021-10-20  7:04                       ` Jie Deng
2021-10-20  7:04                         ` Jie Deng
2021-10-20 10:55                         ` Vincent Whitchurch
2021-10-20 10:55                           ` Vincent Whitchurch
2021-10-20 11:03                           ` Viresh Kumar
2021-10-20 11:03                             ` Viresh Kumar
2021-10-21  3:30                             ` Jie Deng
2021-10-21  3:30                               ` Jie Deng
2021-10-29 12:24                               ` Vincent Whitchurch
2021-10-29 12:24                                 ` Vincent Whitchurch
2021-11-01  5:23                                 ` Jie Deng
2021-11-01  5:23                                   ` Jie Deng
2021-11-03  6:18                                   ` Chen, Conghui
2021-11-03  6:37                                     ` Viresh Kumar
2021-11-03  6:37                                       ` Viresh Kumar
2021-11-03 14:42                                       ` Vincent Whitchurch
2021-11-03 14:42                                         ` Vincent Whitchurch
2021-11-09  4:52                                         ` Viresh Kumar
2021-11-09  4:52                                           ` Viresh Kumar
2021-10-20  3:36     ` Jie Deng
2021-10-20  3:36       ` Jie Deng
2021-10-19  7:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] i2c: virtio: fix completion handling Vincent Whitchurch
2021-10-19  7:46   ` Vincent Whitchurch
2021-10-19  8:22   ` Viresh Kumar
2021-10-19  8:22     ` Viresh Kumar
2021-10-20  8:54     ` Jie Deng
2021-10-20  8:54       ` Jie Deng
2021-10-20  9:17       ` Viresh Kumar
2021-10-20  9:17         ` Viresh Kumar
2021-10-20 10:38         ` Vincent Whitchurch
2021-10-20 10:38           ` Vincent Whitchurch
2021-10-20 10:47           ` Viresh Kumar
2021-10-20 10:47             ` Viresh Kumar
2021-10-29 11:54             ` Vincent Whitchurch
2021-10-29 11:54               ` Vincent Whitchurch
2021-10-21  5:55   ` Jie Deng
2021-10-21  5:55     ` Jie Deng
2021-10-21  5:58     ` Viresh Kumar
2021-10-21  5:58       ` Viresh Kumar
2021-11-02  4:32   ` Viresh Kumar
2021-11-02  4:32     ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211019074647.19061-2-vincent.whitchurch@axis.com \
    --to=vincent.whitchurch@axis.com \
    --cc=jie.deng@intel.com \
    --cc=kernel@axis.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wsa@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.