All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH linux-next] xfrm: Remove redundant fields
@ 2021-10-21  6:56 luo penghao
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: luo penghao @ 2021-10-21  6:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: SimonHorman
  Cc: Steffen Klassert, Herbert Xu, David S . Miller, Jakub Kicinski,
	netdev, linux-kernel, luo penghao, Zeal Robot

The variable err is not necessary in such places. It should be revmoved
for the simplicity of the code.

The clang_analyzer complains as follows:

net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c:533: warning:
net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c:563: warning:

Although the value stored to 'err' is used in the enclosing expression,
the value is never actually read from 'err'.

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: luo penghao <luo.penghao@zte.com.cn>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
index 3df0861..70a8c36 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
@@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ int xfrm_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, int encap_type)
 				goto drop;
 			}
 
-			if ((err = xfrm_parse_spi(skb, nexthdr, &spi, &seq)) != 0) {
+			if (xfrm_parse_spi(skb, nexthdr, &spi, &seq)) {
 				XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMINHDRERROR);
 				goto drop;
 			}
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ int xfrm_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, int encap_type)
 	}
 
 	seq = 0;
-	if (!spi && (err = xfrm_parse_spi(skb, nexthdr, &spi, &seq)) != 0) {
+	if (!spi && xfrm_parse_spi(skb, nexthdr, &spi, &seq)) {
 		secpath_reset(skb);
 		XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMINHDRERROR);
 		goto drop;
-- 
2.15.2



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH linux-next] xfrm: Remove redundant fields
  2021-10-18  9:17 luo penghao
@ 2021-10-20  9:07 ` Simon Horman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2021-10-20  9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: luo penghao
  Cc: Steffen Klassert, Herbert Xu, David S . Miller, Jakub Kicinski,
	netdev, linux-kernel, penghao luo, Zeal Robot

On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 09:17:58AM +0000, luo penghao wrote:
> From: penghao luo <luo.penghao@zte.com.cn>
> 
> the variable err is not necessary in such places. It should be revmoved
> for the simplicity of the code.
> 
> The clang_analyzer complains as follows:
> 
> net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c:530: warning:
> 
> Although the value stored to 'err' is used in the enclosing expression,
> the value is never actually read from 'err'.
> 
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: penghao luo <luo.penghao@zte.com.cn>
> ---
>  net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
> index 3df0861..ff34667 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
> @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ int xfrm_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, int encap_type)
>  				goto drop;
>  			}
>  
> -			if ((err = xfrm_parse_spi(skb, nexthdr, &spi, &seq)) != 0) {
> +			if ((xfrm_parse_spi(skb, nexthdr, &spi, &seq)) != 0) {

I agree that assigning the value to err is not needed.
But you may also wish to consider:

1. Dropping the () around the call to xfrm_parse_spi, which seem out of
   place now.
2. Dropping the explicit check against zero

Which would leave you with:

			if (xfrm_parse_spi(skb, nexthdr, &spi, &seq)) {

>  				XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMINHDRERROR);
>  				goto drop;
>  			}
> @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ int xfrm_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, int encap_type)
>  	}
>  
>  	seq = 0;
> -	if (!spi && (err = xfrm_parse_spi(skb, nexthdr, &spi, &seq)) != 0) {
> +	if (!spi && (xfrm_parse_spi(skb, nexthdr, &spi, &seq)) != 0) {
>  		secpath_reset(skb);
>  		XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMINHDRERROR);
>  		goto drop;
> -- 
> 2.15.2
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH linux-next] xfrm: Remove redundant fields
@ 2021-10-18  9:17 luo penghao
  2021-10-20  9:07 ` Simon Horman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: luo penghao @ 2021-10-18  9:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steffen Klassert
  Cc: Herbert Xu, David S . Miller, Jakub Kicinski, netdev,
	linux-kernel, penghao luo, Zeal Robot

From: penghao luo <luo.penghao@zte.com.cn>

the variable err is not necessary in such places. It should be revmoved
for the simplicity of the code.

The clang_analyzer complains as follows:

net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c:530: warning:

Although the value stored to 'err' is used in the enclosing expression,
the value is never actually read from 'err'.

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: penghao luo <luo.penghao@zte.com.cn>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
index 3df0861..ff34667 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
@@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ int xfrm_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, int encap_type)
 				goto drop;
 			}
 
-			if ((err = xfrm_parse_spi(skb, nexthdr, &spi, &seq)) != 0) {
+			if ((xfrm_parse_spi(skb, nexthdr, &spi, &seq)) != 0) {
 				XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMINHDRERROR);
 				goto drop;
 			}
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ int xfrm_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, int encap_type)
 	}
 
 	seq = 0;
-	if (!spi && (err = xfrm_parse_spi(skb, nexthdr, &spi, &seq)) != 0) {
+	if (!spi && (xfrm_parse_spi(skb, nexthdr, &spi, &seq)) != 0) {
 		secpath_reset(skb);
 		XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMINHDRERROR);
 		goto drop;
-- 
2.15.2



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH linux-next] xfrm: Remove redundant fields
@ 2021-10-18  9:12 luo penghao
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: luo penghao @ 2021-10-18  9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steffen Klassert
  Cc: Herbert Xu, David S . Miller, Jakub Kicinski, netdev,
	linux-kernel, penghao luo, Zeal Robot

From: penghao luo <luo.penghao@zte.com.cn>

the variable err is not necessary in such places. It should be revmoved
for the simplicity of the code.

The clang_analyzer complains as follows:

net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c:530: warning:

Although the value stored to 'err' is used in the enclosing expression,
the value is never actually read from 'err'.

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: penghao luo <luo.penghao@zte.com.cn>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
index 3df0861..ff34667 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
@@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ int xfrm_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, int encap_type)
 				goto drop;
 			}
 
-			if ((err = xfrm_parse_spi(skb, nexthdr, &spi, &seq)) != 0) {
+			if ((xfrm_parse_spi(skb, nexthdr, &spi, &seq)) != 0) {
 				XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMINHDRERROR);
 				goto drop;
 			}
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ int xfrm_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, int encap_type)
 	}
 
 	seq = 0;
-	if (!spi && (err = xfrm_parse_spi(skb, nexthdr, &spi, &seq)) != 0) {
+	if (!spi && (xfrm_parse_spi(skb, nexthdr, &spi, &seq)) != 0) {
 		secpath_reset(skb);
 		XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMINHDRERROR);
 		goto drop;
-- 
2.15.2



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-21  6:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-10-21  6:56 [PATCH linux-next] xfrm: Remove redundant fields luo penghao
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-10-18  9:17 luo penghao
2021-10-20  9:07 ` Simon Horman
2021-10-18  9:12 luo penghao

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.