All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH resend] btrfs: mount: call btrfs_check_rw_degradable only if there is a missing device
@ 2021-10-19 10:43 Anand Jain
  2021-10-19 14:06 ` Josef Bacik
  2021-10-25 17:18 ` David Sterba
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2021-10-19 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrfs

In open_ctree() in btrfs_check_rw_degradable() [1], we check each block
group individually if at least the minimum number of devices is available
for that profile. If all the devices are available, then we don't have to
check degradable.

[1]
open_ctree()
::
3559 if (!sb_rdonly(sb) && !btrfs_check_rw_degradable(fs_info, NULL)) {

Also before calling btrfs_check_rw_degradable() in open_ctee() at the
line number shown below [2] we call btrfs_read_chunk_tree() and down to
add_missing_dev() to record number of missing devices.

[2]
open_ctree()
::
3454         ret = btrfs_read_chunk_tree(fs_info);

btrfs_read_chunk_tree()
 read_one_chunk() / read_one_dev()
  add_missing_dev()

So, check if there is any missing device before btrfs_check_rw_degradable()
in open_ctree().

With this, in an example, the mount command could save ~16ms.[3] in the
most common case, that is no device is missing.

[3]
 1) * 16934.96 us | btrfs_check_rw_degradable [btrfs]();

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index 7d80e5b22d32..b86049a16a27 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -3564,7 +3564,8 @@ int __cold open_ctree(struct super_block *sb, struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_device
 		goto fail_sysfs;
 	}
 
-	if (!sb_rdonly(sb) && !btrfs_check_rw_degradable(fs_info, NULL)) {
+	if (!sb_rdonly(sb) && fs_info->fs_devices->missing_devices &&
+	    !btrfs_check_rw_degradable(fs_info, NULL)) {
 		btrfs_warn(fs_info,
 		"writable mount is not allowed due to too many missing devices");
 		goto fail_sysfs;
-- 
2.31.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH resend] btrfs: mount: call btrfs_check_rw_degradable only if there is a missing device
  2021-10-19 10:43 [PATCH resend] btrfs: mount: call btrfs_check_rw_degradable only if there is a missing device Anand Jain
@ 2021-10-19 14:06 ` Josef Bacik
  2021-10-25 17:18 ` David Sterba
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Josef Bacik @ 2021-10-19 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anand Jain; +Cc: linux-btrfs

On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 06:43:38PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> In open_ctree() in btrfs_check_rw_degradable() [1], we check each block
> group individually if at least the minimum number of devices is available
> for that profile. If all the devices are available, then we don't have to
> check degradable.
> 
> [1]
> open_ctree()
> ::
> 3559 if (!sb_rdonly(sb) && !btrfs_check_rw_degradable(fs_info, NULL)) {
> 
> Also before calling btrfs_check_rw_degradable() in open_ctee() at the
> line number shown below [2] we call btrfs_read_chunk_tree() and down to
> add_missing_dev() to record number of missing devices.
> 
> [2]
> open_ctree()
> ::
> 3454         ret = btrfs_read_chunk_tree(fs_info);
> 
> btrfs_read_chunk_tree()
>  read_one_chunk() / read_one_dev()
>   add_missing_dev()
> 
> So, check if there is any missing device before btrfs_check_rw_degradable()
> in open_ctree().
> 
> With this, in an example, the mount command could save ~16ms.[3] in the
> most common case, that is no device is missing.
> 
> [3]
>  1) * 16934.96 us | btrfs_check_rw_degradable [btrfs]();
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>

Thanks,

Josef

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH resend] btrfs: mount: call btrfs_check_rw_degradable only if there is a missing device
  2021-10-19 10:43 [PATCH resend] btrfs: mount: call btrfs_check_rw_degradable only if there is a missing device Anand Jain
  2021-10-19 14:06 ` Josef Bacik
@ 2021-10-25 17:18 ` David Sterba
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Sterba @ 2021-10-25 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anand Jain; +Cc: linux-btrfs

On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 06:43:38PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> In open_ctree() in btrfs_check_rw_degradable() [1], we check each block
> group individually if at least the minimum number of devices is available
> for that profile. If all the devices are available, then we don't have to
> check degradable.
> 
> [1]
> open_ctree()
> ::
> 3559 if (!sb_rdonly(sb) && !btrfs_check_rw_degradable(fs_info, NULL)) {
> 
> Also before calling btrfs_check_rw_degradable() in open_ctee() at the
> line number shown below [2] we call btrfs_read_chunk_tree() and down to
> add_missing_dev() to record number of missing devices.
> 
> [2]
> open_ctree()
> ::
> 3454         ret = btrfs_read_chunk_tree(fs_info);
> 
> btrfs_read_chunk_tree()
>  read_one_chunk() / read_one_dev()
>   add_missing_dev()
> 
> So, check if there is any missing device before btrfs_check_rw_degradable()
> in open_ctree().
> 
> With this, in an example, the mount command could save ~16ms.[3] in the
> most common case, that is no device is missing.
> 
> [3]
>  1) * 16934.96 us | btrfs_check_rw_degradable [btrfs]();
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>

Added to misc-next, thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-25 17:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-10-19 10:43 [PATCH resend] btrfs: mount: call btrfs_check_rw_degradable only if there is a missing device Anand Jain
2021-10-19 14:06 ` Josef Bacik
2021-10-25 17:18 ` David Sterba

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.