From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux NVDIMM <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: futher decouple DAX from block devices
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 10:51:39 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211029105139.1194bb7f@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4iEt78-XSsKjTWcpy71zaduXyyigTro6f3fmRqqFOG98Q@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1197 bytes --]
Hi Dan,
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:46:31 -0700 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
>
> My merge resolution is here [1]. Christoph, please have a look. The
> rebase and the merge result are both passing my test and I'm now going
> to review the individual patches. However, while I do that and collect
> acks from DM and EROFS folks, I want to give Stephen a heads up that
> this is coming. Primarily I want to see if someone sees a better
> strategy to merge this, please let me know, but if not I plan to walk
> Stephen and Linus through the resolution.
It doesn't look to bad to me (however it is a bit late in the cycle :-(
). Once you are happy, just put it in your tree (some of the conflicts
are against the current -rc3 based version of your tree anyway) and I
will cope with it on Monday.
You could do a test merge against next-<date>^^ (that leaves out
Andrew's patch series) and if you think there is anything tricky please
send me a "git diff-tree --cc HEAD" after you have resolved the
conflicts to your satisfaction and committed the test merge or just
point me at the test merge in a tree somewhere (like this one).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Linux NVDIMM <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: futher decouple DAX from block devices
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 10:51:39 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211029105139.1194bb7f@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4iEt78-XSsKjTWcpy71zaduXyyigTro6f3fmRqqFOG98Q@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1197 bytes --]
Hi Dan,
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:46:31 -0700 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
>
> My merge resolution is here [1]. Christoph, please have a look. The
> rebase and the merge result are both passing my test and I'm now going
> to review the individual patches. However, while I do that and collect
> acks from DM and EROFS folks, I want to give Stephen a heads up that
> this is coming. Primarily I want to see if someone sees a better
> strategy to merge this, please let me know, but if not I plan to walk
> Stephen and Linus through the resolution.
It doesn't look to bad to me (however it is a bit late in the cycle :-(
). Once you are happy, just put it in your tree (some of the conflicts
are against the current -rc3 based version of your tree anyway) and I
will cope with it on Monday.
You could do a test merge against next-<date>^^ (that leaves out
Andrew's patch series) and if you think there is anything tricky please
send me a "git diff-tree --cc HEAD" after you have resolved the
conflicts to your satisfaction and committed the test merge or just
point me at the test merge in a tree somewhere (like this one).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Linux NVDIMM <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: futher decouple DAX from block devices
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 10:51:39 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211029105139.1194bb7f@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4iEt78-XSsKjTWcpy71zaduXyyigTro6f3fmRqqFOG98Q@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1197 bytes --]
Hi Dan,
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:46:31 -0700 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
>
> My merge resolution is here [1]. Christoph, please have a look. The
> rebase and the merge result are both passing my test and I'm now going
> to review the individual patches. However, while I do that and collect
> acks from DM and EROFS folks, I want to give Stephen a heads up that
> this is coming. Primarily I want to see if someone sees a better
> strategy to merge this, please let me know, but if not I plan to walk
> Stephen and Linus through the resolution.
It doesn't look to bad to me (however it is a bit late in the cycle :-(
). Once you are happy, just put it in your tree (some of the conflicts
are against the current -rc3 based version of your tree anyway) and I
will cope with it on Monday.
You could do a test merge against next-<date>^^ (that leaves out
Andrew's patch series) and if you think there is anything tricky please
send me a "git diff-tree --cc HEAD" after you have resolved the
conflicts to your satisfaction and committed the test merge or just
point me at the test merge in a tree somewhere (like this one).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 183 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Linux NVDIMM <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ira, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] futher decouple DAX from block devices
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 10:51:39 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211029105139.1194bb7f@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4iEt78-XSsKjTWcpy71zaduXyyigTro6f3fmRqqFOG98Q@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1197 bytes --]
Hi Dan,
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:46:31 -0700 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
>
> My merge resolution is here [1]. Christoph, please have a look. The
> rebase and the merge result are both passing my test and I'm now going
> to review the individual patches. However, while I do that and collect
> acks from DM and EROFS folks, I want to give Stephen a heads up that
> this is coming. Primarily I want to see if someone sees a better
> strategy to merge this, please let me know, but if not I plan to walk
> Stephen and Linus through the resolution.
It doesn't look to bad to me (however it is a bit late in the cycle :-(
). Once you are happy, just put it in your tree (some of the conflicts
are against the current -rc3 based version of your tree anyway) and I
will cope with it on Monday.
You could do a test merge against next-<date>^^ (that leaves out
Andrew's patch series) and if you think there is anything tricky please
send me a "git diff-tree --cc HEAD" after you have resolved the
conflicts to your satisfaction and committed the test merge or just
point me at the test merge in a tree somewhere (like this one).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 97 bytes --]
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-28 23:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 197+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-18 4:40 futher decouple DAX from block devices Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` [PATCH 01/11] dm: make the DAX support dependend on CONFIG_FS_DAX Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-27 20:53 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-27 20:53 ` [dm-devel] " Dan Williams
2021-10-27 20:53 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-27 20:53 ` Dan Williams
2021-11-01 16:12 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-11-01 16:12 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-11-01 16:12 ` [dm-devel] " Mike Snitzer
2021-11-01 16:12 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-10-18 4:40 ` [PATCH 02/11] dax: remove CONFIG_DAX_DRIVER Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-27 20:54 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-27 20:54 ` [dm-devel] " Dan Williams
2021-10-27 20:54 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-27 20:54 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-18 4:40 ` [PATCH 03/11] dax: simplify the dax_device <-> gendisk association Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-27 22:03 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-27 22:03 ` [dm-devel] " Dan Williams
2021-10-27 22:03 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-27 22:03 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-29 4:57 ` Ira Weiny
2021-10-29 4:57 ` [dm-devel] " Ira Weiny
2021-10-29 4:57 ` Ira Weiny
2021-10-29 4:57 ` Ira Weiny
2021-11-01 16:28 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-11-01 16:28 ` [dm-devel] " Mike Snitzer
2021-11-01 16:28 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-11-01 16:28 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-10-18 4:40 ` [PATCH 04/11] dax: remove the pgmap sanity checks in generic_fsdax_supported Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-27 23:02 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-27 23:02 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-27 23:02 ` [dm-devel] " Dan Williams
2021-10-27 23:02 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-18 4:40 ` [PATCH 05/11] dax: move the partition alignment check into fs_dax_get_by_bdev Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-27 23:07 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-27 23:07 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-27 23:07 ` [dm-devel] " Dan Williams
2021-10-27 23:07 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-18 4:40 ` [PATCH 06/11] xfs: factor out a xfs_setup_dax helper Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 16:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-10-18 16:43 ` [dm-devel] " Darrick J. Wong
2021-10-18 16:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-10-19 7:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-19 7:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-19 7:23 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-19 7:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-27 23:37 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-27 23:37 ` [dm-devel] " Dan Williams
2021-10-27 23:37 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-27 23:37 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-18 4:40 ` [PATCH 07/11] dax: remove dax_capable Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 12:25 ` Gao Xiang
2021-10-18 12:25 ` [dm-devel] " Gao Xiang
2021-10-18 12:25 ` Gao Xiang
2021-10-19 15:44 ` [dm-devel] " Darrick J. Wong
2021-10-19 15:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-10-19 15:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-10-28 0:20 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-28 0:20 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-28 0:20 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-28 0:20 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-28 0:16 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-28 0:16 ` [dm-devel] " Dan Williams
2021-10-28 0:16 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-28 0:16 ` Dan Williams
2021-11-01 16:17 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-11-01 16:17 ` [dm-devel] " Mike Snitzer
2021-11-01 16:17 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-11-01 16:17 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-10-18 4:40 ` [PATCH 08/11] dm-linear: add a linear_dax_pgoff helper Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-28 1:32 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-28 1:32 ` [dm-devel] " Dan Williams
2021-10-28 1:32 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-28 1:32 ` Dan Williams
2021-11-01 16:18 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-11-01 16:18 ` [dm-devel] " Mike Snitzer
2021-11-01 16:18 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-11-01 16:18 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-10-18 4:40 ` [PATCH 09/11] dm-log-writes: add a log_writes_dax_pgoff helper Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-28 1:36 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-28 1:36 ` [dm-devel] " Dan Williams
2021-10-28 1:36 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-28 1:36 ` Dan Williams
2021-11-01 16:19 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-11-01 16:19 ` [dm-devel] " Mike Snitzer
2021-11-01 16:19 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-11-01 16:19 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-10-18 4:40 ` [PATCH 10/11] dm-stripe: add a stripe_dax_pgoff helper Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-28 1:41 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-28 1:41 ` [dm-devel] " Dan Williams
2021-10-28 1:41 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-28 1:41 ` Dan Williams
2021-11-01 16:21 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-11-01 16:21 ` [dm-devel] " Mike Snitzer
2021-11-01 16:21 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-11-01 16:21 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-10-18 4:40 ` [PATCH 11/11] dax: move bdev_dax_pgoff to fs/dax.c Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-28 1:44 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-28 1:44 ` [dm-devel] " Dan Williams
2021-10-28 1:44 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-28 1:44 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-27 20:46 ` futher decouple DAX from block devices Dan Williams
2021-10-27 20:46 ` [dm-devel] " Dan Williams
2021-10-27 20:46 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-27 20:46 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-28 23:51 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2021-10-28 23:51 ` [dm-devel] " Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-28 23:51 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-28 23:51 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-29 15:42 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-29 15:42 ` [dm-devel] " Dan Williams
2021-10-29 15:42 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-29 15:42 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-29 15:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-10-29 15:55 ` [dm-devel] " Darrick J. Wong
2021-10-29 15:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-10-29 16:16 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-29 16:16 ` Dan Williams
2021-10-29 16:16 ` [dm-devel] " Dan Williams
2021-10-29 16:16 ` Dan Williams
2021-11-03 17:59 ` Eric Sandeen
2021-11-03 17:59 ` [dm-devel] " Eric Sandeen
2021-11-03 17:59 ` Eric Sandeen
2021-11-04 8:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-04 8:17 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-04 8:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-04 8:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-04 17:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-11-04 17:34 ` [dm-devel] " Darrick J. Wong
2021-11-04 17:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-11-04 17:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-04 17:35 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-04 17:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-04 17:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-04 18:10 ` Dan Williams
2021-11-04 18:10 ` Dan Williams
2021-11-04 18:10 ` Dan Williams
2021-11-04 18:10 ` [dm-devel] " Dan Williams
2021-11-04 19:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-11-04 19:04 ` [dm-devel] " Darrick J. Wong
2021-11-04 19:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-11-05 3:09 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-11-05 3:09 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-11-05 3:09 ` [dm-devel] " Theodore Ts'o
2021-11-05 3:09 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-11-05 3:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-11-05 3:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-11-05 3:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-11-05 3:30 ` [dm-devel] " Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211029105139.1194bb7f@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.