All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 05/29] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 writable
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:43:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211117064359.2362060-6-reijiw@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211117064359.2362060-1-reijiw@google.com>

This patch adds id_reg_info for ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 to make it writable
by userspace.

Return an error if userspace tries to set MTE field of the register
to a value that conflicts with KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE configuration for
the guest.
Skip fractional feature fields validation at present and they will
be handled by the following patches.

Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h |  1 +
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c       | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
index 597609f26331..b7ad59fd22e2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
@@ -800,6 +800,7 @@
 #define ID_AA64PFR0_ELx_32BIT_64BIT	0x2
 
 /* id_aa64pfr1 */
+#define ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC_SHIFT	32
 #define ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC_SHIFT	16
 #define ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC_SHIFT	12
 #define ID_AA64PFR1_MTE_SHIFT		8
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 35400869067a..7dc2b0d41b75 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -433,6 +433,21 @@ static int validate_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int validate_id_aa64pfr1_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+				    const struct id_reg_info *id_reg, u64 val)
+{
+	bool kvm_mte = kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm);
+	unsigned int mte;
+
+	mte = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(val, ID_AA64PFR1_MTE_SHIFT);
+
+	/* Check if there is a conflict with a request via KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT. */
+	if (kvm_mte ^ (mte > 0))
+		return -EPERM;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static void init_id_aa64pfr0_el1_info(struct id_reg_info *id_reg)
 {
 	u64 limit = id_reg->vcpu_limit_val;
@@ -464,6 +479,12 @@ static void init_id_aa64pfr0_el1_info(struct id_reg_info *id_reg)
 	id_reg->vcpu_limit_val = limit;
 }
 
+static void init_id_aa64pfr1_el1_info(struct id_reg_info *id_reg)
+{
+	if (!system_supports_mte())
+		id_reg->vcpu_limit_val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_MTE);
+}
+
 static u64 get_reset_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 				     const struct id_reg_info *idr)
 {
@@ -478,6 +499,14 @@ static u64 get_reset_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return val;
 }
 
+static u64 get_reset_id_aa64pfr1_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+				     const struct id_reg_info *idr)
+{
+	return kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm) ?
+	       idr->vcpu_limit_val :
+	       (idr->vcpu_limit_val & ~(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_MTE)));
+}
+
 static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = {
 	.sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
 	.ftr_check_types = S_FCT(ID_AA64PFR0_ASIMD_SHIFT, FCT_LOWER_SAFE) |
@@ -487,6 +516,16 @@ static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = {
 	.get_reset_val = get_reset_id_aa64pfr0_el1,
 };
 
+static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr1_el1_info = {
+	.sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+	.ftr_check_types = U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE) |
+			   U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE) |
+			   U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE),
+	.init = init_id_aa64pfr1_el1_info,
+	.validate = validate_id_aa64pfr1_el1,
+	.get_reset_val = get_reset_id_aa64pfr1_el1,
+};
+
 /*
  * An ID register that needs special handling to control the value for the
  * guest must have its own id_reg_info in id_reg_info_table.
@@ -497,6 +536,7 @@ static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = {
 #define	GET_ID_REG_INFO(id)	(id_reg_info_table[IDREG_IDX(id)])
 static struct id_reg_info *id_reg_info_table[KVM_ARM_ID_REG_MAX_NUM] = {
 	[IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1)] = &id_aa64pfr0_el1_info,
+	[IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1)] = &id_aa64pfr1_el1_info,
 };
 
 static int validate_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
@@ -1345,10 +1385,6 @@ static u64 __read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 id)
 			val |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_GIC), gic_lim);
 		}
 		break;
-	case SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1:
-		if (!kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm))
-			val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_MTE);
-		break;
 	case SYS_ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1:
 		if (!vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu))
 			val &= ~(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64ISAR1_APA) |
-- 
2.34.0.rc1.387.gb447b232ab-goog

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	Peng Liang <liangpeng10@huawei.com>,
	Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
	Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
	Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
	Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 05/29] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 writable
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:43:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211117064359.2362060-6-reijiw@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211117064359.2362060-1-reijiw@google.com>

This patch adds id_reg_info for ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 to make it writable
by userspace.

Return an error if userspace tries to set MTE field of the register
to a value that conflicts with KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE configuration for
the guest.
Skip fractional feature fields validation at present and they will
be handled by the following patches.

Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h |  1 +
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c       | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
index 597609f26331..b7ad59fd22e2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
@@ -800,6 +800,7 @@
 #define ID_AA64PFR0_ELx_32BIT_64BIT	0x2
 
 /* id_aa64pfr1 */
+#define ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC_SHIFT	32
 #define ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC_SHIFT	16
 #define ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC_SHIFT	12
 #define ID_AA64PFR1_MTE_SHIFT		8
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 35400869067a..7dc2b0d41b75 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -433,6 +433,21 @@ static int validate_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int validate_id_aa64pfr1_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+				    const struct id_reg_info *id_reg, u64 val)
+{
+	bool kvm_mte = kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm);
+	unsigned int mte;
+
+	mte = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(val, ID_AA64PFR1_MTE_SHIFT);
+
+	/* Check if there is a conflict with a request via KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT. */
+	if (kvm_mte ^ (mte > 0))
+		return -EPERM;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static void init_id_aa64pfr0_el1_info(struct id_reg_info *id_reg)
 {
 	u64 limit = id_reg->vcpu_limit_val;
@@ -464,6 +479,12 @@ static void init_id_aa64pfr0_el1_info(struct id_reg_info *id_reg)
 	id_reg->vcpu_limit_val = limit;
 }
 
+static void init_id_aa64pfr1_el1_info(struct id_reg_info *id_reg)
+{
+	if (!system_supports_mte())
+		id_reg->vcpu_limit_val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_MTE);
+}
+
 static u64 get_reset_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 				     const struct id_reg_info *idr)
 {
@@ -478,6 +499,14 @@ static u64 get_reset_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return val;
 }
 
+static u64 get_reset_id_aa64pfr1_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+				     const struct id_reg_info *idr)
+{
+	return kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm) ?
+	       idr->vcpu_limit_val :
+	       (idr->vcpu_limit_val & ~(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_MTE)));
+}
+
 static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = {
 	.sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
 	.ftr_check_types = S_FCT(ID_AA64PFR0_ASIMD_SHIFT, FCT_LOWER_SAFE) |
@@ -487,6 +516,16 @@ static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = {
 	.get_reset_val = get_reset_id_aa64pfr0_el1,
 };
 
+static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr1_el1_info = {
+	.sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+	.ftr_check_types = U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE) |
+			   U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE) |
+			   U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE),
+	.init = init_id_aa64pfr1_el1_info,
+	.validate = validate_id_aa64pfr1_el1,
+	.get_reset_val = get_reset_id_aa64pfr1_el1,
+};
+
 /*
  * An ID register that needs special handling to control the value for the
  * guest must have its own id_reg_info in id_reg_info_table.
@@ -497,6 +536,7 @@ static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = {
 #define	GET_ID_REG_INFO(id)	(id_reg_info_table[IDREG_IDX(id)])
 static struct id_reg_info *id_reg_info_table[KVM_ARM_ID_REG_MAX_NUM] = {
 	[IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1)] = &id_aa64pfr0_el1_info,
+	[IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1)] = &id_aa64pfr1_el1_info,
 };
 
 static int validate_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
@@ -1345,10 +1385,6 @@ static u64 __read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 id)
 			val |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_GIC), gic_lim);
 		}
 		break;
-	case SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1:
-		if (!kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm))
-			val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_MTE);
-		break;
 	case SYS_ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1:
 		if (!vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu))
 			val &= ~(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64ISAR1_APA) |
-- 
2.34.0.rc1.387.gb447b232ab-goog


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	 Peng Liang <liangpeng10@huawei.com>,
	Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	 Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
	 Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
	Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
	Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 05/29] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 writable
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:43:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211117064359.2362060-6-reijiw@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211117064359.2362060-1-reijiw@google.com>

This patch adds id_reg_info for ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 to make it writable
by userspace.

Return an error if userspace tries to set MTE field of the register
to a value that conflicts with KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE configuration for
the guest.
Skip fractional feature fields validation at present and they will
be handled by the following patches.

Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h |  1 +
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c       | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
index 597609f26331..b7ad59fd22e2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
@@ -800,6 +800,7 @@
 #define ID_AA64PFR0_ELx_32BIT_64BIT	0x2
 
 /* id_aa64pfr1 */
+#define ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC_SHIFT	32
 #define ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC_SHIFT	16
 #define ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC_SHIFT	12
 #define ID_AA64PFR1_MTE_SHIFT		8
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 35400869067a..7dc2b0d41b75 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -433,6 +433,21 @@ static int validate_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int validate_id_aa64pfr1_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+				    const struct id_reg_info *id_reg, u64 val)
+{
+	bool kvm_mte = kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm);
+	unsigned int mte;
+
+	mte = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(val, ID_AA64PFR1_MTE_SHIFT);
+
+	/* Check if there is a conflict with a request via KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT. */
+	if (kvm_mte ^ (mte > 0))
+		return -EPERM;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static void init_id_aa64pfr0_el1_info(struct id_reg_info *id_reg)
 {
 	u64 limit = id_reg->vcpu_limit_val;
@@ -464,6 +479,12 @@ static void init_id_aa64pfr0_el1_info(struct id_reg_info *id_reg)
 	id_reg->vcpu_limit_val = limit;
 }
 
+static void init_id_aa64pfr1_el1_info(struct id_reg_info *id_reg)
+{
+	if (!system_supports_mte())
+		id_reg->vcpu_limit_val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_MTE);
+}
+
 static u64 get_reset_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 				     const struct id_reg_info *idr)
 {
@@ -478,6 +499,14 @@ static u64 get_reset_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return val;
 }
 
+static u64 get_reset_id_aa64pfr1_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+				     const struct id_reg_info *idr)
+{
+	return kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm) ?
+	       idr->vcpu_limit_val :
+	       (idr->vcpu_limit_val & ~(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_MTE)));
+}
+
 static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = {
 	.sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
 	.ftr_check_types = S_FCT(ID_AA64PFR0_ASIMD_SHIFT, FCT_LOWER_SAFE) |
@@ -487,6 +516,16 @@ static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = {
 	.get_reset_val = get_reset_id_aa64pfr0_el1,
 };
 
+static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr1_el1_info = {
+	.sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+	.ftr_check_types = U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE) |
+			   U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE) |
+			   U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE),
+	.init = init_id_aa64pfr1_el1_info,
+	.validate = validate_id_aa64pfr1_el1,
+	.get_reset_val = get_reset_id_aa64pfr1_el1,
+};
+
 /*
  * An ID register that needs special handling to control the value for the
  * guest must have its own id_reg_info in id_reg_info_table.
@@ -497,6 +536,7 @@ static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = {
 #define	GET_ID_REG_INFO(id)	(id_reg_info_table[IDREG_IDX(id)])
 static struct id_reg_info *id_reg_info_table[KVM_ARM_ID_REG_MAX_NUM] = {
 	[IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1)] = &id_aa64pfr0_el1_info,
+	[IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1)] = &id_aa64pfr1_el1_info,
 };
 
 static int validate_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
@@ -1345,10 +1385,6 @@ static u64 __read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 id)
 			val |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_GIC), gic_lim);
 		}
 		break;
-	case SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1:
-		if (!kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm))
-			val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_MTE);
-		break;
 	case SYS_ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1:
 		if (!vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu))
 			val &= ~(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64ISAR1_APA) |
-- 
2.34.0.rc1.387.gb447b232ab-goog


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-17  6:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 328+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-17  6:43 [RFC PATCH v3 00/29] KVM: arm64: Make CPU ID registers writable by userspace Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/29] KVM: arm64: Add has_reset_once flag for vcpu Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-21 12:36   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-21 12:36     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-21 12:36     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-23  0:51     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-23  0:51       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-23  0:51       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/29] KVM: arm64: Save ID registers' sanitized value per vCPU Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-18 20:36   ` Eric Auger
2021-11-18 20:36     ` Eric Auger
2021-11-18 20:36     ` Eric Auger
2021-11-18 22:00     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-18 22:00       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-18 22:00       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-24 18:08       ` Eric Auger
2021-11-24 18:08         ` Eric Auger
2021-11-24 18:08         ` Eric Auger
2021-11-21 12:36   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-21 12:36     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-21 12:36     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-23  4:39     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-23  4:39       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-23  4:39       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-23 10:03       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-23 10:03         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-23 10:03         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-23 17:12         ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-23 17:12           ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-23 17:12           ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-02 10:58   ` Eric Auger
2021-12-02 10:58     ` Eric Auger
2021-12-02 10:58     ` Eric Auger
2021-12-04  1:45     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-04  1:45       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-04  1:45       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-07  9:34       ` Eric Auger
2021-12-07  9:34         ` Eric Auger
2021-12-07  9:34         ` Eric Auger
2021-12-08  5:57         ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-08  5:57           ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-08  5:57           ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-08  7:09           ` Eric Auger
2021-12-08  7:09             ` Eric Auger
2021-12-08  7:09             ` Eric Auger
2021-12-08  7:18             ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-08  7:18               ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-08  7:18               ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/29] KVM: arm64: Introduce struct id_reg_info Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-18 20:36   ` Eric Auger
2021-11-18 20:36     ` Eric Auger
2021-11-18 20:36     ` Eric Auger
2021-11-19  4:47     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-19  4:47       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-19  4:47       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-21 12:37       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-21 12:37         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-21 12:37         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-23  0:56         ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-23  0:56           ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-23  0:56           ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-24 18:22       ` Eric Auger
2021-11-24 18:22         ` Eric Auger
2021-11-24 18:22         ` Eric Auger
2021-11-25  6:05         ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-25  6:05           ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-25  6:05           ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-21 12:37   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-21 12:37     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-21 12:37     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-25  5:27     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-25  5:27       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-25  5:27       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-01 15:38       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-01 15:38         ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-01 15:38         ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-02  4:32         ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-02  4:32           ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-02  4:32           ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-24 21:07   ` Eric Auger
2021-11-24 21:07     ` Eric Auger
2021-11-24 21:07     ` Eric Auger
2021-11-25  6:40     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-25  6:40       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-25  6:40       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-02 12:51       ` Eric Auger
2021-12-02 12:51         ` Eric Auger
2021-12-02 12:51         ` Eric Auger
2021-12-01 15:24   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-01 15:24     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-01 15:24     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-02  4:09     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-02  4:09       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-02  4:09       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-02 12:51   ` Eric Auger
2021-12-02 12:51     ` Eric Auger
2021-12-02 12:51     ` Eric Auger
2021-12-04  4:35     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-04  4:35       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-04  4:35       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-07  9:36       ` Eric Auger
2021-12-07  9:36         ` Eric Auger
2021-12-07  9:36         ` Eric Auger
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/29] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-21 12:37   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-21 12:37     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-21 12:37     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-24  6:11     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-24  6:11       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-24  6:11       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-25 15:35   ` Eric Auger
2021-11-25 15:35     ` Eric Auger
2021-11-25 15:35     ` Eric Auger
2021-11-30  1:29     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-30  1:29       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-30  1:29       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-02 13:02       ` Eric Auger
2021-12-02 13:02         ` Eric Auger
2021-12-02 13:02         ` Eric Auger
2021-12-04  7:59         ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-04  7:59           ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-04  7:59           ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-07  9:42           ` Eric Auger
2021-12-07  9:42             ` Eric Auger
2021-12-07  9:42             ` Eric Auger
2021-11-17  6:43 ` Reiji Watanabe [this message]
2021-11-17  6:43   ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/29] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/29] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/29] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/29] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-25 15:31   ` Eric Auger
2021-11-25 15:31     ` Eric Auger
2021-11-25 15:31     ` Eric Auger
2021-11-30  4:43     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-30  4:43       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-30  4:43       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-25 16:06   ` Eric Auger
2021-11-25 16:06     ` Eric Auger
2021-11-25 16:06     ` Eric Auger
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/29] KVM: arm64: Hide IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED PMU support for the guest Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-25 20:30   ` Eric Auger
2021-11-25 20:30     ` Eric Auger
2021-11-25 20:30     ` Eric Auger
2021-11-30  5:32     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-30  5:32       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-30  5:32       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-01 15:53       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-01 15:53         ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-01 15:53         ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-01 16:09         ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-01 16:09           ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-01 16:09           ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-02  4:42           ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-02  4:42             ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-02  4:42             ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-02 10:57       ` Eric Auger
2021-12-02 10:57         ` Eric Auger
2021-12-02 10:57         ` Eric Auger
2021-12-04  1:04         ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-04  1:04           ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-04  1:04           ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-04 14:14           ` Eric Auger
2021-12-04 14:14             ` Eric Auger
2021-12-04 14:14             ` Eric Auger
2021-12-04 17:39             ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-04 17:39               ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-04 17:39               ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-04 23:38               ` Itaru Kitayama
2021-12-04 23:38                 ` Itaru Kitayama
2021-12-04 23:38                 ` Itaru Kitayama
2021-12-06  0:27                 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-06  0:27                   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-06  0:27                   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-06  9:52               ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-06  9:52                 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-06  9:52                 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-06 10:25                 ` Eric Auger
2021-12-06 10:25                   ` Eric Auger
2021-12-06 10:25                   ` Eric Auger
2021-12-07  7:07                   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-07  7:07                     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-07  7:07                     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-07  8:10                 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-07  8:10                   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-07  8:10                   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/29] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-25 20:30   ` Eric Auger
2021-11-25 20:30     ` Eric Auger
2021-11-25 20:30     ` Eric Auger
2021-11-30  5:21     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-30  5:21       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-30  5:21       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/29] KVM: arm64: Make ID_DFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-24 13:46   ` Eric Auger
2021-11-24 13:46     ` Eric Auger
2021-11-24 13:46     ` Eric Auger
2021-11-25  5:33     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-25  5:33       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-25  5:33       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/29] KVM: arm64: Make ID_DFR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-25 20:30   ` Eric Auger
2021-11-25 20:30     ` Eric Auger
2021-11-25 20:30     ` Eric Auger
2021-11-30  5:39     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-30  5:39       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-30  5:39       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-02 13:11       ` Eric Auger
2021-12-02 13:11         ` Eric Auger
2021-12-02 13:11         ` Eric Auger
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/29] KVM: arm64: Make ID_MMFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 14/29] KVM: arm64: Make MVFR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 15/29] KVM: arm64: Make ID registers without id_reg_info writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 16/29] KVM: arm64: Add consistency checking for frac fields of ID registers Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 17/29] KVM: arm64: Introduce KVM_CAP_ARM_ID_REG_CONFIGURABLE capability Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 18/29] KVM: arm64: Add kunit test for ID register validation Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-19  3:34   ` kernel test robot
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 19/29] KVM: arm64: Use vcpu->arch cptr_el2 to track value of cptr_el2 for VHE Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 20/29] KVM: arm64: Use vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2 to track value of mdcr_el2 Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 21/29] KVM: arm64: Introduce framework to trap disabled features Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-21 18:46   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-21 18:46     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-21 18:46     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-23  7:27     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-23  7:27       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-23  7:27       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 22/29] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 23/29] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 24/29] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 25/29] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 26/29] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 27/29] KVM: arm64: Initialize trapping of disabled CPU features for the guest Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 28/29] KVM: arm64: Add kunit test for trap initialization Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 29/29] KVM: arm64: selftests: Introduce id_reg_test Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17  6:43   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-18 20:34   ` Eric Auger
2021-11-18 20:34     ` Eric Auger
2021-11-18 20:34     ` Eric Auger
2021-11-20  6:39     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-20  6:39       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-20  6:39       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-22 14:17       ` Eric Auger
2021-11-22 14:17         ` Eric Auger
2021-11-22 14:17         ` Eric Auger
2021-11-23  6:33         ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-23  6:33           ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-23  6:33           ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-23 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v3 00/29] KVM: arm64: Make CPU ID registers writable by userspace Alexandru Elisei
2021-11-23 16:00   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-11-23 16:00   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-11-24  5:13   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-24  5:13     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-24  5:13     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-24 10:50     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-11-24 10:50       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-11-24 10:50       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-11-24 17:00       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-24 17:00         ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-24 17:00         ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-23 16:27 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-11-23 16:27   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-11-23 16:27   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-11-24  5:49   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-24  5:49     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-24  5:49     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-24 10:48     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-11-24 10:48       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-11-24 10:48       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-11-24 16:44       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-24 16:44         ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-24 16:44         ` Reiji Watanabe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211117064359.2362060-6-reijiw@google.com \
    --to=reijiw@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pshier@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.