All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH resend 0/1] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Use CPU-id check instead of _HRV check to differentiate variants
@ 2021-12-06 17:48 Hans de Goede
  2021-12-06 17:48 ` [PATCH resend 1/1] " Hans de Goede
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hans de Goede @ 2021-12-06 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Andy Shevchenko, Mika Westerberg; +Cc: Hans de Goede, linux-kernel

Hi Lee,

This patch seems to have fallen through the cracks,
so I'm resending it now.

Note it already has a Reviewed-by from Andy so AFAICT it is
ready for merging.

Regards,

Hans


Hans de Goede (1):
  mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Use CPU-id check instead of _HRV check to
    differentiate variants

 drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.c | 28 +++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

-- 
2.33.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH resend 1/1] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Use CPU-id check instead of _HRV check to differentiate variants
  2021-12-06 17:48 [PATCH resend 0/1] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Use CPU-id check instead of _HRV check to differentiate variants Hans de Goede
@ 2021-12-06 17:48 ` Hans de Goede
  2021-12-29 13:33   ` Lee Jones
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hans de Goede @ 2021-12-06 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Andy Shevchenko, Mika Westerberg
  Cc: Hans de Goede, linux-kernel, Tsuchiya Yuto, Andy Shevchenko

The Intel Crystal Cove PMIC has 2 different variants, one for use with
Bay Trail (BYT) SoCs and one for use with Cherry Trail (CHT) SoCs.

So far we have been using an ACPI _HRV check to differentiate between
the 2, but at least on the Microsoft Surface 3, which is a CHT device,
the wrong _HRV value is reported by ACPI.

So instead switch to a CPU-ID check which avoids us relying on the
possibly wrong ACPI _HRV value.

Reported-by: Tsuchiya Yuto <kitakar@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.c | 28 +++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.c b/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.c
index ddd64f9e3341..47cb7f00dfcf 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.c
@@ -14,15 +14,12 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/mfd/core.h>
 #include <linux/mfd/intel_soc_pmic.h>
+#include <linux/platform_data/x86/soc.h>
 #include <linux/pwm.h>
 #include <linux/regmap.h>
 
 #include "intel_soc_pmic_core.h"
 
-/* Crystal Cove PMIC shares same ACPI ID between different platforms */
-#define BYT_CRC_HRV		2
-#define CHT_CRC_HRV		3
-
 /* PWM consumed by the Intel GFX */
 static struct pwm_lookup crc_pwm_lookup[] = {
 	PWM_LOOKUP("crystal_cove_pwm", 0, "0000:00:02.0", "pwm_pmic_backlight", 0, PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL),
@@ -34,31 +31,12 @@ static int intel_soc_pmic_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
 	struct device *dev = &i2c->dev;
 	struct intel_soc_pmic_config *config;
 	struct intel_soc_pmic *pmic;
-	unsigned long long hrv;
-	acpi_status status;
 	int ret;
 
-	/*
-	 * There are 2 different Crystal Cove PMICs a Bay Trail and Cherry
-	 * Trail version, use _HRV to differentiate between the 2.
-	 */
-	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(ACPI_HANDLE(dev), "_HRV", NULL, &hrv);
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
-		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PMIC hardware revision\n");
-		return -ENODEV;
-	}
-
-	switch (hrv) {
-	case BYT_CRC_HRV:
+	if (soc_intel_is_byt())
 		config = &intel_soc_pmic_config_byt_crc;
-		break;
-	case CHT_CRC_HRV:
+	else
 		config = &intel_soc_pmic_config_cht_crc;
-		break;
-	default:
-		dev_warn(dev, "Unknown hardware rev %llu, assuming BYT\n", hrv);
-		config = &intel_soc_pmic_config_byt_crc;
-	}
 
 	pmic = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pmic), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!pmic)
-- 
2.33.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH resend 1/1] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Use CPU-id check instead of _HRV check to differentiate variants
  2021-12-06 17:48 ` [PATCH resend 1/1] " Hans de Goede
@ 2021-12-29 13:33   ` Lee Jones
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2021-12-29 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hans de Goede
  Cc: Andy Shevchenko, Mika Westerberg, linux-kernel, Tsuchiya Yuto,
	Andy Shevchenko

On Mon, 06 Dec 2021, Hans de Goede wrote:

> The Intel Crystal Cove PMIC has 2 different variants, one for use with
> Bay Trail (BYT) SoCs and one for use with Cherry Trail (CHT) SoCs.
> 
> So far we have been using an ACPI _HRV check to differentiate between
> the 2, but at least on the Microsoft Surface 3, which is a CHT device,
> the wrong _HRV value is reported by ACPI.
> 
> So instead switch to a CPU-ID check which avoids us relying on the
> possibly wrong ACPI _HRV value.
> 
> Reported-by: Tsuchiya Yuto <kitakar@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>

I switched these around (same with the other patches).

> ---
>  drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.c | 28 +++-------------------------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-29 13:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-12-06 17:48 [PATCH resend 0/1] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Use CPU-id check instead of _HRV check to differentiate variants Hans de Goede
2021-12-06 17:48 ` [PATCH resend 1/1] " Hans de Goede
2021-12-29 13:33   ` Lee Jones

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.