All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com,
	Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
	etienne.carriere@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH v8 02/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Make smc transport use common completions
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 19:56:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211220195646.44498-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211220195646.44498-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com>

When a completion irq is available use it and delegate command completion
handling to the core SCMI completion mechanism.

If no completion irq is available revert to polling, using the core common
polling machinery.

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
---
v6 --> v7
- removed spurios blank line removal
v4 --> v5
- removed RFC tag
v3 --> v4
- renamed usage of .needs_polling to .no_completion_irq
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c
index 4effecc3bb46..d6c6ad9f6bab 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c
@@ -25,8 +25,6 @@
  * @shmem: Transmit/Receive shared memory area
  * @shmem_lock: Lock to protect access to Tx/Rx shared memory area
  * @func_id: smc/hvc call function id
- * @irq: Optional; employed when platforms indicates msg completion by intr.
- * @tx_complete: Optional, employed only when irq is valid.
  */
 
 struct scmi_smc {
@@ -34,15 +32,14 @@ struct scmi_smc {
 	struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *shmem;
 	struct mutex shmem_lock;
 	u32 func_id;
-	int irq;
-	struct completion tx_complete;
 };
 
 static irqreturn_t smc_msg_done_isr(int irq, void *data)
 {
 	struct scmi_smc *scmi_info = data;
 
-	complete(&scmi_info->tx_complete);
+	scmi_rx_callback(scmi_info->cinfo,
+			 shmem_read_header(scmi_info->shmem), NULL);
 
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
@@ -111,8 +108,8 @@ static int smc_chan_setup(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct device *dev,
 			dev_err(dev, "failed to setup SCMI smc irq\n");
 			return ret;
 		}
-		init_completion(&scmi_info->tx_complete);
-		scmi_info->irq = irq;
+	} else {
+		cinfo->no_completion_irq = true;
 	}
 
 	scmi_info->func_id = func_id;
@@ -142,26 +139,22 @@ static int smc_send_message(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
 	struct scmi_smc *scmi_info = cinfo->transport_info;
 	struct arm_smccc_res res;
 
+	/*
+	 * Channel lock will be released only once response has been
+	 * surely fully retrieved, so after .mark_txdone()
+	 */
 	mutex_lock(&scmi_info->shmem_lock);
 
 	shmem_tx_prepare(scmi_info->shmem, xfer);
 
-	if (scmi_info->irq)
-		reinit_completion(&scmi_info->tx_complete);
-
 	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(scmi_info->func_id, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
 
-	if (scmi_info->irq)
-		wait_for_completion(&scmi_info->tx_complete);
-
-	scmi_rx_callback(scmi_info->cinfo,
-			 shmem_read_header(scmi_info->shmem), NULL);
-
-	mutex_unlock(&scmi_info->shmem_lock);
-
 	/* Only SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is valid error code */
-	if (res.a0)
+	if (res.a0) {
+		mutex_unlock(&scmi_info->shmem_lock);
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -173,6 +166,13 @@ static void smc_fetch_response(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
 	shmem_fetch_response(scmi_info->shmem, xfer);
 }
 
+static void smc_mark_txdone(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, int ret)
+{
+	struct scmi_smc *scmi_info = cinfo->transport_info;
+
+	mutex_unlock(&scmi_info->shmem_lock);
+}
+
 static bool
 smc_poll_done(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
 {
@@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ static const struct scmi_transport_ops scmi_smc_ops = {
 	.chan_setup = smc_chan_setup,
 	.chan_free = smc_chan_free,
 	.send_message = smc_send_message,
+	.mark_txdone = smc_mark_txdone,
 	.fetch_response = smc_fetch_response,
 	.poll_done = smc_poll_done,
 };
-- 
2.17.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com,
	Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
	etienne.carriere@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH v8 02/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Make smc transport use common completions
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 19:56:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211220195646.44498-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211220195646.44498-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com>

When a completion irq is available use it and delegate command completion
handling to the core SCMI completion mechanism.

If no completion irq is available revert to polling, using the core common
polling machinery.

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
---
v6 --> v7
- removed spurios blank line removal
v4 --> v5
- removed RFC tag
v3 --> v4
- renamed usage of .needs_polling to .no_completion_irq
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c
index 4effecc3bb46..d6c6ad9f6bab 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c
@@ -25,8 +25,6 @@
  * @shmem: Transmit/Receive shared memory area
  * @shmem_lock: Lock to protect access to Tx/Rx shared memory area
  * @func_id: smc/hvc call function id
- * @irq: Optional; employed when platforms indicates msg completion by intr.
- * @tx_complete: Optional, employed only when irq is valid.
  */
 
 struct scmi_smc {
@@ -34,15 +32,14 @@ struct scmi_smc {
 	struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *shmem;
 	struct mutex shmem_lock;
 	u32 func_id;
-	int irq;
-	struct completion tx_complete;
 };
 
 static irqreturn_t smc_msg_done_isr(int irq, void *data)
 {
 	struct scmi_smc *scmi_info = data;
 
-	complete(&scmi_info->tx_complete);
+	scmi_rx_callback(scmi_info->cinfo,
+			 shmem_read_header(scmi_info->shmem), NULL);
 
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
@@ -111,8 +108,8 @@ static int smc_chan_setup(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct device *dev,
 			dev_err(dev, "failed to setup SCMI smc irq\n");
 			return ret;
 		}
-		init_completion(&scmi_info->tx_complete);
-		scmi_info->irq = irq;
+	} else {
+		cinfo->no_completion_irq = true;
 	}
 
 	scmi_info->func_id = func_id;
@@ -142,26 +139,22 @@ static int smc_send_message(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
 	struct scmi_smc *scmi_info = cinfo->transport_info;
 	struct arm_smccc_res res;
 
+	/*
+	 * Channel lock will be released only once response has been
+	 * surely fully retrieved, so after .mark_txdone()
+	 */
 	mutex_lock(&scmi_info->shmem_lock);
 
 	shmem_tx_prepare(scmi_info->shmem, xfer);
 
-	if (scmi_info->irq)
-		reinit_completion(&scmi_info->tx_complete);
-
 	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(scmi_info->func_id, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
 
-	if (scmi_info->irq)
-		wait_for_completion(&scmi_info->tx_complete);
-
-	scmi_rx_callback(scmi_info->cinfo,
-			 shmem_read_header(scmi_info->shmem), NULL);
-
-	mutex_unlock(&scmi_info->shmem_lock);
-
 	/* Only SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is valid error code */
-	if (res.a0)
+	if (res.a0) {
+		mutex_unlock(&scmi_info->shmem_lock);
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -173,6 +166,13 @@ static void smc_fetch_response(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
 	shmem_fetch_response(scmi_info->shmem, xfer);
 }
 
+static void smc_mark_txdone(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, int ret)
+{
+	struct scmi_smc *scmi_info = cinfo->transport_info;
+
+	mutex_unlock(&scmi_info->shmem_lock);
+}
+
 static bool
 smc_poll_done(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
 {
@@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ static const struct scmi_transport_ops scmi_smc_ops = {
 	.chan_setup = smc_chan_setup,
 	.chan_free = smc_chan_free,
 	.send_message = smc_send_message,
+	.mark_txdone = smc_mark_txdone,
 	.fetch_response = smc_fetch_response,
 	.poll_done = smc_poll_done,
 };
-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-20 19:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-20 19:56 [PATCH v8 00/11] Introduce atomic support for SCMI transports Cristian Marussi
2021-12-20 19:56 ` Cristian Marussi
2021-12-20 19:56 ` [PATCH v8 01/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add configurable polling mode for transports Cristian Marussi
2021-12-20 19:56   ` Cristian Marussi
2021-12-21 19:38   ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-21 19:38     ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-21 20:23     ` Sudeep Holla
2021-12-21 20:23       ` Sudeep Holla
2021-12-20 19:56 ` Cristian Marussi [this message]
2021-12-20 19:56   ` [PATCH v8 02/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Make smc transport use common completions Cristian Marussi
2021-12-20 19:56 ` [PATCH v8 03/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add sync_cmds_completed_on_ret transport flag Cristian Marussi
2021-12-20 19:56   ` Cristian Marussi
2021-12-20 19:56 ` [PATCH v8 04/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Make smc support sync_cmds_completed_on_ret Cristian Marussi
2021-12-20 19:56   ` Cristian Marussi
2021-12-20 19:56 ` [PATCH v8 05/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Make optee " Cristian Marussi
2021-12-20 19:56   ` Cristian Marussi
2021-12-20 19:56 ` [PATCH v8 06/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for atomic transports Cristian Marussi
2021-12-20 19:56   ` Cristian Marussi
2021-12-20 19:56 ` [PATCH v8 07/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add atomic mode support to smc transport Cristian Marussi
2021-12-20 19:56   ` Cristian Marussi
2021-12-20 19:56 ` [PATCH v8 08/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add new parameter to mark_txdone Cristian Marussi
2021-12-20 19:56   ` Cristian Marussi
2021-12-20 19:56 ` [PATCH v8 09/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add atomic mode support to virtio transport Cristian Marussi
2021-12-20 19:56   ` Cristian Marussi
2021-12-20 23:17   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-12-20 23:17     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-12-20 23:17     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-12-21 12:09     ` Cristian Marussi
2021-12-21 12:09       ` Cristian Marussi
2021-12-21 14:00   ` [PATCH v9 " Cristian Marussi
2021-12-21 14:00     ` Cristian Marussi
2022-01-18 14:21     ` Peter Hilber
2022-01-18 14:21       ` Peter Hilber
2022-01-19 12:23       ` Cristian Marussi
2022-01-19 12:23         ` Cristian Marussi
2022-01-20 19:09         ` Peter Hilber
2022-01-20 19:09           ` Peter Hilber
2022-01-20 20:39           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-20 20:39             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-20 20:39             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-23 20:02             ` Cristian Marussi
2022-01-23 20:02               ` Cristian Marussi
2022-01-23 22:40               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-23 22:40                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-23 22:40                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-23 22:45                 ` Cristian Marussi
2022-01-23 22:45                   ` Cristian Marussi
2021-12-20 19:56 ` [PATCH v8 10/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add atomic support to clock protocol Cristian Marussi
2021-12-20 19:56   ` Cristian Marussi
2021-12-20 19:56 ` [PATCH v8 11/11] clk: scmi: Support atomic clock enable/disable API Cristian Marussi
2021-12-20 19:56   ` Cristian Marussi
2022-01-14 23:08   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-14 23:08     ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-17 10:31     ` Sudeep Holla
2022-01-17 10:31       ` Sudeep Holla
2022-01-17 12:40       ` Cristian Marussi
2022-01-17 12:40         ` Cristian Marussi
2021-12-22 14:23 ` [PATCH v8 00/11] (subset) Introduce atomic support for SCMI transports Sudeep Holla
2021-12-22 14:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-01-11 18:13 ` [PATCH v8 00/11] " Cristian Marussi
2022-01-11 18:13   ` Cristian Marussi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211220195646.44498-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --to=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
    --cc=etienne.carriere@linaro.org \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=souvik.chakravarty@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.