All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH V3] arm64: Unhash early pointer print plus improve comment
@ 2021-12-21 15:52 Guilherme G. Piccoli
  2021-12-21 16:52 ` Robin Murphy
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Guilherme G. Piccoli @ 2021-12-21 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: catalin.marinas, will, broonie, u.kleine-koenig, gpiccoli,
	kernel, robin.murphy

When facing a really early issue on DT parsing we have currently
a message that shows both the physical and virtual address of the FDT.
The printk pointer modifier for the virtual address shows a hashed
address there unless the user provides "no_hash_pointers" parameter in
the command-line. The situation in which this message shows-up is a bit
more serious though: the boot process is broken, nothing can be done
(even an oops is too much for this early stage) so we have this message
as a last resort in order to help debug bootloader issues, for example.
Hence, we hereby change that to "%px" in order to make debugging easy,
there's not much information leak risk in such early boot failure.

Also, we tried to improve a bit the commenting on that function, given
that if kernel fails there, it just hangs forever in a cpu_relax() loop.
The reason we cannot BUG/panic is that is too early to do so; thanks to
Mark Brown for pointing that on IRC and thanks Robin Murphy for the good
pointer hash discussion in the mailing-list.

Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
---

V3:
* Improved commit message (thanks Robin!);
* Fixed comment style.

 arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
index be5f85b0a24d..a80430550a73 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
@@ -189,11 +189,16 @@ static void __init setup_machine_fdt(phys_addr_t dt_phys)
 
 	if (!dt_virt || !early_init_dt_scan(dt_virt)) {
 		pr_crit("\n"
-			"Error: invalid device tree blob at physical address %pa (virtual address 0x%p)\n"
+			"Error: invalid device tree blob at physical address %pa (virtual address 0x%px)\n"
 			"The dtb must be 8-byte aligned and must not exceed 2 MB in size\n"
 			"\nPlease check your bootloader.",
 			&dt_phys, dt_virt);
 
+		/*
+		 * Note that in this _really_ early stage we cannot even BUG()
+		 * or oops, so the least terrible thing to do is cpu_relax(),
+		 * or else we could end-up printing non-initialized data, etc.
+		 */
 		while (true)
 			cpu_relax();
 	}
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V3] arm64: Unhash early pointer print plus improve comment
  2021-12-21 15:52 [PATCH V3] arm64: Unhash early pointer print plus improve comment Guilherme G. Piccoli
@ 2021-12-21 16:52 ` Robin Murphy
  2021-12-22  6:51 ` Uwe Kleine-König
  2021-12-22 11:26 ` Catalin Marinas
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Robin Murphy @ 2021-12-21 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Guilherme G. Piccoli, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: catalin.marinas, will, broonie, u.kleine-koenig, kernel

On 2021-12-21 15:52, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> When facing a really early issue on DT parsing we have currently
> a message that shows both the physical and virtual address of the FDT.
> The printk pointer modifier for the virtual address shows a hashed
> address there unless the user provides "no_hash_pointers" parameter in
> the command-line. The situation in which this message shows-up is a bit
> more serious though: the boot process is broken, nothing can be done
> (even an oops is too much for this early stage) so we have this message
> as a last resort in order to help debug bootloader issues, for example.
> Hence, we hereby change that to "%px" in order to make debugging easy,
> there's not much information leak risk in such early boot failure.
> 
> Also, we tried to improve a bit the commenting on that function, given
> that if kernel fails there, it just hangs forever in a cpu_relax() loop.
> The reason we cannot BUG/panic is that is too early to do so; thanks to
> Mark Brown for pointing that on IRC and thanks Robin Murphy for the good
> pointer hash discussion in the mailing-list.

Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>

> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
> ---
> 
> V3:
> * Improved commit message (thanks Robin!);
> * Fixed comment style.
> 
>   arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 7 ++++++-
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> index be5f85b0a24d..a80430550a73 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -189,11 +189,16 @@ static void __init setup_machine_fdt(phys_addr_t dt_phys)
>   
>   	if (!dt_virt || !early_init_dt_scan(dt_virt)) {
>   		pr_crit("\n"
> -			"Error: invalid device tree blob at physical address %pa (virtual address 0x%p)\n"
> +			"Error: invalid device tree blob at physical address %pa (virtual address 0x%px)\n"
>   			"The dtb must be 8-byte aligned and must not exceed 2 MB in size\n"
>   			"\nPlease check your bootloader.",
>   			&dt_phys, dt_virt);
>   
> +		/*
> +		 * Note that in this _really_ early stage we cannot even BUG()
> +		 * or oops, so the least terrible thing to do is cpu_relax(),
> +		 * or else we could end-up printing non-initialized data, etc.
> +		 */
>   		while (true)
>   			cpu_relax();
>   	}

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V3] arm64: Unhash early pointer print plus improve comment
  2021-12-21 15:52 [PATCH V3] arm64: Unhash early pointer print plus improve comment Guilherme G. Piccoli
  2021-12-21 16:52 ` Robin Murphy
@ 2021-12-22  6:51 ` Uwe Kleine-König
  2021-12-22 12:27   ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
  2021-12-22 11:26 ` Catalin Marinas
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2021-12-22  6:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Guilherme G. Piccoli
  Cc: linux-arm-kernel, catalin.marinas, will, broonie, kernel, robin.murphy


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1710 bytes --]

Hello,


On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 12:52:30PM -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> When facing a really early issue on DT parsing we have currently
> a message that shows both the physical and virtual address of the FDT.
> The printk pointer modifier for the virtual address shows a hashed
> address there unless the user provides "no_hash_pointers" parameter in
> the command-line. The situation in which this message shows-up is a bit
> more serious though: the boot process is broken, nothing can be done
> (even an oops is too much for this early stage) so we have this message
> as a last resort in order to help debug bootloader issues, for example.
> Hence, we hereby change that to "%px" in order to make debugging easy,
> there's not much information leak risk in such early boot failure.
> 
> Also, we tried to improve a bit the commenting on that function, given
> that if kernel fails there, it just hangs forever in a cpu_relax() loop.
> The reason we cannot BUG/panic is that is too early to do so; thanks to
> Mark Brown for pointing that on IRC and thanks Robin Murphy for the good
> pointer hash discussion in the mailing-list.
> 
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>

not sure why I was Cc:d for this patch, but it looks good to me. If I
had done it, I would have added a comment about the px, but I like it as
is, too.

Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V3] arm64: Unhash early pointer print plus improve comment
  2021-12-21 15:52 [PATCH V3] arm64: Unhash early pointer print plus improve comment Guilherme G. Piccoli
  2021-12-21 16:52 ` Robin Murphy
  2021-12-22  6:51 ` Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2021-12-22 11:26 ` Catalin Marinas
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Catalin Marinas @ 2021-12-22 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel, Guilherme G. Piccoli
  Cc: Will Deacon, kernel, u.kleine-koenig, robin.murphy, broonie

On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 12:52:30 -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> When facing a really early issue on DT parsing we have currently
> a message that shows both the physical and virtual address of the FDT.
> The printk pointer modifier for the virtual address shows a hashed
> address there unless the user provides "no_hash_pointers" parameter in
> the command-line. The situation in which this message shows-up is a bit
> more serious though: the boot process is broken, nothing can be done
> (even an oops is too much for this early stage) so we have this message
> as a last resort in order to help debug bootloader issues, for example.
> Hence, we hereby change that to "%px" in order to make debugging easy,
> there's not much information leak risk in such early boot failure.
> 
> [...]

Applied to arm64 (for-next/misc), thanks!

[1/1] arm64: Unhash early pointer print plus improve comment
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/31e833b20312

-- 
Catalin


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V3] arm64: Unhash early pointer print plus improve comment
  2021-12-22  6:51 ` Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2021-12-22 12:27   ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Guilherme G. Piccoli @ 2021-12-22 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Uwe Kleine-König
  Cc: linux-arm-kernel, catalin.marinas, will, broonie, kernel, robin.murphy

On 22/12/2021 03:51, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
> 
>[...] 
> not sure why I was Cc:d for this patch, but it looks good to me. If I
> had done it, I would have added a comment about the px, but I like it as
> is, too.
> 
> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
>

Thanks Uwe! You're CCed because you suggested me to do this patch on
IRC, when I talked to Mark heheh - so I thought in adding you to the loop =)


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-22 12:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-12-21 15:52 [PATCH V3] arm64: Unhash early pointer print plus improve comment Guilherme G. Piccoli
2021-12-21 16:52 ` Robin Murphy
2021-12-22  6:51 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-12-22 12:27   ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2021-12-22 11:26 ` Catalin Marinas

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.