* [PATCH 0/3] Fix RVV calling incorrect RFV/RVD check functions bug
@ 2021-12-29 2:12 ` frank.chang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: frank.chang @ 2021-12-29 2:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel; +Cc: Frank Chang, qemu-riscv
From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
For vector widening and narrowing floating-point instructions, we should
use require_scale_rvf() instead of require_rvf() to check whether the
correspond RVF/RVD is enabled if either source or destination
floating-point operand is double-width of SEW. Otherwise, illegal
instruction exception should be raised.
e.g. For SEW=16, if the source/destination floating-point operand is
double-width of SEW, RVF needs to be enabled. Otherwise, an illegal
instruction exception will be raised. Similarly, for SEW=32, RVD
needs to be enabled.
Frank Chang (3):
target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for
widening fp insns
target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for
widening fp/int type-convert insns
target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for
narrowing fp/int type-convert insns
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc | 78 ++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/3] Fix RVV calling incorrect RFV/RVD check functions bug
@ 2021-12-29 2:12 ` frank.chang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: frank.chang @ 2021-12-29 2:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-riscv, Frank Chang
From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
For vector widening and narrowing floating-point instructions, we should
use require_scale_rvf() instead of require_rvf() to check whether the
correspond RVF/RVD is enabled if either source or destination
floating-point operand is double-width of SEW. Otherwise, illegal
instruction exception should be raised.
e.g. For SEW=16, if the source/destination floating-point operand is
double-width of SEW, RVF needs to be enabled. Otherwise, an illegal
instruction exception will be raised. Similarly, for SEW=32, RVD
needs to be enabled.
Frank Chang (3):
target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for
widening fp insns
target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for
widening fp/int type-convert insns
target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for
narrowing fp/int type-convert insns
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc | 78 ++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/3] target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for widening fp insns
2021-12-29 2:12 ` frank.chang
@ 2021-12-29 2:12 ` frank.chang
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: frank.chang @ 2021-12-29 2:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: qemu-riscv, Frank Chang, Bin Meng, Richard Henderson,
Palmer Dabbelt, Alistair Francis, LIU Zhiwei
From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
Vector widening floating-point instructions should use
require_scale_rvf() instead of require_rvf() to check whether RVF/RVD is
enabled.
---
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
index 5e3f7fdb77..8d92243f2b 100644
--- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
+++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
@@ -2254,7 +2254,8 @@ GEN_OPFVF_TRANS(vfrsub_vf, opfvf_check)
static bool opfvv_widen_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmrr *a)
{
return require_rvv(s) &&
- require_rvf(s) &&
+ require_scale_rvf(s) &&
+ (s->sew != MO_8) &&
vext_check_isa_ill(s) &&
vext_check_dss(s, a->rd, a->rs1, a->rs2, a->vm);
}
@@ -2292,7 +2293,8 @@ GEN_OPFVV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwsub_vv, opfvv_widen_check)
static bool opfvf_widen_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmrr *a)
{
return require_rvv(s) &&
- require_rvf(s) &&
+ require_scale_rvf(s) &&
+ (s->sew != MO_8) &&
vext_check_isa_ill(s) &&
vext_check_ds(s, a->rd, a->rs2, a->vm);
}
@@ -2321,7 +2323,8 @@ GEN_OPFVF_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwsub_vf)
static bool opfwv_widen_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmrr *a)
{
return require_rvv(s) &&
- require_rvf(s) &&
+ require_scale_rvf(s) &&
+ (s->sew != MO_8) &&
vext_check_isa_ill(s) &&
vext_check_dds(s, a->rd, a->rs1, a->rs2, a->vm);
}
@@ -2359,7 +2362,8 @@ GEN_OPFWV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwsub_wv)
static bool opfwf_widen_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmrr *a)
{
return require_rvv(s) &&
- require_rvf(s) &&
+ require_scale_rvf(s) &&
+ (s->sew != MO_8) &&
vext_check_isa_ill(s) &&
vext_check_dd(s, a->rd, a->rs2, a->vm);
}
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/3] target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for widening fp insns
@ 2021-12-29 2:12 ` frank.chang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: frank.chang @ 2021-12-29 2:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: qemu-riscv, Frank Chang, Palmer Dabbelt, Alistair Francis,
Bin Meng, Richard Henderson, LIU Zhiwei
From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
Vector widening floating-point instructions should use
require_scale_rvf() instead of require_rvf() to check whether RVF/RVD is
enabled.
---
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
index 5e3f7fdb77..8d92243f2b 100644
--- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
+++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
@@ -2254,7 +2254,8 @@ GEN_OPFVF_TRANS(vfrsub_vf, opfvf_check)
static bool opfvv_widen_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmrr *a)
{
return require_rvv(s) &&
- require_rvf(s) &&
+ require_scale_rvf(s) &&
+ (s->sew != MO_8) &&
vext_check_isa_ill(s) &&
vext_check_dss(s, a->rd, a->rs1, a->rs2, a->vm);
}
@@ -2292,7 +2293,8 @@ GEN_OPFVV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwsub_vv, opfvv_widen_check)
static bool opfvf_widen_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmrr *a)
{
return require_rvv(s) &&
- require_rvf(s) &&
+ require_scale_rvf(s) &&
+ (s->sew != MO_8) &&
vext_check_isa_ill(s) &&
vext_check_ds(s, a->rd, a->rs2, a->vm);
}
@@ -2321,7 +2323,8 @@ GEN_OPFVF_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwsub_vf)
static bool opfwv_widen_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmrr *a)
{
return require_rvv(s) &&
- require_rvf(s) &&
+ require_scale_rvf(s) &&
+ (s->sew != MO_8) &&
vext_check_isa_ill(s) &&
vext_check_dds(s, a->rd, a->rs1, a->rs2, a->vm);
}
@@ -2359,7 +2362,8 @@ GEN_OPFWV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwsub_wv)
static bool opfwf_widen_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmrr *a)
{
return require_rvv(s) &&
- require_rvf(s) &&
+ require_scale_rvf(s) &&
+ (s->sew != MO_8) &&
vext_check_isa_ill(s) &&
vext_check_dd(s, a->rd, a->rs2, a->vm);
}
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for widening fp/int type-convert insns
2021-12-29 2:12 ` frank.chang
@ 2021-12-29 2:12 ` frank.chang
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: frank.chang @ 2021-12-29 2:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: qemu-riscv, Frank Chang, Bin Meng, Richard Henderson,
Palmer Dabbelt, Alistair Francis, LIU Zhiwei
From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
vfwcvt.xu.f.v, vfwcvt.x.f.v, vfwcvt.rtz.xu.f.v and vfwcvt.rtz.x.f.v
convert single-width floating-point to double-width integer.
Therefore, should use require_rvf() to check whether RVF/RVD is enabled.
vfwcvt.f.xu.v, vfwcvt.f.x.v convert single-width integer to double-width
floating-point, and vfwcvt.f.f.v convert double-width floating-point to
single-width floating-point. Therefore, should use require_scale_rvf() to
check whether RVF/RVD is enabled.
---
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc | 34 ++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
index 8d92243f2b..f1b44ccad2 100644
--- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
+++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
@@ -2613,16 +2613,27 @@ GEN_OPFV_CVT_TRANS(vfcvt_rtz_x_f_v, vfcvt_x_f_v, RISCV_FRM_RTZ)
static bool opfv_widen_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmr *a)
{
return require_rvv(s) &&
- require_scale_rvf(s) &&
- (s->sew != MO_8) &&
vext_check_isa_ill(s) &&
vext_check_ds(s, a->rd, a->rs2, a->vm);
}
-#define GEN_OPFV_WIDEN_TRANS(NAME, HELPER, FRM) \
+static bool opxfv_widen_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmr *a)
+{
+ return opfv_widen_check(s, a) &&
+ require_rvf(s);
+}
+
+static bool opffv_widen_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmr *a)
+{
+ return opfv_widen_check(s, a) &&
+ require_scale_rvf(s) &&
+ (s->sew != MO_8);
+}
+
+#define GEN_OPFV_WIDEN_TRANS(NAME, CHECK, HELPER, FRM) \
static bool trans_##NAME(DisasContext *s, arg_rmr *a) \
{ \
- if (opfv_widen_check(s, a)) { \
+ if (CHECK(s, a)) { \
if (FRM != RISCV_FRM_DYN) { \
gen_set_rm(s, RISCV_FRM_DYN); \
} \
@@ -2649,12 +2660,17 @@ static bool trans_##NAME(DisasContext *s, arg_rmr *a) \
return false; \
}
-GEN_OPFV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwcvt_xu_f_v, vfwcvt_xu_f_v, RISCV_FRM_DYN)
-GEN_OPFV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwcvt_x_f_v, vfwcvt_x_f_v, RISCV_FRM_DYN)
-GEN_OPFV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwcvt_f_f_v, vfwcvt_f_f_v, RISCV_FRM_DYN)
+GEN_OPFV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwcvt_xu_f_v, opxfv_widen_check, vfwcvt_xu_f_v,
+ RISCV_FRM_DYN)
+GEN_OPFV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwcvt_x_f_v, opxfv_widen_check, vfwcvt_x_f_v,
+ RISCV_FRM_DYN)
+GEN_OPFV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwcvt_f_f_v, opffv_widen_check, vfwcvt_f_f_v,
+ RISCV_FRM_DYN)
/* Reuse the helper functions from vfwcvt.xu.f.v and vfwcvt.x.f.v */
-GEN_OPFV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwcvt_rtz_xu_f_v, vfwcvt_xu_f_v, RISCV_FRM_RTZ)
-GEN_OPFV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwcvt_rtz_x_f_v, vfwcvt_x_f_v, RISCV_FRM_RTZ)
+GEN_OPFV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwcvt_rtz_xu_f_v, opxfv_widen_check, vfwcvt_xu_f_v,
+ RISCV_FRM_RTZ)
+GEN_OPFV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwcvt_rtz_x_f_v, opxfv_widen_check, vfwcvt_x_f_v,
+ RISCV_FRM_RTZ)
static bool opfxv_widen_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmr *a)
{
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for widening fp/int type-convert insns
@ 2021-12-29 2:12 ` frank.chang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: frank.chang @ 2021-12-29 2:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: qemu-riscv, Frank Chang, Palmer Dabbelt, Alistair Francis,
Bin Meng, Richard Henderson, LIU Zhiwei
From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
vfwcvt.xu.f.v, vfwcvt.x.f.v, vfwcvt.rtz.xu.f.v and vfwcvt.rtz.x.f.v
convert single-width floating-point to double-width integer.
Therefore, should use require_rvf() to check whether RVF/RVD is enabled.
vfwcvt.f.xu.v, vfwcvt.f.x.v convert single-width integer to double-width
floating-point, and vfwcvt.f.f.v convert double-width floating-point to
single-width floating-point. Therefore, should use require_scale_rvf() to
check whether RVF/RVD is enabled.
---
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc | 34 ++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
index 8d92243f2b..f1b44ccad2 100644
--- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
+++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
@@ -2613,16 +2613,27 @@ GEN_OPFV_CVT_TRANS(vfcvt_rtz_x_f_v, vfcvt_x_f_v, RISCV_FRM_RTZ)
static bool opfv_widen_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmr *a)
{
return require_rvv(s) &&
- require_scale_rvf(s) &&
- (s->sew != MO_8) &&
vext_check_isa_ill(s) &&
vext_check_ds(s, a->rd, a->rs2, a->vm);
}
-#define GEN_OPFV_WIDEN_TRANS(NAME, HELPER, FRM) \
+static bool opxfv_widen_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmr *a)
+{
+ return opfv_widen_check(s, a) &&
+ require_rvf(s);
+}
+
+static bool opffv_widen_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmr *a)
+{
+ return opfv_widen_check(s, a) &&
+ require_scale_rvf(s) &&
+ (s->sew != MO_8);
+}
+
+#define GEN_OPFV_WIDEN_TRANS(NAME, CHECK, HELPER, FRM) \
static bool trans_##NAME(DisasContext *s, arg_rmr *a) \
{ \
- if (opfv_widen_check(s, a)) { \
+ if (CHECK(s, a)) { \
if (FRM != RISCV_FRM_DYN) { \
gen_set_rm(s, RISCV_FRM_DYN); \
} \
@@ -2649,12 +2660,17 @@ static bool trans_##NAME(DisasContext *s, arg_rmr *a) \
return false; \
}
-GEN_OPFV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwcvt_xu_f_v, vfwcvt_xu_f_v, RISCV_FRM_DYN)
-GEN_OPFV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwcvt_x_f_v, vfwcvt_x_f_v, RISCV_FRM_DYN)
-GEN_OPFV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwcvt_f_f_v, vfwcvt_f_f_v, RISCV_FRM_DYN)
+GEN_OPFV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwcvt_xu_f_v, opxfv_widen_check, vfwcvt_xu_f_v,
+ RISCV_FRM_DYN)
+GEN_OPFV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwcvt_x_f_v, opxfv_widen_check, vfwcvt_x_f_v,
+ RISCV_FRM_DYN)
+GEN_OPFV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwcvt_f_f_v, opffv_widen_check, vfwcvt_f_f_v,
+ RISCV_FRM_DYN)
/* Reuse the helper functions from vfwcvt.xu.f.v and vfwcvt.x.f.v */
-GEN_OPFV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwcvt_rtz_xu_f_v, vfwcvt_xu_f_v, RISCV_FRM_RTZ)
-GEN_OPFV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwcvt_rtz_x_f_v, vfwcvt_x_f_v, RISCV_FRM_RTZ)
+GEN_OPFV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwcvt_rtz_xu_f_v, opxfv_widen_check, vfwcvt_xu_f_v,
+ RISCV_FRM_RTZ)
+GEN_OPFV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwcvt_rtz_x_f_v, opxfv_widen_check, vfwcvt_x_f_v,
+ RISCV_FRM_RTZ)
static bool opfxv_widen_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmr *a)
{
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for narrowing fp/int type-convert insns
2021-12-29 2:12 ` frank.chang
@ 2021-12-29 2:12 ` frank.chang
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: frank.chang @ 2021-12-29 2:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: qemu-riscv, Frank Chang, Bin Meng, Richard Henderson,
Palmer Dabbelt, Alistair Francis, LIU Zhiwei
From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
vfncvt.f.xu.w, vfncvt.f.x.w convert double-width integer to single-width
floating-point. Therefore, should use require_rvf() to check whether
RVF/RVD is enabled.
vfncvt.f.f.w, vfncvt.rod.f.f.w convert double-width floating-point to
single-width integer. Therefore, should use require_scale_rvf() to check
whether RVF/RVD is enabled.
---
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc | 32 ++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
index f1b44ccad2..6c285c958b 100644
--- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
+++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
@@ -2719,17 +2719,29 @@ GEN_OPFXV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwcvt_f_x_v)
static bool opfv_narrow_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmr *a)
{
return require_rvv(s) &&
- require_rvf(s) &&
- (s->sew != MO_64) &&
vext_check_isa_ill(s) &&
/* OPFV narrowing instructions ignore vs1 check */
vext_check_sd(s, a->rd, a->rs2, a->vm);
}
-#define GEN_OPFV_NARROW_TRANS(NAME, HELPER, FRM) \
+static bool opfxv_narrow_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmr *a)
+{
+ return opfv_narrow_check(s, a) &&
+ require_rvf(s) &&
+ (s->sew != MO_64);
+}
+
+static bool opffv_narrow_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmr *a)
+{
+ return opfv_narrow_check(s, a) &&
+ require_scale_rvf(s) &&
+ (s->sew != MO_8);
+}
+
+#define GEN_OPFV_NARROW_TRANS(NAME, CHECK, HELPER, FRM) \
static bool trans_##NAME(DisasContext *s, arg_rmr *a) \
{ \
- if (opfv_narrow_check(s, a)) { \
+ if (CHECK(s, a)) { \
if (FRM != RISCV_FRM_DYN) { \
gen_set_rm(s, RISCV_FRM_DYN); \
} \
@@ -2756,11 +2768,15 @@ static bool trans_##NAME(DisasContext *s, arg_rmr *a) \
return false; \
}
-GEN_OPFV_NARROW_TRANS(vfncvt_f_xu_w, vfncvt_f_xu_w, RISCV_FRM_DYN)
-GEN_OPFV_NARROW_TRANS(vfncvt_f_x_w, vfncvt_f_x_w, RISCV_FRM_DYN)
-GEN_OPFV_NARROW_TRANS(vfncvt_f_f_w, vfncvt_f_f_w, RISCV_FRM_DYN)
+GEN_OPFV_NARROW_TRANS(vfncvt_f_xu_w, opfxv_narrow_check, vfncvt_f_xu_w,
+ RISCV_FRM_DYN)
+GEN_OPFV_NARROW_TRANS(vfncvt_f_x_w, opfxv_narrow_check, vfncvt_f_x_w,
+ RISCV_FRM_DYN)
+GEN_OPFV_NARROW_TRANS(vfncvt_f_f_w, opffv_narrow_check, vfncvt_f_f_w,
+ RISCV_FRM_DYN)
/* Reuse the helper function from vfncvt.f.f.w */
-GEN_OPFV_NARROW_TRANS(vfncvt_rod_f_f_w, vfncvt_f_f_w, RISCV_FRM_ROD)
+GEN_OPFV_NARROW_TRANS(vfncvt_rod_f_f_w, opffv_narrow_check, vfncvt_f_f_w,
+ RISCV_FRM_ROD)
static bool opxfv_narrow_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmr *a)
{
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for narrowing fp/int type-convert insns
@ 2021-12-29 2:12 ` frank.chang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: frank.chang @ 2021-12-29 2:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: qemu-riscv, Frank Chang, Palmer Dabbelt, Alistair Francis,
Bin Meng, Richard Henderson, LIU Zhiwei
From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
vfncvt.f.xu.w, vfncvt.f.x.w convert double-width integer to single-width
floating-point. Therefore, should use require_rvf() to check whether
RVF/RVD is enabled.
vfncvt.f.f.w, vfncvt.rod.f.f.w convert double-width floating-point to
single-width integer. Therefore, should use require_scale_rvf() to check
whether RVF/RVD is enabled.
---
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc | 32 ++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
index f1b44ccad2..6c285c958b 100644
--- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
+++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
@@ -2719,17 +2719,29 @@ GEN_OPFXV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwcvt_f_x_v)
static bool opfv_narrow_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmr *a)
{
return require_rvv(s) &&
- require_rvf(s) &&
- (s->sew != MO_64) &&
vext_check_isa_ill(s) &&
/* OPFV narrowing instructions ignore vs1 check */
vext_check_sd(s, a->rd, a->rs2, a->vm);
}
-#define GEN_OPFV_NARROW_TRANS(NAME, HELPER, FRM) \
+static bool opfxv_narrow_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmr *a)
+{
+ return opfv_narrow_check(s, a) &&
+ require_rvf(s) &&
+ (s->sew != MO_64);
+}
+
+static bool opffv_narrow_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmr *a)
+{
+ return opfv_narrow_check(s, a) &&
+ require_scale_rvf(s) &&
+ (s->sew != MO_8);
+}
+
+#define GEN_OPFV_NARROW_TRANS(NAME, CHECK, HELPER, FRM) \
static bool trans_##NAME(DisasContext *s, arg_rmr *a) \
{ \
- if (opfv_narrow_check(s, a)) { \
+ if (CHECK(s, a)) { \
if (FRM != RISCV_FRM_DYN) { \
gen_set_rm(s, RISCV_FRM_DYN); \
} \
@@ -2756,11 +2768,15 @@ static bool trans_##NAME(DisasContext *s, arg_rmr *a) \
return false; \
}
-GEN_OPFV_NARROW_TRANS(vfncvt_f_xu_w, vfncvt_f_xu_w, RISCV_FRM_DYN)
-GEN_OPFV_NARROW_TRANS(vfncvt_f_x_w, vfncvt_f_x_w, RISCV_FRM_DYN)
-GEN_OPFV_NARROW_TRANS(vfncvt_f_f_w, vfncvt_f_f_w, RISCV_FRM_DYN)
+GEN_OPFV_NARROW_TRANS(vfncvt_f_xu_w, opfxv_narrow_check, vfncvt_f_xu_w,
+ RISCV_FRM_DYN)
+GEN_OPFV_NARROW_TRANS(vfncvt_f_x_w, opfxv_narrow_check, vfncvt_f_x_w,
+ RISCV_FRM_DYN)
+GEN_OPFV_NARROW_TRANS(vfncvt_f_f_w, opffv_narrow_check, vfncvt_f_f_w,
+ RISCV_FRM_DYN)
/* Reuse the helper function from vfncvt.f.f.w */
-GEN_OPFV_NARROW_TRANS(vfncvt_rod_f_f_w, vfncvt_f_f_w, RISCV_FRM_ROD)
+GEN_OPFV_NARROW_TRANS(vfncvt_rod_f_f_w, opffv_narrow_check, vfncvt_f_f_w,
+ RISCV_FRM_ROD)
static bool opxfv_narrow_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmr *a)
{
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix RVV calling incorrect RFV/RVD check functions bug
2021-12-29 2:12 ` frank.chang
@ 2021-12-29 2:43 ` Frank Chang
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Frank Chang @ 2021-12-29 2:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frank Chang; +Cc: open list:RISC-V, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1333 bytes --]
<frank.chang@sifive.com> 於 2021年12月29日 週三 上午10:13寫道：
> From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
>
> For vector widening and narrowing floating-point instructions, we should
> use require_scale_rvf() instead of require_rvf() to check whether the
> correspond RVF/RVD is enabled if either source or destination
> floating-point operand is double-width of SEW. Otherwise, illegal
> instruction exception should be raised.
>
> e.g. For SEW=16, if the source/destination floating-point operand is
> double-width of SEW, RVF needs to be enabled. Otherwise, an illegal
> instruction exception will be raised. Similarly, for SEW=32, RVD
> needs to be enabled.
>
> Frank Chang (3):
> target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for
> widening fp insns
> target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for
> widening fp/int type-convert insns
> target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for
> narrowing fp/int type-convert insns
Oops, I misspell the word "function" in the patch titles.
I will correct it in my next patchset.
Regards,
Frank Chang
>
> target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc | 78 ++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2070 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix RVV calling incorrect RFV/RVD check functions bug
@ 2021-12-29 2:43 ` Frank Chang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Frank Chang @ 2021-12-29 2:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frank Chang; +Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers, open list:RISC-V
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1333 bytes --]
<frank.chang@sifive.com> 於 2021年12月29日 週三 上午10:13寫道：
> From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
>
> For vector widening and narrowing floating-point instructions, we should
> use require_scale_rvf() instead of require_rvf() to check whether the
> correspond RVF/RVD is enabled if either source or destination
> floating-point operand is double-width of SEW. Otherwise, illegal
> instruction exception should be raised.
>
> e.g. For SEW=16, if the source/destination floating-point operand is
> double-width of SEW, RVF needs to be enabled. Otherwise, an illegal
> instruction exception will be raised. Similarly, for SEW=32, RVD
> needs to be enabled.
>
> Frank Chang (3):
> target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for
> widening fp insns
> target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for
> widening fp/int type-convert insns
> target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for
> narrowing fp/int type-convert insns
Oops, I misspell the word "function" in the patch titles.
I will correct it in my next patchset.
Regards,
Frank Chang
>
> target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc | 78 ++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2070 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix RVV calling incorrect RFV/RVD check functions bug
2021-12-29 2:43 ` Frank Chang
@ 2021-12-30 6:53 ` Frank Chang
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Frank Chang @ 2021-12-30 6:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frank Chang; +Cc: open list:RISC-V, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1598 bytes --]
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:43 AM Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com> wrote:
> <frank.chang@sifive.com> 於 2021年12月29日 週三 上午10:13寫道：
>
>> From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
>>
>> For vector widening and narrowing floating-point instructions, we should
>> use require_scale_rvf() instead of require_rvf() to check whether the
>> correspond RVF/RVD is enabled if either source or destination
>> floating-point operand is double-width of SEW. Otherwise, illegal
>> instruction exception should be raised.
>>
>> e.g. For SEW=16, if the source/destination floating-point operand is
>> double-width of SEW, RVF needs to be enabled. Otherwise, an illegal
>> instruction exception will be raised. Similarly, for SEW=32, RVD
>> needs to be enabled.
>>
>> Frank Chang (3):
>> target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for
>> widening fp insns
>> target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for
>> widening fp/int type-convert insns
>> target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for
>> narrowing fp/int type-convert insns
>
>
> Oops, I misspell the word "function" in the patch titles.
> I will correct it in my next patchset.
>
> Regards,
> Frank Chang
>
I also missed the 'Signed-off-by' in this patch series.
Will also fix it in my next-version patchset.
Regards,
Frank Chang
>
>
>>
>
>
>> target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc | 78 ++++++++++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.31.1
>>
>>
>>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2825 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix RVV calling incorrect RFV/RVD check functions bug
@ 2021-12-30 6:53 ` Frank Chang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Frank Chang @ 2021-12-30 6:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frank Chang; +Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers, open list:RISC-V
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1598 bytes --]
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:43 AM Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com> wrote:
> <frank.chang@sifive.com> 於 2021年12月29日 週三 上午10:13寫道：
>
>> From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
>>
>> For vector widening and narrowing floating-point instructions, we should
>> use require_scale_rvf() instead of require_rvf() to check whether the
>> correspond RVF/RVD is enabled if either source or destination
>> floating-point operand is double-width of SEW. Otherwise, illegal
>> instruction exception should be raised.
>>
>> e.g. For SEW=16, if the source/destination floating-point operand is
>> double-width of SEW, RVF needs to be enabled. Otherwise, an illegal
>> instruction exception will be raised. Similarly, for SEW=32, RVD
>> needs to be enabled.
>>
>> Frank Chang (3):
>> target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for
>> widening fp insns
>> target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for
>> widening fp/int type-convert insns
>> target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for
>> narrowing fp/int type-convert insns
>
>
> Oops, I misspell the word "function" in the patch titles.
> I will correct it in my next patchset.
>
> Regards,
> Frank Chang
>
I also missed the 'Signed-off-by' in this patch series.
Will also fix it in my next-version patchset.
Regards,
Frank Chang
>
>
>>
>
>
>> target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc | 78 ++++++++++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.31.1
>>
>>
>>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2825 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for widening fp insns
2021-12-29 2:12 ` frank.chang
@ 2022-01-04 21:49 ` Alistair Francis
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Alistair Francis @ 2022-01-04 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frank Chang
Cc: open list:RISC-V, Bin Meng, Richard Henderson,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers, Palmer Dabbelt,
Alistair Francis, LIU Zhiwei
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 12:15 PM <frank.chang@sifive.com> wrote:
>
> From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
>
> Vector widening floating-point instructions should use
> require_scale_rvf() instead of require_rvf() to check whether RVF/RVD is
> enabled.
Missing Signed off by line
Alistair
> ---
> target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
> index 5e3f7fdb77..8d92243f2b 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
> +++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
> @@ -2254,7 +2254,8 @@ GEN_OPFVF_TRANS(vfrsub_vf, opfvf_check)
> static bool opfvv_widen_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmrr *a)
> {
> return require_rvv(s) &&
> - require_rvf(s) &&
> + require_scale_rvf(s) &&
> + (s->sew != MO_8) &&
> vext_check_isa_ill(s) &&
> vext_check_dss(s, a->rd, a->rs1, a->rs2, a->vm);
> }
> @@ -2292,7 +2293,8 @@ GEN_OPFVV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwsub_vv, opfvv_widen_check)
> static bool opfvf_widen_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmrr *a)
> {
> return require_rvv(s) &&
> - require_rvf(s) &&
> + require_scale_rvf(s) &&
> + (s->sew != MO_8) &&
> vext_check_isa_ill(s) &&
> vext_check_ds(s, a->rd, a->rs2, a->vm);
> }
> @@ -2321,7 +2323,8 @@ GEN_OPFVF_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwsub_vf)
> static bool opfwv_widen_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmrr *a)
> {
> return require_rvv(s) &&
> - require_rvf(s) &&
> + require_scale_rvf(s) &&
> + (s->sew != MO_8) &&
> vext_check_isa_ill(s) &&
> vext_check_dds(s, a->rd, a->rs1, a->rs2, a->vm);
> }
> @@ -2359,7 +2362,8 @@ GEN_OPFWV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwsub_wv)
> static bool opfwf_widen_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmrr *a)
> {
> return require_rvv(s) &&
> - require_rvf(s) &&
> + require_scale_rvf(s) &&
> + (s->sew != MO_8) &&
> vext_check_isa_ill(s) &&
> vext_check_dd(s, a->rd, a->rs2, a->vm);
> }
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for widening fp insns
@ 2022-01-04 21:49 ` Alistair Francis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Alistair Francis @ 2022-01-04 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frank Chang
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers, open list:RISC-V, Bin Meng,
Richard Henderson, Palmer Dabbelt, Alistair Francis, LIU Zhiwei
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 12:15 PM <frank.chang@sifive.com> wrote:
>
> From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
>
> Vector widening floating-point instructions should use
> require_scale_rvf() instead of require_rvf() to check whether RVF/RVD is
> enabled.
Missing Signed off by line
Alistair
> ---
> target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
> index 5e3f7fdb77..8d92243f2b 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
> +++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
> @@ -2254,7 +2254,8 @@ GEN_OPFVF_TRANS(vfrsub_vf, opfvf_check)
> static bool opfvv_widen_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmrr *a)
> {
> return require_rvv(s) &&
> - require_rvf(s) &&
> + require_scale_rvf(s) &&
> + (s->sew != MO_8) &&
> vext_check_isa_ill(s) &&
> vext_check_dss(s, a->rd, a->rs1, a->rs2, a->vm);
> }
> @@ -2292,7 +2293,8 @@ GEN_OPFVV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwsub_vv, opfvv_widen_check)
> static bool opfvf_widen_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmrr *a)
> {
> return require_rvv(s) &&
> - require_rvf(s) &&
> + require_scale_rvf(s) &&
> + (s->sew != MO_8) &&
> vext_check_isa_ill(s) &&
> vext_check_ds(s, a->rd, a->rs2, a->vm);
> }
> @@ -2321,7 +2323,8 @@ GEN_OPFVF_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwsub_vf)
> static bool opfwv_widen_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmrr *a)
> {
> return require_rvv(s) &&
> - require_rvf(s) &&
> + require_scale_rvf(s) &&
> + (s->sew != MO_8) &&
> vext_check_isa_ill(s) &&
> vext_check_dds(s, a->rd, a->rs1, a->rs2, a->vm);
> }
> @@ -2359,7 +2362,8 @@ GEN_OPFWV_WIDEN_TRANS(vfwsub_wv)
> static bool opfwf_widen_check(DisasContext *s, arg_rmrr *a)
> {
> return require_rvv(s) &&
> - require_rvf(s) &&
> + require_scale_rvf(s) &&
> + (s->sew != MO_8) &&
> vext_check_isa_ill(s) &&
> vext_check_dd(s, a->rd, a->rs2, a->vm);
> }
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-01-04 21:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-12-29 2:12 [PATCH 0/3] Fix RVV calling incorrect RFV/RVD check functions bug frank.chang
2021-12-29 2:12 ` frank.chang
2021-12-29 2:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for widening fp insns frank.chang
2021-12-29 2:12 ` frank.chang
2022-01-04 21:49 ` Alistair Francis
2022-01-04 21:49 ` Alistair Francis
2021-12-29 2:12 ` [PATCH 2/3] target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for widening fp/int type-convert insns frank.chang
2021-12-29 2:12 ` frank.chang
2021-12-29 2:12 ` [PATCH 3/3] target/riscv: rvv-1.0: Call the correct RVF/RVD check funtion for narrowing " frank.chang
2021-12-29 2:12 ` frank.chang
2021-12-29 2:43 ` [PATCH 0/3] Fix RVV calling incorrect RFV/RVD check functions bug Frank Chang
2021-12-29 2:43 ` Frank Chang
2021-12-30 6:53 ` Frank Chang
2021-12-30 6:53 ` Frank Chang
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.