* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/72] 5.15.13-rc2 review
2022-01-04 7:41 [PATCH 5.15 00/72] 5.15.13-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2022-01-04 17:08 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2022-01-04 18:48 ` Florian Fainelli
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee @ 2022-01-04 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable
Hi Greg,
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 08:41:12AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.13 release.
> There are 72 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jan 2022 07:38:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression.
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/72] 5.15.13-rc2 review
2022-01-04 7:41 [PATCH 5.15 00/72] 5.15.13-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-04 17:08 ` Sudip Mukherjee
@ 2022-01-04 18:48 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-01-05 1:29 ` Guenter Roeck
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2022-01-04 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, stable
On 1/3/22 11:41 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.13 release.
> There are 72 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jan 2022 07:38:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.13-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/72] 5.15.13-rc2 review
2022-01-04 7:41 [PATCH 5.15 00/72] 5.15.13-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-04 17:08 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2022-01-04 18:48 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2022-01-05 1:29 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-01-05 2:16 ` Shuah Khan
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2022-01-05 1:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 08:41:12AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.13 release.
> There are 72 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jan 2022 07:38:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 480 pass: 480 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/72] 5.15.13-rc2 review
2022-01-04 7:41 [PATCH 5.15 00/72] 5.15.13-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-05 1:29 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2022-01-05 2:16 ` Shuah Khan
2022-01-05 3:52 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2022-01-05 2:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable, Shuah Khan
On 1/4/22 12:41 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.13 release.
> There are 72 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jan 2022 07:38:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.13-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/72] 5.15.13-rc2 review
2022-01-04 7:41 [PATCH 5.15 00/72] 5.15.13-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-05 2:16 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2022-01-05 3:52 ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-01-05 3:58 ` Zan Aziz
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2022-01-05 3:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable
On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 at 13:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.13 release.
> There are 72 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jan 2022 07:38:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.13-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.15.13-rc2
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git branch: linux-5.15.y
* git commit: 2e05ea9d1c9a321bc00be4d8bd8ebbd58e5421e4
* git describe: v5.15.12-73-g2e05ea9d1c9a
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.12-73-g2e05ea9d1c9a
## No Test Regressions (compared to v5.15.11-129-g47b0c2878802)
No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.15.11-129-g47b0c2878802)
No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.15.11-129-g47b0c2878802)
No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.15.11-129-g47b0c2878802)
No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary
total: 98217, pass: 84033, fail: 724, skip: 12624, xfail: 836
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 259 total, 255 passed, 4 failed
* arm64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 34 total, 30 passed, 4 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 52 total, 48 passed, 4 failed
* riscv: 24 total, 16 passed, 8 failed
* s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-lkdtm
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/72] 5.15.13-rc2 review
2022-01-04 7:41 [PATCH 5.15 00/72] 5.15.13-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-05 3:52 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2022-01-05 3:58 ` Zan Aziz
2022-01-05 13:02 ` Jeffrin Jose T
2022-01-05 14:55 ` Fox Chen
7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Zan Aziz @ 2022-01-05 3:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable, Zan Aziz
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 7:47 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.13 release.
> There are 72 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jan 2022 07:38:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.13-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system Lenovo P50s: Intel Core i7
No emergency and critical messages in the dmesg
I am a high school student and this is the first kernel I tested.
Please let me know if you
would like to know more information about my test system or dmesg.
Tested-by: Zan Aziz <zanaziz313@gmail.com>
Thanks
-Zan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/72] 5.15.13-rc2 review
2022-01-04 7:41 [PATCH 5.15 00/72] 5.15.13-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-05 3:58 ` Zan Aziz
@ 2022-01-05 13:02 ` Jeffrin Jose T
2022-01-05 14:56 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-05 14:55 ` Fox Chen
7 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrin Jose T @ 2022-01-05 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable
On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 08:41 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.13 release.
> There are 72 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jan 2022 07:38:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.13-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-
> stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
hello,
There was a compilation error....
-----------x--------------x------------------x--
MODPOST vmlinux.symvers
MODINFO modules.builtin.modinfo
GEN modules.builtin
BTF: .tmp_vmlinux.btf: pahole (pahole) is not available
Failed to generate BTF for vmlinux
Try to disable CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF
make: *** [Makefile:1183: vmlinux] Error 1
---------x--------------x-------------x---
i did CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=n in .config and then compilation was
success.
Compiled and booted 5.15.13-rc2+. dmesg gave no major problems.
Tested-by: Jeffrin Jose T <jeffrin@rajagiritech.edu.in>
--
software engineer
rajagiri school of engineering and technology - autonomous
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/72] 5.15.13-rc2 review
2022-01-05 13:02 ` Jeffrin Jose T
@ 2022-01-05 14:56 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-05 15:17 ` Shuah Khan
2022-01-05 18:15 ` Jeffrin Jose T
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2022-01-05 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeffrin Jose T
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 06:32:43PM +0530, Jeffrin Jose T wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 08:41 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.13 release.
> > There are 72 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jan 2022 07:38:29 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.13-rc2.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-
> > stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
> hello,
>
> There was a compilation error....
>
> -----------x--------------x------------------x--
> MODPOST vmlinux.symvers
> MODINFO modules.builtin.modinfo
> GEN modules.builtin
> BTF: .tmp_vmlinux.btf: pahole (pahole) is not available
> Failed to generate BTF for vmlinux
> Try to disable CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF
> make: *** [Makefile:1183: vmlinux] Error 1
Is this a regression? If so, what commit caused this?
> i did CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=n in .config and then compilation was
> success.
Or you can install pahole, right? That's a requirement for that build
option I think.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/72] 5.15.13-rc2 review
2022-01-05 14:56 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2022-01-05 15:17 ` Shuah Khan
2022-01-05 18:15 ` Jeffrin Jose T
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2022-01-05 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Jeffrin Jose T
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable, Shuah Khan
On 1/5/22 7:56 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 06:32:43PM +0530, Jeffrin Jose T wrote:
>> On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 08:41 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.13 release.
>>> There are 72 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jan 2022 07:38:29 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>
>>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.13-rc2.gz
>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-
>>> stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>>>
>> hello,
>>
>> There was a compilation error....
>>
>> -----------x--------------x------------------x--
>> MODPOST vmlinux.symvers
>> MODINFO modules.builtin.modinfo
>> GEN modules.builtin
>> BTF: .tmp_vmlinux.btf: pahole (pahole) is not available
>> Failed to generate BTF for vmlinux
>> Try to disable CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF
>> make: *** [Makefile:1183: vmlinux] Error 1
>
> Is this a regression? If so, what commit caused this?
>
>> i did CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=n in .config and then compilation was
>> success.
>
> Or you can install pahole, right? That's a requirement for that build
> option I think.
>
Looks like some distros enabled this option - either disable the
option or install pahole. Not a regression.
Keep in mind that CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF is a dependency to build
bpf tests. bpf build pulls kernel defines from BTF to generate a
header file. Not desirable to generate header that conflicts with
standard libgcc defines which is not relevant to this conversation.
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/72] 5.15.13-rc2 review
2022-01-05 14:56 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-05 15:17 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2022-01-05 18:15 ` Jeffrin Jose T
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrin Jose T @ 2022-01-05 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable
On Wed, 2022-01-05 at 15:56 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 06:32:43PM +0530, Jeffrin Jose T wrote:
> > On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 08:41 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.13
> > > release.
> > > There are 72 patches in this series, all will be posted as a
> > > response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied,
> > > please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jan 2022 07:38:29 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > >
> > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.13-rc2.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linu
> > > x-
> > > stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> > >
> > hello,
> >
> > There was a compilation error....
> >
> > -----------x--------------x------------------x--
> > MODPOST vmlinux.symvers
> > MODINFO modules.builtin.modinfo
> > GEN modules.builtin
> > BTF: .tmp_vmlinux.btf: pahole (pahole) is not available
> > Failed to generate BTF for vmlinux
> > Try to disable CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF
> > make: *** [Makefile:1183: vmlinux] Error 1
>
> Is this a regression? If so, what commit caused this?
>
> > i did CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=n in .config and then compilation was
> > success.
>
> Or you can install pahole, right? That's a requirement for that
> build
> option I think.
>
i installed pahole which is in package "dwarves" in debian after
reading yours and shuah's message
i agree with shuah's answer.
thanks shuah
--
software engineer
rajagiri school of engineering and technology - autonomous
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH 5.15 00/72] 5.15.13-rc2 review
2022-01-04 7:41 [PATCH 5.15 00/72] 5.15.13-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-05 13:02 ` Jeffrin Jose T
@ 2022-01-05 14:55 ` Fox Chen
7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Fox Chen @ 2022-01-05 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable, Fox Chen
On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 08:41:12 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.13 release.
> There are 72 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jan 2022 07:38:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.13-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
5.15.13-rc2 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
Tested-by: Fox Chen <foxhlchen@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread