All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 6/6] remoteproc: Instantiate the new remoteproc virtio platform device
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 11:48:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220106184816.GB642186@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211222082349.30378-7-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>

On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 09:23:49AM +0100, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> Migrate from the rvdev device to the rvdev platform device.
> From this patch, when a vdev resource is found in the resource table
> the remoteproc core register a platform device.
> 
> All reference to the rvdev->dev has been updated to rvdev-pdev->dev
> 
> The use of kref counter is replaced by get/put_device on the remoteproc
> virtio device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
> 
> ---
> Update vs previous revision:
>   - rework comments around virtio platform device creation
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c     | 48 +++++++-----
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h |  2 -
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c   | 99 ++++++------------------
>  include/linux/remoteproc.h               |  4 -
>  4 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index ca2fe8d9cac8..4f332ec0fdd0 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -465,6 +465,8 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr,
>  {
>  	struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc = ptr;
>  	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> +	struct rproc_vdev_pdata vdev_data;
> +	struct platform_device *pdev;
>  	struct rproc_vdev *rvdev;
>  	int i, ret;
>  
> @@ -484,25 +486,36 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr,
>  	dev_dbg(dev, "vdev rsc: id %d, dfeatures 0x%x, cfg len %d, %d vrings\n",
>  		rsc->id, rsc->dfeatures, rsc->config_len, rsc->num_of_vrings);
>  
> -	/* we currently support only two vrings per rvdev */
> -	if (rsc->num_of_vrings > ARRAY_SIZE(rvdev->vring)) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "too many vrings: %d\n", rsc->num_of_vrings);
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> +	/* Register a remoteproc virtio platform device in charge of the virtio device */
> +	vdev_data.rsc_offset = offset;
> +	vdev_data.id  = rsc->id;
> +	vdev_data.index  = rproc->nb_vdev;
>  
> -	rvdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*rvdev), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!rvdev)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> +	pdev = rproc_virtio_register_device(rproc, &vdev_data);
> +	if (PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(pdev)) {
> +		dev_err(rproc->dev.parent,
> +			"failed to create rproc-virtio device\n");
> +		return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(pdev);

The error check and dev_err() message is exactly the same as what is found in
rproc_virtio_register_device(). As such two error messages will be printed out
for every single failure.  I would call platform_device_register_data() directly
rather than keeping rproc_virtio_register_device() around.

> +	}
>  
> -	kref_init(&rvdev->refcount);
> +	/*
> +	 * At this point the registered remoteproc virtio platform device should has been probed.

s/has been/have been

> +	 * Get the associated rproc_vdev struct to assign the vrings
> +	 */
> +	rvdev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	if (WARN_ON(!rvdev)) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto free_rvdev;
> +	}
>  
> -	rvdev->id = rsc->id;
> -	rvdev->rproc = rproc;
> -	rvdev->index = rproc->nb_vdev++;
> +	rproc->nb_vdev++;
>  
> -	ret = rproc_rvdev_add_device(rvdev);
> -	if (ret)
> +	/* we currently support only two vrings per rvdev */
> +	if (rsc->num_of_vrings > ARRAY_SIZE(rvdev->vring)) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "too many vrings: %d\n", rsc->num_of_vrings);
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
>  		goto free_rvdev;
> +	}
>  
>  	/* parse the vrings */
>  	for (i = 0; i < rsc->num_of_vrings; i++) {
> @@ -511,9 +524,6 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr,
>  			goto free_rvdev;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* remember the resource offset*/
> -	rvdev->rsc_offset = offset;
> -
>  	/* allocate the vring resources */
>  	for (i = 0; i < rsc->num_of_vrings; i++) {
>  		ret = rproc_alloc_vring(rvdev, i);
> @@ -527,7 +537,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr,
>  	for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
>  		rproc_free_vring(&rvdev->vring[i]);
>  free_rvdev:
> -	device_unregister(&rvdev->dev);
> +	rproc_virtio_unregister_device(rvdev);

Here too I wouldn't bother with a new function - I would simply call
platform_device_unregister().

>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1266,7 +1276,7 @@ void rproc_resource_cleanup(struct rproc *rproc)
>  
>  	/* clean up remote vdev entries */
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(rvdev, rvtmp, &rproc->rvdevs, node)
> -		kref_put(&rvdev->refcount, rproc_vdev_release);
> +		rproc_virtio_unregister_device(rvdev);

Same as above.

>  
>  	rproc_coredump_cleanup(rproc);
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> index 3007d29a26e1..1479c5e33e2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> @@ -36,12 +36,10 @@ int rproc_of_parse_firmware(struct device *dev, int index,
>  			    const char **fw_name);
>  
>  /* from remoteproc_virtio.c */
> -int rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev);
>  struct platform_device *
>  rproc_virtio_register_device(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_vdev_pdata *vdev_data);
>  void rproc_virtio_unregister_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev);
>  irqreturn_t rproc_vq_interrupt(struct rproc *rproc, int vq_id);
> -void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref);
>  
>  /* from remoteproc_debugfs.c */
>  void rproc_remove_trace_file(struct dentry *tfile);
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> index 5eef679cc520..55e797095bfe 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> @@ -48,7 +48,11 @@ static int copy_dma_range_map(struct device *to, struct device *from)
>  
>  static struct rproc_vdev *vdev_to_rvdev(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  {
> -	return container_of(vdev->dev.parent, struct rproc_vdev, dev);
> +	struct platform_device *pdev;
> +
> +	pdev = container_of(vdev->dev.parent, struct platform_device, dev);
> +
> +	return platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  }
>  
>  static  struct rproc *vdev_to_rproc(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> @@ -343,13 +347,10 @@ static void rproc_virtio_dev_release(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct virtio_device *vdev = dev_to_virtio(dev);
>  	struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = vdev_to_rvdev(vdev);
> -	struct rproc *rproc = vdev_to_rproc(vdev);
>  
>  	kfree(vdev);
>  
> -	kref_put(&rvdev->refcount, rproc_vdev_release);
> -
> -	put_device(&rproc->dev);
> +	put_device(&rvdev->pdev->dev);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -365,7 +366,7 @@ static void rproc_virtio_dev_release(struct device *dev)
>  static int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id)
>  {
>  	struct rproc *rproc = rvdev->rproc;
> -	struct device *dev = &rvdev->dev;
> +	struct device *dev = &rvdev->pdev->dev;
>  	struct virtio_device *vdev;
>  	struct rproc_mem_entry *mem;
>  	int ret;
> @@ -436,17 +437,15 @@ static int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id)
>  	vdev->dev.release = rproc_virtio_dev_release;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * We're indirectly making a non-temporary copy of the rproc pointer
> +	 * We're indirectly making a non-temporary copy of the rvdev pointer
>  	 * here, because drivers probed with this vdev will indirectly
>  	 * access the wrapping rproc.
>  	 *
> -	 * Therefore we must increment the rproc refcount here, and decrement
> +	 * Therefore we must increment the rvdev refcount here, and decrement
>  	 * it _only_ when the vdev is released.
>  	 */
> -	get_device(&rproc->dev);
> +	get_device(dev);
>  
> -	/* Reference the vdev and vring allocations */
> -	kref_get(&rvdev->refcount);
>  
>  	ret = register_virtio_device(vdev);
>  	if (ret) {
> @@ -488,56 +487,30 @@ static int rproc_vdev_do_start(struct rproc_subdev *subdev)
>  static void rproc_vdev_do_stop(struct rproc_subdev *subdev, bool crashed)
>  {
>  	struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(subdev, struct rproc_vdev, subdev);
> +	struct device *dev = &rvdev->pdev->dev;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	ret = device_for_each_child(&rvdev->dev, NULL, rproc_remove_virtio_dev);
> +	ret = device_for_each_child(dev, NULL, rproc_remove_virtio_dev);
>  	if (ret)
> -		dev_warn(&rvdev->dev, "can't remove vdev child device: %d\n", ret);
> -}
> -
> -/**
> - * rproc_rvdev_release() - release the existence of a rvdev
> - *
> - * @dev: the subdevice's dev
> - */
> -static void rproc_rvdev_release(struct device *dev)
> -{
> -	struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(dev, struct rproc_vdev, dev);
> -
> -	of_reserved_mem_device_release(dev);
> -
> -	kfree(rvdev);
> +		dev_warn(dev, "can't remove vdev child device: %d\n", ret);
>  }
>  
> -int rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev)
> +static int rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev)
>  {
>  	struct rproc *rproc = rvdev->rproc;
> -	char name[16];
> +	struct device *dev = &rvdev->pdev->dev;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "vdev%dbuffer", rvdev->index);
> -	rvdev->dev.parent = &rproc->dev;
> -	rvdev->dev.release = rproc_rvdev_release;
> -	dev_set_name(&rvdev->dev, "%s#%s", dev_name(rvdev->dev.parent), name);
> -	dev_set_drvdata(&rvdev->dev, rvdev);
> -
> -	ret = device_register(&rvdev->dev);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		put_device(&rvdev->dev);
> -		return ret;
> -	}
> -	ret = copy_dma_range_map(&rvdev->dev, rproc->dev.parent);
> +	ret = copy_dma_range_map(dev, rproc->dev.parent);
>  	if (ret)
> -		goto free_rvdev;
> +		return ret;
>  
>  	/* Make device dma capable by inheriting from parent's capabilities */
> -	set_dma_ops(&rvdev->dev, get_dma_ops(rproc->dev.parent));
> +	set_dma_ops(dev, get_dma_ops(rproc->dev.parent));
>  
> -	ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(&rvdev->dev,
> -					   dma_get_mask(rproc->dev.parent));
> +	ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, dma_get_mask(rproc->dev.parent));
>  	if (ret) {
> -		dev_warn(&rvdev->dev,
> -			 "Failed to set DMA mask %llx. Trying to continue... (%pe)\n",
> +		dev_warn(dev, "Failed to set DMA mask %llx. Trying to continue... (%pe)\n",
>  			 dma_get_mask(rproc->dev.parent), ERR_PTR(ret));
>  	}
>  
> @@ -548,34 +521,9 @@ int rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev)
>  
>  	rproc_add_subdev(rproc, &rvdev->subdev);
>  
> -	return 0;
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "virtio dev %d added\n",  rvdev->index);
>  
> -free_rvdev:
> -	device_unregister(&rvdev->dev);
> -	return ret;
> -}
> -
> -static void rproc_rvdev_remove_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev)
> -{
> -	struct rproc *rproc = rvdev->rproc;
> -
> -	rproc_remove_subdev(rproc, &rvdev->subdev);
> -	rproc_unregister_rvdev(rvdev);
> -	device_unregister(&rvdev->dev);
> -}
> -
> -void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref)
> -{
> -	struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(ref, struct rproc_vdev, refcount);
> -	struct rproc_vring *rvring;
> -	int id;
> -
> -	for (id = 0; id < ARRAY_SIZE(rvdev->vring); id++) {
> -		rvring = &rvdev->vring[id];
> -		rproc_free_vring(rvring);
> -	}
> -
> -	rproc_rvdev_remove_device(rvdev);
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -594,8 +542,7 @@ rproc_virtio_register_device(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_vdev_pdata *vdev_
>  	pdev = platform_device_register_data(dev, "rproc-virtio", vdev_data->index, vdev_data,
>  					     sizeof(*vdev_data));
>  	if (PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(pdev)) {
> -		dev_err(rproc->dev.parent,
> -			"failed to create rproc-virtio device\n");
> +		dev_err(rproc->dev.parent, "failed to create rproc-virtio device\n");
>  	}
>  
>  	return  pdev;
> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> index 542a3d4664f2..7951a3e2b62a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> @@ -614,10 +614,8 @@ struct rproc_vring {
>  
>  /**
>   * struct rproc_vdev - remoteproc state for a supported virtio device
> - * @refcount: reference counter for the vdev and vring allocations
>   * @subdev: handle for registering the vdev as a rproc subdevice
>   * @pdev: remoteproc virtio platform device
> - * @dev: device struct used for reference count semantics
>   * @id: virtio device id (as in virtio_ids.h)
>   * @node: list node
>   * @rproc: the rproc handle
> @@ -626,11 +624,9 @@ struct rproc_vring {
>   * @index: vdev position versus other vdev declared in resource table
>   */
>  struct rproc_vdev {
> -	struct kref refcount;
>  
>  	struct rproc_subdev subdev;
>  	struct platform_device *pdev;
> -	struct device dev;
>  
>  	unsigned int id;
>  	struct list_head node;
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2022-01-06 18:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-22  8:23 [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] remoteproc: restructure the remoteproc VirtIO device Arnaud Pouliquen
2021-12-22  8:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] remoteproc: core: Introduce virtio device add/remove functions Arnaud Pouliquen
2022-01-04 19:08   ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-01-05  8:05     ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2022-01-05 18:05       ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-12-22  8:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] remoteproc: core: Introduce rproc_register_rvdev function Arnaud Pouliquen
2021-12-22  8:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/6] remoteproc: Move rproc_vdev management to remoteproc_virtio.c Arnaud Pouliquen
2022-01-05 18:32   ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-12-22  8:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/6] remoteproc: virtio: Create platform device for the remoteproc_virtio Arnaud Pouliquen
2022-01-06 18:53   ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-01-07  9:30     ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-12-22  8:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/6] remoteproc: virtio: Add helper to create platform device Arnaud Pouliquen
2022-01-06 18:22   ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-12-22  8:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/6] remoteproc: Instantiate the new remoteproc virtio " Arnaud Pouliquen
2022-01-06 18:48   ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220106184816.GB642186@p14s \
    --to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.