All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] net: fix fragments have the disallowed options
@ 2022-01-07  8:05 ooppublic
  2022-01-12 18:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
  2022-01-12 18:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: ooppublic @ 2022-01-07  8:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: davem; +Cc: dsahern, netdev, caixf

From: caixf <ooppublic@163.com>

When in function ip_do_fragment() enter fsat path,
if skb have opthons, all fragments will have the same options.

Just guarantee the second fragment not have the disallowed options.

Signed-off-by: caixf <ooppublic@163.com>
---
 net/ipv4/ip_output.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
index 9bca57ef8b83..ce178b5eb848 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
@@ -826,15 +826,16 @@ int ip_do_fragment(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
 		/* Everything is OK. Generate! */
 		ip_fraglist_init(skb, iph, hlen, &iter);
 
-		if (iter.frag)
-			ip_options_fragment(iter.frag);
-
 		for (;;) {
 			/* Prepare header of the next frame,
 			 * before previous one went down. */
 			if (iter.frag) {
+				bool first_frag = (iter.offset == 0);
+
 				IPCB(iter.frag)->flags = IPCB(skb)->flags;
 				ip_fraglist_prepare(skb, &iter);
+				if (first_frag)
+					ip_options_fragment(iter.frag);
 			}
 
 			skb->tstamp = tstamp;
-- 
2.34.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net: fix fragments have the disallowed options
  2022-01-07  8:05 [PATCH] net: fix fragments have the disallowed options ooppublic
@ 2022-01-12 18:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
  2022-01-18 21:10   ` Jakub Kicinski
  2022-01-12 18:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2022-01-12 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ooppublic; +Cc: davem, dsahern, netdev

On Fri,  7 Jan 2022 16:05:59 +0800 ooppublic@163.com wrote:
> From: caixf <ooppublic@163.com>
> 
> When in function ip_do_fragment() enter fsat path,

fsat -> fast

> if skb have opthons, all fragments will have the same options.

opthons -> options

> Just guarantee the second fragment not have the disallowed options.

You're right. Can you send a patch which explicitly reverts these
two commits instead:

 1b9fbe813016b08e08b22ddba4ddbf9cb1b04b00
 faf482ca196a5b16007190529b3b2dd32ab3f761

I prefer the code the way it was before them, plus keeping the code how
it was could help backports.

Thanks!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net: fix fragments have the disallowed options
  2022-01-07  8:05 [PATCH] net: fix fragments have the disallowed options ooppublic
  2022-01-12 18:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2022-01-12 18:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2022-01-12 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: regressions; +Cc: ooppublic, davem, dsahern, netdev

On Fri,  7 Jan 2022 16:05:59 +0800 ooppublic@163.com wrote:
> From: caixf <ooppublic@163.com>
> 
> When in function ip_do_fragment() enter fsat path,
> if skb have opthons, all fragments will have the same options.
> 
> Just guarantee the second fragment not have the disallowed options.

#regzbot ^introduced: faf482ca196a5b16007190529b3b2dd32ab3f761

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net: fix fragments have the disallowed options
  2022-01-12 18:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2022-01-18 21:10   ` Jakub Kicinski
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2022-01-18 21:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ooppublic; +Cc: davem, dsahern, netdev

On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 10:43:24 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri,  7 Jan 2022 16:05:59 +0800 ooppublic@163.com wrote:
> > From: caixf <ooppublic@163.com>
> > 
> > When in function ip_do_fragment() enter fsat path,  
> 
> fsat -> fast
> 
> > if skb have opthons, all fragments will have the same options.  
> 
> opthons -> options
> 
> > Just guarantee the second fragment not have the disallowed options.  
> 
> You're right. Can you send a patch which explicitly reverts these
> two commits instead:
> 
>  1b9fbe813016b08e08b22ddba4ddbf9cb1b04b00
>  faf482ca196a5b16007190529b3b2dd32ab3f761
> 
> I prefer the code the way it was before them, plus keeping the code how
> it was could help backports.

Please let us know if you're planning to send the new patch otherwise
I'll do the revert myself, it's a clear bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-01-18 21:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-01-07  8:05 [PATCH] net: fix fragments have the disallowed options ooppublic
2022-01-12 18:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-01-18 21:10   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-01-12 18:46 ` Jakub Kicinski

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.