All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>,
	Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>, Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
	Julien Su <juliensu@mxic.com.tw>,
	Jaime Liao <jaimeliao@mxic.com.tw>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
	Xiangsheng Hou <xiangsheng.hou@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 01/13] spi: spi-mem: Introduce a capability structure
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 10:37:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220127103749.5b195f03@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YfGHy/MsQhaWCeYM@sirena.org.uk>

Hi Mark,

broonie@kernel.org wrote on Wed, 26 Jan 2022 17:41:31 +0000:

> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 06:36:01PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> 
> > > I was hoping to review this stuff?  I think I was expecting it to be
> > > rebased after the merge window...  
> 
> > Sorry for the misunderstanding, I thought you were fine with these
> > spi bits so I didn't ping you before applying. Can you review the v9
> > then? There is nothing different in the series I applied.  
> 
> > Depending on the outcome I'll either fix inline if you ack the patches
> > or drop the patches from that branch and send a v10 otherwise.  
> 
> I don't recall seeing anything but I'd dropped them due to the merge
> window, like I say I was expecting a repost for -rc1.  I'll try to fish
> them out and have a look tomorrow.

No worries, I've re-sent exactly the patches currently applied on the
spi-mem-ecc branch (so the rebased ones). Take your time for reviewing
them and depending on how it goes I will introduce your Acks inline or
send a v11 if it is needed.

Thanks,
Miquèl

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>,
	Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>, Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
	Julien Su <juliensu@mxic.com.tw>,
	Jaime Liao <jaimeliao@mxic.com.tw>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
	Xiangsheng Hou <xiangsheng.hou@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 01/13] spi: spi-mem: Introduce a capability structure
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 10:37:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220127103749.5b195f03@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YfGHy/MsQhaWCeYM@sirena.org.uk>

Hi Mark,

broonie@kernel.org wrote on Wed, 26 Jan 2022 17:41:31 +0000:

> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 06:36:01PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> 
> > > I was hoping to review this stuff?  I think I was expecting it to be
> > > rebased after the merge window...  
> 
> > Sorry for the misunderstanding, I thought you were fine with these
> > spi bits so I didn't ping you before applying. Can you review the v9
> > then? There is nothing different in the series I applied.  
> 
> > Depending on the outcome I'll either fix inline if you ack the patches
> > or drop the patches from that branch and send a v10 otherwise.  
> 
> I don't recall seeing anything but I'd dropped them due to the merge
> window, like I say I was expecting a repost for -rc1.  I'll try to fish
> them out and have a look tomorrow.

No worries, I've re-sent exactly the patches currently applied on the
spi-mem-ecc branch (so the rebased ones). Take your time for reviewing
them and depending on how it goes I will introduce your Acks inline or
send a v11 if it is needed.

Thanks,
Miquèl

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-27  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-04  8:36 [PATCH v9 00/13] External ECC engines & Macronix support Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36 ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36 ` [PATCH v9 01/13] spi: spi-mem: Introduce a capability structure Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-05  5:52   ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-01-05  5:52     ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-01-26 10:53   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 10:53     ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 16:35     ` Mark Brown
2022-01-26 16:35       ` Mark Brown
2022-01-26 17:36       ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 17:36         ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 17:41         ` Mark Brown
2022-01-26 17:41           ` Mark Brown
2022-01-27  9:20           ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-27  9:20             ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-27  9:37           ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2022-01-27  9:37             ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36 ` [PATCH v9 02/13] spi: spi-mem: Check the controller extra capabilities Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-05  5:53   ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-01-05  5:53     ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-01-26 10:53   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 10:53     ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36 ` [PATCH v9 03/13] spi: cadence-quadspi: Provide a capability structure Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 10:53   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 10:53     ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36 ` [PATCH v9 04/13] spi: mxic: " Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 10:53   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 10:53     ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36 ` [PATCH v9 05/13] spi: spi-mem: Kill the spi_mem_dtr_supports_op() helper Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 10:53   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 10:53     ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36 ` [PATCH v9 06/13] spi: spi-mem: Add an ecc parameter to the spi_mem_op structure Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  9:02   ` Boris Brezillon
2022-01-04  9:02     ` Boris Brezillon
2022-01-04  9:24     ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  9:24       ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 10:53   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 10:53     ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36 ` [PATCH v9 07/13] mtd: spinand: Delay a little bit the dirmap creation Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 10:53   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 10:53     ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36 ` [PATCH v9 08/13] mtd: spinand: Create direct mapping descriptors for ECC operations Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 10:52   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 10:52     ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36 ` [PATCH v9 09/13] spi: mxic: Fix the transmit path Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 10:52   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 10:52     ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36 ` [PATCH v9 10/13] spi: mxic: Create a helper to configure the controller before an operation Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 10:52   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 10:52     ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36 ` [PATCH v9 11/13] spi: mxic: Create a helper to ease the start of " Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 10:52   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 10:52     ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36 ` [PATCH v9 12/13] spi: mxic: Add support for direct mapping Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 10:52   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 10:52     ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36 ` [PATCH v9 13/13] spi: mxic: Add support for pipelined ECC operations Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  8:36   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 10:52   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 10:52     ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-04  9:04 ` [PATCH v9 00/13] External ECC engines & Macronix support Boris Brezillon
2022-01-04  9:04   ` Boris Brezillon
2022-01-23 16:01 ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-23 16:01   ` Miquel Raynal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220127103749.5b195f03@xps13 \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaimeliao@mxic.com.tw \
    --cc=juliensu@mxic.com.tw \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael@walle.cc \
    --cc=p.yadav@ti.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    --cc=xiangsheng.hou@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.