linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel-gt tree with the drm-intel tree

linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel-gt tree with the drm-intel tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1872 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel-gt tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h

between commit:

  0d6419e9c855 ("drm/i915: Move GT registers to their own header file")

from the drm-intel tree and commit:

  270677026261 ("drm/i915/dg2: Add Wa_14015227452")

from the drm-intel-gt tree.

I fixed it up (I used the former version and then added the following
merge fix patch) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed
as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should
be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

It would be nice if you synced up these 2 trees (by merging one into
the other) as I am carrying several merge fix patches due to the
splitting up of i915_reg.h.

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 11:09:02 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "drm/i915: Move GT registers to their own header file"

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
index 16d98ebee687..a6f0220c2e9f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
@@ -1482,6 +1482,7 @@ enum {
 
 #define GEN9_ROW_CHICKEN4				_MMIO(0xe48c)
 #define   GEN12_DISABLE_GRF_CLEAR			REG_BIT(13)
+#define   XEHP_DIS_BBL_SYSPIPE				REG_BIT(11)
 #define   GEN12_DISABLE_TDL_PUSH			REG_BIT(9)
 #define   GEN11_DIS_PICK_2ND_EU				REG_BIT(7)
 #define   GEN12_DISABLE_HDR_PAST_PAYLOAD_HOLD_FIX	REG_BIT(4)
-- 
2.34.1

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel-gt tree with the drm-intel tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1872 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel-gt tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h

between commit:

  0d6419e9c855 ("drm/i915: Move GT registers to their own header file")

from the drm-intel tree and commit:

  270677026261 ("drm/i915/dg2: Add Wa_14015227452")

from the drm-intel-gt tree.

I fixed it up (I used the former version and then added the following
merge fix patch) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed
as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should
be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

It would be nice if you synced up these 2 trees (by merging one into
the other) as I am carrying several merge fix patches due to the
splitting up of i915_reg.h.

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 11:09:02 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "drm/i915: Move GT registers to their own header file"

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
index 16d98ebee687..a6f0220c2e9f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
@@ -1482,6 +1482,7 @@ enum {
 
 #define GEN9_ROW_CHICKEN4				_MMIO(0xe48c)
 #define   GEN12_DISABLE_GRF_CLEAR			REG_BIT(13)
+#define   XEHP_DIS_BBL_SYSPIPE				REG_BIT(11)
 #define   GEN12_DISABLE_TDL_PUSH			REG_BIT(9)
 #define   GEN11_DIS_PICK_2ND_EU				REG_BIT(7)
 #define   GEN12_DISABLE_HDR_PAST_PAYLOAD_HOLD_FIX	REG_BIT(4)
-- 
2.34.1

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel-gt tree with the drm-intel tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1872 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel-gt tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h

between commit:

  0d6419e9c855 ("drm/i915: Move GT registers to their own header file")

from the drm-intel tree and commit:

  270677026261 ("drm/i915/dg2: Add Wa_14015227452")

from the drm-intel-gt tree.

I fixed it up (I used the former version and then added the following
merge fix patch) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed
as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should
be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

It would be nice if you synced up these 2 trees (by merging one into
the other) as I am carrying several merge fix patches due to the
splitting up of i915_reg.h.

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 11:09:02 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "drm/i915: Move GT registers to their own header file"

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
index 16d98ebee687..a6f0220c2e9f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
@@ -1482,6 +1482,7 @@ enum {
 
 #define GEN9_ROW_CHICKEN4				_MMIO(0xe48c)
 #define   GEN12_DISABLE_GRF_CLEAR			REG_BIT(13)
+#define   XEHP_DIS_BBL_SYSPIPE				REG_BIT(11)
 #define   GEN12_DISABLE_TDL_PUSH			REG_BIT(9)
 #define   GEN11_DIS_PICK_2ND_EU				REG_BIT(7)
 #define   GEN12_DISABLE_HDR_PAST_PAYLOAD_HOLD_FIX	REG_BIT(4)
-- 
2.34.1

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel-gt tree with the drm-intel tree (rev2)

[Patchwork]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 460 bytes --]

== Series Details ==

Series: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel-gt tree with the drm-intel tree (rev2)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/99294/
State : failure

== Summary ==

Applying: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel-gt tree with the drm-intel tree
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
No changes -- Patch already applied.



[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 954 bytes --]

linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel-gt tree with the drm-intel tree

[broonie]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel-gt tree got conflicts in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c

between commits:

  b508d01fa577e ("drm/i915: split out i915_gem_internal.h from i915_drv.h")
  29b9702ffe70d ("drm/i915/ttm: Return some errors instead of trying memcpy move")
  9a8e720fd0641 ("drm/i915: split out gem/i915_gem_domain.h from i915_drv.h")
  b508d01fa577e ("drm/i915: split out i915_gem_internal.h from i915_drv.h")

from the drm-intel tree and commits:

  3526b607b0239 ("drm/i915/ttm: Return some errors instead of trying memcpy move")
  a413c99fc1e49 ("drm/i915: add gtt misalignment test")
  b508d01fa577e ("drm/i915: split out i915_gem_internal.h from i915_drv.h")

from the drm-intel-gt tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index ffde71b6b3f1f,6ffadf4b3f1ab..0000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@@ -1089,10 -1284,10 +1087,12 @@@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_pr
  	IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G10)
  #define IS_DG2_G11(dev_priv) \
  	IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G11)
+ #define IS_DG2_G12(dev_priv) \
+ 	IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G12)
  #define IS_ADLS_RPLS(dev_priv) \
  	IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_ALDERLAKE_S, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_RPL_S)
 +#define IS_ADLP_N(dev_priv) \
 +	IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_ALDERLAKE_P, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_N)
  #define IS_HSW_EARLY_SDV(dev_priv) (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) && \
  				    (INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) & 0xFF00) == 0x0C00)
  #define IS_BDW_ULT(dev_priv) \
diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index 8e1b469a4cd1b,4b95c94084d98..0000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
index 1b508c89468c1,ca4ed9dd909b8..0000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
@@@ -26,7 -26,7 +26,8 @@@
  #include <linux/prime_numbers.h>
  
  #include "gem/i915_gem_context.h"
 +#include "gem/i915_gem_internal.h"
+ #include "gem/i915_gem_region.h"
  #include "gem/selftests/mock_context.h"
  #include "gt/intel_context.h"
  #include "gt/intel_gpu_commands.h"
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h
index d4478b6ad11bb..b7f8e9435b2c6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h
@@ -12,13 +12,16 @@ struct drm_mm_node;
 struct i915_address_space;
 
 int __must_check i915_gem_evict_something(struct i915_address_space *vm,
+					  struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
 					  u64 min_size, u64 alignment,
 					  unsigned long color,
 					  u64 start, u64 end,
 					  unsigned flags);
 int __must_check i915_gem_evict_for_node(struct i915_address_space *vm,
+					 struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
 					 struct drm_mm_node *node,
 					 unsigned int flags);
-int i915_gem_evict_vm(struct i915_address_space *vm);
+int i915_gem_evict_vm(struct i915_address_space *vm,
+		      struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww);
 
 #endif /* __I915_GEM_EVICT_H__ */

linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel-gt tree with the drm-intel tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 280 bytes --]

Hi all,

The ongoing merge conflicts between the drm-intel tree and the
drm-intel-gt tree are just a mess, so I am removing the drm-intel-gt
tree from linux-next until you all can come up with a better way of
doing conflicting development.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel-gt tree with the drm-intel tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 280 bytes --]

Hi all,

The ongoing merge conflicts between the drm-intel tree and the
drm-intel-gt tree are just a mess, so I am removing the drm-intel-gt
tree from linux-next until you all can come up with a better way of
doing conflicting development.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel-gt tree with the drm-intel tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3942 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel-gt tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h

between commit:

  2ef97818d3aa ("drm/i915: split out i915_gem_evict.h from i915_drv.h")

from the drm-intel tree and commit:

  7e00897be8bf ("drm/i915: Add object locking to i915_gem_evict_for_node and i915_gem_evict_something, v2.")

from the drm-intel-gt tree.

I fixed it up (I used the former and adde the following merge fix patch)
and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 09:44:44 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] merge fix for "drm/i915: split out i915_gem_evict.h from i915_drv.h"

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h
index d4478b6ad11b..bd6e78abd530 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h
@@ -12,11 +12,13 @@ struct drm_mm_node;
 struct i915_address_space;
 
 int __must_check i915_gem_evict_something(struct i915_address_space *vm,
+					  struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
 					  u64 min_size, u64 alignment,
 					  unsigned long color,
 					  u64 start, u64 end,
 					  unsigned flags);
 int __must_check i915_gem_evict_for_node(struct i915_address_space *vm,
+					 struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
 					 struct drm_mm_node *node,
 					 unsigned int flags);
 int i915_gem_evict_vm(struct i915_address_space *vm);
-- 
2.34.1

But then I also needed due to commit:

  6945c53bc712 ("drm/i915: Add locking to i915_gem_evict_vm(), v3.")

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 09:51:55 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] extra merge fix for "drm/i915: split out i915_gem_evict.h from i915_drv.h"

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h
index bd6e78abd530..b7f8e9435b2c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ int __must_check i915_gem_evict_for_node(struct i915_address_space *vm,
 					 struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
 					 struct drm_mm_node *node,
 					 unsigned int flags);
-int i915_gem_evict_vm(struct i915_address_space *vm);
+int i915_gem_evict_vm(struct i915_address_space *vm,
+		      struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww);
 
 #endif /* __I915_GEM_EVICT_H__ */
-- 
2.34.1

And then this due to commit

  e849f7e70860 ("drm/i915: Call i915_gem_evict_vm in vm_fault_gtt to prevent new ENOSPC errors, v2.")
(and the above commit)

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:02:16 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] extra 2 merge fix for "drm/i915: split out i915_gem_evict.h from i915_drv.h"

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
index 4afad1604a6a..a69787999d09 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 #include "i915_trace.h"
 #include "i915_user_extensions.h"
 #include "i915_gem_ttm.h"
+#include "i915_gem_evict.h"
 #include "i915_vma.h"
 
 static inline bool
-- 
2.34.1

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel-gt tree with the drm-intel tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3942 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel-gt tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h

between commit:

  2ef97818d3aa ("drm/i915: split out i915_gem_evict.h from i915_drv.h")

from the drm-intel tree and commit:

  7e00897be8bf ("drm/i915: Add object locking to i915_gem_evict_for_node and i915_gem_evict_something, v2.")

from the drm-intel-gt tree.

I fixed it up (I used the former and adde the following merge fix patch)
and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 09:44:44 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] merge fix for "drm/i915: split out i915_gem_evict.h from i915_drv.h"

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h
index d4478b6ad11b..bd6e78abd530 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h
@@ -12,11 +12,13 @@ struct drm_mm_node;
 struct i915_address_space;
 
 int __must_check i915_gem_evict_something(struct i915_address_space *vm,
+					  struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
 					  u64 min_size, u64 alignment,
 					  unsigned long color,
 					  u64 start, u64 end,
 					  unsigned flags);
 int __must_check i915_gem_evict_for_node(struct i915_address_space *vm,
+					 struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
 					 struct drm_mm_node *node,
 					 unsigned int flags);
 int i915_gem_evict_vm(struct i915_address_space *vm);
-- 
2.34.1

But then I also needed due to commit:

  6945c53bc712 ("drm/i915: Add locking to i915_gem_evict_vm(), v3.")

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 09:51:55 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] extra merge fix for "drm/i915: split out i915_gem_evict.h from i915_drv.h"

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h
index bd6e78abd530..b7f8e9435b2c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.h
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ int __must_check i915_gem_evict_for_node(struct i915_address_space *vm,
 					 struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
 					 struct drm_mm_node *node,
 					 unsigned int flags);
-int i915_gem_evict_vm(struct i915_address_space *vm);
+int i915_gem_evict_vm(struct i915_address_space *vm,
+		      struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww);
 
 #endif /* __I915_GEM_EVICT_H__ */
-- 
2.34.1

And then this due to commit

  e849f7e70860 ("drm/i915: Call i915_gem_evict_vm in vm_fault_gtt to prevent new ENOSPC errors, v2.")
(and the above commit)

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:02:16 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] extra 2 merge fix for "drm/i915: split out i915_gem_evict.h from i915_drv.h"

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
index 4afad1604a6a..a69787999d09 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 #include "i915_trace.h"
 #include "i915_user_extensions.h"
 #include "i915_gem_ttm.h"
+#include "i915_gem_evict.h"
 #include "i915_vma.h"
 
 static inline bool
-- 
2.34.1

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel-gt tree with the drm-intel tree

[broonie]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel-gt tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c

between commit:

  6678916dfa012 ("drm/i915: Move pipe/transcoder/abox masks under intel_device_info.display")

from the drm-intel tree and commit:

  c83125bb2199b ("drm/i915: Add has_64k_pages flag")

from the drm-intel-gt tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
index ae36dfd77dcfa,332cb8b25e494..0000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
@@@ -1027,6 -1015,8 +1027,7 @@@ static const struct intel_device_info x
  	DGFX_FEATURES,
  	PLATFORM(INTEL_XEHPSDV),
  	.display = { },
+ 	.has_64k_pages = 1,
 -	.pipe_mask = 0,
  	.platform_engine_mask =
  		BIT(RCS0) | BIT(BCS0) |
  		BIT(VECS0) | BIT(VECS1) | BIT(VECS2) | BIT(VECS3) |

linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel-gt tree with the drm-intel tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1609 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel-gt tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c

between commit:

  d06188234427 ("drm/i915/fbc: s/dev_priv/i915/")

from the drm-intel tree and commit:

  cca084692394 ("drm/i915: Use per device iommu check")

from the drm-intel-gt tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
index d0c34bc3af6c,c40444206425..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
@@@ -1674,12 -1536,12 +1674,12 @@@ static int intel_sanitize_fbc_option(st
  	return 0;
  }
  
 -static bool need_fbc_vtd_wa(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 +static bool need_fbc_vtd_wa(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
  {
  	/* WaFbcTurnOffFbcWhenHyperVisorIsUsed:skl,bxt */
- 	if (intel_vtd_active() &&
 -	if (intel_vtd_active(dev_priv) &&
 -	    (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_BROXTON(dev_priv))) {
 -		drm_info(&dev_priv->drm,
++	if (intel_vtd_active(i915) &&
 +	    (IS_SKYLAKE(i915) || IS_BROXTON(i915))) {
 +		drm_info(&i915->drm,
  			 "Disabling framebuffer compression (FBC) to prevent screen flicker with VT-d enabled\n");
  		return true;
  	}

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel-gt tree with the drm-intel tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1609 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel-gt tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c

between commit:

  d06188234427 ("drm/i915/fbc: s/dev_priv/i915/")

from the drm-intel tree and commit:

  cca084692394 ("drm/i915: Use per device iommu check")

from the drm-intel-gt tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
index d0c34bc3af6c,c40444206425..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
@@@ -1674,12 -1536,12 +1674,12 @@@ static int intel_sanitize_fbc_option(st
  	return 0;
  }
  
 -static bool need_fbc_vtd_wa(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 +static bool need_fbc_vtd_wa(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
  {
  	/* WaFbcTurnOffFbcWhenHyperVisorIsUsed:skl,bxt */
- 	if (intel_vtd_active() &&
 -	if (intel_vtd_active(dev_priv) &&
 -	    (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_BROXTON(dev_priv))) {
 -		drm_info(&dev_priv->drm,
++	if (intel_vtd_active(i915) &&
 +	    (IS_SKYLAKE(i915) || IS_BROXTON(i915))) {
 +		drm_info(&i915->drm,
  			 "Disabling framebuffer compression (FBC) to prevent screen flicker with VT-d enabled\n");
  		return true;
  	}

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel-gt tree with the drm-intel tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1240 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel-gt tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c

between commit:

  3c542cfa8266 ("drm/i915/dg2: Tile 4 plane format support")

from the drm-intel tree and commit:

  a5b7ef27da60 ("drm/i915: Add struct to hold IP version")

from the drm-intel-gt tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
index 69b8029da6b6,5e6795853dc3..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
@@@ -1042,9 -1030,8 +1042,9 @@@ static const struct intel_device_info d
  	XE_HPM_FEATURES,
  	XE_LPD_FEATURES,
  	DGFX_FEATURES,
- 	.graphics_rel = 55,
- 	.media_rel = 55,
+ 	.graphics.rel = 55,
+ 	.media.rel = 55,
 +	.has_4tile = 1,
  	PLATFORM(INTEL_DG2),
  	.platform_engine_mask =
  		BIT(RCS0) | BIT(BCS0) |

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel-gt tree with the drm-intel tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1240 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel-gt tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c

between commit:

  3c542cfa8266 ("drm/i915/dg2: Tile 4 plane format support")

from the drm-intel tree and commit:

  a5b7ef27da60 ("drm/i915: Add struct to hold IP version")

from the drm-intel-gt tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
index 69b8029da6b6,5e6795853dc3..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
@@@ -1042,9 -1030,8 +1042,9 @@@ static const struct intel_device_info d
  	XE_HPM_FEATURES,
  	XE_LPD_FEATURES,
  	DGFX_FEATURES,
- 	.graphics_rel = 55,
- 	.media_rel = 55,
+ 	.graphics.rel = 55,
+ 	.media.rel = 55,
 +	.has_4tile = 1,
  	PLATFORM(INTEL_DG2),
  	.platform_engine_mask =
  		BIT(RCS0) | BIT(BCS0) |

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]