From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexander Egorenkov <egorenar@linux.ibm.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>, <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] mm: memcg: synchronize objcg lists with a dedicated spinlock
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 15:19:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220203151912.87d47b82c1bc3f0d56be0e3a@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yfm1IHmoGdyUR81T@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 14:33:04 -0800 Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> wrote:
> Alexander reported a circular lock dependency revealed by the mmap1
> ltp test:
> LOCKDEP_CIRCULAR (suite: ltp, case: mtest06 (mmap1))
>
> ...
>
> Fixes: bf4f059954dc ("mm: memcg/slab: obj_cgroup API")
I'm thinking it needs cc:stable. It sounds unlikely that we'll hit it
in real life, but lockdep splats are concerning and I expect downstream
kernel consumers will end up merging this anyway, for this reason.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Egorenkov <egorenar@linux.ibm.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] mm: memcg: synchronize objcg lists with a dedicated spinlock
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 15:19:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220203151912.87d47b82c1bc3f0d56be0e3a@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yfm1IHmoGdyUR81T@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 14:33:04 -0800 Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> wrote:
> Alexander reported a circular lock dependency revealed by the mmap1
> ltp test:
> LOCKDEP_CIRCULAR (suite: ltp, case: mtest06 (mmap1))
>
> ...
>
> Fixes: bf4f059954dc ("mm: memcg/slab: obj_cgroup API")
I'm thinking it needs cc:stable. It sounds unlikely that we'll hit it
in real life, but lockdep splats are concerning and I expect downstream
kernel consumers will end up merging this anyway, for this reason.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-03 23:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-01 22:33 [PATCH RESEND] mm: memcg: synchronize objcg lists with a dedicated spinlock Roman Gushchin
2022-02-01 22:33 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-02-01 22:48 ` Tejun Heo
2022-02-01 22:48 ` Tejun Heo
2022-02-01 23:26 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-02-01 23:26 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-02-01 23:49 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-02-01 23:49 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-02-02 15:58 ` Jeremy Linton
2022-02-02 15:58 ` Jeremy Linton
2022-02-02 16:19 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-02-02 16:19 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-02-03 23:19 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2022-02-03 23:19 ` Andrew Morton
2022-02-05 16:58 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-02-05 16:58 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-02-05 12:27 ` Muchun Song
2022-02-05 12:27 ` Muchun Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220203151912.87d47b82c1bc3f0d56be0e3a@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=egorenar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.