All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
To: daniel@ffwll.ch, deller@gmx.de, javierm@redhat.com,
	geert@linux-m68k.org, sam@ravnborg.org, kraxel@redhat.com
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] fbdev: Improve performance of sys_imageblit()
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 20:54:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220221195410.9172-3-tzimmermann@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220221195410.9172-1-tzimmermann@suse.de>

Improve the performance of sys_imageblit() by manually unrolling
the inner blitting loop and moving some invariants out. The compiler
failed to do this automatically. The resulting binary code was even
slower than the cfb_imageblit() helper, which uses the same algorithm,
but operates on I/O memory.

A microbenchmark measures the average number of CPU cycles
for sys_imageblit() after a stabilizing period of a few minutes
(i7-4790, FullHD, simpledrm, kernel with debugging). The value
for CFB is given as a reference.

  sys_imageblit(), new: 25934 cycles
  sys_imageblit(), old: 35944 cycles
  cfb_imageblit():      30566 cycles

In the optimized case, sys_imageblit() is now ~30% faster than before
and ~20% faster than cfb_imageblit().

v2:
	* move switch out of inner loop (Gerd)
	* remove test for alignment of dst1 (Sam)

Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
---
 drivers/video/fbdev/core/sysimgblt.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/sysimgblt.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/sysimgblt.c
index a4d05b1b17d7..722c327a381b 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/sysimgblt.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/sysimgblt.c
@@ -188,23 +188,29 @@ static void fast_imageblit(const struct fb_image *image, struct fb_info *p,
 {
 	u32 fgx = fgcolor, bgx = bgcolor, bpp = p->var.bits_per_pixel;
 	u32 ppw = 32/bpp, spitch = (image->width + 7)/8;
-	u32 bit_mask, end_mask, eorx, shift;
+	u32 bit_mask, eorx;
 	const char *s = image->data, *src;
 	u32 *dst;
-	const u32 *tab = NULL;
+	const u32 *tab;
+	size_t tablen;
+	u32 colortab[16];
 	int i, j, k;
 
 	switch (bpp) {
 	case 8:
 		tab = fb_be_math(p) ? cfb_tab8_be : cfb_tab8_le;
+		tablen = 16;
 		break;
 	case 16:
 		tab = fb_be_math(p) ? cfb_tab16_be : cfb_tab16_le;
+		tablen = 4;
 		break;
 	case 32:
-	default:
 		tab = cfb_tab32;
+		tablen = 2;
 		break;
+	default:
+		return;
 	}
 
 	for (i = ppw-1; i--; ) {
@@ -218,19 +224,40 @@ static void fast_imageblit(const struct fb_image *image, struct fb_info *p,
 	eorx = fgx ^ bgx;
 	k = image->width/ppw;
 
+	for (i = 0; i < tablen; ++i)
+		colortab[i] = (tab[i] & eorx) ^ bgx;
+
 	for (i = image->height; i--; ) {
 		dst = dst1;
-		shift = 8;
 		src = s;
 
-		for (j = k; j--; ) {
-			shift -= ppw;
-			end_mask = tab[(*src >> shift) & bit_mask];
-			*dst++ = (end_mask & eorx) ^ bgx;
-			if (!shift) {
-				shift = 8;
-				src++;
+		switch (ppw) {
+		case 4: /* 8 bpp */
+			for (j = k; j; j -= 2, ++src) {
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 4) & bit_mask];
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 0) & bit_mask];
+			}
+			break;
+		case 2: /* 16 bpp */
+			for (j = k; j; j -= 4, ++src) {
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 6) & bit_mask];
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 4) & bit_mask];
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 2) & bit_mask];
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 0) & bit_mask];
+			}
+			break;
+		case 1: /* 32 bpp */
+			for (j = k; j; j -= 8, ++src) {
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 7) & bit_mask];
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 6) & bit_mask];
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 5) & bit_mask];
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 4) & bit_mask];
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 3) & bit_mask];
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 2) & bit_mask];
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 1) & bit_mask];
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 0) & bit_mask];
 			}
+			break;
 		}
 		dst1 += p->fix.line_length;
 		s += spitch;
-- 
2.35.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
To: daniel@ffwll.ch, deller@gmx.de, javierm@redhat.com,
	geert@linux-m68k.org, sam@ravnborg.org, kraxel@redhat.com
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] fbdev: Improve performance of sys_imageblit()
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 20:54:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220221195410.9172-3-tzimmermann@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220221195410.9172-1-tzimmermann@suse.de>

Improve the performance of sys_imageblit() by manually unrolling
the inner blitting loop and moving some invariants out. The compiler
failed to do this automatically. The resulting binary code was even
slower than the cfb_imageblit() helper, which uses the same algorithm,
but operates on I/O memory.

A microbenchmark measures the average number of CPU cycles
for sys_imageblit() after a stabilizing period of a few minutes
(i7-4790, FullHD, simpledrm, kernel with debugging). The value
for CFB is given as a reference.

  sys_imageblit(), new: 25934 cycles
  sys_imageblit(), old: 35944 cycles
  cfb_imageblit():      30566 cycles

In the optimized case, sys_imageblit() is now ~30% faster than before
and ~20% faster than cfb_imageblit().

v2:
	* move switch out of inner loop (Gerd)
	* remove test for alignment of dst1 (Sam)

Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
---
 drivers/video/fbdev/core/sysimgblt.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/sysimgblt.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/sysimgblt.c
index a4d05b1b17d7..722c327a381b 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/sysimgblt.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/sysimgblt.c
@@ -188,23 +188,29 @@ static void fast_imageblit(const struct fb_image *image, struct fb_info *p,
 {
 	u32 fgx = fgcolor, bgx = bgcolor, bpp = p->var.bits_per_pixel;
 	u32 ppw = 32/bpp, spitch = (image->width + 7)/8;
-	u32 bit_mask, end_mask, eorx, shift;
+	u32 bit_mask, eorx;
 	const char *s = image->data, *src;
 	u32 *dst;
-	const u32 *tab = NULL;
+	const u32 *tab;
+	size_t tablen;
+	u32 colortab[16];
 	int i, j, k;
 
 	switch (bpp) {
 	case 8:
 		tab = fb_be_math(p) ? cfb_tab8_be : cfb_tab8_le;
+		tablen = 16;
 		break;
 	case 16:
 		tab = fb_be_math(p) ? cfb_tab16_be : cfb_tab16_le;
+		tablen = 4;
 		break;
 	case 32:
-	default:
 		tab = cfb_tab32;
+		tablen = 2;
 		break;
+	default:
+		return;
 	}
 
 	for (i = ppw-1; i--; ) {
@@ -218,19 +224,40 @@ static void fast_imageblit(const struct fb_image *image, struct fb_info *p,
 	eorx = fgx ^ bgx;
 	k = image->width/ppw;
 
+	for (i = 0; i < tablen; ++i)
+		colortab[i] = (tab[i] & eorx) ^ bgx;
+
 	for (i = image->height; i--; ) {
 		dst = dst1;
-		shift = 8;
 		src = s;
 
-		for (j = k; j--; ) {
-			shift -= ppw;
-			end_mask = tab[(*src >> shift) & bit_mask];
-			*dst++ = (end_mask & eorx) ^ bgx;
-			if (!shift) {
-				shift = 8;
-				src++;
+		switch (ppw) {
+		case 4: /* 8 bpp */
+			for (j = k; j; j -= 2, ++src) {
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 4) & bit_mask];
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 0) & bit_mask];
+			}
+			break;
+		case 2: /* 16 bpp */
+			for (j = k; j; j -= 4, ++src) {
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 6) & bit_mask];
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 4) & bit_mask];
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 2) & bit_mask];
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 0) & bit_mask];
+			}
+			break;
+		case 1: /* 32 bpp */
+			for (j = k; j; j -= 8, ++src) {
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 7) & bit_mask];
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 6) & bit_mask];
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 5) & bit_mask];
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 4) & bit_mask];
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 3) & bit_mask];
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 2) & bit_mask];
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 1) & bit_mask];
+				*dst++ = colortab[(*src >> 0) & bit_mask];
 			}
+			break;
 		}
 		dst1 += p->fix.line_length;
 		s += spitch;
-- 
2.35.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-21 19:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-21 19:54 [PATCH v2 0/5] fbdev: Improve performance of fbdev console Thomas Zimmermann
2022-02-21 19:54 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-02-21 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] fbdev: Improve performance of sys_fillrect() Thomas Zimmermann
2022-02-21 19:54   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-02-21 19:54 ` Thomas Zimmermann [this message]
2022-02-21 19:54   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] fbdev: Improve performance of sys_imageblit() Thomas Zimmermann
2022-02-21 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] fbdev: Remove trailing whitespaces from cfbimgblt.c Thomas Zimmermann
2022-02-21 19:54   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-02-21 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] fbdev: Improve performance of cfb_imageblit() Thomas Zimmermann
2022-02-21 19:54   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-02-22 13:01   ` Pekka Paalanen
2022-02-22 13:01     ` Pekka Paalanen
2022-02-22 18:48     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-02-21 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] drm: Add TODO item for optimizing format helpers Thomas Zimmermann
2022-02-21 19:54   ` Thomas Zimmermann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220221195410.9172-3-tzimmermann@suse.de \
    --to=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=javierm@redhat.com \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.