All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@xilinx.com>
Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	michal.simek@xilinx.com, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com,
	ben.levinsky@xilinx.com, bill.mills@linaro.org,
	sergei.korneichuk@xilinx.com, arun.balaji.kannan@xilinx.com,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add Xilinx RPU subsystem bindings
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 09:36:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220222163613.GA923552@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f383cd27-9757-7b56-4ebc-1227b28f51f7@xilinx.com>

On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 05:58:15PM -0800, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
> 
> Thanks for reviews.
> 
> Please find my comments below.
> 
> On 2/14/22 10:22 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 03:28:19AM -0800, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> > > Xilinx ZynqMP platform has dual-core ARM Cortex R5 Realtime Processing
> > > Unit(RPU) subsystem. This patch adds dt-bindings for RPU subsystem (cluster).
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah<tanmay.shah@xilinx.com>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > Changes in v3:
> > >    - None
> > > 
> > >   .../bindings/remoteproc/xlnx,r5f-rproc.yaml   | 139 ++++++++++++++++++
> > >   include/dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h |   6 +
> > >   2 files changed, 145 insertions(+)
> > >   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xlnx,r5f-rproc.yaml
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xlnx,r5f-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xlnx,r5f-rproc.yaml
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..d43f0b16ad7f
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xlnx,r5f-rproc.yaml
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only or BSD-2-Clause)
> > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > +---
> > > +$id:http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/xlnx,r5f-rproc.yaml#
> > > +$schema:http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > +
> > > +title: Xilinx R5F processor subsystem
> > > +
> > > +maintainers:
> > > +  - Ben Levinsky<ben.levinsky@xilinx.com>
> > > +  - Tanmay Shah<tanmay.shah@xilinx.com>
> > > +
> > > +description: |
> > > +  The Xilinx platforms include a pair of Cortex-R5F processors (RPU) for
> > > +  real-time processing based on the Cortex-R5F processor core from ARM.
> > > +  The Cortex-R5F processor implements the Arm v7-R architecture and includes a
> > > +  floating-point unit that implements the Arm VFPv3 instruction set.
> > > +
> > > +properties:
> > > +  compatible:
> > > +    const: xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss
> > > +
> > > +  xlnx,cluster-mode:
> > > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > > +    description: |
> > > +      The RPU MPCore can operate in split mode(Dual-processor performance), Safety
> > > +      lock-step mode(Both RPU cores execute the same code in lock-step,
> > > +      clock-for-clock) or Single CPU mode (RPU core 0 can be held in reset while
> > > +      core 1 runs normally). The processor does not support dynamic configuration.
> > > +      Switching between modes is only permitted immediately after a processor reset.
> > > +      If set to  1 then lockstep mode and if 0 then split mode.
> > > +      If set to  2 then single CPU mode. When not defined, default will be lockstep mode.
> > > +
> > > +  "#address-cells":
> > > +    const: 1
> > > +
> > > +  "#size-cells":
> > > +    const: 1
> > > +
> > > +  reg:
> > > +    items:
> > > +      - description: RPU subsystem status and control registers
> > > +
> > > +patternProperties:
> > > +  "^r5f-[a-f0-9]+$":
> > > +    type: object
> > > +    description: |
> > > +      The RPU is located in the Low Power Domain of the Processor Subsystem.
> > > +      Each processor includes separate L1 instruction and data caches and
> > > +      tightly coupled memories (TCM). System memory is cacheable, but the TCM
> > > +      memory space is non-cacheable.
> > > +
> > > +      Each RPU contains one 64KB memory and two 32KB memories that
> > > +      are accessed via the TCM A and B port interfaces, for a total of 128KB
> > > +      per processor. In lock-step mode, the processor has access to 256KB of
> > > +      TCM memory.
> > > +
> > > +    properties:
> > > +      compatible:
> > > +        const: xlnx,zynqmp-r5f
> > > +
> > > +      power-domains:
> > > +        description: |
> > > +          phandle to a PM domain provider node and an args specifier containing
> > > +          the r5f0 and r5f1 node id value.
> > > +
> > > +      reg:
> > > +        items:
> > > +          - description: RPU0 and RPU1 control and status registers
> > > +
> > > +      mboxes:
> > > +        items:
> > > +          - description: |
> > > +              Bi-directional channel to send data to RPU and receive ack from RPU.
> > > +              Request and response message buffers are available and each buffer is 32 bytes.
> > > +          - description: |
> > > +              Bi-directional channel to receive data from RPU and send ack from RPU.
> > > +              Request and response message buffers are available and each buffer is 32 bytes.
> > > +        minItems: 1
> > > +
> > > +      mbox-names:
> > > +        items:
> > > +          - const: tx
> > > +          - const: rx
> > > +        minItems: 1
> > > +
> > > +      sram:
> > > +        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> > > +        minItems: 1
> > > +        description: |
> > > +          phandles to one or more reserved on-chip SRAM regions. Other than TCM,
> > > +          the RPU can execute instructions and access data from, the OCM memory,
> > > +          the main DDR memory, and other system memories.
> > > +
> > > +          The regions should be defined as child nodes of the respective SRAM
> > > +          node, and should be defined as per the generic bindings in,
> > > +          Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml
> > > +
> > > +      memory-region:
> > > +        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> > > +        description: |
> > > +          List of phandles to the reserved memory regions associated with the
> > > +          remoteproc device. This is variable and describes the memories shared with
> > > +          the remote processor (e.g. remoteproc firmware and carveouts, rpmsg
> > > +          vrings, ...). This reserved memory region will be allocated on DDR memory.
> > > +          See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt
> > > 
> > Aside from "compatible" and "power-domains", none of the above properties appear
> > in the example below, making this patchset harder to review.
> > 
> > I am pretty sure to have commented on this earlier...
> 
> In example, I have included only required property nodes.
> 
> If you want, I can include other properties as well. However, some of the
> properties needs new bindings for example "sram".
> 
> So, I can't include it as I don't know how bindings for them will look like.
> 

I'm fine with that part.

> In next revision, I can include mboxes, mbox-names and memory-region
> properties. Is that fine?
> 
> Also, should I add those nodes in actual device-tree now or later?
> 
> For example, mboxes and mbox-names are not needed for driver as of now.
> 
> So should I include them in dts now or later when I send rpmsg related
> patches?

Include in the example the properties currently supported by the driver.  Not
all of them have to be in the DTS though.

> 
> > More comments to come later or tomorrow.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Mathieu
> > 
> > > +    required:
> > > +      - compatible
> > > +      - power-domains
> > > +
> > > +    unevaluatedProperties: false
> > > +
> > > +required:
> > > +  - compatible
> > > +
> > > +additionalProperties: false
> > > +
> > > +examples:
> > > +  - |
> > > +    r5fss: r5fss@ff9a0000 {
> > > +        compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss";
> > > +        xlnx,cluster-mode = <1>;
> > > +
> > > +        #address-cells = <1>;
> > > +        #size-cells = <1>;
> > > +        reg = <0xff9a0000 0x228>;
> > > +
> > > +        r5f-0 {
> > > +            compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5f";
> > > +            power-domains = <&zynqmp_firmware 0x7>;
> > > +        };
> > > +
> > > +        r5f-1 {
> > > +            compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5f";
> > > +            power-domains = <&zynqmp_firmware 0x8>;
> > > +        };
> > > +    };
> > > +...
> > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h
> > > index 0d9a412fd5e0..618024cbb20d 100644
> > > --- a/include/dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h
> > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h
> > > @@ -6,6 +6,12 @@
> > >   #ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_ZYNQMP_POWER_H
> > >   #define _DT_BINDINGS_ZYNQMP_POWER_H
> > > +#define		PD_RPU_0	7
> > > +#define		PD_RPU_1	8
> > > +#define		PD_R5_0_ATCM	15
> > > +#define		PD_R5_0_BTCM	16
> > > +#define		PD_R5_1_ATCM	17
> > > +#define		PD_R5_1_BTCM	18
> > >   #define		PD_USB_0	22
> > >   #define		PD_USB_1	23
> > >   #define		PD_TTC_0	24
> > > -- 
> > > 2.25.1
> > > 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@xilinx.com>
Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	michal.simek@xilinx.com, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com,
	ben.levinsky@xilinx.com, bill.mills@linaro.org,
	sergei.korneichuk@xilinx.com, arun.balaji.kannan@xilinx.com,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add Xilinx RPU subsystem bindings
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 09:36:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220222163613.GA923552@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f383cd27-9757-7b56-4ebc-1227b28f51f7@xilinx.com>

On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 05:58:15PM -0800, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
> 
> Thanks for reviews.
> 
> Please find my comments below.
> 
> On 2/14/22 10:22 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 03:28:19AM -0800, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> > > Xilinx ZynqMP platform has dual-core ARM Cortex R5 Realtime Processing
> > > Unit(RPU) subsystem. This patch adds dt-bindings for RPU subsystem (cluster).
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah<tanmay.shah@xilinx.com>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > Changes in v3:
> > >    - None
> > > 
> > >   .../bindings/remoteproc/xlnx,r5f-rproc.yaml   | 139 ++++++++++++++++++
> > >   include/dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h |   6 +
> > >   2 files changed, 145 insertions(+)
> > >   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xlnx,r5f-rproc.yaml
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xlnx,r5f-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xlnx,r5f-rproc.yaml
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..d43f0b16ad7f
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xlnx,r5f-rproc.yaml
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only or BSD-2-Clause)
> > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > +---
> > > +$id:http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/xlnx,r5f-rproc.yaml#
> > > +$schema:http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > +
> > > +title: Xilinx R5F processor subsystem
> > > +
> > > +maintainers:
> > > +  - Ben Levinsky<ben.levinsky@xilinx.com>
> > > +  - Tanmay Shah<tanmay.shah@xilinx.com>
> > > +
> > > +description: |
> > > +  The Xilinx platforms include a pair of Cortex-R5F processors (RPU) for
> > > +  real-time processing based on the Cortex-R5F processor core from ARM.
> > > +  The Cortex-R5F processor implements the Arm v7-R architecture and includes a
> > > +  floating-point unit that implements the Arm VFPv3 instruction set.
> > > +
> > > +properties:
> > > +  compatible:
> > > +    const: xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss
> > > +
> > > +  xlnx,cluster-mode:
> > > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > > +    description: |
> > > +      The RPU MPCore can operate in split mode(Dual-processor performance), Safety
> > > +      lock-step mode(Both RPU cores execute the same code in lock-step,
> > > +      clock-for-clock) or Single CPU mode (RPU core 0 can be held in reset while
> > > +      core 1 runs normally). The processor does not support dynamic configuration.
> > > +      Switching between modes is only permitted immediately after a processor reset.
> > > +      If set to  1 then lockstep mode and if 0 then split mode.
> > > +      If set to  2 then single CPU mode. When not defined, default will be lockstep mode.
> > > +
> > > +  "#address-cells":
> > > +    const: 1
> > > +
> > > +  "#size-cells":
> > > +    const: 1
> > > +
> > > +  reg:
> > > +    items:
> > > +      - description: RPU subsystem status and control registers
> > > +
> > > +patternProperties:
> > > +  "^r5f-[a-f0-9]+$":
> > > +    type: object
> > > +    description: |
> > > +      The RPU is located in the Low Power Domain of the Processor Subsystem.
> > > +      Each processor includes separate L1 instruction and data caches and
> > > +      tightly coupled memories (TCM). System memory is cacheable, but the TCM
> > > +      memory space is non-cacheable.
> > > +
> > > +      Each RPU contains one 64KB memory and two 32KB memories that
> > > +      are accessed via the TCM A and B port interfaces, for a total of 128KB
> > > +      per processor. In lock-step mode, the processor has access to 256KB of
> > > +      TCM memory.
> > > +
> > > +    properties:
> > > +      compatible:
> > > +        const: xlnx,zynqmp-r5f
> > > +
> > > +      power-domains:
> > > +        description: |
> > > +          phandle to a PM domain provider node and an args specifier containing
> > > +          the r5f0 and r5f1 node id value.
> > > +
> > > +      reg:
> > > +        items:
> > > +          - description: RPU0 and RPU1 control and status registers
> > > +
> > > +      mboxes:
> > > +        items:
> > > +          - description: |
> > > +              Bi-directional channel to send data to RPU and receive ack from RPU.
> > > +              Request and response message buffers are available and each buffer is 32 bytes.
> > > +          - description: |
> > > +              Bi-directional channel to receive data from RPU and send ack from RPU.
> > > +              Request and response message buffers are available and each buffer is 32 bytes.
> > > +        minItems: 1
> > > +
> > > +      mbox-names:
> > > +        items:
> > > +          - const: tx
> > > +          - const: rx
> > > +        minItems: 1
> > > +
> > > +      sram:
> > > +        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> > > +        minItems: 1
> > > +        description: |
> > > +          phandles to one or more reserved on-chip SRAM regions. Other than TCM,
> > > +          the RPU can execute instructions and access data from, the OCM memory,
> > > +          the main DDR memory, and other system memories.
> > > +
> > > +          The regions should be defined as child nodes of the respective SRAM
> > > +          node, and should be defined as per the generic bindings in,
> > > +          Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml
> > > +
> > > +      memory-region:
> > > +        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> > > +        description: |
> > > +          List of phandles to the reserved memory regions associated with the
> > > +          remoteproc device. This is variable and describes the memories shared with
> > > +          the remote processor (e.g. remoteproc firmware and carveouts, rpmsg
> > > +          vrings, ...). This reserved memory region will be allocated on DDR memory.
> > > +          See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt
> > > 
> > Aside from "compatible" and "power-domains", none of the above properties appear
> > in the example below, making this patchset harder to review.
> > 
> > I am pretty sure to have commented on this earlier...
> 
> In example, I have included only required property nodes.
> 
> If you want, I can include other properties as well. However, some of the
> properties needs new bindings for example "sram".
> 
> So, I can't include it as I don't know how bindings for them will look like.
> 

I'm fine with that part.

> In next revision, I can include mboxes, mbox-names and memory-region
> properties. Is that fine?
> 
> Also, should I add those nodes in actual device-tree now or later?
> 
> For example, mboxes and mbox-names are not needed for driver as of now.
> 
> So should I include them in dts now or later when I send rpmsg related
> patches?

Include in the example the properties currently supported by the driver.  Not
all of them have to be in the DTS though.

> 
> > More comments to come later or tomorrow.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Mathieu
> > 
> > > +    required:
> > > +      - compatible
> > > +      - power-domains
> > > +
> > > +    unevaluatedProperties: false
> > > +
> > > +required:
> > > +  - compatible
> > > +
> > > +additionalProperties: false
> > > +
> > > +examples:
> > > +  - |
> > > +    r5fss: r5fss@ff9a0000 {
> > > +        compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss";
> > > +        xlnx,cluster-mode = <1>;
> > > +
> > > +        #address-cells = <1>;
> > > +        #size-cells = <1>;
> > > +        reg = <0xff9a0000 0x228>;
> > > +
> > > +        r5f-0 {
> > > +            compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5f";
> > > +            power-domains = <&zynqmp_firmware 0x7>;
> > > +        };
> > > +
> > > +        r5f-1 {
> > > +            compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5f";
> > > +            power-domains = <&zynqmp_firmware 0x8>;
> > > +        };
> > > +    };
> > > +...
> > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h
> > > index 0d9a412fd5e0..618024cbb20d 100644
> > > --- a/include/dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h
> > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h
> > > @@ -6,6 +6,12 @@
> > >   #ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_ZYNQMP_POWER_H
> > >   #define _DT_BINDINGS_ZYNQMP_POWER_H
> > > +#define		PD_RPU_0	7
> > > +#define		PD_RPU_1	8
> > > +#define		PD_R5_0_ATCM	15
> > > +#define		PD_R5_0_BTCM	16
> > > +#define		PD_R5_1_ATCM	17
> > > +#define		PD_R5_1_BTCM	18
> > >   #define		PD_USB_0	22
> > >   #define		PD_USB_1	23
> > >   #define		PD_TTC_0	24
> > > -- 
> > > 2.25.1
> > > 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-22 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-10 11:28 [PATCH v3 0/6] Add Xilinx RPU subsystem support Tanmay Shah
2022-02-10 11:28 ` Tanmay Shah
2022-02-10 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add Xilinx RPU subsystem bindings Tanmay Shah
2022-02-10 11:28   ` Tanmay Shah
2022-02-14 18:22   ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-02-14 18:22     ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-02-22  1:58     ` Tanmay Shah
2022-02-22  1:58       ` Tanmay Shah
2022-02-22 16:36       ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2022-02-22 16:36         ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-02-10 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] arm64: dts: xilinx: zynqmp: Add RPU subsystem device node Tanmay Shah
2022-02-10 11:28   ` Tanmay Shah
2022-02-10 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] firmware: xilinx: Add ZynqMP firmware ioctl enums for RPU configuration Tanmay Shah
2022-02-10 11:28   ` Tanmay Shah
2022-02-10 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] firmware: xilinx: Add shutdown/wakeup APIs Tanmay Shah
2022-02-10 11:28   ` Tanmay Shah
2022-02-10 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] firmware: xilinx: Add RPU configuration APIs Tanmay Shah
2022-02-10 11:28   ` Tanmay Shah
2022-02-10 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] drivers: remoteproc: Add Xilinx r5 remoteproc driver Tanmay Shah
2022-02-10 11:28   ` Tanmay Shah
2022-02-15 18:58   ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-02-15 18:58     ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-02-22  1:59     ` Tanmay Shah
2022-02-22  1:59       ` Tanmay Shah
2022-02-16 18:26   ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-02-16 18:26     ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-02-22  2:01     ` Tanmay Shah
2022-02-22  2:01       ` Tanmay Shah
2022-02-22 16:49       ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-02-22 16:49         ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-02-18 19:11   ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-02-18 19:11     ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-02-22  2:13     ` Tanmay Shah
2022-02-22  2:13       ` Tanmay Shah
2022-02-22 16:57       ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-02-22 16:57         ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-02-22 18:08         ` Tanmay Shah
2022-02-22 18:08           ` Tanmay Shah
2022-03-09  7:18       ` Tanmay Shah
2022-03-09  7:18         ` Tanmay Shah
2022-03-10 15:36         ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-03-10 15:36           ` Mathieu Poirier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220222163613.GA923552@p14s \
    --to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=arun.balaji.kannan@xilinx.com \
    --cc=ben.levinsky@xilinx.com \
    --cc=bill.mills@linaro.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sergei.korneichuk@xilinx.com \
    --cc=tanmay.shah@xilinx.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.