All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc: fix build errors
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 16:33:19 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220225223319.GT614@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1645748601.idp48wexp9.astroid@bobo.none>

On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 10:32:02AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Excerpts from Segher Boessenkool's message of February 25, 2022 3:12 am:
> > On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 03:05:28PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> >> + * gcc 10 started to emit a .machine directive at the beginning of generated
> >> + * .s files, which overrides assembler -Wa,-m<cpu> options passed down.
> >> + * Unclear if this behaviour will be reverted.
> > 
> > It will not be reverted.  If you need a certain .machine for some asm
> > code, you should write just that!
> 
> It should be reverted because it breaks old binutils which did not have
> the workaround patch for this broken gcc behaviour. And it is just
> unnecessary because -m option can already be used to do the same thing.
> 
> Not that I expect gcc to revert it.

Nothing will happen if you do not file a bug report.  And do read the
bug reporting instructions first please.

> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC
> >> +#if (GCC_VERSION >= 100000)
> >> +#if (CONFIG_AS_VERSION == 23800)
> >> +asm(".machine any");
> >> +#endif
> >> +#endif
> >> +#endif
> >> +#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> > 
> > Abusing toplevel asm like this is broken and you *will* end up with
> > unhappiness all around.
> 
> It actually unbreaks things and reduces my unhappiness.

It is broken.  You will need -fno-toplevel-reorder, and you really do
not want that, if you *can* use it in the kernel even.

> It's only done 
> for broken compiler versions and only where as does not have the 
> workaround for the breakage.

What compiler versions?  Please file a PR.


Segher

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc: fix build errors
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 16:33:19 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220225223319.GT614@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1645748601.idp48wexp9.astroid@bobo.none>

On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 10:32:02AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Excerpts from Segher Boessenkool's message of February 25, 2022 3:12 am:
> > On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 03:05:28PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> >> + * gcc 10 started to emit a .machine directive at the beginning of generated
> >> + * .s files, which overrides assembler -Wa,-m<cpu> options passed down.
> >> + * Unclear if this behaviour will be reverted.
> > 
> > It will not be reverted.  If you need a certain .machine for some asm
> > code, you should write just that!
> 
> It should be reverted because it breaks old binutils which did not have
> the workaround patch for this broken gcc behaviour. And it is just
> unnecessary because -m option can already be used to do the same thing.
> 
> Not that I expect gcc to revert it.

Nothing will happen if you do not file a bug report.  And do read the
bug reporting instructions first please.

> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC
> >> +#if (GCC_VERSION >= 100000)
> >> +#if (CONFIG_AS_VERSION == 23800)
> >> +asm(".machine any");
> >> +#endif
> >> +#endif
> >> +#endif
> >> +#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> > 
> > Abusing toplevel asm like this is broken and you *will* end up with
> > unhappiness all around.
> 
> It actually unbreaks things and reduces my unhappiness.

It is broken.  You will need -fno-toplevel-reorder, and you really do
not want that, if you *can* use it in the kernel even.

> It's only done 
> for broken compiler versions and only where as does not have the 
> workaround for the breakage.

What compiler versions?  Please file a PR.


Segher

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-25 22:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-23 13:58 [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: lib: sstep: fix 'sthcx' instruction Anders Roxell
2022-02-23 13:58 ` Anders Roxell
2022-02-23 13:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc: fix build errors Anders Roxell
2022-02-23 13:58   ` Anders Roxell
2022-02-23 15:21   ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-02-23 15:21     ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-02-24  2:54   ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-02-24  2:54     ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-02-24  5:05     ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-02-24  5:05       ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-02-24  8:55       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-24  8:55         ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-24 10:11         ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-02-24 10:11           ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-02-24 10:20           ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-24 10:20             ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-24 11:13             ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-02-24 11:13               ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-02-24 17:29               ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-02-24 17:29                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-02-25  0:23                 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-02-25  0:23                   ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-02-25 22:28                   ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-02-25 22:28                     ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-02-26  0:07                     ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-02-26  0:07                       ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-02-24 17:12       ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-02-24 17:12         ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-02-25  0:32         ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-02-25  0:32           ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-02-25  8:33           ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-25  8:33             ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-25 10:51             ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-02-25 10:51               ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-02-25 22:33           ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2022-02-25 22:33             ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-02-24 12:39   ` Michael Ellerman
2022-02-24 12:39     ` Michael Ellerman
2022-02-24 16:12     ` Anders Roxell
2022-02-24 16:12       ` Anders Roxell
2022-02-24 17:37     ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-02-24 17:37       ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-02-23 13:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: lib: sstep: " Anders Roxell
2022-02-23 13:58   ` Anders Roxell
2022-02-23 15:27   ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-02-23 15:27     ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-02-24  2:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: lib: sstep: fix 'sthcx' instruction Nicholas Piggin
2022-02-24  2:40   ` Nicholas Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220225223319.GT614@gate.crashing.org \
    --to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.