* [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: Remove redundant else branches. @ 2022-03-29 14:09 Sevinj Aghayeva 2022-03-29 20:00 ` Alison Schofield 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Sevinj Aghayeva @ 2022-03-29 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Fabio Aiuto, Lee Jones, Muhammad Usama Anjum, Fabio M. De Francesco, linux-staging, linux-kernel, outreachy This patch fixes the following checkpatch.pl warning: WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return Signed-off-by: Sevinj Aghayeva <sevinj.aghayeva@gmail.com> --- .../staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.c | 32 ++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.c index b449be537376..27de086903e2 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.c +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.c @@ -94,16 +94,14 @@ bool rtw_is_cckratesonly_included(u8 *rate) int rtw_check_network_type(unsigned char *rate, int ratelen, int channel) { - if (channel > 14) { + if (channel > 14) return WIRELESS_INVALID; - } else { /* could be pure B, pure G, or B/G */ - if (rtw_is_cckratesonly_included(rate)) - return WIRELESS_11B; - else if (rtw_is_cckrates_included(rate)) - return WIRELESS_11BG; - else - return WIRELESS_11G; - } + /* could be pure B, pure G, or B/G */ + if (rtw_is_cckratesonly_included(rate)) + return WIRELESS_11B; + if (rtw_is_cckrates_included(rate)) + return WIRELESS_11BG; + return WIRELESS_11G; } u8 *rtw_set_fixed_ie(unsigned char *pbuf, unsigned int len, unsigned char *source, @@ -151,11 +149,10 @@ u8 *rtw_get_ie(u8 *pbuf, signed int index, signed int *len, signed int limit) if (*p == index) { *len = *(p + 1); return p; - } else { - tmp = *(p + 1); - p += (tmp + 2); - i += (tmp + 2); } + tmp = *(p + 1); + p += (tmp + 2); + i += (tmp + 2); if (i >= limit) break; } @@ -199,9 +196,8 @@ u8 *rtw_get_ie_ex(u8 *in_ie, uint in_len, u8 eid, u8 *oui, u8 oui_len, u8 *ie, u *ielen = in_ie[cnt+1]+2; break; - } else { - cnt += in_ie[cnt+1]+2; /* goto next */ } + cnt += in_ie[cnt+1]+2; /* goto next */ } return target_ie; @@ -697,9 +693,8 @@ u8 *rtw_get_wps_ie(u8 *in_ie, uint in_len, u8 *wps_ie, uint *wps_ielen) cnt += in_ie[cnt+1]+2; break; - } else { - cnt += in_ie[cnt+1]+2; /* goto next */ } + cnt += in_ie[cnt+1]+2; /* goto next */ } return wpsie_ptr; @@ -748,9 +743,8 @@ u8 *rtw_get_wps_attr(u8 *wps_ie, uint wps_ielen, u16 target_attr_id, u8 *buf_att *len_attr = attr_len; break; - } else { - attr_ptr += attr_len; /* goto next */ } + attr_ptr += attr_len; /* goto next */ } return target_attr_ptr; -- 2.25.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: Remove redundant else branches. 2022-03-29 14:09 [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: Remove redundant else branches Sevinj Aghayeva @ 2022-03-29 20:00 ` Alison Schofield [not found] ` <CAMWRUK4ti6QxA4JWbG_XwZHwQwWUKYu+HvVHvEBX-k82oaEP6g@mail.gmail.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Alison Schofield @ 2022-03-29 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sevinj Aghayeva Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Fabio Aiuto, Lee Jones, Muhammad Usama Anjum, Fabio M. De Francesco, linux-staging, linux-kernel, outreachy Hi Sevinj, You can do this to make sure your commit msg 'looks' similar to others in the file: $git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit d6ad258ae15d staging: rtl8723bs: Remove redundant else branches. 24e65aac9457 staging: rtl8723bs: remove rf type branching (fourth patch) 167fc30e8e51 staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused macros d7361874468f staging: rtl8723bs: fix camel case in struct wlan_bcn_info 6994aa430368 staging: rtl8723bs: fix camel case in struct ndis_802_11_ssid That tells me the 'Remove' should not start with an uppercase and there should be no period at the end of line. Note that I look at this per patch, because different drivers and subsystems have different conventions. The point is to try to discern the prevailing style, and follow it. Please check the get_maintainers instruction in the first patch tutorial. I only got this: $ git show HEAD | perl scripts/get_maintainer.pl --separator , --nokeywords --nogit --nogit-fallback --norolestats Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 07:09:04AM -0700, Sevinj Aghayeva wrote: Please state the 'why' of this patch. ie something like: Adhere to Linux kernel coding style. > This patch fixes the following checkpatch.pl warning: The phrases 'This patch' is frowned upon as unecessarily wordy. Perhaps simply: Reported by checkpatch: You have another patch in flight with similar things to update. Please post a v2 of that one that addresses the feedback given here. I thought both patches had good scope in that they addressed multiple instances of the same issue in a single file. Thanks! Alison > > WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return > > Signed-off-by: Sevinj Aghayeva <sevinj.aghayeva@gmail.com> > --- > .../staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.c | 32 ++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.c > index b449be537376..27de086903e2 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.c > @@ -94,16 +94,14 @@ bool rtw_is_cckratesonly_included(u8 *rate) > > int rtw_check_network_type(unsigned char *rate, int ratelen, int channel) > { > - if (channel > 14) { > + if (channel > 14) > return WIRELESS_INVALID; > - } else { /* could be pure B, pure G, or B/G */ > - if (rtw_is_cckratesonly_included(rate)) > - return WIRELESS_11B; > - else if (rtw_is_cckrates_included(rate)) > - return WIRELESS_11BG; > - else > - return WIRELESS_11G; > - } > + /* could be pure B, pure G, or B/G */ > + if (rtw_is_cckratesonly_included(rate)) > + return WIRELESS_11B; > + if (rtw_is_cckrates_included(rate)) > + return WIRELESS_11BG; > + return WIRELESS_11G; > } > > u8 *rtw_set_fixed_ie(unsigned char *pbuf, unsigned int len, unsigned char *source, > @@ -151,11 +149,10 @@ u8 *rtw_get_ie(u8 *pbuf, signed int index, signed int *len, signed int limit) > if (*p == index) { > *len = *(p + 1); > return p; > - } else { > - tmp = *(p + 1); > - p += (tmp + 2); > - i += (tmp + 2); > } > + tmp = *(p + 1); > + p += (tmp + 2); > + i += (tmp + 2); > if (i >= limit) > break; > } > @@ -199,9 +196,8 @@ u8 *rtw_get_ie_ex(u8 *in_ie, uint in_len, u8 eid, u8 *oui, u8 oui_len, u8 *ie, u > *ielen = in_ie[cnt+1]+2; > > break; > - } else { > - cnt += in_ie[cnt+1]+2; /* goto next */ > } > + cnt += in_ie[cnt+1]+2; /* goto next */ > } > > return target_ie; > @@ -697,9 +693,8 @@ u8 *rtw_get_wps_ie(u8 *in_ie, uint in_len, u8 *wps_ie, uint *wps_ielen) > cnt += in_ie[cnt+1]+2; > > break; > - } else { > - cnt += in_ie[cnt+1]+2; /* goto next */ > } > + cnt += in_ie[cnt+1]+2; /* goto next */ > } > > return wpsie_ptr; > @@ -748,9 +743,8 @@ u8 *rtw_get_wps_attr(u8 *wps_ie, uint wps_ielen, u16 target_attr_id, u8 *buf_att > *len_attr = attr_len; > > break; > - } else { > - attr_ptr += attr_len; /* goto next */ > } > + attr_ptr += attr_len; /* goto next */ > } > > return target_attr_ptr; > -- > 2.25.1 > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CAMWRUK4ti6QxA4JWbG_XwZHwQwWUKYu+HvVHvEBX-k82oaEP6g@mail.gmail.com>]
* Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: Remove redundant else branches. [not found] ` <CAMWRUK4ti6QxA4JWbG_XwZHwQwWUKYu+HvVHvEBX-k82oaEP6g@mail.gmail.com> @ 2022-03-29 21:24 ` Alison Schofield 2022-03-29 21:15 ` Sevinj Aghayeva 2022-03-29 21:36 ` Alison Schofield 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Alison Schofield @ 2022-03-29 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sevinj Aghayeva Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Fabio Aiuto, Lee Jones, Muhammad Usama Anjum, Fabio M. De Francesco, linux-staging, linux-kernel, outreachy On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 01:59:52PM -0700, Sevinj Aghayeva wrote: > Hi Alison, > > Thanks for the feedback! Please see inline. > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 12:58 PM Alison Schofield < > alison.schofield@intel.com> wrote: > > > Hi Sevinj, > > > > You can do this to make sure your commit msg 'looks' similar to > > others in the file: > > > > $git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit > > > > d6ad258ae15d staging: rtl8723bs: Remove redundant else branches. > > 24e65aac9457 staging: rtl8723bs: remove rf type branching (fourth patch) > > 167fc30e8e51 staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused macros > > d7361874468f staging: rtl8723bs: fix camel case in struct wlan_bcn_info > > 6994aa430368 staging: rtl8723bs: fix camel case in struct ndis_802_11_ssid > > > > That tells me the 'Remove' should not start with an uppercase and > > there should be no period at the end of line. Note that I look at this > > per patch, because different drivers and subsystems have different > > conventions. The point is to try to discern the prevailing style, > > and follow it. > > > > Got it. The few examples that I saw in other places were using > grammatically formatted sentences, but I'll take the subsystem conventions > into account. > > > > Please check the get_maintainers instruction in the first patch tutorial. > > I only got this: > > > > $ git show HEAD | perl scripts/get_maintainer.pl --separator , > > --nokeywords --nogit --nogit-fallback --norolestats > > Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, > > linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > My bad! I ran get_maintainer.pl without those options and got those a lot > more email addresses. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 07:09:04AM -0700, Sevinj Aghayeva wrote: > > > > Please state the 'why' of this patch. ie something like: > > Adhere to Linux kernel coding style. > > > > > This patch fixes the following checkpatch.pl warning: > > The phrases 'This patch' is frowned upon as unecessarily wordy. > > Perhaps simply: > > Reported by checkpatch: > > > > Okay. I think we should update the https://kernelnewbies.org/PatchPhilosophy > because I took "This patch..." from there. Yeah, there's a lot of 'This patch...' and 'Fixes...' and some other stuff that has fallen out of favor. I just made a small edit getting rid of a 'Fixes' subject line. How about if you update this example: Subject: [OPW kernel] [PATCH] Staging: rtl8192e: Fix printk() warning style with your patch right here..once it is done! Thanks! Alison > > > > > > You have another patch in flight with similar things to update. > > Please post a v2 of that one that addresses the feedback given > > here. > > > > That one has already landed. Is it okay if I send v2 just for this patch? Did you see it applied already? > > Thanks! > > > > > > I thought both patches had good scope in that they addressed multiple > > instances of the same issue in a single file. > > > > Thanks! > > Alison > > > > > > > > WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sevinj Aghayeva <sevinj.aghayeva@gmail.com> > > > --- > > > .../staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.c | 32 ++++++++----------- > > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.c > > b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.c > > > index b449be537376..27de086903e2 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.c > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.c > > > @@ -94,16 +94,14 @@ bool rtw_is_cckratesonly_included(u8 *rate) > > > > > > int rtw_check_network_type(unsigned char *rate, int ratelen, int > > channel) > > > { > > > - if (channel > 14) { > > > + if (channel > 14) > > > return WIRELESS_INVALID; > > > - } else { /* could be pure B, pure G, or B/G */ > > > - if (rtw_is_cckratesonly_included(rate)) > > > - return WIRELESS_11B; > > > - else if (rtw_is_cckrates_included(rate)) > > > - return WIRELESS_11BG; > > > - else > > > - return WIRELESS_11G; > > > - } > > > + /* could be pure B, pure G, or B/G */ > > > + if (rtw_is_cckratesonly_included(rate)) > > > + return WIRELESS_11B; > > > + if (rtw_is_cckrates_included(rate)) > > > + return WIRELESS_11BG; > > > + return WIRELESS_11G; > > > } > > > > > > u8 *rtw_set_fixed_ie(unsigned char *pbuf, unsigned int len, unsigned > > char *source, > > > @@ -151,11 +149,10 @@ u8 *rtw_get_ie(u8 *pbuf, signed int index, signed > > int *len, signed int limit) > > > if (*p == index) { > > > *len = *(p + 1); > > > return p; > > > - } else { > > > - tmp = *(p + 1); > > > - p += (tmp + 2); > > > - i += (tmp + 2); > > > } > > > + tmp = *(p + 1); > > > + p += (tmp + 2); > > > + i += (tmp + 2); > > > if (i >= limit) > > > break; > > > } > > > @@ -199,9 +196,8 @@ u8 *rtw_get_ie_ex(u8 *in_ie, uint in_len, u8 eid, u8 > > *oui, u8 oui_len, u8 *ie, u > > > *ielen = in_ie[cnt+1]+2; > > > > > > break; > > > - } else { > > > - cnt += in_ie[cnt+1]+2; /* goto next */ > > > } > > > + cnt += in_ie[cnt+1]+2; /* goto next */ > > > } > > > > > > return target_ie; > > > @@ -697,9 +693,8 @@ u8 *rtw_get_wps_ie(u8 *in_ie, uint in_len, u8 > > *wps_ie, uint *wps_ielen) > > > cnt += in_ie[cnt+1]+2; > > > > > > break; > > > - } else { > > > - cnt += in_ie[cnt+1]+2; /* goto next */ > > > } > > > + cnt += in_ie[cnt+1]+2; /* goto next */ > > > } > > > > > > return wpsie_ptr; > > > @@ -748,9 +743,8 @@ u8 *rtw_get_wps_attr(u8 *wps_ie, uint wps_ielen, u16 > > target_attr_id, u8 *buf_att > > > *len_attr = attr_len; > > > > > > break; > > > - } else { > > > - attr_ptr += attr_len; /* goto next */ > > > } > > > + attr_ptr += attr_len; /* goto next */ > > > } > > > > > > return target_attr_ptr; > > > -- > > > 2.25.1 > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sevinj.Aghayeva ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: Remove redundant else branches. 2022-03-29 21:24 ` Alison Schofield @ 2022-03-29 21:15 ` Sevinj Aghayeva 2022-03-29 21:36 ` Alison Schofield 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Sevinj Aghayeva @ 2022-03-29 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alison Schofield; +Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, outreachy On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 2:22 PM Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 01:59:52PM -0700, Sevinj Aghayeva wrote: > > Hi Alison, > > > > Thanks for the feedback! Please see inline. > > > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 12:58 PM Alison Schofield < > > alison.schofield@intel.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Sevinj, > > > > > > You can do this to make sure your commit msg 'looks' similar to > > > others in the file: > > > > > > $git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit > > > > > > d6ad258ae15d staging: rtl8723bs: Remove redundant else branches. > > > 24e65aac9457 staging: rtl8723bs: remove rf type branching (fourth patch) > > > 167fc30e8e51 staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused macros > > > d7361874468f staging: rtl8723bs: fix camel case in struct wlan_bcn_info > > > 6994aa430368 staging: rtl8723bs: fix camel case in struct ndis_802_11_ssid > > > > > > That tells me the 'Remove' should not start with an uppercase and > > > there should be no period at the end of line. Note that I look at this > > > per patch, because different drivers and subsystems have different > > > conventions. The point is to try to discern the prevailing style, > > > and follow it. > > > > > > > Got it. The few examples that I saw in other places were using > > grammatically formatted sentences, but I'll take the subsystem conventions > > into account. > > > > > > > Please check the get_maintainers instruction in the first patch tutorial. > > > I only got this: > > > > > > $ git show HEAD | perl scripts/get_maintainer.pl --separator , > > > --nokeywords --nogit --nogit-fallback --norolestats > > > Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, > > > linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > > > > My bad! I ran get_maintainer.pl without those options and got those a lot > > more email addresses. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 07:09:04AM -0700, Sevinj Aghayeva wrote: > > > > > > Please state the 'why' of this patch. ie something like: > > > Adhere to Linux kernel coding style. > > > > > > > This patch fixes the following checkpatch.pl warning: > > > The phrases 'This patch' is frowned upon as unecessarily wordy. > > > Perhaps simply: > > > Reported by checkpatch: > > > > > > > Okay. I think we should update the https://kernelnewbies.org/PatchPhilosophy > > because I took "This patch..." from there. > > Yeah, there's a lot of 'This patch...' and 'Fixes...' and some other > stuff that has fallen out of favor. > I just made a small edit getting rid of a 'Fixes' subject line. > > How about if you update this example: > Subject: [OPW kernel] [PATCH] Staging: rtl8192e: Fix printk() warning style > with your patch right here..once it is done! Sounds good! I think I will have to send a request for editing pages like you explained in a previous email... (Removed non-maintainers' email address from this thread. It's baffling that a script called get_maintainers would return email addresses of people who are not maintainers :-).) > > Thanks! > Alison > > > > > > > > > > > You have another patch in flight with similar things to update. > > > Please post a v2 of that one that addresses the feedback given > > > here. > > > > > > > That one has already landed. Is it okay if I send v2 just for this patch? > > Did you see it applied already? > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > I thought both patches had good scope in that they addressed multiple > > > instances of the same issue in a single file. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Alison > > > > > > > > > > > WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sevinj Aghayeva <sevinj.aghayeva@gmail.com> > > > > --- > > > > .../staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.c | 32 ++++++++----------- > > > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.c > > > b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.c > > > > index b449be537376..27de086903e2 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.c > > > > @@ -94,16 +94,14 @@ bool rtw_is_cckratesonly_included(u8 *rate) > > > > > > > > int rtw_check_network_type(unsigned char *rate, int ratelen, int > > > channel) > > > > { > > > > - if (channel > 14) { > > > > + if (channel > 14) > > > > return WIRELESS_INVALID; > > > > - } else { /* could be pure B, pure G, or B/G */ > > > > - if (rtw_is_cckratesonly_included(rate)) > > > > - return WIRELESS_11B; > > > > - else if (rtw_is_cckrates_included(rate)) > > > > - return WIRELESS_11BG; > > > > - else > > > > - return WIRELESS_11G; > > > > - } > > > > + /* could be pure B, pure G, or B/G */ > > > > + if (rtw_is_cckratesonly_included(rate)) > > > > + return WIRELESS_11B; > > > > + if (rtw_is_cckrates_included(rate)) > > > > + return WIRELESS_11BG; > > > > + return WIRELESS_11G; > > > > } > > > > > > > > u8 *rtw_set_fixed_ie(unsigned char *pbuf, unsigned int len, unsigned > > > char *source, > > > > @@ -151,11 +149,10 @@ u8 *rtw_get_ie(u8 *pbuf, signed int index, signed > > > int *len, signed int limit) > > > > if (*p == index) { > > > > *len = *(p + 1); > > > > return p; > > > > - } else { > > > > - tmp = *(p + 1); > > > > - p += (tmp + 2); > > > > - i += (tmp + 2); > > > > } > > > > + tmp = *(p + 1); > > > > + p += (tmp + 2); > > > > + i += (tmp + 2); > > > > if (i >= limit) > > > > break; > > > > } > > > > @@ -199,9 +196,8 @@ u8 *rtw_get_ie_ex(u8 *in_ie, uint in_len, u8 eid, u8 > > > *oui, u8 oui_len, u8 *ie, u > > > > *ielen = in_ie[cnt+1]+2; > > > > > > > > break; > > > > - } else { > > > > - cnt += in_ie[cnt+1]+2; /* goto next */ > > > > } > > > > + cnt += in_ie[cnt+1]+2; /* goto next */ > > > > } > > > > > > > > return target_ie; > > > > @@ -697,9 +693,8 @@ u8 *rtw_get_wps_ie(u8 *in_ie, uint in_len, u8 > > > *wps_ie, uint *wps_ielen) > > > > cnt += in_ie[cnt+1]+2; > > > > > > > > break; > > > > - } else { > > > > - cnt += in_ie[cnt+1]+2; /* goto next */ > > > > } > > > > + cnt += in_ie[cnt+1]+2; /* goto next */ > > > > } > > > > > > > > return wpsie_ptr; > > > > @@ -748,9 +743,8 @@ u8 *rtw_get_wps_attr(u8 *wps_ie, uint wps_ielen, u16 > > > target_attr_id, u8 *buf_att > > > > *len_attr = attr_len; > > > > > > > > break; > > > > - } else { > > > > - attr_ptr += attr_len; /* goto next */ > > > > } > > > > + attr_ptr += attr_len; /* goto next */ > > > > } > > > > > > > > return target_attr_ptr; > > > > -- > > > > 2.25.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Sevinj.Aghayeva -- Sevinj.Aghayeva ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: Remove redundant else branches. 2022-03-29 21:24 ` Alison Schofield 2022-03-29 21:15 ` Sevinj Aghayeva @ 2022-03-29 21:36 ` Alison Schofield 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Alison Schofield @ 2022-03-29 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sevinj Aghayeva Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Fabio Aiuto, Lee Jones, Muhammad Usama Anjum, Fabio M. De Francesco, linux-staging, linux-kernel, outreachy snip On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 02:24:26PM -0700, Alison Schofield wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 01:59:52PM -0700, Sevinj Aghayeva wrote: > > > > That one has already landed. Is it okay if I send v2 just for this patch? > > Did you see it applied already? > I see Greg took a couple that I wanted to send for rework. BTW - if it was really something *wrong* I would ask you to send another patch, but since it's just style, let's just apply the learning to the next one. Thanks! Alison ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-03-29 21:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-03-29 14:09 [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: Remove redundant else branches Sevinj Aghayeva
2022-03-29 20:00 ` Alison Schofield
[not found] ` <CAMWRUK4ti6QxA4JWbG_XwZHwQwWUKYu+HvVHvEBX-k82oaEP6g@mail.gmail.com>
2022-03-29 21:24 ` Alison Schofield
2022-03-29 21:15 ` Sevinj Aghayeva
2022-03-29 21:36 ` Alison Schofield
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.