All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] ALSA: pcm: Fix potential AB/BA lock with buffer_mutex and mmap_lock
@ 2022-03-30 12:09 Takashi Iwai
  2022-03-31  9:51 ` Jaroslav Kysela
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Takashi Iwai @ 2022-03-30 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alsa-devel

syzbot caught a potential deadlock between the PCM
runtime->buffer_mutex and the mm->mmap_lock.  It was brought by the
recent fix to cover the racy read/write and other ioctls, and in that
commit, I overlooked a (hopefully only) corner case that may take the
revert lock, namely, the OSS mmap.  The OSS mmap operation
exceptionally allows to re-configure the parameters inside the OSS
mmap syscall, where mm->mmap_mutex is already held.  Meanwhile, the
copy_from/to_user calls at read/write operations also take the
mm->mmap_lock internally, hence it may lead to a AB/BA deadlock.

A similar problem was already seen in the past and we fixed it with a
refcount (in commit b248371628aa).  The former fix covered only the
call paths with OSS read/write and OSS ioctls, while we need to cover
the concurrent access via both ALSA and OSS APIs now.

This patch addresses the problem above by replacing the buffer_mutex
lock in the read/write operations with a refcount similar as we've
used for OSS.  The new field, runtime->buffer_accessing, keeps the
number of concurrent read/write operations.  Unlike the former
buffer_mutex protection, this protects only around the
copy_from/to_user() calls; the other codes are basically protected by
the PCM stream lock.  The refcount can be a negative, meaning blocked
by the ioctls.  If a negative value is seen, the read/write aborts
with -EBUSY.  In the ioctl side, OTOH, they check this refcount, too,
and set to a negative value for blocking unless it's already being
accessed.

Reported-by: syzbot+6e5c88838328e99c7e1c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: dca947d4d26d ("ALSA: pcm: Fix races among concurrent read/write and buffer changes")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/000000000000381a0d05db622a81@google.com
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
---
 include/sound/pcm.h     |  1 +
 sound/core/pcm.c        |  1 +
 sound/core/pcm_lib.c    |  9 +++++----
 sound/core/pcm_native.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/sound/pcm.h b/include/sound/pcm.h
index 314f2779cab5..6b99310b5b88 100644
--- a/include/sound/pcm.h
+++ b/include/sound/pcm.h
@@ -402,6 +402,7 @@ struct snd_pcm_runtime {
 	struct fasync_struct *fasync;
 	bool stop_operating;		/* sync_stop will be called */
 	struct mutex buffer_mutex;	/* protect for buffer changes */
+	atomic_t buffer_accessing;	/* >0: in r/w operation, <0: blocked */
 
 	/* -- private section -- */
 	void *private_data;
diff --git a/sound/core/pcm.c b/sound/core/pcm.c
index edd9849210f2..977d54320a5c 100644
--- a/sound/core/pcm.c
+++ b/sound/core/pcm.c
@@ -970,6 +970,7 @@ int snd_pcm_attach_substream(struct snd_pcm *pcm, int stream,
 
 	runtime->status->state = SNDRV_PCM_STATE_OPEN;
 	mutex_init(&runtime->buffer_mutex);
+	atomic_set(&runtime->buffer_accessing, 0);
 
 	substream->runtime = runtime;
 	substream->private_data = pcm->private_data;
diff --git a/sound/core/pcm_lib.c b/sound/core/pcm_lib.c
index a40a35e51fad..1fc7c50ffa62 100644
--- a/sound/core/pcm_lib.c
+++ b/sound/core/pcm_lib.c
@@ -1906,11 +1906,9 @@ static int wait_for_avail(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
 		if (avail >= runtime->twake)
 			break;
 		snd_pcm_stream_unlock_irq(substream);
-		mutex_unlock(&runtime->buffer_mutex);
 
 		tout = schedule_timeout(wait_time);
 
-		mutex_lock(&runtime->buffer_mutex);
 		snd_pcm_stream_lock_irq(substream);
 		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 		switch (runtime->status->state) {
@@ -2221,7 +2219,6 @@ snd_pcm_sframes_t __snd_pcm_lib_xfer(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
 
 	nonblock = !!(substream->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
 
-	mutex_lock(&runtime->buffer_mutex);
 	snd_pcm_stream_lock_irq(substream);
 	err = pcm_accessible_state(runtime);
 	if (err < 0)
@@ -2276,6 +2273,10 @@ snd_pcm_sframes_t __snd_pcm_lib_xfer(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
 			err = -EINVAL;
 			goto _end_unlock;
 		}
+		if (!atomic_inc_unless_negative(&runtime->buffer_accessing)) {
+			err = -EBUSY;
+			goto _end_unlock;
+		}
 		snd_pcm_stream_unlock_irq(substream);
 		if (!is_playback)
 			snd_pcm_dma_buffer_sync(substream, SNDRV_DMA_SYNC_CPU);
@@ -2284,6 +2285,7 @@ snd_pcm_sframes_t __snd_pcm_lib_xfer(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
 		if (is_playback)
 			snd_pcm_dma_buffer_sync(substream, SNDRV_DMA_SYNC_DEVICE);
 		snd_pcm_stream_lock_irq(substream);
+		atomic_dec(&runtime->buffer_accessing);
 		if (err < 0)
 			goto _end_unlock;
 		err = pcm_accessible_state(runtime);
@@ -2313,7 +2315,6 @@ snd_pcm_sframes_t __snd_pcm_lib_xfer(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
 	if (xfer > 0 && err >= 0)
 		snd_pcm_update_state(substream, runtime);
 	snd_pcm_stream_unlock_irq(substream);
-	mutex_unlock(&runtime->buffer_mutex);
 	return xfer > 0 ? (snd_pcm_sframes_t)xfer : err;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__snd_pcm_lib_xfer);
diff --git a/sound/core/pcm_native.c b/sound/core/pcm_native.c
index 704fdc9ebf91..4adaee62ef33 100644
--- a/sound/core/pcm_native.c
+++ b/sound/core/pcm_native.c
@@ -685,6 +685,24 @@ static int snd_pcm_hw_params_choose(struct snd_pcm_substream *pcm,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/* acquire buffer_mutex; if it's in r/w operation, return -EBUSY, otherwise
+ * block the further r/w operations
+ */
+static int snd_pcm_buffer_access_lock(struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime)
+{
+	if (!atomic_dec_unless_positive(&runtime->buffer_accessing))
+		return -EBUSY;
+	mutex_lock(&runtime->buffer_mutex);
+	return 0; /* keep buffer_mutex, unlocked by below */
+}
+
+/* release buffer_mutex and clear r/w access flag */
+static void snd_pcm_buffer_access_unlock(struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime)
+{
+	mutex_unlock(&runtime->buffer_mutex);
+	atomic_inc(&runtime->buffer_accessing);
+}
+
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_PCM_OSS)
 #define is_oss_stream(substream)	((substream)->oss.oss)
 #else
@@ -695,14 +713,16 @@ static int snd_pcm_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
 			     struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params)
 {
 	struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime;
-	int err = 0, usecs;
+	int err, usecs;
 	unsigned int bits;
 	snd_pcm_uframes_t frames;
 
 	if (PCM_RUNTIME_CHECK(substream))
 		return -ENXIO;
 	runtime = substream->runtime;
-	mutex_lock(&runtime->buffer_mutex);
+	err = snd_pcm_buffer_access_lock(runtime);
+	if (err < 0)
+		return err;
 	snd_pcm_stream_lock_irq(substream);
 	switch (runtime->status->state) {
 	case SNDRV_PCM_STATE_OPEN:
@@ -820,7 +840,7 @@ static int snd_pcm_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
 			snd_pcm_lib_free_pages(substream);
 	}
  unlock:
-	mutex_unlock(&runtime->buffer_mutex);
+	snd_pcm_buffer_access_unlock(runtime);
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -865,7 +885,9 @@ static int snd_pcm_hw_free(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
 	if (PCM_RUNTIME_CHECK(substream))
 		return -ENXIO;
 	runtime = substream->runtime;
-	mutex_lock(&runtime->buffer_mutex);
+	result = snd_pcm_buffer_access_lock(runtime);
+	if (result < 0)
+		return result;
 	snd_pcm_stream_lock_irq(substream);
 	switch (runtime->status->state) {
 	case SNDRV_PCM_STATE_SETUP:
@@ -884,7 +906,7 @@ static int snd_pcm_hw_free(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
 	snd_pcm_set_state(substream, SNDRV_PCM_STATE_OPEN);
 	cpu_latency_qos_remove_request(&substream->latency_pm_qos_req);
  unlock:
-	mutex_unlock(&runtime->buffer_mutex);
+	snd_pcm_buffer_access_unlock(runtime);
 	return result;
 }
 
@@ -1369,12 +1391,15 @@ static int snd_pcm_action_nonatomic(const struct action_ops *ops,
 
 	/* Guarantee the group members won't change during non-atomic action */
 	down_read(&snd_pcm_link_rwsem);
-	mutex_lock(&substream->runtime->buffer_mutex);
+	res = snd_pcm_buffer_access_lock(substream->runtime);
+	if (res < 0)
+		goto unlock;
 	if (snd_pcm_stream_linked(substream))
 		res = snd_pcm_action_group(ops, substream, state, false);
 	else
 		res = snd_pcm_action_single(ops, substream, state);
-	mutex_unlock(&substream->runtime->buffer_mutex);
+	snd_pcm_buffer_access_unlock(substream->runtime);
+ unlock:
 	up_read(&snd_pcm_link_rwsem);
 	return res;
 }
-- 
2.31.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ALSA: pcm: Fix potential AB/BA lock with buffer_mutex and mmap_lock
  2022-03-30 12:09 [PATCH] ALSA: pcm: Fix potential AB/BA lock with buffer_mutex and mmap_lock Takashi Iwai
@ 2022-03-31  9:51 ` Jaroslav Kysela
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jaroslav Kysela @ 2022-03-31  9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Takashi Iwai, alsa-devel

On 30. 03. 22 14:09, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> syzbot caught a potential deadlock between the PCM
> runtime->buffer_mutex and the mm->mmap_lock.  It was brought by the
> recent fix to cover the racy read/write and other ioctls, and in that
> commit, I overlooked a (hopefully only) corner case that may take the
> revert lock, namely, the OSS mmap.  The OSS mmap operation
> exceptionally allows to re-configure the parameters inside the OSS
> mmap syscall, where mm->mmap_mutex is already held.  Meanwhile, the
> copy_from/to_user calls at read/write operations also take the
> mm->mmap_lock internally, hence it may lead to a AB/BA deadlock.
> 
> A similar problem was already seen in the past and we fixed it with a
> refcount (in commit b248371628aa).  The former fix covered only the
> call paths with OSS read/write and OSS ioctls, while we need to cover
> the concurrent access via both ALSA and OSS APIs now.
> 
> This patch addresses the problem above by replacing the buffer_mutex
> lock in the read/write operations with a refcount similar as we've
> used for OSS.  The new field, runtime->buffer_accessing, keeps the
> number of concurrent read/write operations.  Unlike the former
> buffer_mutex protection, this protects only around the
> copy_from/to_user() calls; the other codes are basically protected by
> the PCM stream lock.  The refcount can be a negative, meaning blocked
> by the ioctls.  If a negative value is seen, the read/write aborts
> with -EBUSY.  In the ioctl side, OTOH, they check this refcount, too,
> and set to a negative value for blocking unless it's already being
> accessed.
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+6e5c88838328e99c7e1c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: dca947d4d26d ("ALSA: pcm: Fix races among concurrent read/write and buffer changes")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/000000000000381a0d05db622a81@google.com
> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

The change looks good.

Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>

				Thanks,
					Jaroslav

-- 
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Linux Sound Maintainer; ALSA Project; Red Hat, Inc.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-03-31  9:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-03-30 12:09 [PATCH] ALSA: pcm: Fix potential AB/BA lock with buffer_mutex and mmap_lock Takashi Iwai
2022-03-31  9:51 ` Jaroslav Kysela

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.