From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
davem@davemloft.net, grygorii.strashko@ti.com, kuba@kernel.org,
kurt@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, mlichvar@redhat.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com,
vladimir.oltean@nxp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V1 net-next 3/4] net: Let the active time stamping layer be selectable.
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 22:59:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220405055954.GB91955@hoboy.vegasvil.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e5a6f6193b86388ed7a081939b8745be@walle.cc>
On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 07:12:11PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> That would make sense. I guess what bothers me with the current
> mechanism is that a feature addition to the PHY in the *future* (the
> timestamping support) might break a board - or at least changes the
> behavior by suddenly using PHY timestamping.
That is a good point, but then something will break in any case.
Thanks,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-05 6:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-03 23:25 [PATCH RFC V1 net-next 3/4] net: Let the active time stamping layer be selectable Richard Cochran
2022-01-03 23:53 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-01-04 1:42 ` Richard Cochran
2022-04-04 15:05 ` Michael Walle
2022-04-04 15:20 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-04-04 17:12 ` Michael Walle
2022-04-05 5:59 ` Richard Cochran [this message]
2022-04-05 8:48 ` Michael Walle
2022-04-05 15:46 ` Richard Cochran
2022-04-05 9:01 ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2022-04-05 9:19 ` Michael Walle
2022-04-05 11:19 ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2022-04-05 13:15 ` Grygorii Strashko
2022-04-05 13:29 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-04-05 15:48 ` Richard Cochran
2022-04-06 11:18 ` Grygorii Strashko
2022-01-04 6:29 ` kernel test robot
2022-01-04 6:50 ` kernel test robot
2022-01-20 16:48 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-01-21 3:38 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-01-21 4:05 ` Richard Cochran
2022-01-21 14:50 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-01-21 15:28 ` Richard Cochran
2022-01-21 16:23 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-01-22 2:08 ` Richard Cochran
2022-01-24 9:28 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2022-01-24 15:37 ` Richard Cochran
2022-01-25 15:37 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-01-21 11:05 ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2022-01-21 15:31 ` Richard Cochran
2022-01-10 15:46 kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220405055954.GB91955@hoboy.vegasvil.org \
--to=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kurt@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=mlichvar@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.