[PATCH bpf v5 1/2] bpf: Support dual-stack sockets in bpf_tcp_check_syncookie

[PATCH bpf v5 1/2] bpf: Support dual-stack sockets in bpf_tcp_check_syncookie

[Maxim Mikityanskiy]

bpf_tcp_gen_syncookie looks at the IP version in the IP header and
validates the address family of the socket. It supports IPv4 packets in
AF_INET6 dual-stack sockets.

On the other hand, bpf_tcp_check_syncookie looks only at the address
family of the socket, ignoring the real IP version in headers, and
validates only the packet size. This implementation has some drawbacks:

1. Packets are not validated properly, allowing a BPF program to trick
   bpf_tcp_check_syncookie into handling an IPv6 packet on an IPv4
   socket.

2. Dual-stack sockets fail the checks on IPv4 packets. IPv4 clients end
   up receiving a SYNACK with the cookie, but the following ACK gets
   dropped.

This patch fixes these issues by changing the checks in
bpf_tcp_check_syncookie to match the ones in bpf_tcp_gen_syncookie. IP
version from the header is taken into account, and it is validated
properly with address family.

Fixes: 399040847084 ("bpf: add helper to check for a valid SYN cookie")
Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Arthur Fabre <afabre@cloudflare.com>
---
 net/core/filter.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index a7044e98765e..64470a727ef7 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -7016,24 +7016,33 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_tcp_check_syncookie, struct sock *, sk, void *, iph, u32, iph_len
 	if (!th->ack || th->rst || th->syn)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
+	if (unlikely(iph_len < sizeof(struct iphdr)))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	if (tcp_synq_no_recent_overflow(sk))
 		return -ENOENT;
 
 	cookie = ntohl(th->ack_seq) - 1;
 
-	switch (sk->sk_family) {
-	case AF_INET:
-		if (unlikely(iph_len < sizeof(struct iphdr)))
+	/* Both struct iphdr and struct ipv6hdr have the version field at the
+	 * same offset so we can cast to the shorter header (struct iphdr).
+	 */
+	switch (((struct iphdr *)iph)->version) {
+	case 4:
+		if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET6 && ipv6_only_sock(sk))
 			return -EINVAL;
 
 		ret = __cookie_v4_check((struct iphdr *)iph, th, cookie);
 		break;
 
 #if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_IPV6)
-	case AF_INET6:
+	case 6:
 		if (unlikely(iph_len < sizeof(struct ipv6hdr)))
 			return -EINVAL;
 
+		if (sk->sk_family != AF_INET6)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
 		ret = __cookie_v6_check((struct ipv6hdr *)iph, th, cookie);
 		break;
 #endif /* CONFIG_IPV6 */
-- 
2.30.2

[PATCH bpf v5 2/2] bpf: Adjust bpf_tcp_check_syncookie selftest to test dual-stack sockets

[Maxim Mikityanskiy]

The previous commit fixed support for dual-stack sockets in
bpf_tcp_check_syncookie. This commit adjusts the selftest to verify the
fixed functionality.

Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Arthur Fabre <afabre@cloudflare.com>
---
 .../bpf/test_tcp_check_syncookie_user.c       | 78 ++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcp_check_syncookie_user.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcp_check_syncookie_user.c
index b9e991d43155..e7775d3bbe08 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcp_check_syncookie_user.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcp_check_syncookie_user.c
@@ -18,8 +18,9 @@
 #include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 #include "cgroup_helpers.h"
 
-static int start_server(const struct sockaddr *addr, socklen_t len)
+static int start_server(const struct sockaddr *addr, socklen_t len, bool dual)
 {
+	int mode = !dual;
 	int fd;
 
 	fd = socket(addr->sa_family, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
@@ -28,6 +29,14 @@ static int start_server(const struct sockaddr *addr, socklen_t len)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	if (addr->sa_family == AF_INET6) {
+		if (setsockopt(fd, IPPROTO_IPV6, IPV6_V6ONLY, (char *)&mode,
+			       sizeof(mode)) == -1) {
+			log_err("Failed to set the dual-stack mode");
+			goto close_out;
+		}
+	}
+
 	if (bind(fd, addr, len) == -1) {
 		log_err("Failed to bind server socket");
 		goto close_out;
@@ -47,24 +56,17 @@ static int start_server(const struct sockaddr *addr, socklen_t len)
 	return fd;
 }
 
-static int connect_to_server(int server_fd)
+static int connect_to_server(const struct sockaddr *addr, socklen_t len)
 {
-	struct sockaddr_storage addr;
-	socklen_t len = sizeof(addr);
 	int fd = -1;
 
-	if (getsockname(server_fd, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, &len)) {
-		log_err("Failed to get server addr");
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	fd = socket(addr.ss_family, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
+	fd = socket(addr->sa_family, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
 	if (fd == -1) {
 		log_err("Failed to create client socket");
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	if (connect(fd, (const struct sockaddr *)&addr, len) == -1) {
+	if (connect(fd, (const struct sockaddr *)addr, len) == -1) {
 		log_err("Fail to connect to server");
 		goto close_out;
 	}
@@ -116,7 +118,8 @@ static int get_map_fd_by_prog_id(int prog_id, bool *xdp)
 	return map_fd;
 }
 
-static int run_test(int server_fd, int results_fd, bool xdp)
+static int run_test(int server_fd, int results_fd, bool xdp,
+		    const struct sockaddr *addr, socklen_t len)
 {
 	int client = -1, srv_client = -1;
 	int ret = 0;
@@ -142,7 +145,7 @@ static int run_test(int server_fd, int results_fd, bool xdp)
 		goto err;
 	}
 
-	client = connect_to_server(server_fd);
+	client = connect_to_server(addr, len);
 	if (client == -1)
 		goto err;
 
@@ -199,12 +202,30 @@ static int run_test(int server_fd, int results_fd, bool xdp)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static bool get_port(int server_fd, in_port_t *port)
+{
+	struct sockaddr_in addr;
+	socklen_t len = sizeof(addr);
+
+	if (getsockname(server_fd, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, &len)) {
+		log_err("Failed to get server addr");
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	/* sin_port and sin6_port are located at the same offset. */
+	*port = addr.sin_port;
+	return true;
+}
+
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
 	struct sockaddr_in addr4;
 	struct sockaddr_in6 addr6;
+	struct sockaddr_in addr4dual;
+	struct sockaddr_in6 addr6dual;
 	int server = -1;
 	int server_v6 = -1;
+	int server_dual = -1;
 	int results = -1;
 	int err = 0;
 	bool xdp;
@@ -224,25 +245,43 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 	addr4.sin_family = AF_INET;
 	addr4.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(INADDR_LOOPBACK);
 	addr4.sin_port = 0;
+	memcpy(&addr4dual, &addr4, sizeof(addr4dual));
 
 	memset(&addr6, 0, sizeof(addr6));
 	addr6.sin6_family = AF_INET6;
 	addr6.sin6_addr = in6addr_loopback;
 	addr6.sin6_port = 0;
 
-	server = start_server((const struct sockaddr *)&addr4, sizeof(addr4));
-	if (server == -1)
+	memset(&addr6dual, 0, sizeof(addr6dual));
+	addr6dual.sin6_family = AF_INET6;
+	addr6dual.sin6_addr = in6addr_any;
+	addr6dual.sin6_port = 0;
+
+	server = start_server((const struct sockaddr *)&addr4, sizeof(addr4),
+			      false);
+	if (server == -1 || !get_port(server, &addr4.sin_port))
 		goto err;
 
 	server_v6 = start_server((const struct sockaddr *)&addr6,
-				 sizeof(addr6));
-	if (server_v6 == -1)
+				 sizeof(addr6), false);
+	if (server_v6 == -1 || !get_port(server_v6, &addr6.sin6_port))
+		goto err;
+
+	server_dual = start_server((const struct sockaddr *)&addr6dual,
+				   sizeof(addr6dual), true);
+	if (server_dual == -1 || !get_port(server_dual, &addr4dual.sin_port))
+		goto err;
+
+	if (run_test(server, results, xdp,
+		     (const struct sockaddr *)&addr4, sizeof(addr4)))
 		goto err;
 
-	if (run_test(server, results, xdp))
+	if (run_test(server_v6, results, xdp,
+		     (const struct sockaddr *)&addr6, sizeof(addr6)))
 		goto err;
 
-	if (run_test(server_v6, results, xdp))
+	if (run_test(server_dual, results, xdp,
+		     (const struct sockaddr *)&addr4dual, sizeof(addr4dual)))
 		goto err;
 
 	printf("ok\n");
@@ -252,6 +291,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 out:
 	close(server);
 	close(server_v6);
+	close(server_dual);
 	close(results);
 	return err;
 }
-- 
2.30.2

Re: [PATCH bpf v5 1/2] bpf: Support dual-stack sockets in bpf_tcp_check_syncookie

[patchwork-bot+netdevbpf]

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:41:12 +0300 you wrote:
> bpf_tcp_gen_syncookie looks at the IP version in the IP header and
> validates the address family of the socket. It supports IPv4 packets in
> AF_INET6 dual-stack sockets.
> 
> On the other hand, bpf_tcp_check_syncookie looks only at the address
> family of the socket, ignoring the real IP version in headers, and
> validates only the packet size. This implementation has some drawbacks:
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf,v5,1/2] bpf: Support dual-stack sockets in bpf_tcp_check_syncookie
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/2e8702cc0cfa
  - [bpf,v5,2/2] bpf: Adjust bpf_tcp_check_syncookie selftest to test dual-stack sockets
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/53968dafc4a6

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html