All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Xiyu Yang <xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/5] fbdev: Restart conflicting fb removal loop when unregistering devices
Date: Wed,  6 Apr 2022 18:06:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220406160632.496684-4-javierm@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220406160632.496684-1-javierm@redhat.com>

Drivers that want to remove registered conflicting framebuffers prior to
register their own framebuffer, calls remove_conflicting_framebuffers().

This function takes the registration_lock mutex, to prevent a races when
drivers register framebuffer devices. But if a conflicting framebuffer
device is found, the underlaying platform device is unregistered and this
will lead to the platform driver .remove callback to be called, which in
turn will call to the unregister_framebuffer() that takes the same lock.

To prevent this, a struct fb_info.forced_out field was used as indication
to unregister_framebuffer() whether the mutex has to be grabbed or not.

A cleaner solution is to drop the lock before platform_device_unregister()
so unregister_framebuffer() can take it when called from the fbdev driver,
and just grab the lock again after the device has been registered and do
a removal loop restart.

Since the framebuffer devices will already be removed, the loop would just
finish when no more conflicting framebuffers are found.

Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
---

 drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
 include/linux/fb.h               |  1 -
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
index b585339509b0..c1bfb8df9cba 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
@@ -1555,6 +1555,7 @@ static void do_remove_conflicting_framebuffers(struct apertures_struct *a,
 {
 	int i;
 
+restart_removal:
 	/* check all firmware fbs and kick off if the base addr overlaps */
 	for_each_registered_fb(i) {
 		struct apertures_struct *gen_aper;
@@ -1582,8 +1583,18 @@ static void do_remove_conflicting_framebuffers(struct apertures_struct *a,
 			 * fix would add code to remove the device from the system.
 			 */
 			if (dev_is_platform(device)) {
-				registered_fb[i]->forced_out = true;
+				/*
+				 * Drop the lock since the driver will call to the
+				 * unregister_framebuffer() function that takes it.
+				 */
+				mutex_unlock(&registration_lock);
 				platform_device_unregister(to_platform_device(device));
+				mutex_lock(&registration_lock);
+				/*
+				 * Restart the removal now that the platform device
+				 * has been unregistered and its associated fb gone.
+				 */
+				goto restart_removal;
 			} else {
 				pr_warn("fb%d: cannot remove device\n", i);
 				do_unregister_framebuffer(registered_fb[i]);
@@ -1917,13 +1928,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_framebuffer);
 void
 unregister_framebuffer(struct fb_info *fb_info)
 {
-	bool forced_out = fb_info->forced_out;
-
-	if (!forced_out)
-		mutex_lock(&registration_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&registration_lock);
 	do_unregister_framebuffer(fb_info);
-	if (!forced_out)
-		mutex_unlock(&registration_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&registration_lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_framebuffer);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/fb.h b/include/linux/fb.h
index 39baa9a70779..f1e0cd751b06 100644
--- a/include/linux/fb.h
+++ b/include/linux/fb.h
@@ -503,7 +503,6 @@ struct fb_info {
 	} *apertures;
 
 	bool skip_vt_switch; /* no VT switch on suspend/resume required */
-	bool forced_out; /* set when being removed by another driver */
 };
 
 static inline struct apertures_struct *alloc_apertures(unsigned int max_num) {
-- 
2.35.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	Xiyu Yang <xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn>,
	Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/5] fbdev: Restart conflicting fb removal loop when unregistering devices
Date: Wed,  6 Apr 2022 18:06:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220406160632.496684-4-javierm@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220406160632.496684-1-javierm@redhat.com>

Drivers that want to remove registered conflicting framebuffers prior to
register their own framebuffer, calls remove_conflicting_framebuffers().

This function takes the registration_lock mutex, to prevent a races when
drivers register framebuffer devices. But if a conflicting framebuffer
device is found, the underlaying platform device is unregistered and this
will lead to the platform driver .remove callback to be called, which in
turn will call to the unregister_framebuffer() that takes the same lock.

To prevent this, a struct fb_info.forced_out field was used as indication
to unregister_framebuffer() whether the mutex has to be grabbed or not.

A cleaner solution is to drop the lock before platform_device_unregister()
so unregister_framebuffer() can take it when called from the fbdev driver,
and just grab the lock again after the device has been registered and do
a removal loop restart.

Since the framebuffer devices will already be removed, the loop would just
finish when no more conflicting framebuffers are found.

Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
---

 drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
 include/linux/fb.h               |  1 -
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
index b585339509b0..c1bfb8df9cba 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
@@ -1555,6 +1555,7 @@ static void do_remove_conflicting_framebuffers(struct apertures_struct *a,
 {
 	int i;
 
+restart_removal:
 	/* check all firmware fbs and kick off if the base addr overlaps */
 	for_each_registered_fb(i) {
 		struct apertures_struct *gen_aper;
@@ -1582,8 +1583,18 @@ static void do_remove_conflicting_framebuffers(struct apertures_struct *a,
 			 * fix would add code to remove the device from the system.
 			 */
 			if (dev_is_platform(device)) {
-				registered_fb[i]->forced_out = true;
+				/*
+				 * Drop the lock since the driver will call to the
+				 * unregister_framebuffer() function that takes it.
+				 */
+				mutex_unlock(&registration_lock);
 				platform_device_unregister(to_platform_device(device));
+				mutex_lock(&registration_lock);
+				/*
+				 * Restart the removal now that the platform device
+				 * has been unregistered and its associated fb gone.
+				 */
+				goto restart_removal;
 			} else {
 				pr_warn("fb%d: cannot remove device\n", i);
 				do_unregister_framebuffer(registered_fb[i]);
@@ -1917,13 +1928,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_framebuffer);
 void
 unregister_framebuffer(struct fb_info *fb_info)
 {
-	bool forced_out = fb_info->forced_out;
-
-	if (!forced_out)
-		mutex_lock(&registration_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&registration_lock);
 	do_unregister_framebuffer(fb_info);
-	if (!forced_out)
-		mutex_unlock(&registration_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&registration_lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_framebuffer);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/fb.h b/include/linux/fb.h
index 39baa9a70779..f1e0cd751b06 100644
--- a/include/linux/fb.h
+++ b/include/linux/fb.h
@@ -503,7 +503,6 @@ struct fb_info {
 	} *apertures;
 
 	bool skip_vt_switch; /* no VT switch on suspend/resume required */
-	bool forced_out; /* set when being removed by another driver */
 };
 
 static inline struct apertures_struct *alloc_apertures(unsigned int max_num) {
-- 
2.35.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-06 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-06 16:06 [RFC PATCH 0/5] Fix some race conditions that exists between fbmem and sysfb Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-04-06 16:06 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-04-06 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] firmware: sysfb: Make sysfb_create_simplefb() return a pdev pointer Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-04-06 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] firmware: sysfb: Add helpers to unregister a pdev and disable registration Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-04-06 16:06 ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
2022-04-06 16:06   ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] fbdev: Restart conflicting fb removal loop when unregistering devices Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-04-06 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] fbdev: Fix some race conditions between fbmem and sysfb Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-04-06 16:06   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-04-06 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] Revert "fbdev: Prevent probing generic drivers if a FB is already registered" Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-04-06 16:06   ` Javier Martinez Canillas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220406160632.496684-4-javierm@redhat.com \
    --to=javierm@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    --cc=xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.