All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [nf-next PATCH v3 0/3] netfilter: bitwise: support boolean operations with variable RHS operands
@ 2022-04-09 13:52 Jeremy Sowden
  2022-04-09 13:52 ` [nf-next PATCH v3 1/3] netfilter: bitwise: keep track of bit-length of expressions Jeremy Sowden
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Sowden @ 2022-04-09 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Netfilter Devel

Currently bitwise boolean operations (AND, OR and XOR) can only have one
variable operand.  They are converted in user space into mask-and-xor
operations on one register and two immediate values which are evaluated
by the kernel.  We add support for evaluating these operations directly
in kernel space on one register and either an immediate value or a
second register.

We also add support for keeping track of the bit-length of boolean
expressions since this can be useful to user space during
delinearization.

* Patch 1 adds support for keeping track of the bit-length of
  boolean expressions.
* Patch 2 renames functions and an enum constant related to the current
  mask-and-xor implementation in anticipation of adding support for
  directly evaluating AND, OR and XOR operations.
* Patch 3 adds support for directly evaluating AND, OR and XOR
  operations.

Changes since v2

  * Increase size of `nbits` to `u16` and correct checking of maximum
    value (`U8_MAX * BITS_PER_BYTE`).

Changes since v1

  * Patch 1 was new.
  * In v1, all boolean operations were still expected to be
    mask-and-xor operations, but the mask and xor values could be
    passed in registers.

Jeremy Sowden (3):
  netfilter: bitwise: keep track of bit-length of expressions
  netfilter: bitwise: rename some boolean operation functions
  netfilter: bitwise: add support for doing AND, OR and XOR directly

 include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h |  21 ++-
 net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c              | 174 +++++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 166 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

-- 
2.35.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [nf-next PATCH v3 1/3] netfilter: bitwise: keep track of bit-length of expressions
  2022-04-09 13:52 [nf-next PATCH v3 0/3] netfilter: bitwise: support boolean operations with variable RHS operands Jeremy Sowden
@ 2022-04-09 13:52 ` Jeremy Sowden
  2022-04-09 13:52 ` [nf-next PATCH v3 2/3] netfilter: bitwise: rename some boolean operation functions Jeremy Sowden
  2022-04-09 13:52 ` [nf-next PATCH v3 3/3] netfilter: bitwise: add support for doing AND, OR and XOR directly Jeremy Sowden
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Sowden @ 2022-04-09 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Netfilter Devel

Some bitwise operations are generated in user space when munging paylod
expressions.  During delinearization, user space attempts to eliminate
these operations.  However, it does this before deducing the byte-order
or the correct length in bits of the operands, which means that it
doesn't always handle multi-byte host-endian operations correctly.
Therefore, add support for storing the bit-length of the expression,
even though the kernel doesn't use it, in order to be able to pass it
back to user space.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Sowden <jeremy@azazel.net>
---
 include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h |  2 ++
 net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c              | 14 ++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h
index 466fd3f4447c..f3dcc4a34ff1 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h
@@ -561,6 +561,7 @@ enum nft_bitwise_ops {
  * @NFTA_BITWISE_OP: type of operation (NLA_U32: nft_bitwise_ops)
  * @NFTA_BITWISE_DATA: argument for non-boolean operations
  *                     (NLA_NESTED: nft_data_attributes)
+ * @NFTA_BITWISE_NBITS: length of operation in bits (NLA_U32)
  *
  * The bitwise expression supports boolean and shift operations.  It implements
  * the boolean operations by performing the following operation:
@@ -584,6 +585,7 @@ enum nft_bitwise_attributes {
 	NFTA_BITWISE_XOR,
 	NFTA_BITWISE_OP,
 	NFTA_BITWISE_DATA,
+	NFTA_BITWISE_NBITS,
 	__NFTA_BITWISE_MAX
 };
 #define NFTA_BITWISE_MAX	(__NFTA_BITWISE_MAX - 1)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c b/net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c
index 83590afe3768..a120eaadb3e7 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ struct nft_bitwise {
 	struct nft_data		mask;
 	struct nft_data		xor;
 	struct nft_data		data;
+	u16                     nbits;
 };
 
 static void nft_bitwise_eval_bool(u32 *dst, const u32 *src,
@@ -88,6 +89,7 @@ static const struct nla_policy nft_bitwise_policy[NFTA_BITWISE_MAX + 1] = {
 	[NFTA_BITWISE_XOR]	= { .type = NLA_NESTED },
 	[NFTA_BITWISE_OP]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
 	[NFTA_BITWISE_DATA]	= { .type = NLA_NESTED },
+	[NFTA_BITWISE_NBITS]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
 };
 
 static int nft_bitwise_init_bool(struct nft_bitwise *priv,
@@ -194,6 +196,16 @@ static int nft_bitwise_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
 	} else {
 		priv->op = NFT_BITWISE_BOOL;
 	}
+	if (tb[NFTA_BITWISE_NBITS]) {
+		u32 nbits;
+
+		err = nft_parse_u32_check(tb[NFTA_BITWISE_NBITS],
+					  U8_MAX * BITS_PER_BYTE, &nbits);
+		if (err < 0)
+			return err;
+
+		priv->nbits = nbits;
+	}
 
 	switch(priv->op) {
 	case NFT_BITWISE_BOOL:
@@ -244,6 +256,8 @@ static int nft_bitwise_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nft_expr *expr)
 		return -1;
 	if (nla_put_be32(skb, NFTA_BITWISE_OP, htonl(priv->op)))
 		return -1;
+	if (nla_put_be32(skb, NFTA_BITWISE_NBITS, htonl(priv->nbits)))
+		return -1;
 
 	switch (priv->op) {
 	case NFT_BITWISE_BOOL:
-- 
2.35.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [nf-next PATCH v3 2/3] netfilter: bitwise: rename some boolean operation functions
  2022-04-09 13:52 [nf-next PATCH v3 0/3] netfilter: bitwise: support boolean operations with variable RHS operands Jeremy Sowden
  2022-04-09 13:52 ` [nf-next PATCH v3 1/3] netfilter: bitwise: keep track of bit-length of expressions Jeremy Sowden
@ 2022-04-09 13:52 ` Jeremy Sowden
  2022-04-09 13:52 ` [nf-next PATCH v3 3/3] netfilter: bitwise: add support for doing AND, OR and XOR directly Jeremy Sowden
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Sowden @ 2022-04-09 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Netfilter Devel

In the next patch we add support for doing AND, OR and XOR operations
directly in the kernel, so rename some functions and an enum constant
related to mask-and-xor boolean operations.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Sowden <jeremy@azazel.net>
---
 include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h | 10 ++++---
 net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c              | 34 ++++++++++++------------
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h
index f3dcc4a34ff1..1c118a316381 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h
@@ -539,16 +539,20 @@ enum nft_immediate_attributes {
 /**
  * enum nft_bitwise_ops - nf_tables bitwise operations
  *
- * @NFT_BITWISE_BOOL: mask-and-xor operation used to implement NOT, AND, OR and
- *                    XOR boolean operations
+ * @NFT_BITWISE_MASK_XOR: mask-and-xor operation used to implement NOT, AND, OR
+ *                        and XOR boolean operations
  * @NFT_BITWISE_LSHIFT: left-shift operation
  * @NFT_BITWISE_RSHIFT: right-shift operation
  */
 enum nft_bitwise_ops {
-	NFT_BITWISE_BOOL,
+	NFT_BITWISE_MASK_XOR,
 	NFT_BITWISE_LSHIFT,
 	NFT_BITWISE_RSHIFT,
 };
+/*
+ * Old name for NFT_BITWISE_MASK_XOR.  Retained for backwards-compatibility.
+ */
+#define NFT_BITWISE_BOOL NFT_BITWISE_MASK_XOR
 
 /**
  * enum nft_bitwise_attributes - nf_tables bitwise expression netlink attributes
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c b/net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c
index a120eaadb3e7..c50f4340a21e 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c
@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ struct nft_bitwise {
 	u16                     nbits;
 };
 
-static void nft_bitwise_eval_bool(u32 *dst, const u32 *src,
-				  const struct nft_bitwise *priv)
+static void nft_bitwise_eval_mask_xor(u32 *dst, const u32 *src,
+				      const struct nft_bitwise *priv)
 {
 	unsigned int i;
 
@@ -69,8 +69,8 @@ void nft_bitwise_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr,
 	u32 *dst = &regs->data[priv->dreg];
 
 	switch (priv->op) {
-	case NFT_BITWISE_BOOL:
-		nft_bitwise_eval_bool(dst, src, priv);
+	case NFT_BITWISE_MASK_XOR:
+		nft_bitwise_eval_mask_xor(dst, src, priv);
 		break;
 	case NFT_BITWISE_LSHIFT:
 		nft_bitwise_eval_lshift(dst, src, priv);
@@ -92,8 +92,8 @@ static const struct nla_policy nft_bitwise_policy[NFTA_BITWISE_MAX + 1] = {
 	[NFTA_BITWISE_NBITS]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
 };
 
-static int nft_bitwise_init_bool(struct nft_bitwise *priv,
-				 const struct nlattr *const tb[])
+static int nft_bitwise_init_mask_xor(struct nft_bitwise *priv,
+				     const struct nlattr *const tb[])
 {
 	struct nft_data_desc mask, xor;
 	int err;
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static int nft_bitwise_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
 	if (tb[NFTA_BITWISE_OP]) {
 		priv->op = ntohl(nla_get_be32(tb[NFTA_BITWISE_OP]));
 		switch (priv->op) {
-		case NFT_BITWISE_BOOL:
+		case NFT_BITWISE_MASK_XOR:
 		case NFT_BITWISE_LSHIFT:
 		case NFT_BITWISE_RSHIFT:
 			break;
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ static int nft_bitwise_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
 			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 		}
 	} else {
-		priv->op = NFT_BITWISE_BOOL;
+		priv->op = NFT_BITWISE_MASK_XOR;
 	}
 	if (tb[NFTA_BITWISE_NBITS]) {
 		u32 nbits;
@@ -208,8 +208,8 @@ static int nft_bitwise_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
 	}
 
 	switch(priv->op) {
-	case NFT_BITWISE_BOOL:
-		err = nft_bitwise_init_bool(priv, tb);
+	case NFT_BITWISE_MASK_XOR:
+		err = nft_bitwise_init_mask_xor(priv, tb);
 		break;
 	case NFT_BITWISE_LSHIFT:
 	case NFT_BITWISE_RSHIFT:
@@ -220,8 +220,8 @@ static int nft_bitwise_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
 	return err;
 }
 
-static int nft_bitwise_dump_bool(struct sk_buff *skb,
-				 const struct nft_bitwise *priv)
+static int nft_bitwise_dump_mask_xor(struct sk_buff *skb,
+				     const struct nft_bitwise *priv)
 {
 	if (nft_data_dump(skb, NFTA_BITWISE_MASK, &priv->mask,
 			  NFT_DATA_VALUE, priv->len) < 0)
@@ -260,8 +260,8 @@ static int nft_bitwise_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nft_expr *expr)
 		return -1;
 
 	switch (priv->op) {
-	case NFT_BITWISE_BOOL:
-		err = nft_bitwise_dump_bool(skb, priv);
+	case NFT_BITWISE_MASK_XOR:
+		err = nft_bitwise_dump_mask_xor(skb, priv);
 		break;
 	case NFT_BITWISE_LSHIFT:
 	case NFT_BITWISE_RSHIFT:
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ static int nft_bitwise_offload(struct nft_offload_ctx *ctx,
 	const struct nft_bitwise *priv = nft_expr_priv(expr);
 	struct nft_offload_reg *reg = &ctx->regs[priv->dreg];
 
-	if (priv->op != NFT_BITWISE_BOOL)
+	if (priv->op != NFT_BITWISE_MASK_XOR)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
 	if (memcmp(&priv->xor, &zero, sizeof(priv->xor)) ||
@@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ nft_bitwise_fast_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nft_expr *expr)
 		return -1;
 	if (nla_put_be32(skb, NFTA_BITWISE_LEN, htonl(sizeof(u32))))
 		return -1;
-	if (nla_put_be32(skb, NFTA_BITWISE_OP, htonl(NFT_BITWISE_BOOL)))
+	if (nla_put_be32(skb, NFTA_BITWISE_OP, htonl(NFT_BITWISE_MASK_XOR)))
 		return -1;
 
 	data.data[0] = priv->mask;
@@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ nft_bitwise_select_ops(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
 		return &nft_bitwise_ops;
 
 	if (tb[NFTA_BITWISE_OP] &&
-	    ntohl(nla_get_be32(tb[NFTA_BITWISE_OP])) != NFT_BITWISE_BOOL)
+	    ntohl(nla_get_be32(tb[NFTA_BITWISE_OP])) != NFT_BITWISE_MASK_XOR)
 		return &nft_bitwise_ops;
 
 	return &nft_bitwise_fast_ops;
-- 
2.35.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [nf-next PATCH v3 3/3] netfilter: bitwise: add support for doing AND, OR and XOR directly
  2022-04-09 13:52 [nf-next PATCH v3 0/3] netfilter: bitwise: support boolean operations with variable RHS operands Jeremy Sowden
  2022-04-09 13:52 ` [nf-next PATCH v3 1/3] netfilter: bitwise: keep track of bit-length of expressions Jeremy Sowden
  2022-04-09 13:52 ` [nf-next PATCH v3 2/3] netfilter: bitwise: rename some boolean operation functions Jeremy Sowden
@ 2022-04-09 13:52 ` Jeremy Sowden
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Sowden @ 2022-04-09 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Netfilter Devel

Hitherto, these operations have been converted in user space to
mask-and-xor operations on one register and two immediate values, and it
is the latter which have been evaluated by the kernel.  We add support
for evaluating these operations directly in kernel space on one register
and either an immediate value or a second register.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Sowden <jeremy@azazel.net>
---
 include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h |  11 +-
 net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c              | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h
index 1c118a316381..cd3e9e4ac646 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h
@@ -543,14 +543,21 @@ enum nft_immediate_attributes {
  *                        and XOR boolean operations
  * @NFT_BITWISE_LSHIFT: left-shift operation
  * @NFT_BITWISE_RSHIFT: right-shift operation
+ * @NFT_BITWISE_AND: and operation
+ * @NFT_BITWISE_OR: or operation
+ * @NFT_BITWISE_XOR: xor operation
  */
 enum nft_bitwise_ops {
 	NFT_BITWISE_MASK_XOR,
 	NFT_BITWISE_LSHIFT,
 	NFT_BITWISE_RSHIFT,
+	NFT_BITWISE_AND,
+	NFT_BITWISE_OR,
+	NFT_BITWISE_XOR,
 };
 /*
- * Old name for NFT_BITWISE_MASK_XOR.  Retained for backwards-compatibility.
+ * Old name for NFT_BITWISE_MASK_XOR, predating the addition of NFT_BITWISE_AND,
+ * NFT_BITWISE_OR and NFT_BITWISE_XOR.  Retained for backwards-compatibility.
  */
 #define NFT_BITWISE_BOOL NFT_BITWISE_MASK_XOR
 
@@ -566,6 +573,7 @@ enum nft_bitwise_ops {
  * @NFTA_BITWISE_DATA: argument for non-boolean operations
  *                     (NLA_NESTED: nft_data_attributes)
  * @NFTA_BITWISE_NBITS: length of operation in bits (NLA_U32)
+ * @NFTA_BITWISE_SREG2: second source register (NLA_U32: nft_registers)
  *
  * The bitwise expression supports boolean and shift operations.  It implements
  * the boolean operations by performing the following operation:
@@ -590,6 +598,7 @@ enum nft_bitwise_attributes {
 	NFTA_BITWISE_OP,
 	NFTA_BITWISE_DATA,
 	NFTA_BITWISE_NBITS,
+	NFTA_BITWISE_SREG2,
 	__NFTA_BITWISE_MAX
 };
 #define NFTA_BITWISE_MAX	(__NFTA_BITWISE_MAX - 1)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c b/net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c
index c50f4340a21e..6c79ffa09338 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 
 struct nft_bitwise {
 	u8			sreg;
+	u8			sreg2;
 	u8			dreg;
 	enum nft_bitwise_ops	op:8;
 	u8			len;
@@ -61,28 +62,72 @@ static void nft_bitwise_eval_rshift(u32 *dst, const u32 *src,
 	}
 }
 
+static void nft_bitwise_eval_and(u32 *dst, const u32 *src, const u32 *src2,
+				 const struct nft_bitwise *priv)
+{
+	unsigned int i, n;
+
+	for (i = 0, n = DIV_ROUND_UP(priv->len, sizeof(u32)); i < n; i++)
+		dst[i] = src[i] & src2[i];
+}
+
+static void nft_bitwise_eval_or(u32 *dst, const u32 *src, const u32 *src2,
+				const struct nft_bitwise *priv)
+{
+	unsigned int i, n;
+
+	for (i = 0, n = DIV_ROUND_UP(priv->len, sizeof(u32)); i < n; i++)
+		dst[i] = src[i] | src2[i];
+}
+
+static void nft_bitwise_eval_xor(u32 *dst, const u32 *src, const u32 *src2,
+				 const struct nft_bitwise *priv)
+{
+	unsigned int i, n;
+
+	for (i = 0, n = DIV_ROUND_UP(priv->len, sizeof(u32)); i < n; i++)
+		dst[i] = src[i] ^ src2[i];
+}
+
 void nft_bitwise_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr,
 		      struct nft_regs *regs, const struct nft_pktinfo *pkt)
 {
 	const struct nft_bitwise *priv = nft_expr_priv(expr);
-	const u32 *src = &regs->data[priv->sreg];
+	const u32 *src = &regs->data[priv->sreg], *src2;
 	u32 *dst = &regs->data[priv->dreg];
 
-	switch (priv->op) {
-	case NFT_BITWISE_MASK_XOR:
+	if (priv->op == NFT_BITWISE_MASK_XOR) {
 		nft_bitwise_eval_mask_xor(dst, src, priv);
-		break;
-	case NFT_BITWISE_LSHIFT:
+		return;
+	}
+	if (priv->op == NFT_BITWISE_LSHIFT) {
 		nft_bitwise_eval_lshift(dst, src, priv);
-		break;
-	case NFT_BITWISE_RSHIFT:
+		return;
+	}
+	if (priv->op == NFT_BITWISE_RSHIFT) {
 		nft_bitwise_eval_rshift(dst, src, priv);
-		break;
+		return;
+	}
+
+	src2 = priv->sreg2 ? &regs->data[priv->sreg2] : priv->data.data;
+
+	if (priv->op == NFT_BITWISE_AND) {
+		nft_bitwise_eval_and(dst, src, src2, priv);
+		return;
+	}
+	if (priv->op == NFT_BITWISE_OR) {
+		nft_bitwise_eval_or(dst, src, src2, priv);
+		return;
+	}
+	if (priv->op == NFT_BITWISE_XOR) {
+		nft_bitwise_eval_xor(dst, src, src2, priv);
+		return;
 	}
 }
 
 static const struct nla_policy nft_bitwise_policy[NFTA_BITWISE_MAX + 1] = {
 	[NFTA_BITWISE_SREG]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
+	[NFTA_BITWISE_SREG2]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
 	[NFTA_BITWISE_DREG]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
 	[NFTA_BITWISE_LEN]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
 	[NFTA_BITWISE_MASK]	= { .type = NLA_NESTED },
@@ -98,7 +143,8 @@ static int nft_bitwise_init_mask_xor(struct nft_bitwise *priv,
 	struct nft_data_desc mask, xor;
 	int err;
 
-	if (tb[NFTA_BITWISE_DATA])
+	if (tb[NFTA_BITWISE_DATA] ||
+	    tb[NFTA_BITWISE_SREG2])
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (!tb[NFTA_BITWISE_MASK] ||
@@ -139,7 +185,8 @@ static int nft_bitwise_init_shift(struct nft_bitwise *priv,
 	int err;
 
 	if (tb[NFTA_BITWISE_MASK] ||
-	    tb[NFTA_BITWISE_XOR])
+	    tb[NFTA_BITWISE_XOR]  ||
+	    tb[NFTA_BITWISE_SREG2])
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (!tb[NFTA_BITWISE_DATA])
@@ -158,6 +205,40 @@ static int nft_bitwise_init_shift(struct nft_bitwise *priv,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int nft_bitwise_init_bool(struct nft_bitwise *priv,
+				 const struct nlattr *const tb[])
+{
+	struct nft_data_desc d;
+	int err;
+
+	if (tb[NFTA_BITWISE_MASK] ||
+	    tb[NFTA_BITWISE_XOR])
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if ((!tb[NFTA_BITWISE_DATA] && !tb[NFTA_BITWISE_SREG2]) ||
+	    (tb[NFTA_BITWISE_DATA] && tb[NFTA_BITWISE_SREG2]))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (tb[NFTA_BITWISE_DATA]) {
+		err = nft_data_init(NULL, &priv->data, sizeof(priv->data), &d,
+				    tb[NFTA_BITWISE_DATA]);
+		if (err < 0)
+			return err;
+		if (d.type != NFT_DATA_VALUE || d.len != sizeof(u32) ||
+		    priv->data.data[0] >= BITS_PER_TYPE(u32)) {
+			nft_data_release(&priv->data, d.type);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+	} else {
+		err = nft_parse_register_load(tb[NFTA_BITWISE_SREG2],
+					      &priv->sreg2, priv->len);
+		if (err < 0)
+			return err;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int nft_bitwise_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
 			    const struct nft_expr *expr,
 			    const struct nlattr * const tb[])
@@ -189,6 +270,9 @@ static int nft_bitwise_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
 		case NFT_BITWISE_MASK_XOR:
 		case NFT_BITWISE_LSHIFT:
 		case NFT_BITWISE_RSHIFT:
+		case NFT_BITWISE_AND:
+		case NFT_BITWISE_OR:
+		case NFT_BITWISE_XOR:
 			break;
 		default:
 			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -215,6 +299,11 @@ static int nft_bitwise_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
 	case NFT_BITWISE_RSHIFT:
 		err = nft_bitwise_init_shift(priv, tb);
 		break;
+	case NFT_BITWISE_AND:
+	case NFT_BITWISE_OR:
+	case NFT_BITWISE_XOR:
+		err = nft_bitwise_init_bool(priv, tb);
+		break;
 	}
 
 	return err;
@@ -243,6 +332,19 @@ static int nft_bitwise_dump_shift(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int nft_bitwise_dump_bool(struct sk_buff *skb,
+				 const struct nft_bitwise *priv)
+{
+	if (nft_dump_register(skb, NFTA_BITWISE_SREG2, priv->sreg2))
+		return -1;
+
+	if (nft_data_dump(skb, NFTA_BITWISE_DATA, &priv->data,
+			  NFT_DATA_VALUE, sizeof(u32)) < 0)
+		return -1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int nft_bitwise_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nft_expr *expr)
 {
 	const struct nft_bitwise *priv = nft_expr_priv(expr);
@@ -267,6 +369,11 @@ static int nft_bitwise_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nft_expr *expr)
 	case NFT_BITWISE_RSHIFT:
 		err = nft_bitwise_dump_shift(skb, priv);
 		break;
+	case NFT_BITWISE_AND:
+	case NFT_BITWISE_OR:
+	case NFT_BITWISE_XOR:
+		err = nft_bitwise_dump_bool(skb, priv);
+		break;
 	}
 
 	return err;
@@ -311,6 +418,7 @@ static bool nft_bitwise_reduce(struct nft_regs_track *track,
 	    track->regs[priv->dreg].bitwise &&
 	    track->regs[priv->dreg].bitwise->ops == expr->ops &&
 	    priv->sreg == bitwise->sreg &&
+	    priv->sreg2 == bitwise->sreg2 &&
 	    priv->dreg == bitwise->dreg &&
 	    priv->op == bitwise->op &&
 	    priv->len == bitwise->len &&
-- 
2.35.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-09 13:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-04-09 13:52 [nf-next PATCH v3 0/3] netfilter: bitwise: support boolean operations with variable RHS operands Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-09 13:52 ` [nf-next PATCH v3 1/3] netfilter: bitwise: keep track of bit-length of expressions Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-09 13:52 ` [nf-next PATCH v3 2/3] netfilter: bitwise: rename some boolean operation functions Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-09 13:52 ` [nf-next PATCH v3 3/3] netfilter: bitwise: add support for doing AND, OR and XOR directly Jeremy Sowden

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.