From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> To: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ionela.Voinescu@arm.com, Lukasz.Luba@arm.com, Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com, Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] cpufreq: CPPC: Register EM based on efficiency class information Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 08:42:31 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220411031231.noq5yprp5oui3lsx@vireshk-i7> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220407081620.1662192-4-pierre.gondois@arm.com> On 07-04-22, 10:16, Pierre Gondois wrote: > +static void cppc_cpufreq_register_em(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > +{ > + struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data; > + struct em_data_callback em_cb = > + EM_ADV_DATA_CB(cppc_get_cpu_power, cppc_get_cpu_cost); > + > + if (!efficiency_class_populated) Instead of a new variable for this, what about setting cppc_cpufreq_driver.register_em = cppc_cpufreq_register_em, only if you were able to populate the efficiency class in the first place ? > + return; > + > + cpu_data = cppc_cpufreq_search_cpu_data(policy->cpu); > + em_dev_register_perf_domain(get_cpu_device(policy->cpu), > + get_perf_level_count(policy), &em_cb, > + cpu_data->shared_cpu_map, 0); > +} > + > #else > > static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_get_transition_delay_us(unsigned int cpu) > @@ -471,6 +609,9 @@ static int populate_efficiency_class(void) > { > return 0; > } > +static void cppc_cpufreq_register_em(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > +{ > +} > #endif > > > @@ -742,6 +883,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver cppc_cpufreq_driver = { > .init = cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init, > .exit = cppc_cpufreq_cpu_exit, > .set_boost = cppc_cpufreq_set_boost, > + .register_em = cppc_cpufreq_register_em, > .attr = cppc_cpufreq_attr, > .name = "cppc_cpufreq", > }; > -- > 2.25.1 -- viresh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> To: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ionela.Voinescu@arm.com, Lukasz.Luba@arm.com, Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com, Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] cpufreq: CPPC: Register EM based on efficiency class information Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 08:42:31 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220411031231.noq5yprp5oui3lsx@vireshk-i7> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220407081620.1662192-4-pierre.gondois@arm.com> On 07-04-22, 10:16, Pierre Gondois wrote: > +static void cppc_cpufreq_register_em(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > +{ > + struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data; > + struct em_data_callback em_cb = > + EM_ADV_DATA_CB(cppc_get_cpu_power, cppc_get_cpu_cost); > + > + if (!efficiency_class_populated) Instead of a new variable for this, what about setting cppc_cpufreq_driver.register_em = cppc_cpufreq_register_em, only if you were able to populate the efficiency class in the first place ? > + return; > + > + cpu_data = cppc_cpufreq_search_cpu_data(policy->cpu); > + em_dev_register_perf_domain(get_cpu_device(policy->cpu), > + get_perf_level_count(policy), &em_cb, > + cpu_data->shared_cpu_map, 0); > +} > + > #else > > static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_get_transition_delay_us(unsigned int cpu) > @@ -471,6 +609,9 @@ static int populate_efficiency_class(void) > { > return 0; > } > +static void cppc_cpufreq_register_em(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > +{ > +} > #endif > > > @@ -742,6 +883,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver cppc_cpufreq_driver = { > .init = cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init, > .exit = cppc_cpufreq_cpu_exit, > .set_boost = cppc_cpufreq_set_boost, > + .register_em = cppc_cpufreq_register_em, > .attr = cppc_cpufreq_attr, > .name = "cppc_cpufreq", > }; > -- > 2.25.1 -- viresh _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-11 3:12 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-04-07 8:16 [PATCH v2 0/3] Enable EAS for CPPC/ACPI based systems Pierre Gondois 2022-04-07 8:16 ` Pierre Gondois 2022-04-07 8:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] cpufreq: CPPC: Add cppc_cpufreq_search_cpu_data Pierre Gondois 2022-04-07 8:16 ` Pierre Gondois 2022-04-11 3:10 ` Viresh Kumar 2022-04-11 3:10 ` Viresh Kumar 2022-04-11 10:34 ` Pierre Gondois 2022-04-11 10:34 ` Pierre Gondois 2022-04-07 8:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] cpufreq: CPPC: Add per_cpu efficiency_class Pierre Gondois 2022-04-07 8:16 ` Pierre Gondois 2022-04-07 11:20 ` Catalin Marinas 2022-04-07 11:20 ` Catalin Marinas 2022-04-07 8:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] cpufreq: CPPC: Register EM based on efficiency class information Pierre Gondois 2022-04-07 8:16 ` Pierre Gondois 2022-04-11 3:12 ` Viresh Kumar [this message] 2022-04-11 3:12 ` Viresh Kumar 2022-04-11 10:33 ` Pierre Gondois 2022-04-11 10:33 ` Pierre Gondois [not found] ` <CANW9uytEOhRX4-TcOYThYFJ0UvrsYETzNp2YiH4zGDn_yb3a9A@mail.gmail.com> 2022-04-07 10:00 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Enable EAS for CPPC/ACPI based systems Pierre Gondois 2022-04-07 10:00 ` Pierre Gondois
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20220411031231.noq5yprp5oui3lsx@vireshk-i7 \ --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \ --cc=Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com \ --cc=Ionela.Voinescu@arm.com \ --cc=Lukasz.Luba@arm.com \ --cc=Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com \ --cc=ardb@kernel.org \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=maz@kernel.org \ --cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \ --cc=rafael@kernel.org \ --cc=robh@kernel.org \ --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \ --cc=tabba@google.com \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.