* [PATCH] cifs: verify that tcon is valid before dereference in cifs_kill_sb
@ 2022-04-13 0:02 Ronnie Sahlberg
2022-04-14 3:26 ` Shyam Prasad N
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ronnie Sahlberg @ 2022-04-13 0:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-cifs; +Cc: Steve French
On umount, cifs_sb->tlink_tree might contain entries that do not represent
a valid tcon.
Check the tcon for error before we dereference it.
Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
---
fs/cifs/cifsfs.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
index aba0783a8f09..25719b70564a 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
@@ -266,10 +266,11 @@ static void cifs_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb)
* before we kill the sb.
*/
if (cifs_sb->root) {
- node = rb_first(root);
- while (node != NULL) {
+ for(node = rb_first(root); node; node = rb_next(node)) {
tlink = rb_entry(node, struct tcon_link, tl_rbnode);
tcon = tlink_tcon(tlink);
+ if (IS_ERR(tcon))
+ continue;
cfid = &tcon->crfid;
mutex_lock(&cfid->fid_mutex);
if (cfid->dentry) {
@@ -277,7 +278,6 @@ static void cifs_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb)
cfid->dentry = NULL;
}
mutex_unlock(&cfid->fid_mutex);
- node = rb_next(node);
}
/* finally release root dentry */
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cifs: verify that tcon is valid before dereference in cifs_kill_sb
2022-04-13 0:02 [PATCH] cifs: verify that tcon is valid before dereference in cifs_kill_sb Ronnie Sahlberg
@ 2022-04-14 3:26 ` Shyam Prasad N
2022-04-14 13:41 ` ronnie sahlberg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Shyam Prasad N @ 2022-04-14 3:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ronnie Sahlberg; +Cc: linux-cifs, Steve French
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 7:06 AM Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On umount, cifs_sb->tlink_tree might contain entries that do not represent
> a valid tcon.
> Check the tcon for error before we dereference it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/cifs/cifsfs.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> index aba0783a8f09..25719b70564a 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> @@ -266,10 +266,11 @@ static void cifs_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb)
> * before we kill the sb.
> */
> if (cifs_sb->root) {
> - node = rb_first(root);
> - while (node != NULL) {
> + for(node = rb_first(root); node; node = rb_next(node)) {
> tlink = rb_entry(node, struct tcon_link, tl_rbnode);
> tcon = tlink_tcon(tlink);
> + if (IS_ERR(tcon))
> + continue;
> cfid = &tcon->crfid;
> mutex_lock(&cfid->fid_mutex);
> if (cfid->dentry) {
> @@ -277,7 +278,6 @@ static void cifs_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb)
> cfid->dentry = NULL;
> }
> mutex_unlock(&cfid->fid_mutex);
> - node = rb_next(node);
> }
>
> /* finally release root dentry */
> --
> 2.30.2
>
The changes look good to me.
Reviewed-by: Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com>
Does this cover all the mount failure scenarios, Ronnie?
--
Regards,
Shyam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cifs: verify that tcon is valid before dereference in cifs_kill_sb
2022-04-14 3:26 ` Shyam Prasad N
@ 2022-04-14 13:41 ` ronnie sahlberg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: ronnie sahlberg @ 2022-04-14 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shyam Prasad N; +Cc: Ronnie Sahlberg, linux-cifs, Steve French
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 11:33 PM Shyam Prasad N <nspmangalore@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 7:06 AM Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On umount, cifs_sb->tlink_tree might contain entries that do not represent
> > a valid tcon.
> > Check the tcon for error before we dereference it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > fs/cifs/cifsfs.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> > index aba0783a8f09..25719b70564a 100644
> > --- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> > +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> > @@ -266,10 +266,11 @@ static void cifs_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb)
> > * before we kill the sb.
> > */
> > if (cifs_sb->root) {
> > - node = rb_first(root);
> > - while (node != NULL) {
> > + for(node = rb_first(root); node; node = rb_next(node)) {
> > tlink = rb_entry(node, struct tcon_link, tl_rbnode);
> > tcon = tlink_tcon(tlink);
> > + if (IS_ERR(tcon))
> > + continue;
> > cfid = &tcon->crfid;
> > mutex_lock(&cfid->fid_mutex);
> > if (cfid->dentry) {
> > @@ -277,7 +278,6 @@ static void cifs_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb)
> > cfid->dentry = NULL;
> > }
> > mutex_unlock(&cfid->fid_mutex);
> > - node = rb_next(node);
> > }
> >
> > /* finally release root dentry */
> > --
> > 2.30.2
> >
>
> The changes look good to me.
> Reviewed-by: Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com>
>
> Does this cover all the mount failure scenarios, Ronnie?
It should. It should also fix similar issues at umount if an idle tcon
has been reaped, or say a tcon failed to initialize during multiuser.
For example, mount multiuser, then try to access the share with a
different user without credentials. That second tcon will fail
and then when we umount we would oops.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shyam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-14 14:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-04-13 0:02 [PATCH] cifs: verify that tcon is valid before dereference in cifs_kill_sb Ronnie Sahlberg
2022-04-14 3:26 ` Shyam Prasad N
2022-04-14 13:41 ` ronnie sahlberg
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.