[PATCH v2] cw1200: fix incorrect check to determine if no element is found in list

* [PATCH v2] cw1200: fix incorrect check to determine if no element is found in list
@ 2022-03-20  3:54 Xiaomeng Tong
  2022-04-06 11:32 ` Kalle Valo
  2022-04-12 13:51 ` Kalle Valo
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Xiaomeng Tong @ 2022-03-20  3:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pizza
  Cc: kvalo, davem, kuba, pabeni, linville, linux-wireless, netdev,
	linux-kernel, jakobkoschel, Xiaomeng Tong

The bug is here: "} else if (item) {".

The list iterator value will *always* be set and non-NULL by
list_for_each_entry(), so it is incorrect to assume that the iterator
value will be NULL if the list is empty or no element is found in list.

Use a new value 'iter' as the list iterator, while use the old value
'item' as a dedicated pointer to point to the found element, which
1. can fix this bug, due to now 'item' is NULL only if it's not found.
2. do not need to change all the uses of 'item' after the loop.
3. can also limit the scope of the list iterator 'iter' *only inside*
   the traversal loop by simply declaring 'iter' inside the loop in the
   future, as usage of the iterator outside of the list_for_each_entry
   is considered harmful. https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/2/17/1032

Fixes: a910e4a94f692 ("cw1200: add driver for the ST-E CW1100 & CW1200 WLAN chipsets")
Signed-off-by: Xiaomeng Tong <xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com>
---
changes since v1:
 - fix incorrect check to item (Jakob Koschel)

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220319063800.28791-1-xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com/
---
 drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c b/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c
index 12952b1c29df..d8dd4fac4ef1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c
@@ -90,23 +90,25 @@ static void __cw1200_queue_gc(struct cw1200_queue *queue,
 			      bool unlock)
 {
 	struct cw1200_queue_stats *stats = queue->stats;
-	struct cw1200_queue_item *item = NULL, *tmp;
+	struct cw1200_queue_item *item = NULL, *iter, *tmp;
 	bool wakeup_stats = false;
 
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(item, tmp, &queue->queue, head) {
-		if (jiffies - item->queue_timestamp < queue->ttl)
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(iter, tmp, &queue->queue, head) {
+		if (jiffies - iter->queue_timestamp < queue->ttl) {
+			item = iter;
 			break;
+		}
 		--queue->num_queued;
-		--queue->link_map_cache[item->txpriv.link_id];
+		--queue->link_map_cache[iter->txpriv.link_id];
 		spin_lock_bh(&stats->lock);
 		--stats->num_queued;
-		if (!--stats->link_map_cache[item->txpriv.link_id])
+		if (!--stats->link_map_cache[iter->txpriv.link_id])
 			wakeup_stats = true;
 		spin_unlock_bh(&stats->lock);
 		cw1200_debug_tx_ttl(stats->priv);
-		cw1200_queue_register_post_gc(head, item);
-		item->skb = NULL;
-		list_move_tail(&item->head, &queue->free_pool);
+		cw1200_queue_register_post_gc(head, iter);
+		iter->skb = NULL;
+		list_move_tail(&iter->head, &queue->free_pool);
 	}
 
 	if (wakeup_stats)
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread