[PATCH] wlcore: cmd: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

[PATCH] wlcore: cmd: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

[cgel.zte]

From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>

Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() to replace pm_runtime_get_sync and
pm_runtime_put_noidle. This change is just to simplify the code, no
actual functional changes.

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c
index 8b798b5fcaf5..62388ee8febc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c
@@ -178,11 +178,9 @@ int wlcore_cmd_wait_for_event_or_timeout(struct wl1271 *wl,
 
 	timeout_time = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(WL1271_EVENT_TIMEOUT);
 
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(wl->dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(wl->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(wl->dev);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto free_vector;
-	}
 
 	do {
 		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout_time)) {
-- 
2.25.1

Re: wlcore: cmd: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() instead of pm_runtime_get_sync()

[Kalle Valo]

cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote:

> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
> 
> Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() to replace pm_runtime_get_sync and
> pm_runtime_put_noidle. This change is just to simplify the code, no
> actual functional changes.
> 
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>

Patch applied to wireless-next.git, thanks.

e05c7ddfeb23 wlcore: cmd: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() instead of pm_runtime_get_sync()

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20220420090141.2588553-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches