All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH printk v3 14/15] printk: extend console_lock for proper kthread support
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 12:04:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202204201103.MeWPs1iv-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220419234637.357112-15-john.ogness@linutronix.de>

Hi John,

I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on 84d7df104dbab9c3dda8f2c5b46f9a6fc256fe02]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/John-Ogness/printk-for-next/20220420-080725
base:   84d7df104dbab9c3dda8f2c5b46f9a6fc256fe02
config: s390-randconfig-r032-20220419 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220420/202204201103.MeWPs1iv-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project bac6cd5bf85669e3376610cfc4c4f9ca015e7b9b)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-s390x-linux-gnu
        # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/5139c5b347088e124f3812a3fa63eb284b14f2dc
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review John-Ogness/printk-for-next/20220420-080725
        git checkout 5139c5b347088e124f3812a3fa63eb284b14f2dc
        # save the config file
        mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=s390 SHELL=/bin/bash kernel/printk/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from kernel/printk/printk.c:35:
   In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:13:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:464:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                             ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:477:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
   #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
                                                             ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16'
   #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
                                                        ^
   In file included from kernel/printk/printk.c:35:
   In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:13:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
   #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
                                                             ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
   #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
                                                        ^
   In file included from kernel/printk/printk.c:35:
   In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:13:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:501:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                               ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:511:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:521:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:609:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:617:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:625:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:634:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:643:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:652:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> kernel/printk/printk.c:2703:6: warning: no previous prototype for function 'console_lock_single_hold' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
   void console_lock_single_hold(struct console *con)
        ^
   kernel/printk/printk.c:2703:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
   void console_lock_single_hold(struct console *con)
   ^
   static 
   13 warnings generated.


vim +/console_lock_single_hold +2703 kernel/printk/printk.c

  2697	
  2698	/*
  2699	 * Lock the console_lock, but rather than blocking all the kthread printers,
  2700	 * lock a specified kthread printer and hold the lock. This is useful if
  2701	 * console flags for a particular console need to be updated.
  2702	 */
> 2703	void console_lock_single_hold(struct console *con)
  2704	{
  2705		might_sleep();
  2706		down_console_sem();
  2707		mutex_lock(&con->lock);
  2708		console_locked = 1;
  2709		console_may_schedule = 1;
  2710	}
  2711	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-20  4:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-19 23:46 [PATCH printk v3 00/15] printk/for-next John Ogness
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 01/15] printk: rename cpulock functions John Ogness
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 02/15] printk: cpu sync always disable interrupts John Ogness
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 03/15] printk: add missing memory barrier to wake_up_klogd() John Ogness
2022-04-20 12:34   ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 04/15] printk: wake up all waiters John Ogness
2022-04-20 12:36   ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 05/15] printk: wake waiters for safe and NMI contexts John Ogness
2022-04-20 13:55   ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 06/15] printk: get caller_id/timestamp after migration disable John Ogness
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 07/15] printk: call boot_delay_msec() in printk_delay() John Ogness
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 08/15] printk: add con_printk() macro for console details John Ogness
2022-04-20 14:01   ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 09/15] printk: refactor and rework printing logic John Ogness
2022-04-20 14:55   ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 10/15] printk: move buffer definitions into console_emit_next_record() caller John Ogness
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 11/15] printk: add pr_flush() John Ogness
2022-04-20 15:10   ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 12/15] printk: add functions to prefer direct printing John Ogness
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 13/15] printk: add kthread console printers John Ogness
2022-04-20 17:53   ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-20 20:02     ` John Ogness
2022-04-21 14:25       ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 14/15] printk: extend console_lock for proper kthread support John Ogness
2022-04-20  2:13   ` kernel test robot
2022-04-20 13:32     ` John Ogness
2022-04-20 13:32       ` John Ogness
2022-04-20  4:04   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2022-04-21 12:41   ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-21 14:30     ` John Ogness
2022-04-22 13:03       ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-22 14:14         ` John Ogness
2022-04-22 15:15           ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-22 21:25             ` John Ogness
2022-04-25 15:18               ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-25 19:10                 ` John Ogness
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 15/15] printk: remove @console_locked John Ogness
2022-04-21 12:46   ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-21 14:40 ` [PATCH printk v3 00/15] printk/for-next Petr Mladek
2022-04-21 15:02   ` John Ogness

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202204201103.MeWPs1iv-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.