All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
To: <rafael@kernel.org>, <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	<robh+dt@kernel.org>, <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>, <roger.lu@mediatek.com>,
	<hsinyi@google.com>, <khilman@baylibre.com>,
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com>,
	Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 04/10] cpufreq: mediatek: Refine mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking()
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 19:52:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220505115226.20130-5-rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220505115226.20130-1-rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>

From: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>

Because the difference of sram and proc should in a range of min_volt_shift
and max_volt_shift. We need to adjust the sram and proc step by step.

We replace VOLT_TOL (voltage tolerance) with the platform data and update the
logic to determine the voltage boundary and invoking regulator_set_voltage.

- Use 'sram_min_volt' and 'sram_max_volt' to determine the voltage boundary
  of sram regulator.
- Use (sram_min_volt - min_volt_shift) and 'proc_max_volt' to determine the
  voltage boundary of vproc regulator.

Moreover, to prevent infinite loop when tracking voltage, we calculate the
maximum value for each platform data.
We assume min voltage is 0 and tracking target voltage using
min_volt_shift for each iteration.
The retry_max is 3 times of expeted iteration count.

Signed-off-by: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c | 147 ++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
index 0b6c3479c8cc..fe205eca657d 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
 #include <linux/cpumask.h>
+#include <linux/minmax.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
@@ -15,8 +16,6 @@
 #include <linux/pm_opp.h>
 #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
 
-#define VOLT_TOL		(10000)
-
 struct mtk_cpufreq_platform_data {
 	int min_volt_shift;
 	int max_volt_shift;
@@ -48,6 +47,7 @@ struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info {
 	bool need_voltage_tracking;
 	int pre_vproc;
 	const struct mtk_cpufreq_platform_data *soc_data;
+	int vtrack_max;
 };
 
 static struct platform_device *cpufreq_pdev;
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
 	struct regulator *proc_reg = info->proc_reg;
 	struct regulator *sram_reg = info->sram_reg;
 	int pre_vproc, pre_vsram, new_vsram, vsram, vproc, ret;
+	int retry = info->vtrack_max;
 
 	pre_vproc = regulator_get_voltage(proc_reg);
 	if (pre_vproc < 0) {
@@ -80,91 +81,44 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
 			"invalid Vproc value: %d\n", pre_vproc);
 		return pre_vproc;
 	}
-	/* Vsram should not exceed the maximum allowed voltage of SoC. */
-	new_vsram = min(new_vproc + soc_data->min_volt_shift,
-			soc_data->sram_max_volt);
-
-	if (pre_vproc < new_vproc) {
-		/*
-		 * When scaling up voltages, Vsram and Vproc scale up step
-		 * by step. At each step, set Vsram to (Vproc + 200mV) first,
-		 * then set Vproc to (Vsram - 100mV).
-		 * Keep doing it until Vsram and Vproc hit target voltages.
-		 */
-		do {
-			pre_vsram = regulator_get_voltage(sram_reg);
-			if (pre_vsram < 0) {
-				dev_err(info->cpu_dev,
-					"invalid Vsram value: %d\n", pre_vsram);
-				return pre_vsram;
-			}
-			pre_vproc = regulator_get_voltage(proc_reg);
-			if (pre_vproc < 0) {
-				dev_err(info->cpu_dev,
-					"invalid Vproc value: %d\n", pre_vproc);
-				return pre_vproc;
-			}
-
-			vsram = min(new_vsram,
-				    pre_vproc + soc_data->min_volt_shift);
 
-			if (vsram + VOLT_TOL >= soc_data->sram_max_volt) {
-				vsram = soc_data->sram_max_volt;
+	pre_vsram = regulator_get_voltage(sram_reg);
+	if (pre_vsram < 0) {
+		dev_err(info->cpu_dev, "invalid Vsram value: %d\n", pre_vsram);
+		return pre_vsram;
+	}
 
-				/*
-				 * If the target Vsram hits the maximum voltage,
-				 * try to set the exact voltage value first.
-				 */
-				ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg, vsram,
-							    vsram);
-				if (ret)
-					ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg,
-							vsram - VOLT_TOL,
-							vsram);
+	new_vsram = clamp(new_vproc + soc_data->min_volt_shift,
+			  soc_data->sram_min_volt, soc_data->sram_max_volt);
 
-				vproc = new_vproc;
-			} else {
-				ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg, vsram,
-							    vsram + VOLT_TOL);
+	do {
+		if (pre_vproc <= new_vproc) {
+			vsram = clamp(pre_vproc + soc_data->max_volt_shift,
+				      soc_data->sram_min_volt, new_vsram);
+			ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg, vsram,
+						    soc_data->sram_max_volt);
 
-				vproc = vsram - soc_data->min_volt_shift;
-			}
 			if (ret)
 				return ret;
 
+			if (vsram == soc_data->sram_max_volt ||
+			    new_vsram == soc_data->sram_min_volt)
+				vproc = new_vproc;
+			else
+				vproc = vsram - soc_data->min_volt_shift;
+
 			ret = regulator_set_voltage(proc_reg, vproc,
-						    vproc + VOLT_TOL);
+						    soc_data->proc_max_volt);
 			if (ret) {
 				regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg, pre_vsram,
-						      pre_vsram);
+						      soc_data->sram_max_volt);
 				return ret;
 			}
-		} while (vproc < new_vproc || vsram < new_vsram);
-	} else if (pre_vproc > new_vproc) {
-		/*
-		 * When scaling down voltages, Vsram and Vproc scale down step
-		 * by step. At each step, set Vproc to (Vsram - 200mV) first,
-		 * then set Vproc to (Vproc + 100mV).
-		 * Keep doing it until Vsram and Vproc hit target voltages.
-		 */
-		do {
-			pre_vproc = regulator_get_voltage(proc_reg);
-			if (pre_vproc < 0) {
-				dev_err(info->cpu_dev,
-					"invalid Vproc value: %d\n", pre_vproc);
-				return pre_vproc;
-			}
-			pre_vsram = regulator_get_voltage(sram_reg);
-			if (pre_vsram < 0) {
-				dev_err(info->cpu_dev,
-					"invalid Vsram value: %d\n", pre_vsram);
-				return pre_vsram;
-			}
-
+		} else if (pre_vproc > new_vproc) {
 			vproc = max(new_vproc,
 				    pre_vsram - soc_data->max_volt_shift);
 			ret = regulator_set_voltage(proc_reg, vproc,
-						    vproc + VOLT_TOL);
+						    soc_data->proc_max_volt);
 			if (ret)
 				return ret;
 
@@ -174,32 +128,24 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
 				vsram = max(new_vsram,
 					    vproc + soc_data->min_volt_shift);
 
-			if (vsram + VOLT_TOL >= soc_data->sram_max_volt) {
-				vsram = soc_data->sram_max_volt;
-
-				/*
-				 * If the target Vsram hits the maximum voltage,
-				 * try to set the exact voltage value first.
-				 */
-				ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg, vsram,
-							    vsram);
-				if (ret)
-					ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg,
-							vsram - VOLT_TOL,
-							vsram);
-			} else {
-				ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg, vsram,
-							    vsram + VOLT_TOL);
-			}
-
+			ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg, vsram,
+						    soc_data->sram_max_volt);
 			if (ret) {
 				regulator_set_voltage(proc_reg, pre_vproc,
-						      pre_vproc);
+						      soc_data->proc_max_volt);
 				return ret;
 			}
-		} while (vproc > new_vproc + VOLT_TOL ||
-			 vsram > new_vsram + VOLT_TOL);
-	}
+		}
+
+		pre_vproc = vproc;
+		pre_vsram = vsram;
+
+		if (--retry < 0) {
+			dev_err(info->cpu_dev,
+				"over loop count, failed to set voltage\n");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+	} while (vproc != new_vproc || vsram != new_vsram);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -261,8 +207,8 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	 * If the new voltage or the intermediate voltage is higher than the
 	 * current voltage, scale up voltage first.
 	 */
-	target_vproc = (inter_vproc > vproc) ? inter_vproc : vproc;
-	if (pre_vproc < target_vproc) {
+	target_vproc = max(inter_vproc, vproc);
+	if (pre_vproc <= target_vproc) {
 		ret = mtk_cpufreq_set_voltage(info, target_vproc);
 		if (ret) {
 			dev_err(cpu_dev,
@@ -417,6 +363,15 @@ static int mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info, int cpu)
 	 */
 	info->need_voltage_tracking = (info->sram_reg != NULL);
 
+	/*
+	 * We assume min voltage is 0 and tracking target voltage using
+	 * min_volt_shift for each iteration.
+	 * The vtrack_max is 3 times of expeted iteration count.
+	 */
+	info->vtrack_max = 3 * DIV_ROUND_UP(max(info->soc_data->sram_max_volt,
+						info->soc_data->proc_max_volt),
+					    info->soc_data->min_volt_shift);
+
 	return 0;
 
 out_disable_inter_clock:
-- 
2.18.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
To: <rafael@kernel.org>, <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	<robh+dt@kernel.org>, <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>, <roger.lu@mediatek.com>,
	<hsinyi@google.com>, <khilman@baylibre.com>,
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	 <Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com>,
	Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 04/10] cpufreq: mediatek: Refine mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking()
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 19:52:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220505115226.20130-5-rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220505115226.20130-1-rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>

From: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>

Because the difference of sram and proc should in a range of min_volt_shift
and max_volt_shift. We need to adjust the sram and proc step by step.

We replace VOLT_TOL (voltage tolerance) with the platform data and update the
logic to determine the voltage boundary and invoking regulator_set_voltage.

- Use 'sram_min_volt' and 'sram_max_volt' to determine the voltage boundary
  of sram regulator.
- Use (sram_min_volt - min_volt_shift) and 'proc_max_volt' to determine the
  voltage boundary of vproc regulator.

Moreover, to prevent infinite loop when tracking voltage, we calculate the
maximum value for each platform data.
We assume min voltage is 0 and tracking target voltage using
min_volt_shift for each iteration.
The retry_max is 3 times of expeted iteration count.

Signed-off-by: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c | 147 ++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
index 0b6c3479c8cc..fe205eca657d 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
 #include <linux/cpumask.h>
+#include <linux/minmax.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
@@ -15,8 +16,6 @@
 #include <linux/pm_opp.h>
 #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
 
-#define VOLT_TOL		(10000)
-
 struct mtk_cpufreq_platform_data {
 	int min_volt_shift;
 	int max_volt_shift;
@@ -48,6 +47,7 @@ struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info {
 	bool need_voltage_tracking;
 	int pre_vproc;
 	const struct mtk_cpufreq_platform_data *soc_data;
+	int vtrack_max;
 };
 
 static struct platform_device *cpufreq_pdev;
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
 	struct regulator *proc_reg = info->proc_reg;
 	struct regulator *sram_reg = info->sram_reg;
 	int pre_vproc, pre_vsram, new_vsram, vsram, vproc, ret;
+	int retry = info->vtrack_max;
 
 	pre_vproc = regulator_get_voltage(proc_reg);
 	if (pre_vproc < 0) {
@@ -80,91 +81,44 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
 			"invalid Vproc value: %d\n", pre_vproc);
 		return pre_vproc;
 	}
-	/* Vsram should not exceed the maximum allowed voltage of SoC. */
-	new_vsram = min(new_vproc + soc_data->min_volt_shift,
-			soc_data->sram_max_volt);
-
-	if (pre_vproc < new_vproc) {
-		/*
-		 * When scaling up voltages, Vsram and Vproc scale up step
-		 * by step. At each step, set Vsram to (Vproc + 200mV) first,
-		 * then set Vproc to (Vsram - 100mV).
-		 * Keep doing it until Vsram and Vproc hit target voltages.
-		 */
-		do {
-			pre_vsram = regulator_get_voltage(sram_reg);
-			if (pre_vsram < 0) {
-				dev_err(info->cpu_dev,
-					"invalid Vsram value: %d\n", pre_vsram);
-				return pre_vsram;
-			}
-			pre_vproc = regulator_get_voltage(proc_reg);
-			if (pre_vproc < 0) {
-				dev_err(info->cpu_dev,
-					"invalid Vproc value: %d\n", pre_vproc);
-				return pre_vproc;
-			}
-
-			vsram = min(new_vsram,
-				    pre_vproc + soc_data->min_volt_shift);
 
-			if (vsram + VOLT_TOL >= soc_data->sram_max_volt) {
-				vsram = soc_data->sram_max_volt;
+	pre_vsram = regulator_get_voltage(sram_reg);
+	if (pre_vsram < 0) {
+		dev_err(info->cpu_dev, "invalid Vsram value: %d\n", pre_vsram);
+		return pre_vsram;
+	}
 
-				/*
-				 * If the target Vsram hits the maximum voltage,
-				 * try to set the exact voltage value first.
-				 */
-				ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg, vsram,
-							    vsram);
-				if (ret)
-					ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg,
-							vsram - VOLT_TOL,
-							vsram);
+	new_vsram = clamp(new_vproc + soc_data->min_volt_shift,
+			  soc_data->sram_min_volt, soc_data->sram_max_volt);
 
-				vproc = new_vproc;
-			} else {
-				ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg, vsram,
-							    vsram + VOLT_TOL);
+	do {
+		if (pre_vproc <= new_vproc) {
+			vsram = clamp(pre_vproc + soc_data->max_volt_shift,
+				      soc_data->sram_min_volt, new_vsram);
+			ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg, vsram,
+						    soc_data->sram_max_volt);
 
-				vproc = vsram - soc_data->min_volt_shift;
-			}
 			if (ret)
 				return ret;
 
+			if (vsram == soc_data->sram_max_volt ||
+			    new_vsram == soc_data->sram_min_volt)
+				vproc = new_vproc;
+			else
+				vproc = vsram - soc_data->min_volt_shift;
+
 			ret = regulator_set_voltage(proc_reg, vproc,
-						    vproc + VOLT_TOL);
+						    soc_data->proc_max_volt);
 			if (ret) {
 				regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg, pre_vsram,
-						      pre_vsram);
+						      soc_data->sram_max_volt);
 				return ret;
 			}
-		} while (vproc < new_vproc || vsram < new_vsram);
-	} else if (pre_vproc > new_vproc) {
-		/*
-		 * When scaling down voltages, Vsram and Vproc scale down step
-		 * by step. At each step, set Vproc to (Vsram - 200mV) first,
-		 * then set Vproc to (Vproc + 100mV).
-		 * Keep doing it until Vsram and Vproc hit target voltages.
-		 */
-		do {
-			pre_vproc = regulator_get_voltage(proc_reg);
-			if (pre_vproc < 0) {
-				dev_err(info->cpu_dev,
-					"invalid Vproc value: %d\n", pre_vproc);
-				return pre_vproc;
-			}
-			pre_vsram = regulator_get_voltage(sram_reg);
-			if (pre_vsram < 0) {
-				dev_err(info->cpu_dev,
-					"invalid Vsram value: %d\n", pre_vsram);
-				return pre_vsram;
-			}
-
+		} else if (pre_vproc > new_vproc) {
 			vproc = max(new_vproc,
 				    pre_vsram - soc_data->max_volt_shift);
 			ret = regulator_set_voltage(proc_reg, vproc,
-						    vproc + VOLT_TOL);
+						    soc_data->proc_max_volt);
 			if (ret)
 				return ret;
 
@@ -174,32 +128,24 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
 				vsram = max(new_vsram,
 					    vproc + soc_data->min_volt_shift);
 
-			if (vsram + VOLT_TOL >= soc_data->sram_max_volt) {
-				vsram = soc_data->sram_max_volt;
-
-				/*
-				 * If the target Vsram hits the maximum voltage,
-				 * try to set the exact voltage value first.
-				 */
-				ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg, vsram,
-							    vsram);
-				if (ret)
-					ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg,
-							vsram - VOLT_TOL,
-							vsram);
-			} else {
-				ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg, vsram,
-							    vsram + VOLT_TOL);
-			}
-
+			ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg, vsram,
+						    soc_data->sram_max_volt);
 			if (ret) {
 				regulator_set_voltage(proc_reg, pre_vproc,
-						      pre_vproc);
+						      soc_data->proc_max_volt);
 				return ret;
 			}
-		} while (vproc > new_vproc + VOLT_TOL ||
-			 vsram > new_vsram + VOLT_TOL);
-	}
+		}
+
+		pre_vproc = vproc;
+		pre_vsram = vsram;
+
+		if (--retry < 0) {
+			dev_err(info->cpu_dev,
+				"over loop count, failed to set voltage\n");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+	} while (vproc != new_vproc || vsram != new_vsram);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -261,8 +207,8 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	 * If the new voltage or the intermediate voltage is higher than the
 	 * current voltage, scale up voltage first.
 	 */
-	target_vproc = (inter_vproc > vproc) ? inter_vproc : vproc;
-	if (pre_vproc < target_vproc) {
+	target_vproc = max(inter_vproc, vproc);
+	if (pre_vproc <= target_vproc) {
 		ret = mtk_cpufreq_set_voltage(info, target_vproc);
 		if (ret) {
 			dev_err(cpu_dev,
@@ -417,6 +363,15 @@ static int mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info, int cpu)
 	 */
 	info->need_voltage_tracking = (info->sram_reg != NULL);
 
+	/*
+	 * We assume min voltage is 0 and tracking target voltage using
+	 * min_volt_shift for each iteration.
+	 * The vtrack_max is 3 times of expeted iteration count.
+	 */
+	info->vtrack_max = 3 * DIV_ROUND_UP(max(info->soc_data->sram_max_volt,
+						info->soc_data->proc_max_volt),
+					    info->soc_data->min_volt_shift);
+
 	return 0;
 
 out_disable_inter_clock:
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
To: <rafael@kernel.org>, <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	<robh+dt@kernel.org>, <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>, <roger.lu@mediatek.com>,
	<hsinyi@google.com>, <khilman@baylibre.com>,
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	 <Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com>,
	Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 04/10] cpufreq: mediatek: Refine mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking()
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 19:52:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220505115226.20130-5-rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220505115226.20130-1-rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>

From: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>

Because the difference of sram and proc should in a range of min_volt_shift
and max_volt_shift. We need to adjust the sram and proc step by step.

We replace VOLT_TOL (voltage tolerance) with the platform data and update the
logic to determine the voltage boundary and invoking regulator_set_voltage.

- Use 'sram_min_volt' and 'sram_max_volt' to determine the voltage boundary
  of sram regulator.
- Use (sram_min_volt - min_volt_shift) and 'proc_max_volt' to determine the
  voltage boundary of vproc regulator.

Moreover, to prevent infinite loop when tracking voltage, we calculate the
maximum value for each platform data.
We assume min voltage is 0 and tracking target voltage using
min_volt_shift for each iteration.
The retry_max is 3 times of expeted iteration count.

Signed-off-by: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c | 147 ++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
index 0b6c3479c8cc..fe205eca657d 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
 #include <linux/cpumask.h>
+#include <linux/minmax.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
@@ -15,8 +16,6 @@
 #include <linux/pm_opp.h>
 #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
 
-#define VOLT_TOL		(10000)
-
 struct mtk_cpufreq_platform_data {
 	int min_volt_shift;
 	int max_volt_shift;
@@ -48,6 +47,7 @@ struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info {
 	bool need_voltage_tracking;
 	int pre_vproc;
 	const struct mtk_cpufreq_platform_data *soc_data;
+	int vtrack_max;
 };
 
 static struct platform_device *cpufreq_pdev;
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
 	struct regulator *proc_reg = info->proc_reg;
 	struct regulator *sram_reg = info->sram_reg;
 	int pre_vproc, pre_vsram, new_vsram, vsram, vproc, ret;
+	int retry = info->vtrack_max;
 
 	pre_vproc = regulator_get_voltage(proc_reg);
 	if (pre_vproc < 0) {
@@ -80,91 +81,44 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
 			"invalid Vproc value: %d\n", pre_vproc);
 		return pre_vproc;
 	}
-	/* Vsram should not exceed the maximum allowed voltage of SoC. */
-	new_vsram = min(new_vproc + soc_data->min_volt_shift,
-			soc_data->sram_max_volt);
-
-	if (pre_vproc < new_vproc) {
-		/*
-		 * When scaling up voltages, Vsram and Vproc scale up step
-		 * by step. At each step, set Vsram to (Vproc + 200mV) first,
-		 * then set Vproc to (Vsram - 100mV).
-		 * Keep doing it until Vsram and Vproc hit target voltages.
-		 */
-		do {
-			pre_vsram = regulator_get_voltage(sram_reg);
-			if (pre_vsram < 0) {
-				dev_err(info->cpu_dev,
-					"invalid Vsram value: %d\n", pre_vsram);
-				return pre_vsram;
-			}
-			pre_vproc = regulator_get_voltage(proc_reg);
-			if (pre_vproc < 0) {
-				dev_err(info->cpu_dev,
-					"invalid Vproc value: %d\n", pre_vproc);
-				return pre_vproc;
-			}
-
-			vsram = min(new_vsram,
-				    pre_vproc + soc_data->min_volt_shift);
 
-			if (vsram + VOLT_TOL >= soc_data->sram_max_volt) {
-				vsram = soc_data->sram_max_volt;
+	pre_vsram = regulator_get_voltage(sram_reg);
+	if (pre_vsram < 0) {
+		dev_err(info->cpu_dev, "invalid Vsram value: %d\n", pre_vsram);
+		return pre_vsram;
+	}
 
-				/*
-				 * If the target Vsram hits the maximum voltage,
-				 * try to set the exact voltage value first.
-				 */
-				ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg, vsram,
-							    vsram);
-				if (ret)
-					ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg,
-							vsram - VOLT_TOL,
-							vsram);
+	new_vsram = clamp(new_vproc + soc_data->min_volt_shift,
+			  soc_data->sram_min_volt, soc_data->sram_max_volt);
 
-				vproc = new_vproc;
-			} else {
-				ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg, vsram,
-							    vsram + VOLT_TOL);
+	do {
+		if (pre_vproc <= new_vproc) {
+			vsram = clamp(pre_vproc + soc_data->max_volt_shift,
+				      soc_data->sram_min_volt, new_vsram);
+			ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg, vsram,
+						    soc_data->sram_max_volt);
 
-				vproc = vsram - soc_data->min_volt_shift;
-			}
 			if (ret)
 				return ret;
 
+			if (vsram == soc_data->sram_max_volt ||
+			    new_vsram == soc_data->sram_min_volt)
+				vproc = new_vproc;
+			else
+				vproc = vsram - soc_data->min_volt_shift;
+
 			ret = regulator_set_voltage(proc_reg, vproc,
-						    vproc + VOLT_TOL);
+						    soc_data->proc_max_volt);
 			if (ret) {
 				regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg, pre_vsram,
-						      pre_vsram);
+						      soc_data->sram_max_volt);
 				return ret;
 			}
-		} while (vproc < new_vproc || vsram < new_vsram);
-	} else if (pre_vproc > new_vproc) {
-		/*
-		 * When scaling down voltages, Vsram and Vproc scale down step
-		 * by step. At each step, set Vproc to (Vsram - 200mV) first,
-		 * then set Vproc to (Vproc + 100mV).
-		 * Keep doing it until Vsram and Vproc hit target voltages.
-		 */
-		do {
-			pre_vproc = regulator_get_voltage(proc_reg);
-			if (pre_vproc < 0) {
-				dev_err(info->cpu_dev,
-					"invalid Vproc value: %d\n", pre_vproc);
-				return pre_vproc;
-			}
-			pre_vsram = regulator_get_voltage(sram_reg);
-			if (pre_vsram < 0) {
-				dev_err(info->cpu_dev,
-					"invalid Vsram value: %d\n", pre_vsram);
-				return pre_vsram;
-			}
-
+		} else if (pre_vproc > new_vproc) {
 			vproc = max(new_vproc,
 				    pre_vsram - soc_data->max_volt_shift);
 			ret = regulator_set_voltage(proc_reg, vproc,
-						    vproc + VOLT_TOL);
+						    soc_data->proc_max_volt);
 			if (ret)
 				return ret;
 
@@ -174,32 +128,24 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
 				vsram = max(new_vsram,
 					    vproc + soc_data->min_volt_shift);
 
-			if (vsram + VOLT_TOL >= soc_data->sram_max_volt) {
-				vsram = soc_data->sram_max_volt;
-
-				/*
-				 * If the target Vsram hits the maximum voltage,
-				 * try to set the exact voltage value first.
-				 */
-				ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg, vsram,
-							    vsram);
-				if (ret)
-					ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg,
-							vsram - VOLT_TOL,
-							vsram);
-			} else {
-				ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg, vsram,
-							    vsram + VOLT_TOL);
-			}
-
+			ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg, vsram,
+						    soc_data->sram_max_volt);
 			if (ret) {
 				regulator_set_voltage(proc_reg, pre_vproc,
-						      pre_vproc);
+						      soc_data->proc_max_volt);
 				return ret;
 			}
-		} while (vproc > new_vproc + VOLT_TOL ||
-			 vsram > new_vsram + VOLT_TOL);
-	}
+		}
+
+		pre_vproc = vproc;
+		pre_vsram = vsram;
+
+		if (--retry < 0) {
+			dev_err(info->cpu_dev,
+				"over loop count, failed to set voltage\n");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+	} while (vproc != new_vproc || vsram != new_vsram);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -261,8 +207,8 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	 * If the new voltage or the intermediate voltage is higher than the
 	 * current voltage, scale up voltage first.
 	 */
-	target_vproc = (inter_vproc > vproc) ? inter_vproc : vproc;
-	if (pre_vproc < target_vproc) {
+	target_vproc = max(inter_vproc, vproc);
+	if (pre_vproc <= target_vproc) {
 		ret = mtk_cpufreq_set_voltage(info, target_vproc);
 		if (ret) {
 			dev_err(cpu_dev,
@@ -417,6 +363,15 @@ static int mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info, int cpu)
 	 */
 	info->need_voltage_tracking = (info->sram_reg != NULL);
 
+	/*
+	 * We assume min voltage is 0 and tracking target voltage using
+	 * min_volt_shift for each iteration.
+	 * The vtrack_max is 3 times of expeted iteration count.
+	 */
+	info->vtrack_max = 3 * DIV_ROUND_UP(max(info->soc_data->sram_max_volt,
+						info->soc_data->proc_max_volt),
+					    info->soc_data->min_volt_shift);
+
 	return 0;
 
 out_disable_inter_clock:
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-05 11:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-05 11:52 [PATCH v6 00/10] cpufreq: mediatek: Cleanup and support MT8183 and MT8186 Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] dt-bindings: cpufreq: mediatek: Add MediaTek CCI property Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-11 14:37   ` Rob Herring
2022-05-11 14:37     ` Rob Herring
2022-05-11 14:37     ` Rob Herring
2022-05-05 11:52 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] cpufreq: mediatek: Add platform_device_unregister when driver exit Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 15:04   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-05-05 15:04     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-05-05 15:04     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-05-06  1:49     ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-06  1:49       ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-06  1:49       ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-06  4:09   ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-06  4:09     ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-06  4:09     ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-05 11:52 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] cpufreq: mediatek: Move voltage limits to platform data Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-06  4:10   ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-06  4:10     ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-06  4:10     ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-05 11:52 ` Rex-BC Chen [this message]
2022-05-05 11:52   ` [PATCH v6 04/10] cpufreq: mediatek: Refine mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking() Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] cpufreq: mediatek: Add opp notification support Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-06  1:46   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-06  1:46     ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-06  1:46     ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-06  3:22     ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2022-05-06  3:22       ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2022-05-06  3:22       ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2022-05-06  3:32       ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-06  3:32         ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-06  3:32         ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-06  4:15   ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-06  4:15     ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-06  4:15     ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-06  6:21     ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-06  6:21       ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-06  6:21       ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] cpufreq: mediatek: Link CCI device to CPU Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] cpufreq: mediatek: Add support for MT8186 Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] arm64: dts: mediatek: Add opp table and clock property for MT8183 cpufreq Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-12  6:11   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-12  6:11     ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-12  6:11     ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] arm64: dts: mediatek: Add MediaTek CCI node for MT8183 Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-16  5:35   ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2022-05-16  5:35     ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2022-05-16  5:35     ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2022-05-16 10:41     ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-16 10:41       ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-16 10:41       ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] arm64: dts: mediatek: Add mediatek,cci property for MT8183 cpufreq Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52   ` [PATCH v6 10/10] arm64: dts: mediatek: Add mediatek, cci " Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 11:52   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-06  4:20 ` [PATCH v6 00/10] cpufreq: mediatek: Cleanup and support MT8183 and MT8186 Viresh Kumar
2022-05-06  4:20   ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-06  4:20   ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-06  6:32   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-06  6:32     ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-06  6:32     ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-12  5:27     ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-12  5:27       ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-12  5:27       ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-12  5:33       ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-12  5:33         ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-12  5:33         ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-12  5:48         ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-12  5:48           ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-12  5:48           ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-12  6:05           ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-12  6:05             ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-12  6:05             ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-17  9:57             ` Matthias Brugger
2022-05-17  9:57               ` Matthias Brugger
2022-05-17  9:57               ` Matthias Brugger
2022-05-17 10:02               ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-17 10:02                 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-17 10:02                 ` Rex-BC Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220505115226.20130-5-rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com \
    --to=rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hsinyi@google.com \
    --cc=jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=roger.lu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.