All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
	Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1] serial: meson: acquire port->lock in startup()
Date: Sun,  8 May 2022 12:41:47 +0206	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220508103547.626355-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de> (raw)

The uart_ops startup() callback is called without interrupts
disabled and without port->lock locked, relatively late during the
boot process (from the call path of console_on_rootfs()). If the
device is a console, it was already previously registered and could
be actively printing messages.

Since the startup() callback is reading/writing registers used by
the console write() callback (AML_UART_CONTROL), its access must
be synchronized using the port->lock. Currently it is not.

The startup() callback is the only function that explicitly enables
interrupts. Without the synchronization, it is possible that
interrupts become accidentally permanently disabled.

CPU0                           CPU1
meson_serial_console_write     meson_uart_startup
--------------------------     ------------------
spin_lock(port->lock)
val = readl(AML_UART_CONTROL)
uart_console_write()
                               writel(INT_EN, AML_UART_CONTROL)
writel(val, AML_UART_CONTROL)
spin_unlock(port->lock)

Add port->lock synchronization to meson_uart_startup() to avoid
racing with meson_serial_console_write().

Also add detailed comments to meson_uart_reset() explaining why it
is *not* using port->lock synchronization.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2a82eae7-a256-f70c-fd82-4e510750906e@samsung.com
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c
index 2bf1c57e0981..39021dac09cc 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c
@@ -253,6 +253,14 @@ static const char *meson_uart_type(struct uart_port *port)
 	return (port->type == PORT_MESON) ? "meson_uart" : NULL;
 }
 
+/*
+ * This function is called only from probe() using a temporary io mapping
+ * in order to perform a reset before setting up the device. Since the
+ * temporarily mapped region was successfully requested, there can be no
+ * console on this port at this time. Hence it is not necessary for this
+ * function to acquire the port->lock. (Since there is no console on this
+ * port at this time, the port->lock is not initialized yet.)
+ */
 static void meson_uart_reset(struct uart_port *port)
 {
 	u32 val;
@@ -267,9 +275,12 @@ static void meson_uart_reset(struct uart_port *port)
 
 static int meson_uart_startup(struct uart_port *port)
 {
+	unsigned long flags;
 	u32 val;
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
+
 	val = readl(port->membase + AML_UART_CONTROL);
 	val |= AML_UART_CLEAR_ERR;
 	writel(val, port->membase + AML_UART_CONTROL);
@@ -285,6 +296,8 @@ static int meson_uart_startup(struct uart_port *port)
 	val = (AML_UART_RECV_IRQ(1) | AML_UART_XMIT_IRQ(port->fifosize / 2));
 	writel(val, port->membase + AML_UART_MISC);
 
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags);
+
 	ret = request_irq(port->irq, meson_uart_interrupt, 0,
 			  port->name, port);
 

base-commit: 672c0c5173427e6b3e2a9bbb7be51ceeec78093a
-- 
2.30.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
	Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1] serial: meson: acquire port->lock in startup()
Date: Sun,  8 May 2022 12:41:47 +0206	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220508103547.626355-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de> (raw)

The uart_ops startup() callback is called without interrupts
disabled and without port->lock locked, relatively late during the
boot process (from the call path of console_on_rootfs()). If the
device is a console, it was already previously registered and could
be actively printing messages.

Since the startup() callback is reading/writing registers used by
the console write() callback (AML_UART_CONTROL), its access must
be synchronized using the port->lock. Currently it is not.

The startup() callback is the only function that explicitly enables
interrupts. Without the synchronization, it is possible that
interrupts become accidentally permanently disabled.

CPU0                           CPU1
meson_serial_console_write     meson_uart_startup
--------------------------     ------------------
spin_lock(port->lock)
val = readl(AML_UART_CONTROL)
uart_console_write()
                               writel(INT_EN, AML_UART_CONTROL)
writel(val, AML_UART_CONTROL)
spin_unlock(port->lock)

Add port->lock synchronization to meson_uart_startup() to avoid
racing with meson_serial_console_write().

Also add detailed comments to meson_uart_reset() explaining why it
is *not* using port->lock synchronization.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2a82eae7-a256-f70c-fd82-4e510750906e@samsung.com
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c
index 2bf1c57e0981..39021dac09cc 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c
@@ -253,6 +253,14 @@ static const char *meson_uart_type(struct uart_port *port)
 	return (port->type == PORT_MESON) ? "meson_uart" : NULL;
 }
 
+/*
+ * This function is called only from probe() using a temporary io mapping
+ * in order to perform a reset before setting up the device. Since the
+ * temporarily mapped region was successfully requested, there can be no
+ * console on this port at this time. Hence it is not necessary for this
+ * function to acquire the port->lock. (Since there is no console on this
+ * port at this time, the port->lock is not initialized yet.)
+ */
 static void meson_uart_reset(struct uart_port *port)
 {
 	u32 val;
@@ -267,9 +275,12 @@ static void meson_uart_reset(struct uart_port *port)
 
 static int meson_uart_startup(struct uart_port *port)
 {
+	unsigned long flags;
 	u32 val;
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
+
 	val = readl(port->membase + AML_UART_CONTROL);
 	val |= AML_UART_CLEAR_ERR;
 	writel(val, port->membase + AML_UART_CONTROL);
@@ -285,6 +296,8 @@ static int meson_uart_startup(struct uart_port *port)
 	val = (AML_UART_RECV_IRQ(1) | AML_UART_XMIT_IRQ(port->fifosize / 2));
 	writel(val, port->membase + AML_UART_MISC);
 
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags);
+
 	ret = request_irq(port->irq, meson_uart_interrupt, 0,
 			  port->name, port);
 

base-commit: 672c0c5173427e6b3e2a9bbb7be51ceeec78093a
-- 
2.30.2


_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
	Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1] serial: meson: acquire port->lock in startup()
Date: Sun,  8 May 2022 12:41:47 +0206	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220508103547.626355-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de> (raw)

The uart_ops startup() callback is called without interrupts
disabled and without port->lock locked, relatively late during the
boot process (from the call path of console_on_rootfs()). If the
device is a console, it was already previously registered and could
be actively printing messages.

Since the startup() callback is reading/writing registers used by
the console write() callback (AML_UART_CONTROL), its access must
be synchronized using the port->lock. Currently it is not.

The startup() callback is the only function that explicitly enables
interrupts. Without the synchronization, it is possible that
interrupts become accidentally permanently disabled.

CPU0                           CPU1
meson_serial_console_write     meson_uart_startup
--------------------------     ------------------
spin_lock(port->lock)
val = readl(AML_UART_CONTROL)
uart_console_write()
                               writel(INT_EN, AML_UART_CONTROL)
writel(val, AML_UART_CONTROL)
spin_unlock(port->lock)

Add port->lock synchronization to meson_uart_startup() to avoid
racing with meson_serial_console_write().

Also add detailed comments to meson_uart_reset() explaining why it
is *not* using port->lock synchronization.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2a82eae7-a256-f70c-fd82-4e510750906e@samsung.com
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c
index 2bf1c57e0981..39021dac09cc 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c
@@ -253,6 +253,14 @@ static const char *meson_uart_type(struct uart_port *port)
 	return (port->type == PORT_MESON) ? "meson_uart" : NULL;
 }
 
+/*
+ * This function is called only from probe() using a temporary io mapping
+ * in order to perform a reset before setting up the device. Since the
+ * temporarily mapped region was successfully requested, there can be no
+ * console on this port at this time. Hence it is not necessary for this
+ * function to acquire the port->lock. (Since there is no console on this
+ * port at this time, the port->lock is not initialized yet.)
+ */
 static void meson_uart_reset(struct uart_port *port)
 {
 	u32 val;
@@ -267,9 +275,12 @@ static void meson_uart_reset(struct uart_port *port)
 
 static int meson_uart_startup(struct uart_port *port)
 {
+	unsigned long flags;
 	u32 val;
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
+
 	val = readl(port->membase + AML_UART_CONTROL);
 	val |= AML_UART_CLEAR_ERR;
 	writel(val, port->membase + AML_UART_CONTROL);
@@ -285,6 +296,8 @@ static int meson_uart_startup(struct uart_port *port)
 	val = (AML_UART_RECV_IRQ(1) | AML_UART_XMIT_IRQ(port->fifosize / 2));
 	writel(val, port->membase + AML_UART_MISC);
 
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags);
+
 	ret = request_irq(port->irq, meson_uart_interrupt, 0,
 			  port->name, port);
 

base-commit: 672c0c5173427e6b3e2a9bbb7be51ceeec78093a
-- 
2.30.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

             reply	other threads:[~2022-05-08 10:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-08 10:35 John Ogness [this message]
2022-05-08 10:35 ` [PATCH v1] serial: meson: acquire port->lock in startup() John Ogness
2022-05-08 10:35 ` John Ogness
2022-05-09  5:42 ` Jiri Slaby
2022-05-09  5:42   ` Jiri Slaby
2022-05-09  5:42   ` Jiri Slaby
2022-05-09  7:36 ` Neil Armstrong
2022-05-09  7:36   ` Neil Armstrong
2022-05-09  7:36   ` Neil Armstrong
2022-05-10  9:37   ` Petr Mladek
2022-05-10  9:37     ` Petr Mladek
2022-05-10  9:37     ` Petr Mladek
2022-05-10  9:49     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-05-10  9:49       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-05-10  9:49       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220508103547.626355-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --to=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
    --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.