All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Íñigo Huguet" <ihuguet@redhat.com>
To: ecree.xilinx@gmail.com, habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com, amaftei@solarflare.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"Íñigo Huguet" <ihuguet@redhat.com>,
	"Tianhao Zhao" <tizhao@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 1/2] sfc: fix wrong tx channel offset with efx_separate_tx_channels
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 14:59:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220511125941.55812-2-ihuguet@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220511125941.55812-1-ihuguet@redhat.com>

tx_channel_offset is calculated in efx_allocate_msix_channels, but it is
also calculated again in efx_set_channels because it was originally done
there, and when efx_allocate_msix_channels was introduced it was
forgotten to be removed from efx_set_channels.

Moreover, the old calculation is wrong when using
efx_separate_tx_channels because now we can have XDP channels after the
TX channels, so n_channels - n_tx_channels doesn't point to the first TX
channel.

Remove the old calculation from efx_set_channels, and add the
initialization of this variable if MSI or legacy interrupts are used,
next to the initialization of the rest of the related variables, where
it was missing.

Fixes: 3990a8fffbda ("sfc: allocate channels for XDP tx queues")
Reported-by: Tianhao Zhao <tizhao@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Íñigo Huguet <ihuguet@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_channels.c | 17 +++++------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_channels.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_channels.c
index 40df910aa140..da2db6791907 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_channels.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_channels.c
@@ -241,14 +241,9 @@ static int efx_allocate_msix_channels(struct efx_nic *efx,
 	n_channels -= efx->n_xdp_channels;
 
 	if (efx_separate_tx_channels) {
-		efx->n_tx_channels =
-			min(max(n_channels / 2, 1U),
-			    efx->max_tx_channels);
-		efx->tx_channel_offset =
-			n_channels - efx->n_tx_channels;
-		efx->n_rx_channels =
-			max(n_channels -
-			    efx->n_tx_channels, 1U);
+		efx->n_tx_channels = min(max(n_channels / 2, 1U), efx->max_tx_channels);
+		efx->tx_channel_offset = n_channels - efx->n_tx_channels;
+		efx->n_rx_channels = max(n_channels - efx->n_tx_channels, 1U);
 	} else {
 		efx->n_tx_channels = min(n_channels, efx->max_tx_channels);
 		efx->tx_channel_offset = 0;
@@ -324,6 +319,7 @@ int efx_probe_interrupts(struct efx_nic *efx)
 		efx->n_channels = 1;
 		efx->n_rx_channels = 1;
 		efx->n_tx_channels = 1;
+		efx->tx_channel_offset = 0;
 		efx->n_xdp_channels = 0;
 		efx->xdp_channel_offset = efx->n_channels;
 		rc = pci_enable_msi(efx->pci_dev);
@@ -344,6 +340,7 @@ int efx_probe_interrupts(struct efx_nic *efx)
 		efx->n_channels = 1 + (efx_separate_tx_channels ? 1 : 0);
 		efx->n_rx_channels = 1;
 		efx->n_tx_channels = 1;
+		efx->tx_channel_offset = 1;
 		efx->n_xdp_channels = 0;
 		efx->xdp_channel_offset = efx->n_channels;
 		efx->legacy_irq = efx->pci_dev->irq;
@@ -979,10 +976,6 @@ int efx_set_channels(struct efx_nic *efx)
 	struct efx_channel *channel;
 	int rc;
 
-	efx->tx_channel_offset =
-		efx_separate_tx_channels ?
-		efx->n_channels - efx->n_tx_channels : 0;
-
 	if (efx->xdp_tx_queue_count) {
 		EFX_WARN_ON_PARANOID(efx->xdp_tx_queues);
 
-- 
2.34.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-11 13:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-11 12:59 [PATCH net 0/2] sfc: fix some efx_separate_tx_channels errors Íñigo Huguet
2022-05-11 12:59 ` Íñigo Huguet [this message]
2022-05-12 17:01   ` [PATCH net 1/2] sfc: fix wrong tx channel offset with efx_separate_tx_channels Jakub Kicinski
2022-05-11 12:59 ` [PATCH net 2/2] sfc: do not initialize non existing queues " Íñigo Huguet
2022-05-13 11:07   ` Martin Habets
2022-05-13 12:37     ` Martin Habets
2022-05-24 15:36       ` Íñigo Huguet
2022-05-27  6:14         ` Martin Habets

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220511125941.55812-2-ihuguet@redhat.com \
    --to=ihuguet@redhat.com \
    --cc=amaftei@solarflare.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ecree.xilinx@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=tizhao@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.