From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> To: <jack@suse.cz>, <paolo.valente@linaro.org>, <axboe@kernel.dk>, <tj@kernel.org> Cc: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <yukuai3@huawei.com>, <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Subject: [PATCH -next 6/8] block, bfq: remove dead code for updating 'rq_in_driver' Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 17:05:20 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220514090522.1669270-7-yukuai3@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220514090522.1669270-1-yukuai3@huawei.com> Such code are not even compiled since they are inside marco "#if 0". Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 16 ---------------- 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 1d0141c450c0..e36a16684fb4 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -2322,22 +2322,6 @@ static sector_t get_sdist(sector_t last_pos, struct request *rq) return 0; } -#if 0 /* Still not clear if we can do without next two functions */ -static void bfq_activate_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq) -{ - struct bfq_data *bfqd = q->elevator->elevator_data; - - bfqd->rq_in_driver++; -} - -static void bfq_deactivate_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq) -{ - struct bfq_data *bfqd = q->elevator->elevator_data; - - bfqd->rq_in_driver--; -} -#endif - static void bfq_remove_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq) { -- 2.31.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> To: jack-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org, paolo.valente-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org, tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org Cc: linux-block-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, yukuai3-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, yi.zhang-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Subject: [PATCH -next 6/8] block, bfq: remove dead code for updating 'rq_in_driver' Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 17:05:20 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220514090522.1669270-7-yukuai3@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220514090522.1669270-1-yukuai3-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Such code are not even compiled since they are inside marco "#if 0". Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 16 ---------------- 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 1d0141c450c0..e36a16684fb4 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -2322,22 +2322,6 @@ static sector_t get_sdist(sector_t last_pos, struct request *rq) return 0; } -#if 0 /* Still not clear if we can do without next two functions */ -static void bfq_activate_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq) -{ - struct bfq_data *bfqd = q->elevator->elevator_data; - - bfqd->rq_in_driver++; -} - -static void bfq_deactivate_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq) -{ - struct bfq_data *bfqd = q->elevator->elevator_data; - - bfqd->rq_in_driver--; -} -#endif - static void bfq_remove_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq) { -- 2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-14 8:51 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-05-14 9:05 [PATCH -next 0/8] multiple cleanup patches for bfq Yu Kuai 2022-05-14 9:05 ` Yu Kuai 2022-05-14 9:05 ` [PATCH -next 1/8] block, bfq: cleanup bfq_weights_tree add/remove apis Yu Kuai 2022-05-14 9:05 ` Yu Kuai 2022-05-19 10:59 ` Jan Kara 2022-05-14 9:05 ` [PATCH -next 2/8] block, bfq: cleanup __bfq_weights_tree_remove() Yu Kuai 2022-05-14 9:05 ` Yu Kuai 2022-05-19 11:02 ` Jan Kara 2022-05-14 9:05 ` [PATCH -next 3/8] block, bfq: factor out code to update 'active_entities' Yu Kuai 2022-05-14 9:05 ` Yu Kuai 2022-05-19 11:04 ` Jan Kara 2022-05-19 11:04 ` Jan Kara 2022-05-14 9:05 ` [PATCH -next 4/8] block, bfq: don't declare 'bfqd' as type 'void *' in bfq_group Yu Kuai 2022-05-14 9:05 ` Yu Kuai 2022-05-19 11:01 ` Jan Kara 2022-05-14 9:05 ` [PATCH -next 5/8] block, bfq: cleanup bfq_activate_requeue_entity() Yu Kuai 2022-05-14 9:05 ` Yu Kuai 2022-05-19 11:06 ` Jan Kara 2022-05-14 9:05 ` Yu Kuai [this message] 2022-05-14 9:05 ` [PATCH -next 6/8] block, bfq: remove dead code for updating 'rq_in_driver' Yu Kuai 2022-05-19 11:06 ` Jan Kara 2022-05-19 11:06 ` Jan Kara 2022-05-14 9:05 ` [PATCH -next 7/8] block, bfq: cleanup bfq_bfqq_update_budg_for_activation() Yu Kuai 2022-05-14 9:05 ` Yu Kuai 2022-05-19 11:18 ` Jan Kara 2022-05-19 11:18 ` Jan Kara 2022-05-19 13:21 ` yukuai (C) 2022-05-19 13:21 ` yukuai (C) 2022-05-14 9:05 ` [PATCH -next 8/8] block, bfq: cleanup bfq_bfqq_handle_idle_busy_switch() Yu Kuai 2022-05-14 9:05 ` Yu Kuai 2022-05-19 11:23 ` Jan Kara 2022-05-19 11:23 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20220514090522.1669270-7-yukuai3@huawei.com \ --to=yukuai3@huawei.com \ --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \ --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=jack@suse.cz \ --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \ --cc=tj@kernel.org \ --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.